My thanks go to Juan Schoch who by his work brought me into contact with the Vitvan material (School of the natural order - Website), Gerald Massey's research on Egypt, the pagan origin of Christanity, and Alvin Boyd Kuhn, the pupil of Massey who has written extensively on the meaning of symbols in myth. Also, Godfrey Higgins work Anacalypsis can be found at members.tripod.com/~pc93 Martin Euser Webmaster --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message from Juan: Electronically typed and edited by Juan Schoch for educational research purposes. Join gnosis284 - Send e-mail to: gnosis284-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Refs: enlightenment-engine, members.tripod.com/~pc93 I am looking for contributions: texts, comments, etc. I (Juan) can be contacted at: pc93@enlightenment-engine.net Do not remove this notice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A good intro into the essence of Kuhn's writings re Christianity can be found
in the books of Tom Harpur,
especially the one about the Pagan Christ.
Theosophy
A MODERN
REVIVAL OF
ANCIENT WISDOM
Alvin Boyd
Kuhn
STUDIES IN RELIGION AND CULTURE
AMERICAN RELIGION
SERIES
II
THEOSOPHY
PREFACE
Since
this work was designed to be one of a series of studies in American religions,
the treatment of the subject was consciously limited to those aspects of
Theosophy which are in some manner distinctively related to America. This
restriction has been difficult to enforce for the reason that, though officially
born here, Theosophy has never since its inception had its headquarters on this
continent. The springs of the movement have emanated from foreign sources and
influences. Its prime inspiration has come from ancient Oriental cultures.
America in this case has rather adopted an exotic cult than evolved it from the
conditions of her native milieu. The main events in American Theosophic history
have been mostly repercussions of events transpiring in English, Continental, or
Indian Theosophy. It was thus virtually impossible to segregate American
Theosophy from its connections with foreign leadership. But the attempt to do so
has made it necessary to give meagre treatment to some of the major currents of
world-wide Theosophic development. The book does not purport to be a complete
history of Theosophy, but it is an attempt to present a unified picture of the
movement in its larger aspects. No effort has been made to weigh the truth or
falsity of Theosophic principles, but an effort has been made to understand
their significance in relation to the historical situation and psychological
disposition of those who have adopted it.
The author wises to express his
obligation to several persons without whose assistance the enterprise would have
been more onerous and less successful. His thanks are due in largest measure to
Professor Roy F. Mitchell of New York University, and to Mrs. Mitchell, for
placing at his disposal much of their time and of their wide knowledge of
Theosophical material; to Mr. L. W. Rogers, President of the American
Theosophical Society, Wheaton, Illinois, for
cordial
vii
co-operation in the matter of the questionnaire, and
to the many members of the Society who took pains to reply to the questions; to
Mr. John Garrigues, of the United Lodge of Theosophists, New York, for valuable
data out of his great store of Theosophic information, and to several of the
ladies at the U.L.T. Reading Room for library assistance; to Professor Louis H.
Gray, of Columbia University, for technical criticism in Sanskrit terminology;
to Mr. Arthur E. Christy, of Columbia University, for data showing Emerson's
indebtedness to Oriental philosophy; and to Professor Herbert W. Schneider, of
Columbia University, for his painstaking criticism of the study
throughout.
A. B. K.
New York City
September,
1930
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
| I. THEOSOPHY, AN ANCIENT
TRADITION . . . . . . |
1 |
| II. THE AMERICAN BACKGROUND OF
THEOSOPHY . . . . |
18 |
| III. HELENA P. BLAVATSKY: HER
LIFE AND PSYCHIC |
|
| CAREER . . . . . . . . . . .
. |
43 |
| IV. FROM SPIRITUALISM TO
THEOSOPHY . . . . . . |
89 |
| V. ISIS UNVEILED . . . . . . .
. . . . |
115 |
| VI. THE MAHATMAS AND THEIR
LETTERS . . . . . . |
147 |
| VII. STORM, WRECK, AND
REBUILDING . . . . . . |
176 |
| VIII. THE SECRET DOCTRINE . . .
. . . . . . |
194 |
| IX. EVOLUTION, REBIRTH, AND
KARMA . . . . . . |
232 |
| X. ESOTERIC WISDOM AND PHYSICAL
SCIENCE . . . . |
253 |
| XI. THEOSOPHY IN ETHICAL
PRACTICE . . . . . . |
265 |
| XII. LATER THEOSOPHICAL HISTORY
. . . . . . . |
301 |
| XIII. SOME FACTS AND FIGURES .
. . . . . . . |
341 |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . .
. . . |
351 |
| INDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. |
375 |
ix
(blank)
x
THEOSOPHY
CHAPTER
I
In the mind of the general public Theosophy is classed with
Spiritualism, New Thought, Unity and Christian Science, as one of the modern
cults. It needs but a slight acquaintance with the facts in the case to reveal
that Theosophy is amenable to this classification only in the most superficial
sense. Though the Theosophical Society is recent, theosophy, in the sense of an
esoteric philosophic mystic system of religious thought, must be ranked as one
of the most ancient traditions. It is not a mere cult, in the sense of being the
expression of a quite specialized form of devotion, practice, or theory,
propagated by a small group. It is a summation and synthesis of many cults of
all times. It is as broad and universal a motif, let us say, as mysticism. It is
one of the most permanent phases of religion, and as such it has welled up again
and again in the life of mankind. It is that "wisdom of the divine" which has
been in the world practically continuously since ancient times. The movement of
today is but another periodical recurrence of a phenomenon which has marked the
course of history from classical antiquity. Not always visible in outward
organization--indeed never formally organized as Theosophy under that name until
now--the thread of theosophic teaching and temperament can be traced in almost
unbroken course from ancient times to the present. It has often been
subterranean, inasmuch as esotericism and secrecy have been essential elements
of its very constitution. The modern presentation of theosophy differs from all
the past ones chiefly in that it has lifted the veil that cloaked its teachings
in mystery, and offered alleged secrets freely to the world. Theosophists
tell
1
us that before the launching of the latest "drive" to
promulgate Theosophy in the world, the councils of the Great White Brotherhood
of Adepts, or Mahatmas, long debated whether the times were ripe for the free
propagation of the secret Gnosis; whether the modern world, with its Western
dominance and with the prevalence of materialistic standards, could appropriate
the sacred knowledge without the risk of serious misuse of high spiritual
forces, which might be diverted into selfish channels. We are told that in these
councils it was the majority opinion that broadcasting the Ancient Wisdom over
the Occidental areas would be a veritable casting of pearls before swine; yet
two of the Mahatmas settled the question by undertaking to assume all karmic
debts for the move, to take the responsibility for all possible disturbances and
ill effects.
If we look at the matter through Theosophic eyes, we are led
to believe that when in the fall of 1875 Madame Blavatsky, Col. H. S. Olcott,
and Mr. W. Q. Judge took out the charter for the Theosophical Society in New
York, the world was witnessing a really major event in human history. Not only
did it signify that one more of the many recurrent waves of esoteric cultism was
launched but that this time practically the whole body of occult lore, which had
been so sedulously guarded in mystery schools, brotherhoods, secret societies,
religious orders, and other varieties of organization, was finally to be given
to the world en pleine lumière! At last the lid of antiquity's treasure
chest would be lifted and the contents exposed to public gaze. There might even
be found therein the solution to the riddle of the Sphynx! The great Secret
Doctrine was to be taught openly; Isis was to be unveiled!
To understand
the periodical recurrence of the theosophic tendency in history it is necessary
to note two cardinal features of the Theosophic theory of development. The first
is that progress in religion, philosophy, science, or art is not a direct
advance, but in advance in cyclical swirls. When you view progress in small
sections, it may appear to be a development in a straight line; but if your gaze
takes in the
2
whole course of history, you will see the outline
of a quite different method of progress. You will not see uninterrupted
unfolding of human life, but advances and retreats, plunges and recessions.
Spring does not emerge from winter by a steady rise of temperature, but by
successive rushes of heat, each carrying the season a bit ahead. Movement in
nature is cyclical and periodic. History progresses through the rise and fall of
nations. The true symbol of progress is the helix, motion round and round, but
tending upward at each swirl. But we must have large perspectives if we are to
see the gyrations of the helix.
The application of this interpretation of
progress to philosophy and religion is this: the evolution of ideas apparently
repeats itself at intervals time after time, a closed circuit of theories
running through the same succession at many points in history. Scholars have
discerned this fact in regard to the various types of government: monarchy
working over into oligarchy, which shifts to democracy, out of which monarchy
arises again. The round has also been observed in the domain of philosophy,
where development starts with revelation and proceeds through rationalism to
empiricism, and, in revulsion from that, swings back to authority or mystic
revelation once more. Hegel's theory that progress was not in a straight line
but in cycles formed by the manifestation of thesis, antithesis, and then
synthesis, which in turn becomes the ground of a new thesis, is but a variation
of this general theme.
Theosophists, then, regard their movement as but
the renaissance of the esoteric and occult aspect of human thought in this
particular swing of the spiral.
The second aspect of the occult theory of
development is a method of interpretation which claims to furnish a key to the
understanding of religious history. Briefly, the theory is that religions never
evolve; they always degenerate. Contrary to the assumptions of comparative
mythology, they do not originate in crude primitive feelings or ideas, and then
transform themselves slowly into loftier and purer ones. They begin lofty and
pure, and deteriorate into crasser
3
forms. They come forth in the
glow of spirituality and living power and later pass into empty forms and
lifeless practices. From the might of the spirit they contract into the
materialism of the letter. No religion can rise above its source, can surpass
its founder; and the more exalted the founder and his message, the more
certainly is degeneration to be looked for. There is always gradual change in
the direction of obscuration and loss of primal vision, initial force. Religions
tend constantly to wane, and need repeated revivals and reformations. Nowhere is
it possible to discern anything remotely like steady growth in spiritual
unfolding.
It is the occult theory that what we find when we search the
many religions of the earth is but the fragments, the dissociated and distorted
units of what were once profound and coherent systems. It is difficult to trace
in the isolated remnants the contour of the original structure. But it is this
completed system which the Theosophist seeks to reconstruct from the scattered
remnants.
Religion, then, is a phase of human life which is alleged to
operate on a principle exactly opposite to evolution, and theosophy believes
this key makes it intelligible. Religions never claim to have evolved from human
society; they claim to be gifts to humanity. They come to man with the seal of
some divine authority and the stamp of supreme perfection. Not only are they
born above the world, but they are brought to the world by the embodied divinity
of a great Messenger, a Savior, a World-Teacher, a Prophet, a Sage, a Son of
God. These bring their own credentials in the form of a divine life. Their words
and works bespeak the glory that earth can not engender.
The two phases
of theosophic explanation can now be linked into a unified principle. Religions
come periodically; and they are given to men from high sources, by supermen. The
theory of growth from crude beginnings to spirituality tacitly assumes that man
is alone in the universe and left entirely to his own devices; that he must
learn everything for himself from experience, which somehow enlarges
his
4
faculties and quickens them for higher conceptions. This
view, says occultism, does unnatural violence to the fundamental economy of the
universe, wrenching humanity out of its proper setting and relationship in an
order of harmony and fitness. Humankind is made to be the sole manipulator of
intelligence, the favored beneficiary of evolution, and as such is severed from
its natural connection with the rest of the cosmic scheme. So small and poor a
view does pitiable injustice to the wealth of the cosmic resources. Bruno,
Copernicus, and modern science have taught us that man is not the darling of
creation, nor the only child in the cosmic family, the pampered ward of the
gods. Far from it; he is one among the order of beings, occupying his proper
place in relation to vaster hierarchies than he has knowledge of, above and
below him.1
What is the character of that relationship? It is, says the
esoteric teaching, that of guardian and ward; of a young race in the tutelage of
an older; of infant humanity being taught by more highly evolved beings, whose
intelligence is to that of early man as an adept's to a tyro's. It is the
relationship of children to parents or guardians. Throughout our history we have
been the wards of an elder race, or at least of the elder brothers of our own
race. The members of a former evolutionary school have turned back often, like
the guardians in Plato's cave allegory, to instruct us in vital knowledge. The
wisdom of the ages, the knowledge of the very Ancient of Days, has at times been
handed down to us. The human family has produced some advanced Sages, Seers,
Adepts, Christs, and these have cared for the less-advanced classes, and have
from time to time given out a body of deeper wisdom than man's own. Theosophy
claims that it
______________
1 The same idea is voiced by William James
(Pragmatism, p. 299): "I thoroughly disbelieve, myself, that our human
experience is the highest form of experience extant in the universe. I believe
rather that we stand in much the same relation to the whole of the universe as
our canine and feline pets do to the whole of human life. They inhabit our
drawing rooms and libraries. They take part in scenes of whose significance they
have no inkling. They are merely tangent to curves of history, the beginnings
and ends and forms of which pass wholly beyond their ken. So we are tangent to
the wider life of things."
5
is the traditional memory of these
noble characters, their lives and messages, which has left the ancient field
strewn with the legends of its Gods, Kings, Magi, Rishis, Avatars and its great
semi-divine heroes. Such wisdom and knowledge as they could wisely and safely
impart they have handed down, either coming themselves to earth from more
ethereal realms, or commissioning competent representatives. And thus the world
has periodically been given the boon of a new religion and a new stimulus from
the earthly presence of a savior regarded as divine. And always the gospel
contained milk for the babes and meat for grown men. There was both an exoteric
and an esoteric doctrine. The former was broadcast among the masses, and did its
proper and salutary work for them; the latter, however, was imparted only to the
fit and disciplined initiates in secret organizations. Much real truth was
hidden behind the veil of allegory; myth and symbol were employed. This
aggregate of precious knowledge, this innermost heart of the secret teaching of
the gods to mankind, is, needless to say, the Ancient Wisdom--is Theosophy. Or
at least Theosophy claims the key to all this body of wisdom. It has always been
in the world, but never publicly promulgated until now.
To trace the
currents of esoteric influence in ancient religious literature would be the work
of volumes. Theosophic or kindred doctrines are to be found in a large number of
the world's sacred books or bibles. The lore of India, China, Persia, Babylon,
Egypt, Greece, yields material for Theosophy.
Philosophy, not less than
religion, bears the stamp of theosophical ideology. Traces of the occult
doctrine permeate most of the thought systems of the past. All histories of
philosophy in the western world begin, with or without brief apology to the
venerable systems of the Orient, with Thales of Miletus and the early Greek
thinkers of about the sixth century B.C. In the dim background stand Homer and
Hesiod and Pindar and the myths of the Olympian pantheon. Contemporary religious
faiths, too, such as the cult of
6
Pythagoreanism,2 and the Orphic
and Eleusinian Mysteries, influenced philosophical speculation.
It needs
no extraordinary erudition to trace the stream of esoteric teaching through the
field of Greek philosophy. What is really surprising is that the world of modern
scholarship should have so long assumed that Greek speculation developed without
reference to the wide-spread religious cult systems which transfused the thought
of the near-Eastern nations. Esotericism was an ingrained characteristic of the
Oriental mind and Greece could no more escape the contagion than could Egypt or
Persia. The occultist endeavors to make the point that practically all of early
Greek philosophy dealt with material presented by the Dionysiac and Orphic
Mysteries and later by the Pythagorean revisions of these.3
Thales'
fragments contain Theosophical ideas in his identification of the physis
with the soul of the universe, and in his affirmation that "the materiality
of physis is supersensible." Thales thought that this physis or
natural world was "full of gods."4 Both these conceptions of the impersonal and
the personal physis, the latter a reasoning substance approaching
Nous, came out of the continuum of the group soul, as a vehicle of magic
power.5 Man was believed to stand in a sympathetic relation to this nature or
physis, and the deepening of his sympathetic attitude was supposed to
give him nothing less than magical control over its elements.
Prominent
among the Orphic tenets was that of reincarnation, possibly a transference to
man of the annual rebirth
______________
2 See in particular such works as
From Religion to Philosophy, by F. M. Cornford (London, 1912), and
From Orpheus to Paul, by Prof. Vittorio D. Macchioro (New York, Henry
Holt & Co., 1930).
3 "The work of philosophy thus appears as an
elucidation and clarifying of religious material. It does not create its new
conceptual tools; it rather discovers them by ever subtler analysis and closer
definition of the elements confused in the original datum."--From Religion to
Philosophy, by F. M. Cornford, p. 126.
4 Ibid., pp. 94
ff.
5 "Physis was not an object, but a metaphysical substance. It
differs from modern ether in being thought actual. It is important to notice
that Greek speculation was not based on observation of external nature. It is
more easily understood as an echo from the Orphic teachings."--Ibid., pp.
136 ff.
7
in nature. Worship of heavenly bodies as aiding
periodical harvests found a place here also.6 The conception of the wheel of
Dike and Moira, the allotted flow and apportionment in time as well as place, of
all things, nature and man together, was underlying in the ancient Greek mind.
Persian occult ideas may have influenced the Orphic systems.7
Anaximander
added to the scientific doctrines of Thales the idea of compensatory retribution
for the transgression of Moira's bounds which suggests Karma. The sum of
Heraclitus' teaching is the One Soul of the universe, in ever-running cycles of
expression-"Fire8 lives the death of air, air lives the death of fire; earth
lives the death of water, water lives the death of earth."9 And interwoven with
it is a sort of justice which resembles karmic force.10
Dionysiac
influence brought the theme of reincarnation prominently to the fore in
metaphysical thinking.11
Socrates, in the Phaedo, speaks of "the
ancient doctrine that souls pass out of this world to the other, and there
exist, and then come back hither from the dead, and are born again." In Hesiod's
Works and Days there is the image of the Wheel of Life. In the mystical
tradition there was prominent the wide-spread notion of a fall of higher forms
of life into the human sphere of limitation and misery. The Orphics definitely
taught that the soul of man fell from the stars into the prison of this earthly
body, sinking from the upper regions of fire and light into the misty darkness
of this dismal vale. The fall is ascribed to some original sin,
which
______________
6 "The fate of man was sympathetically related to the
circling lights of heaven."--Ibid., p. 171.
7 Ibid., pp.
176 ff.
8 The universal soul substance.
9 Quoted by F. M.
Cornford, From Religion to Philosophy, p. 185.
10 For the Orphic
origin of Heraclitus' philosophy consult From Orpheus to Paul, by Prof.
Vittorio D. Macchioro, pp. 169 ff.
11 "The most primitive of these
(cardinal doctrines of mysticism) is Reincarnation (palingenesis). This life,
which is perpetually renewed, is reborn out of that opposite state called
'death,' into which, at the other end of its arc, it passes again. In this idea
of Reincarnation . . . we have the first conception of a cycle of existence, a
Wheel of Life, divided into two hemicycles of light and darkness, through which
the one life, or soul, continuously revolves."--From Religion to
Philosophy, p. 160.
8
entailed expulsion from the purity and
perfection of divine existence and had to be expiated by life on earth and by
purgation in the nether world.12
The philosophies of Parmenides,
Empedocles, and Plato came directly out of the Pythagorean movement.13 Aristotle
described Empedocles' poems as "Esoteric," and it is thought that Parmenides'
poems were similarly so. Parmenides' theory that the earth is the plane of life
outermost, most remotely descended from God, is re-echoed in theosophic
schematism. Also his idea--"The downward fall of life from the heavenly fires is
countered by an upward impulse which 'sends the soul back from the seen to the
unseen'"--completes the Theosophic picture of outgoing and return. Parmenides
"was really the 'associate' of a Pythagorean, Ameinias, son of Diochartas, a
poor but noble man, to whom he afterwards built a shrine, as to a hero."14
"Strabo describes Parmenides and Zeno as Pythagoreans."15 Cornford's comment on
the philosophy of Empedocles leaves little doubt as to its origin in the
Mysteries.16 Strife causes the fall, love brings the
return.
______________
12 "Caught in the wheel of birth, the soul passes
through the forms of man and beast and plant."--From Religion to
Philosophy, p. 178.
13 From Religion to Philosophy, p. 197.
Also From Orpheus to Paul, Chapter VIII.
14 John Burnet, Early
Greek Philosophy (London, 1920), p. 138.
15 Ibid., p.
156.
16 "That the doctrine (exile of the soul from God) . . . was not
invented by Empedocles is certain from the fact that the essential features of
it are found in Pindar's second Olympian, written for Theron of Acragas,
where Empedocles was born, at a date when Empedocles was a boy. Throughout the
course of that majestic Ode revolves the Wheel of Time, Destiny and Judgment.
The doctrine can be classed unhesitatingly as 'Orphic.' The soul is conceived as
falling from the region of light down into the 'roofed-in cave,' the 'dark
meadow of Ate.' (Frag. 119, 120, 121.) This fall is a penalty for sin,
flesh-eating or oath-breaking. Caught in the Wheel of Time, the soul, preserving
its individual identity, passes through all shapes of life. This implies that
man's soul is not 'human'; human life is only one of the shapes it passes
through. Its substance is divine and immutable, and it is the same substance as
all other soul in the world. In this sense the unity of all life is maintained;
but, on the other hand, each soul is an atomic individual, which persists
throughout its ten thousand years' cycle of reincarnations. The soul travels the
round of the four elements: 'For I have been ere now, a body, and a girl, a bush
(earth), a bird (air) and a dumb fish in the sea.' (Frag. 117.) These four
elements compose the bodies which it successively inhabits.
"The soul is
further called 'an exile from God' and a wanderer, and its
offence,
9
Empedocles was a member of a Pythagorean society or
school, for Diogenes tells us that he and Plato were expelled from the
organization for having revealed the secret teachings.17
Of Pythagoras as
a Theosophic type of philosopher there is no need to speak at any length. What
is known of Pythagoreanism strongly resembles Theosophy.
As to Socrates,
it is interesting to note that Cornford's argument "points to the conclusion
that Socrates was more familiar with Pythagorean ideas than has commonly been
supposed."18 Socrates gave utterance to many Pythagorean sentiments and he was
associated with members of the Pythagorean community at Phlious, near Thebes.
R. D. Hicks comments on Plato's
"imaginative sympathy with the whole mass of floating legend, myth and dogma, of
a partly religious, partly ethical character, which found a wide, but not
universal acceptance, at an early time in the Orphic and Pythagorean
associations and brotherhoods."19
"The Platonic myths afford ample evidence that Plato was
perfectly familiar with all the leading features of this strange creed. The
divine origin of the soul, its fall from bliss and the society of the gods, its
long pilgrimage of penance through hundreds of generations, its task of
purification from earthly pollution, its
______________
which entailed
this exile, is described as 'following Strife,' 'putting trust in Strife.' At
the end of the cycle of births, men may hope to 'appear among mortals as
prophets, song-writers, physicians and princes; and thence they rise up, as gods
exalted in honor, sharing the hearth of the other immortals and the same table,
free from human woes, delivered from destiny and harm.' (Frags. 146, 147.) Thus
the course of the soul begins with separation from God, and ends in reunion with
him, after passing through all the moirai of the elements."--From
Religion to Philosophy, p. 228.
17 By comparison with the passage
expounding Empedocles' theory of rebirth (supra), the following assumes
significance: "From these (Golden Verses of Pythagoras) we learn that it
had some striking resemblance to the beliefs prevalent in India about the same
time, though it is really impossible to assume any Indian influence on Greece at
this date. In any case the main purpose of the Orphic observances and rites was
to release the soul from the 'wheel of birth,' that is, from reincarnation in
animal or vegetable forms. The soul so released became once more a god enjoying
everlasting bliss."--John Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy, p.
82.
18 From Religion to Philosophy, p. 247.
19 R. D. Hicks:
Introduction to Aristotle's De Anima, (Cambridge,
1907).
10
reincarnation in successive bodies, its upward and
downward progress, and the law of retribution for all offences . .
."20
There is evidence pointing to the fact that Plato was quite familiar
with the Mystery teachings, if not actually an initiate.21 In the Phaedrus
he says:
". . . being initiated into those Mysteries which it is
lawful to call the most blessed of all Mysteries . . . we were freed from the
molestation of evils which otherwise await us in a future period of time.
Likewise in consequence of this divine initiation, we become spectators of
entire, simple, immovable and blessed visions resident in the pure
light."22
And his immersion in the prevalent esoteric attitude is hinted
at in another passage:
"You say that, in my former discourse, I have not
sufficiently explained to you the nature of the First. I purposely spoke
enigmatically, for in case the tablet should have happened with any accident,
either by land or sea, a person, without some previous knowledge of the subject,
might not be able to understand its contents."23
______________
20
Ibid. "It is now generally agreed that we may distinguish a group of
early dialogues commonly called 'Socratic' from a larger group in which the
doctrines characteristic of Orphism and Pythagoreanism for the first time make
their appearance"--From Religion to Philosophy, p. 242.
"Thus, the
Megarian and Eleatic doctrines, though they had not satisfied him, had impelled
Plato to look for a point of union of the One and the Many; but he was enabled
to find it only by a more thorough acquaintance with the Pythagoreans. It is
only after his return from Italy that his doctrine appears fully established and
rounded off into a complete system."--Johann Edward Erdmann: History of
Philosophy (London, 1891), Vol. I, p. 231.
21 "Constantly perfecting
himself in perfect Mysteries, a man in them alone becomes truly perfect, says he
in the Phaedrus."--Isaac Preston Cory: Ancient Fragments: Plato;
Phaedrus, I, p. 328.
22 This passage, from Cory's Ancient
Fragments, is in a translation somewhat different from that of Jowett and
other editors, though Jowett (Plato's Works, Vol. I, Phaedrus, p.
450) gives the following: ". . . and he who has part in this gift, and is truly
possessed and duly out of his mind, is by the use of purifications and mysteries
made whole and exempt from evil. . . ." The term "pure light" appears to be a
reference to the Astral Light, or Akasha, of the Theosophists. For this term,
Astral Light, Madame Blavatsky gives in the Theosophical Glossary the
following definition: "A subtle essence visible only to the clairvoyant eye, and
the lowest but one (viz., the earth) of the Seven Akashic or Kosmic
principles." She further says that it corresponds to the astral body in
man.
23 I. P. Cory: Ancient Fragments, Plato, Ep. II, p.
312.
11
Aristotle left the esoteric tradition, and went in the
direction of naturalism and empiricism. Yet in him too there are many points of
distinctly esoteric ideology. His distinction between the vegetative animal soul
and the rational soul, the latter alone surviving while the former perished; his
dualism of heavenly and terrestrial life; his belief that the heavenly bodies
were great living beings among the hierarchies; and his theory that development
is the passing of potentiality over into actualization, are all items of
Theosophic belief.
Greek philosophy is said to have ended with
Neo-Platonism--which is one of history's greatest waves of the esoteric
tendency. It would be a long task to detail the theosophic ideas of the great
Plotinus. He, Origen and Herrennius were pupils of Ammonius Saccas, whose
teachings they promised never to reveal, as being occult. Plotinus' own
teachings were given only to initiated circles of students.24 Proclus25 gives
astonishing corroboration to a fragment of Theosophic doctrine in any excerpt
quoted in Isis Unveiled:
"After death, the soul (the spirit)
continueth to linger in the aerial (astral) form till it is entirely purified
from all angry and voluptuous passions . . . then doth it put off by a second
dying the aerial body as it did the earthly one. Whereupon the ancients say that
there is a celestial body always joined with the soul, and which is immortal,
luminous and star-like."26
The esotericist feels that the evidence, a
meagre portion of which has been thus cursorily submitted, is highly
indica-
______________
24 Porphyry: Life of Plotinus, in the
Introduction to Vol. I, of the Works of Plotinus, edited by Dr. Kenneth
S. Guthrie.
25 "Proclus maintained that the philosophical doctrines
(chiefly Platonism) are of the same content as the mystic revelations, that
philosophy in fact borrowed from the Mysteries, from Orphism, through
Pythagoras, from whom Plato borrowed."--Samuel Angus: The Mystery Religions
and Christianity (London, J. Murray, 1925), p. 267.
26 Quoted by
Madame Blavatsky in Isis Unveiled (New York, J. W. Bouton, 1877), Vol. I,
p. 432. Proclus' familiarity with the Mysteries is revealed in the following,
also quoted by Madame Blavatsky in Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 113: "In
all the Initiations and Mysteries the gods exhibit many forms of themselves, and
appear in a variety of shapes, and sometimes indeed a formless light of
themselves is held forth to view; sometimes this light is according to a human
form and sometimes it proceeds into a different shape."
12
tive
that beneath the surface of ancient pagan civilization there were undercurrents
of sacred wisdom, esoteric traditions of high knowledge, descended from revered
sources, and really cherished in secret.
Presumably the Christian
religion itself drew many of its basic concepts directly or indirectly from
esoteric sources. It was born amid the various cults and faiths that then
occupied the field of the Alexandrian East and the Roman Empire, and it was
unable to escape the influences emanating from these sources. Its immediate
predecessors were the Mystery-Religions, the Jewish faith, and the syncretistic
blend of these with Syrian Orientalism and Greek philosophy. Judaism was itself
deeply tinctured with Hellenistic and oriental influences. The Mystery cults
were more or less esoteric; Judaism had received a highly allegorical
formulation at the hands of Philo; the Hermetic Literature was similar to
Theosophy; the Syrian faiths were saturated with the strain of "Chaldean"
occultism; and Greek rationalism had yielded that final mysticism which
culminated in Plotinus. Christianity was indebted to many of these sources and
many scholars believe that it triumphed only because it was the most successful
syncretism of many diverse elements. Numerous streams of esoteric doctrine
contributed to Christianity; we can merely hint at the large body of evidence
available on this point.
Christianity grew up in the milieu of the
Mysteries,27 and those early Fathers who formulated the body of Christian
doctrine did not step drastically outside the traditions of the prevalent
faiths. Their work was rather an incorporation of some new elements into the
accepted systems of the time. In some cases, as in Alexandria, the two faiths
were actually
______________
27 "For over a thousand years the ancient
Mediterranean world was familiar with a type of religion known as
Mystery-Religions, which changed the religious outlook of the Western world and
which are operative in European philosophy and in the Christian Church to this
day. Dean Inge, in his Christian Mysticism, p. 354, says that Catholicism
owes to the Mysteries . . . the notions of secrecy, of symbolism, of mystical
brotherhood, of sacramental grace, and above all, of the three stages of the
spiritual life; ascetic purification, illumination and epopteia as the
crown."--Samuel Angus: The Mystery Religions and Christianity:
Foreword.
13
blended, for many Christians in the Egyptian city
were at the same time connected with the Mystery cult of Serapis, as many in
Greece and Judea were connected with that of Dionysus. But perhaps the most
direct and prominent product of the two systems is to be seen in St. Paul, about
whose intimate relation to the Mysteries several volumes have been written. Much
of his language so strikingly suggests his close contact with Mystery formulae
that it is a moot question whether or not he was actually an Initiate.28 At all
events many are of the opinion that he must have been powerfully influenced by
the cult teachings and practices.29 He mentions some psychic experiences of his
own, which are cited as savoring strongly of the character of the mystical
exercises taught in the Mysteries.30
When in the third and fourth
centuries the Church Fathers began the task of shaping a body of doctrine for
the new movement, the same theosophic tendencies pressed upon them from every
side. Clement and Origen brought many phases of theosophic doctrine to
prominence, a fact which tended later to exclude their writings from the canon.
And when Augustine drew up the dogmatic schematism of the new religion, he was
tremendously swayed by the work of the Neo-Platonist Plotinus, who, along with
Ammonius Saccas, Numenius, Porphyry, and Proclus, had been a member of one or
several of the Mystery bodies.31
The presence of powerful currents of
Neo-Platonic idealism in the early church is attested by the effects upon it of
Manichaeism, Gnosticism and the Antioch heresy, which tendencies had to be
exterminated before Christianity definitely took its course of orthodox
development. Occult
______________
28 See argument in Dr. Annie Besant's
Esoteric Christianity (London, 1895).
29 See Samuel Angus: The
Mystery Religions and Christianity; and H. A. A. Kennedy: St. Paul and
the Mystery Religions (London, New York, Bombay, Madras, Calcutta; Hodder
and Stoughton, 1913).
30 As in 2 Corinthians, XII, 1-5.
31
"Plotinus, read in a Latin translation, was the schoolmaster who brought
Augustine to Christ. There is therefore nothing startling in the considered
opinion of Rudolph Eucken that Plotinus has influenced Christian theology more
than any other thinker."--Dean R. W. Inge: The Philosophy of Plotinus
(New York, London, 1918), Vol. I.
14
writers32 have indicated the
forces at work in the formative period of the church's dogma which eradicated
the theory of reincarnation and other aspects of esoteric knowledge from the
orthodox canons. The point remains true, nevertheless, that Christianity took
its rise in an atmosphere saturated with ideas resembling those of
Theosophy.
Theosophy, the Gnosis, having been to a large extant rejected
from Catholic theology, nevertheless did not disappear from history. It
possessed an unquenchable vitality and made its way through more or less
submerged channels down the centuries. Movements, sects, and individuals that
embodied its cherished principles could be enumerated at great length. A list
would include Paulicians, the Bogomiles, the Bulgars, the Paterenes, the
Comacines, the Cathari; Albigensians, and pietists; Joachim of Floris, Roger
Bacon, Robert Bradwardine, Raymond Lully; the Alchemists, the Fire Philosophers;
Paracelsus, B. Figulus; the Friends of God, led by Nicholas of Basle; L'Homme de
Cuir, in Switzerland in the Engadine; the early Waldenses; the Bohemian
tradition given in the Tarot; the great Aldus' Academy at Venice; the
Rosicrucians and the Florentine Academy founded by Pletho. Some theosophists
have attempted to find esoteric meanings in the literature of the Troubadours,
and in such writings as The Romance of the Rose, the Holy Grail legends
and the Arthurian Cycle, if read in an esoteric sense; Gower's Confessio
Amantis, Spencer's Faërie Queen, the works of Dietrich of Berne,
Wayland Smith, the Peredur Stories, and the Mabinogian compilations. German
pietism expressed fundamentally Theosophic ideas through Eckhardt, Tauler, Suso,
and Jacob Boehme. The names of such figures as Count Rakowczi, Cagliostro, Count
St. Germain, and Francis Bacon have been linked with the secret orders. In fact
there was hardly a period when the ghosts of occult wisdom did not hover in the
background of European thought.
Sometimes its predominant manifestation
was mystically
______________
32 C. W. Leadbeater: The Christian Creed
(London, 1897); Dr. Annie Besant: Esoteric
Christianity.
15
religious; again it was cosmological and
philosophical; never did it quite lose its attachment to the conceptions of
science, which was at times reduced nearly to magic. And it is upon the
implications of this scientific interest that the occult theorist bases his
claim that science, along with religion and philosophy, has sprung in the
beginning from esoteric knowledge. Not overlooking the oldest scientific lore to
be found in the sacred books of the East, our attention is called to the
astronomical science of the "Chaldeans"; the similar knowledge among the
Egyptians, such, for instance, as led them to construct the Pyramids on lines
conformable to sidereal measurements and movements; the reputed knowledge of the
precession of the equinoxes among the Persian Magi and the "Chaldeans"; the
later work of the scientists among the Alexandrian savants, which had so
important a bearing upon the direction of the nascent science in the minds of
Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, and Newton; the known achievements of Roger Bacon,
Robert Grosseteste, Agrippa von Nettesheim, and Jerome Cardano in incipient
empiricism. It has always been assumed that the strange mixture of true science
and grotesque magic found, for instance, in the work of Roger Bacon, justifies
the implication that the concern with magic operated as a hindrance to the
development of science. It should not be forgotten that the stimulus to
scientific discovery sprang from the presuppositions embodied in magical theory.
It is now beyond dispute that the magnificent achievements of Copernicus,
Kepler, and Galileo were actuated by their brooding over the significance of the
Pythagorean theories of number and harmony. Both science and magic aim, each in
its special modus, at the control of nature. Through the gateway of electricity,
says theosophy, science has been admitted, part way at least, into the inner
sanctum of nature's dynamic heart. Magic has sought an entry to the same citadel
by another road.
The Theosophist, then, believes, on the strength of
evidence only a fragment of which has been touched upon here, that esotericism
has been weaving its web of influence, powerful even if subtle and unseen,
throughout the religions,
16
philosophies, and sciences of the
world. It makes little difference what names have been attached from time to
time to this esoteric tradition; and certainly no attempt is made here to prove
an underlying unity or continuity in all this "wisdom literature." Suffice it to
point out that in all ages there have been movements analogous to modern
Theosophy, and that the modern cult regards itself as merely a regular
revelation in the periodic resurgence of an ancient
learning.
17
CHAPTER II
THE AMERICAN
BACKGROUND
An outline of the circumstances which may be said to
constitute the background for the American development of Theosophy should begin
with the mass of strange phenomena which took place, and were widely reported,
in connection with the religious revivals from 1740 through the Civil War
period. A veritable epidemic of what were known as the "barks" and the "jerks"
swept over the land. They were most frequent in evangelical meetings, but also
became common outside. The Kentucky revivals in the early years of the
nineteenth century produced many odd phenomena, such as speaking in strange
tongues, a condition of trance and swoon frequently attendant upon conversion,
occasional illumination and ecstasy, resembling medieval mystic sainthood, and
the apparently miraculous reformation of many criminals and drunkards. These
phenomena impressed the general mind with the sense of a higher source of power
that might be invoked in behalf of human interests.
During this period,
too, several mathematical prodigies were publicly exhibited in the performance
of quite unaccountable calculations, giving instantaneously the correct results
of complicated manipulations of numbers.1 From about 1820, rumors were beginning
to be heard of exceptional psychic powers possessed by the Hindus.
But a
more notable stir was occasioned a little later when the country began to be
flooded with reports of exhibitions of mesmerism and hypnotism. Couéism had not
yet come, but the work of Mesmer, Janet, Charcot, Bernheim, and others in France
had excited the amazement of the world by its revelations of an apparently
supernormal segment of the human mind. "Healing by faith" had always been a
wide-
______________
1 Paul Morphy, a chess "wizard" of startling
capabilities, excited wonder at the time, like the eight-year-old Polish lad of
more recent times.
18
spread tradition; but when such people as
Quimby and others added to the cult of healing the practice of mesmerism, and
subjoined both to a set of metaphysical or spiritual formulae, the imaginative
susceptibilities of the people were vigorously stimulated, and the ferment
resulted in cults of "mind healing." Quimby was active with his public
demonstrations throughout New England in the fifties and sixties.
The
cult of Swedenborgianism, coming in chiefly from England, survived from the
preceding century as a tremendous contribution to the feeling of mystic
supernaturalism. Emanuel Swedenborg, who gave up his work as a noted
mineralogist to take up the writing of his visions and prophecies, had
profoundly impressed the religious world by the publication of his enormous
works, the Arcana Coelestia, The Apocalypse Revealed, The
Apocalypse Explained, and others, in which he claimed that his inner vision
had been opened to a view of celestial verities. His descriptions of the
heavenly spheres, and of the relation of the life of the Infinite to our finite
existence, and his theory of the actual correspondence of every physical fact to
some eternal truth, impressed the mystic sense of many people, who became his
followers and organized his Church of the New Jerusalem. Though this following
was never large in number, it was influential in the spread of a type of "arcane
wisdom." In the first place, Swedenborg's statements that he had been granted
direct glimpses of the angelic worlds carried a certain impressiveness in view
of his detailed descriptions of what was there seen. He announced that the
causes of all things are in the Divine Mind. The end of existence and creation
is to bring man into conjunction with the higher spirit of the universe, so that
he may become the image of his creator. The law of correspondence is the key to
all the divine treasures of wisdom. He declared that he had witnessed the Last
Judgment and that he was told of the second coming of the Lord. His teachings
influenced among others Coleridge, Blake, Balzac, and, of course, Emerson and
the James family. Though not so much of this influence was
specifically
19
Theosophic in character, it all served to bring
much grist to the later Theosophical mill.
A certain identity of aims and
characters between Theosophy and Swedenborgianism is revealed in the fact that
"in December, 1783, a little company of sympathizers, with similar aims, met in
London and founded the 'Theosophical Society,' among the members of which were
John Flaxman, the sculptor, William Sharpe, the engraver, and F. H. Barthelemon,
the composer."2 It was dissolved about 1788 when the Swedenborgian churches
began to function. Many such religious organizations could well be called
theosophical associations, as was the one founded by Brand in Cincinnati, Ohio,
in 1825.
Another organization which dealt hardly less with heavenly
revelations, and which must also be regarded as conducive to theosophical
attitudes, was the "Children of the Light," the Friends, or Quakers. With a
history antedating the nineteenth century by more than a hundred and fifty
years, these people held a significant place in the religious life of America
during the period we are delineating. Their intense emphasis upon the direct and
spontaneous irradiation of the spirit of God into the human consciousness
strikes a deep note of genuine mysticism. In fact, like Methodism, Quakerism was
born in the midst of a series of spiritualistic occurrences. George Fox heard
the heavenly voices and received inspirational messages directly from spiritual
visitants. The report of his supernatural experiences, and of the miracles of
healing which he was enabled to perform through spirit-given powers, caused
hundreds of people to flock to his banner and gave the movement its primary
impetus. His gospel was essentially one of spirit manifestation, and his whole
ethical system grew out of his conception of the régime of personal life,
conduct and mentality which was best designed to induce the visitations of
spirit influence. The spiritistic and mystical experiences of the celebrated
Madame Guyon, of France, enhanced the force of Fox's
testimony.
______________
2 Encyclopedia Britannica: Article,
"Swedenborgianism."
20
Not less inclined than the Friends to
transcendental experiences were the Shakers, who had settled in eighteen
communistic associations or colonies in the United States. They claimed to enjoy
the power of apostolic healing, prophecy, glossolalia, and the singing of
inspired songs. They were led by the spirit into deep and holy experiences, and
claimed to be inspired by high spiritual intelligences with whom they were in
hourly communion. One of their number, F. W. Evans, wrote to Robert Dale Owen,
the Spiritualist, that the Shakers had predicted the advent of Spiritualism
seven years previously, and that the Shaker order was the great medium between
this world and the world of spirits. He asserted that "Spiritualism originated
among the Shakers of America; that there were hundreds of mediums in the
eighteen Shaker communities, and that, in fact, nearly all the Shakers were
mediums. Mediumistic manifestations are as common among us as gold in
California."3 He maintained that there were three degrees of spiritual
manifestation, the third of which is the "ministration of millennial truths to
various nations, tribes, kindred and people in the spirit world who were
hungering and thirsting after righteousness."4 He further pronounced a panegyric
upon Spiritualism, which is evidence that the Shakers were in sympathy with any
phenomena which seemed to indicate a connection with the celestial
planes:
"Spiritualism has banished scepticism and infidelity from the
minds of thousands, comforted the mourner with angelic consolations, lifted up
the unfortunate, the outcast, the inebriate, taking away the sting of death,
which has kept mankind under perpetual bondage through fear--so that death is
now, to its millions of believers,
The kind and gentle servant who
unlocks,
With noiseless hand, life's flower-encircled door,
To show us
those we loved."5
Still another movement which had its origin in alleged
supernaturalistic manifestations and helped to intensify
a
______________
3 William Howitt: History of the Supernatural (J.
B. Lippincott & Co., Philadelphia, 1863), Vol. II, p. 213.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid., p. 214.
21
general belief in them, was the
Church of the Latter Day Saints, or Mormons. In 1820, and again in 1823, Joseph
Smith had a vision of an angel, who revealed to him the repository of certain
records inscribed on plates of gold, containing the history of the aboriginal
peoples of America. The ability to employ the mystic powers of Urim and Thummim,
which are embodied in these records, constituted the special attribute of the
seers of antiquity. The inscriptions on the gold plates were represented as the
key to the understanding of ancient scriptures, and were said to be in a script
known as Reformed Egyptian. The Book of Mormon claims to be an English
translation of these plates of gold.
It is not necessary here to follow
the history of Smith and his church, but it is interesting to point out the
features of the case that touch either Spiritualism or Theosophy. We have
already noted the origin of Smith's motivating idea in a direct message from the
spirit world. We have also a curious resemblance to Theosophy in the fact that
an alleged ancient document was brought to light as a book of authority, and
that the material therein was asserted to furnish a key to the interpretation of
the archaic scriptures of the world. Of the twelve articles of the Mormon creed,
seven sections show a spirit not incongruous with the tendency of Theosophic
sentiment. Article One professes belief in the Trinity; article Two asserts that
men will be punished for their own sins, not for Adam's; Three refers to the
salvation of all without exception; Seven sets forth belief in the gift of
tongues, prophecy, revelations, visions, healing, etc.; Eight questions the
Bible's accurate translation; Nine expresses the assurance that God will yet
reveal many great and important things pertaining to his kingdom; and Eleven
proclaims freedom of worship and the principle of toleration.
Orson
Pratt, one of the leading publicists of the Mormon cult, said that where there
is an end of manifestation of new phenomena, such as visions, revelations and
inspiration, the people are lost in blindness. When prophecies fail, darkness
hangs over the people. In a tract issued by Pratt it is
stated
22
that the Book of Mormon has been abundantly
confirmed by miracles.
"Nearly every branch of the church has been
blessed by miraculous signs and gifts of the Holy Ghost, by which they have been
confirmed, and by which we know of a surety that this is the Church of Christ.
They know that the blind see, the lame walk, the deaf hear, the dumb speak, that
lepers are cleansed, that bones are set, that the cholera is rebuked, and that
the most virulent diseases give way through faith in the name of Christ and the
power of His gospel."6
About 1825, in a meeting at the home of Josiah
Quincy in Boston, a philosophic-religious movement was launched which may seem
to have had but meagre influence on the advent of Theosophy later in the
century, but which in its motive and animating spirit was probably one of the
cult's most immediate precursors. The Unitarian faith, courageously agitated
from 1812 to 1814 by William E. Channing, Edward Everett, and Francis Parkman,
flowered into a religious denomination in 1825 and thenceforth exercised, in a
measure out of all proportion to its numerical strength, a powerful influence on
American religious thought. Under Emerson and Parker a little later the
principle of free expression of opinion was carried to such length that the
formulation of an orthodox creed was next to impossible.
They questioned
not only the Trinitarian doctrine, as pagan rather than Christian (the identical
position taken by Madame Blavatsky in the volumes of Isis Unveiled), but
the whole orthodox structure. The Bible was not to be regarded as God's
infallible and inspired word, but a work of exalted human agencies. Christ was
no heaven-born savior, but a worthy son of man. If he was man and anything more,
his life is worthless to mere men. His life was a man's life, his gospel a man's
gospel--otherwise inapplicable to us. Salvation is within every person. Death
does not determine the state of the soul for all eternity; the soul passes on
into spirit with all its earth-won character. In the life that is to be, as well
as in the life that now is, the soul must reap what
______________
6
Ibid.
23
it sows. If there were a Unitarian creed, it might
be summarized as follows: The fatherhood of God; the brotherhood of man; the
leadership of Jesus; salvation by character; the progress of mankind onward and
upward forever. All this, as far it goes, is strikingly harmonious with the
Theosophic position. That there was an evident community of interests between
the two movements is indicated by the fact that Unitarianism, like Theosophy,
sought Hindu connections, and strangely enough made a sympathetic entente
with the Brahmo-Somaj Society, while Theosophy later affiliated with the
Arya-Somaj.7
No examination of the American background of Theosophy can
fail to take account of that movement which carried the minds of New England
thinkers to a lofty pitch during the early half of the nineteenth century,
Transcendentalism. It has generally been attributed to the impact of German
Romanticism, transmitted by way of England through Carlyle, Coleridge, and
Wordsworth. French influence was really more direct and dominating, but the
powerful effect of Oriental religion and philosophy on Emerson, hitherto not
considered seriously, should not be overlooked. "All of Emerson's notes on
Oriental scriptures have been deleted from Bliss Perry's Heart of Emerson's
Journals."8 No student conversant with the characteristic marks of Indian
philosophy needs documentary corroboration of the fact that Emerson's thought
was saturated with typically Eastern conceptions. The evidence runs through
nearly all his works like a design in a woven cloth. "Scores upon scores of
passages in his Journals and Essays show that he leaned often on
the Vedas for inspiration, and paraphrased lines of the Puranas in his poems."9
But direct testimony
______________
7 As early as 1824 Unitarians in
America took a lively interest in the Hindu leader Rammohun Roy, who had
"adopted Unitarianism," and also in the work of the Rev. William Adam, a Baptist
missionary, who had become converted to Unitarianism in India. A British-Indian
Unitarian Association was formed, and the Rev. Chas. H. A. Dall was sent to
Calcutta, where he effected the alliance with the Brahmo-Somaj.
8
Article: Emerson's Debt to the Orient, by Arthur E. Christy, in The
Monist, January, 1928.
9 Ibid.
24
from Emerson
himself is not wanting. His Journals prove that his reading of the
ancient Oriental classics was not sporadic, but more or less constant.10 He
refers to some of them in the lists of each year's sources. In 1840 he tells how
in the heated days he read nothing but the "Bible of the tropics, which I find I
come back upon every three or four years. It is sublime as heat and night and
the breathless ocean. It contains every religious sentiment. . . . It is no use
to put away the book; if I trust myself in the woods or in a boat upon the pond,
Nature makes a Brahmin of me presently."11 This was at the age of twenty-seven.
In the Journal of 1845 he writes:
"The Indian teaching, through
its cloud of legends, has yet a simple and grand religion, like a queenly
countenance seen through a rich veil. It teaches to speak the truth, love others
as yourself, and to despise trifles. The East is grand--and makes Europe appear
the land of trifles. Identity! Identity! Friend and foe are of one stuff . . .
Cheerful and noble is the genius of this cosmogony."12
Lecturing before
graduate classes at Harvard he later said: "Thought has subsisted for the most
part on one root; the Norse mythology, the Vedas, Shakespeare have served the
ages." In referring in one passage to the Bible he says:
"I have used in
the above remarks the Bible for the ethical revelation considered generally,
including, that is, the Vedas,
______________
10 The Journal shows
that as early as 1822 he had looked into Zoroaster. In 1823 he refers to two
articles in Hindu mathematics and mythology in Vol. 29 of the Edinburgh
Review. By 1832 he had dipped into Pythagoras. In 1836 he quotes Confucius,
Empedocles, and Xenophanes. By 1838 he had read the Institutes of Menu,
and again quoted Zoroaster, Buddha, and Confucius. The first reference to the
Vedas is made in 1839. In 1841 he had seen the Vishnu Sarna (a
corrupt spelling of Vishnu Sharman), together with Hermes Trismegistus and the
Neo-Platonists, Iamblichus, and Proclus. The She-King and the Chinese
Classics are noted in 1843, and the first reference to the Bhagavad Gita
in 1845. In 1847 comes the Vishnu Purana, and in 1849 the Desatir,
a supposedly Persian work, and in 1855 the Rig Veda Sanhita.
11
This passage is found in Letters of Emerson to a Friend, edited by
Charles Eliot Norton.
12 Emerson's Journal for 1845, p.
130.
25
the sacred writings of every nation, and not of the
Hebrews alone."13
Elsewhere he says:
"Yes, the Zoroastrian, the
Indian, the Persian scriptures are majestic and more to our daily purpose than
this year's almanac or this day's newspaper. I owed--my friend and I owed--a
magnificent day to the Bhagavat-Gita. It was the first of books; it was as if an
empire spoke to us, nothing small or unworthy, but large, serene, consistent,
the voice of an old intelligence which in another age and another climate had
pondered and thus disposed of the same questions which exercise us. . . . Let us
cherish the venerable oracle."14
The first stanza of Emerson's poem
"Brahma, Song of the Soul," runs as follows:
"If the red slayer thinks he
slays,
Or if the slain thinks he is slain,
They know not well the subtle
ways
I keep, and pass and turn again."
Could the strange ideas and
hardly less strange language of this verse have been drawn elsewhere than from
the 19th verse of the Second Valli, of the Katha Upanishad,15 which
reads?:
"If the slayer thinks I slay; if the slain thinks I am slain,
then both of them do not know well. It (the soul) does not slay nor is it
slain."
His poem "Hamatreya" comes next in importance as showing Hindu
influence. In another poem, "Celestial Love," the wheel of birth and death is
referred to:
"In a region where the wheel
On which all beings
ride,
Visibly revolves."
Emerson argues for reincarnation in the
Journal of 1845. "Traveling the path of life through thousands of
births."
______________
13 Emerson's Journals, Vol. V, p.
334.
14 Emerson's Journals, Vol. VII, p. 241.
15
Biblioteca Indica, Vol. XV, translated by E. Roer, Calcutta,
1853.
26
"By the long rotation of fidelity they meet again in
worthy forms." Emerson's "oversoul" is synonymous with a Sanskrit term. He
regarded matter as the negative manifestation of the Universal Spirit. Mind was
the expression of the same Spirit in its positive power. Man, himself, is
nothing but the universal spirit present in a material organism. Soul is "part
and parcel of God." He says that "the soul in man is not an organ, but animates
and exercises all organs; from within and from behind a light shines through us
upon things, and makes us aware that we are nothing, that the light is all."16
This is Vedanta philosophy. In the Journal of 1866 he wrote:
"In
the history of intellect, there is no more important fact than the Hindu
theology, teaching that the beatitude or supreme good is to be attained through
science: namely, by the perception of the real from the unreal, setting aside
matter, and qualities or affections or emotions, and persons and actions, as
mayas or illusions, and thus arriving at the conception of the One eternal Life
and Cause, and a perpetual approach and assimilation to Him, thus escaping new
births and transmigrations. . . . Truth is the principle and the moral of Hindu
theology, Truth as against the Maya which deceives Gods and men; Truth, the
principle, and Retirement and Self-denial the means of attaining
it."17
Mr. Christy18 states that Emerson's concept of evolution must be
thought of in terms of emanation; and a detailed examination of his concept of
compensation reduces it to the doctrine of Karma.
The Journals are
full of quotable passages upon one or another phase of Hinduism. And there are
his other poems "Illusions" and "Maya," whose names bespeak Oriental
presentations. But Mr. Christy thinks the following excerpt is Emerson's supreme
tribute to Orientalism:
"There is no remedy for musty, self-conceited
English life made up of fictitious hating ideas--like Orientalism. That
astonishes and disconcerts English decorum. For once there is thunder
he
______________
16 Emerson's Works (Centenary Edition), Vol. II,
p. 270.
17 Emerson's Journals, Vol. X, p. 162.
18 Article:
"Emerson's Debt to the Orient," Arthur E. Christy, The Monist, January,
1928.
27
never heard, light he never saw, and power which trifles
with time and space."19
It may seem ludicrous to suggest that Emerson was
the chief forerunner of Madame Blavatsky, her John the Baptist. Yet seriously,
without Emerson, Madame Blavatsky could hardly have launched her gospel when she
did with equal hope of success. There is every justification for the assertion
that Emerson's Orientalistic contribution to the general Transcendental trend of
thought was preparatory to Theosophy. It must not be forgotten that his advocacy
of Brahmanic ideas and doctrines came at a time when the expression of a
laudatory opinion of the Asiatic religions called forth an opprobrium from
evangelistic quarters hardly less than vicious in its bitterness. Theosophy
could not hope to make headway until the virulent edge of that orthodox
prejudice had been considerably blunted. It was Emerson's magnanimous
eclecticism which administered the first and severest rebuke to that prejudice,
and inaugurated that gradual mollification of sentiment toward the Orientals
which made possible the welcome which Hindu Yogis and Swamis received toward the
end of the century.
The exposition of Emerson's orientalism makes it
unnecessary to trace the evidences of a similar influence running through the
philosophical thinking of Thoreau and Walt
_______
19 In 1854 a most
significant fact was recorded in New England history. A young Englishman, Thomas
Cholmondeley, friend of Arthur Hugh Clough, and nephew of Bishop Heber, came to
Concord with letters of introduction to Emerson. The latter sent him to board at
Mrs. John Thoreau's. A short time after Cholmondeley's return to England, Henry
Thoreau received forty-four volumes of Hindu literature as a gift from the young
nobleman. Of these, twenty-three were bequeathed to Emerson at Thoreau's death.
The list contained the names of such eminent translators as H. H. Milman, H. H.
Wilson, M. E. Burnouff and Sir William Jones. The books were the texts from the
Vedas, the Vishnu Purana, the Mahabarhata, with the
Bhagavad Gita. Tradition has it that Emerson died with a copy of the
Bhagavad Gita (said to have been one of three copies in the country at
the time) in his faltering grasp. It is known that he read, besides, numerous
volumes of Persian poetry, translations of Confucius and other Chinese
philosophers, by James Ligge, Marshman and David Collier, and books on Hindu
mathematics and mythology. The poem "Brahma" first appeared in the Journal
of July, 1856, and in the Atlantic Monthly, for November, 1867. He
did not receive Thoreau's bequest until 1852, but it requires no stretch of
imagination to presume that the two friends had access to each other's libraries
in the interval between 1854 and 1862.
28
Whitman. The robust
cosmopolitanism of these two intellects lifted them out of the provincialisms of
the current denominations into the realm of universal sympathies. We know that
Thoreau became the recipient of forty-four volumes of the Hindu texts in 1854;
but it is evident that he, like Emerson, had had contact with Brahmanical
literature previous to that. His works are replete with references to Eastern
ideas and beliefs. He could hardly have associated so closely with Emerson as he
did and escaped the contagion of the latter's Oriental enthusiasm.
Mr.
Horace L. Traubel, one of the three literary executors of Whitman, had in his
possession the poet's own copy of the Bhagavad Gita. Perry and Binns, in
their biographies of Whitman, give lists of the literature with which he was
familiar; and many ancient authors are mentioned. Among them are Confucius, the
Hindu poets, Persian poets, Zoroaster; portions of the Vedas and Puranas,
Alger's Oriental Poetry and other Eastern sources. Dr. Richard M. Bucke, another
of the three literary executors, and a close friend and associate of "the good
gray poet," was one of the prominent early Theosophists, and it is reasonable to
presume that Whitman was familiar with Theosophic theory through the channel of
this friendship. Whitman likewise gave form and body to another volume of
sentiment which has contributed, no one can say how much, to the adoption of
Theosophy. This was America's own native mysticism. It created an atmosphere in
which the traditions of the supernatural grew robust and
realistic.
Attention must now be directed to that wide-spread movement in
America which has come to be known as New Thought. It came, as has been hinted
at, out of the spiritualization, or one might say, doctrinization, of mesmerism.
Observation of the surprising effects of hypnotic control, indicating the
presence of a psychic energy in man susceptible to external or self-generated
suggestion, led to the inference that a linking of spiritual affirmation with
the unconscious dynamism would conduce to invariably beneficent results, that
might be made permanent for character. If a
29
jocular suggestion
by the stage mesmerist could lead the subject into a ludicrous performance; if a
suggestion of illness, of pain, of a headache, could produce the veritable
symptoms; why could not a suggestion of adequate strength and authority lead to
the actualization of health, of personality, of well-being, of spirituality? The
task was merely to transform animal magnetism into spiritual suggestion. The aim
was to indoctrinate the subconscious mind with a fixation of spiritual
sufficiency and opulence, until the personality came to embody and manifest on
the physical plane of life the character of the inner motivation. Seeing what an
obsession of a fixed abnormal idea had done to the body and mind in many cases,
New Thought tried to regenerate the life in a positive and salutary direction by
the conscious implantation of a higher spiritual concept, until it, too, became
obsessive, and wrought an effect on the outer life coördinate with its own
nature. The process of hypnotic suggestion became a moral technique, with a
potent religious formula, according to which spiritual truth functioned in place
of personal magnetic force. Essentially it reduced itself to the business of
self-hypnotization by a lofty conception. Thought itself was seen to possess
mesmeric power. "As a man thinketh in his heart" became the slogan of New
Thought, and the kindred Biblical adjuration--"Be ye transformed by the renewing
of your mind"--furnished the needed incentive to positive mental aggression. The
world of today is familiar with the line of phrases which convey the basic
ideology of the New Thought cults. One hears much of being in tune with the
Infinite, of making the at-one-ment with the powers of life, of getting into
harmony with the universe, of making contact with the reservoir of Eternal
Supply, of getting en rapport with the Cosmic Consciousness, of keeping
ourselves puny and stunted because we do not ask more determinedly from the
Boundless.
Here is unmistakable evidence of a somewhat diluted Hinduism.
Under the pioneering of P. P. Quimby, Horatio W. Dresser, and others, study
clubs were formed and lecture courses given. Charles Brodie Patterson, W. J.
Colville,
30
James Lane Allen, C. D. Larson, Orison S. Marden, and
a host of others, aided in the popularization of these ideas, until in the past
few decades there has been witnessed an almost endless brood of ramifications
from the parent conception, with associations of Spiritual Science, Divine
Science, Cosmic Truth, Universal Light and Harmony carrying the message. So we
have been called upon to witness the odd spectacle of what was essentially Hindu
Yoga philosophy masquerading in the guise of commanding personality and forceful
salesmanship! But grotesque as these developments have been, there is no
doubting their importance in the Theosophical background. They have served to
introduce the thought of the Orient to thousands, and have become
stepping-stones to its deeper investigation.
A concomitant episode in the
expansion of New Thought and Transcendentalism was the direct program of Hindu
propaganda fathered by Hindu spokesmen themselves. When it became profitable,
numerous Yogis, Swamis, "Adepts," and "Mahatmas" came to this country and
lectured on the doctrines and principles of Orientalism to audiences of élite
people with mystical susceptibilities. Some time in the seventies, Boston was
galvanized into a veritable quiver of interest in Eastern doctrines by the
eloquent P. C. Mazoomdar, author of The Oriental Christ, whose campaign
left its deep impress. His work, in fact, formed one of the links between
Unitarianism and Brahmanic thought, already noted. In 1893 Swami Vivekananda,
chosen as a delegate to the World Congress of Religions at the Columbian
Exposition at Chicago, and author of Yoga Philosophy, began preaching the
Yoga principles of thought and discipline, and instituted in New York the
Vedanta Society. Almost every year since his coming has brought public lectures
and private instruction courses by native Hindus in the large American
cities.
Concomitant with the evolution of New Thought came the
sensational dissemination of Mrs. Eddy's Christian Science. Offspring of P. P.
Quimby's mesmeric science, and erected by Mrs. Eddy's strange enthusiasm into a
healing
31
cult based on a reinterpretation of Christian
doctrines--the allness of Spirit and the nothingness of matter-the organization
has enjoyed a steady and pronounced growth and drawn into its pale thousands of
Christian communicants who felt the need of a more dynamic or more fruitful
gospel. The conception of the impotence of matter, as non-being, is as old as
Greek and Hindu philosophy. Mrs. Eddy's contribution in the matter was her use
of the philosophical idea as a psychological mantram for healing, and her
adroitness in lining up the Christian scriptures to support the idea.
It
would require a fairly discerning insight to mark out clearly the
inter-connection of Christian Science and Theosophy. There is basically little
similarity between the two schools, or little common ground on which they might
meet. On the contrary there is much direct antagonism in their views and dogma.
Nevertheless the Boston cult tended indirectly to bring some of its votaries
along the path toward occultism. In the first place, like Unitarianism, it had
induced thousands of sincere seekers for a new and liberal faith to sever the
ties of their former servile attachment to an uninspiring orthodoxy. Secondly,
Christian Science does yeoman service in "demonstrating" the spiritual
viewpoint. Its emphasis on spirit, as opposed to material concepts of reality,
is entirely favorable to the general theses of Theosophy. Thirdly, the
intellectual limitations of the system develop the need of a larger philosophy,
which Theosophy stands ready to supply. Christian Science, being primarily a
Christian healing cult, with a body of ideas adequate to that function, often
leads the intelligent and open-minded student in its ranks to become aware that
it falls far short of offering a comprehensive philosophy of life. It has little
or nothing to say about man's origin, his present rank in a universal order, or
his destiny. It leaves the pivotal question of immortality in the same status as
does conventional Christianity. Many Christian Science adherents have seen that
Theosophy offers a fuller and more adequate cosmograph, and accordingly adopted
it. Their experience in the Eddy
32
system brought them to the
outer court of the Occult Temple.20
Among major movements that paved the
way for Theosophy, the one perhaps most directly conducive to it is
Spiritualism, for the founder of the Theosophical Society began her career in
the Spiritualistic ranks. On account of this close relationship it is necessary
to outline the origin and spread of this strange movement more fully.
The
weird behavior of two country girls, the one twelve and the other nine, in the
hamlet of Hydesville, near Rochester, New York, in the spring of 1847, was like
a spark to power for the release of religious fancy; for Margaret and Kate Fox
were supposed to have picked up again the thread of communication between the
world of human consciousness and the world of disembodied spirits, and thus to
have given fresh reinforcement to man's assurance of immortality. From this
bizarre beginning the movement spread rapidly to all parts of America, England,
and France. In nearly every town in America groups were soon meeting, eager for
manifestations and fervently invoking the denizens of the unseen worlds. Various
methods and means were provided whereby the disembodied entities could
communicate with dull mundane faculties. Many and varied were the types of
response. Besides the simple "raps," there were tinklings of tiny aerial bells,
flashings of light, tipping of tables, levitation of furniture and of human
bodies, messages through the planchette, free voice messages, trumpet speaking,
alphabet rapping, materialization of the hands and of complete forms, trance
catalepsis and inspiration, automatic writing, slate writing, glossolalia, and
many other variety of phenomena. Mediums, clairvoyants,
inspirational
______________
20 This difference between the two cults may
perhaps be best depicted by quoting the words used in the author's presence by a
woman of intelligence who had founded two Christian Science churches and had
been notably successful as a healing practitioner, but who later united with the
Theosophical Society. She said: "Christian Science had rather well satisfied my
spiritual needs, but had totally starved my intellect." Her experience is
doubtless typical of that of many others, in whom, after the first burst of
sensational interest in healing has receded, the yearning for a satisfactory
philosophy of life and the cosmos surged uppermost
again.
33
speakers sprang forward plentifully; and each one became
the focus of a group activity. It is somewhat difficult for us to reconstruct
the picture of this flare of interest and activity, the scope of this absorbing
passion for spirit manifestation. It attests the eagerness of the human heart
for tangible evidence of survival. With periodical ebb and flow it has persisted
to the present day, when its vogue is hardly less general than at any former
time. In the fifties and sixties the Spiritualistic agitation was in full flush,
with many extraordinary occurrences accredited to its
exponents.21
Spiritualism encountered opposition among the clergy and the
materialistic scientists, yet it has hardly ever been wanting in adherents among
the members of both groups. An acquaintance with its supporters would reveal a
surprising list of high civil and government officials, attorneys, clergymen,
physicians, professors, and scientists.22
One of the first Spiritualistic
writers of this country was Robert Dale Owen, whose Footfalls on the Boundary
of Another World and The Debatable Land were notable contributions.
Two of the most eminent representatives of the
______________
21 It has
been conservatively estimated that in 1852 there were three hundred mediumistic
circles in Philadelphia. The number of mediums in the United States in 1853 was
thirty thousand. In 1855 there were two and a half million Spiritualists in the
land, with an increase of three hundred each year. The rate of increase far
outran those of the Lutheran and Methodist denominations. An interesting feature
of this rapid spread of the movement was its political significance and results.
Not inherently concerned with politics, its devotees mostly adopted strong
anti-slavery tenets. Judge Edmonds, an eminent jurist, converted to Spiritualism
by his (at first skeptical) investigations of it, asserted that the Spiritualist
vote came near to carrying the election of 1856, and actually did carry that of
1860 for the North against the Democratic party. Another most interesting
side-light is the fact that the sweep of Spiritualistic excitement redeemed
thousands of atheists to an acceptance of religious verities. (For these and
other interesting data see Howitt's History of the Supernatural, Vol.
II.)
22 Spiritualists say that Lincoln was eventually moved to emancipate
the slaves by his reception of a spirit message through Hattie Colburn, a medium
who came to see him about a furlough for her son. Horace Greeley was favorably
impressed by the evidence presented. And a later President, McKinley, maintained
a deep concern in the phenomena, along with his powerful political manager,
Senator Mark Hanna, who seldom undertook a move of any consequence without first
consulting a medium, Mrs. Gutekunst, to whom, for purposes of ready
availability, he had given a residence in his home. Senators and Cabinet members
were by no means immune.
34
movement in its earliest days were
Prof. Robert Hare, an eminent scientist and the inventor of the oxyhydrogen
blow-pipe, and Judge Edmonds, a leading jurist. Both these men had approached
the subject at first in a skeptical spirit, with the intention of disclosing its
unsound premises; but they were fair enough to study the evidence impartially,
with the result that both were convinced of the genuineness of the phenomena.
Both avowed their convictions courageously in public, and Judge Edmonds made
extensive lecture tours of the country, the propaganda effect of which was
great.23 Before the actual launching of the Theosophical Society in 1875 at
least four prominent later Theosophists had played more or less important rôles
in the drama of Spiritualism. Madame Blavatsky, as we shall see, had identified
herself with its activities; Mr. J. R. Newton was a vigorous worker; and it was
Col. Olcott himself who brought the manifestations taking place in 1873 at the
Eddy farmhouse near Chittenden, Vermont, to public notice and who put forth one
of the first large volumes covering these and other phenomena in 1874, People
From the Other World. The fourth member was Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten, who
had served as a medium with the Bulwer-Lytton group of psychic investigators in
England, and who added two books to Spiritualistic literature--Art Magic and
Nineteenth Century Miracles. Col. Olcott, Madame Blavatsky, and Mrs. Britten
made material contributions to several Spiritualistic magazines, especially
The Spiritual Scientist, edited in Boston.
Meantime Spiritualistic
investigation got under way and after the sixties a stream of reports, case
histories, accounts of phenomena, and books from prominent advocates flooded the
country. The Seybert Commission on Spiritualism, composed of leading officers
and professors at the University of Pennsylvania, submitted its report in 1888.
In the same
______________
23 Others prominent in the movement at the time
were Governor N. P. Tallmadge, of Wisconsin, Rev. Adin Ballou, J. P. Davis and
Benjamin Coleman; and Profs. Bush, Mapes, Gray, and Channing from leading
universities. Mr. Epes Sargeant, of Boston, added prestige to the cult. A Dr.
Gardner, of Boston, and the Unitarian Theodore Parker gave testimony as to the
beneficent influence exerted by the Spiritualistic faith.
35
year
R. B. Davenport undertook to turn the world away from what he considered a
delusion with his book Deathblow to Spiritualism: The True Story of the Fox
Sisters; but he found that Spiritualism had a strange vitality that enabled
it to survive many a "deathblow." As a result of studies in psychic phenomena in
England came F. W. H. Myers' impressive work, The Human Personality and Its
Survival of Bodily Death, in which the foundations for the theory of the
subliminal or subconscious mind were laid.
But the work of the mediums
themselves kept public feeling most keenly alert. A list of some of the most
prominent ones includes Mrs. Hayden, Henry Slade, Pierre L. O. A. Keeler, the
slate-writer, Robert Houdin (who bequeathed his name and exploits to the later
Houdini), Ira and William Davenport, Anna Eva Fay, Charles Slade, Eusapia
Paladino, Mrs. Leonara Piper. Robert Dale Owen, already mentioned as author, was
a medium of no mean ability. In the same category was J. M. Peebles, of
California, whose books, Seers of the Ages and Who Are These Spiritualists?
and whose public lecture tours, rendered him one of the most prominent of
all the advocates of the cult. A career of inspirational public speaking was
staged by Cora V. Richmond, who gave lectures on erudite themes with an uncommon
flow of eloquence. W. J. Colville began where she ended, giving unprepared
addresses on topics suggested by the audience.
The three most famous
American mediums deserve somewhat more extended treatment. The first of the trio
is Daniel Dunglas Home, who was a poor Scottish boy adopted in America. While a
child, spiritual power manifested itself to him to his terror and annoyance.
Raps came around him on the table or desk, on the chairs or walls. The furniture
moved about and was attracted toward him. His aunt, with whom he lived was in
consternation at these phenomena, and, deeming him possessed, sent for three
clergymen to exorcise the spirit; when they did not succeed, she threw his
Sunday suit and linen out the window and pushed him out-of-doors. He was thus
cast on the world without friends, but the power that he possessed raised him
friends and sent
36
him forth from America to be the planter of
Spiritualism all over Europe.24
The second of the triumvirate was Andrew
Jackson Davis. His function seemed to be that of the seer and the scribe, rather
than of the producer of material operations. He was born of poor parents, in
1826, in Orange Country, New York. He seems to have inherited a clairvoyant
faculty. He received only five months' schooling in the village, it being "found
impossible to teach him anything there."25 During his solitary hours in the
fields he saw visions and heard voices. Removing to Poughkeepsie, he became the
clairvoyant of a mesmeric lecturer, and in this capacity began to excite wonder
by his revelations. This was before the Rochester knockings were heard. He
diagnosed and healed diseases, and prescribed for scores who came to him,
surprising both patients and physicians by his competence. Then he began to see
"into the heart of things," to descry the essential nature of the world and the
spiritual constitution of the universe. He could see the interior of bodies and
the metals hidden in the earth. Adding his testimony to that of Fox and
Swedenborg, he asserted that every animal represented some human quality, some
vice or virtue. He gave Greek and Latin names of things, without having a
knowledge of these languages. In a vision he beheld The Magic Staff on
which he was urged to learn during life; on it was written his life's motto:
"Under all circumstances keep an open mind." In 1845 he delivered one hundred
and fifty-seven lectures in New York which announced a new philosophy of the
universe. They were published under the title, Nature's Divine
Revelation, a book of eight hundred pages. Davis then became a voluminous
writer.26
______________
24 By strange and fortuitous circumstances he
became the guest of the Emperor of the French, of the King of Holland, of the
Czar of Russia, and of many lesser princes. His demonstrations before these
grandees were extensions of the phenomena occurring in his youth. See Howitt's
History of the Supernatural, Vol. II, pp. 222 ff.
25 Howitt's
History of the Supernatural, Vol. II, p. 225.
26 He published his
The Great Harmonia (Boston 1850); The Philosophy of Spiritual
Intercourse (New York, 1851); The Penetralia (Boston, 1856); The
Present Age and
37
Thomas L. Harris, the third great
representative, was much attracted by Davis' The Divine Revelations of
Nature, but developed spiritistic powers along a somewhat different line,
that of poetic inspiration. In his early exhibitions of this supernormal faculty
he dictated who epics, containing occasionally excellent verse, under the
alleged influence of Byron, Shelley, Keats and others. The interesting manner in
which these poems--a whole volume of three or four hundred pages at a time--were
created, is more amazing than their poetic merit. Mr. Brittan, an English
publisher, tells us that Harris dictated and he wrote down The Lyric of the
Golden Age, a poem of 381 pages, in ninety-four hours! The Lyric of the
Morning Land and other pretentious works were produced in a similar
manner.
"But," says William Howitt in his History of the
Supernatural, "the progress of Harris into an inspirational oratory is still
more surprising. He claims, by opening up his interior being, to receive influx
of divine intuition in such abundance and power as to throw off under its
influence the most astonishing strains of eloquence. This receptive and
communicative power he attributes to an internal spiritual breathing
corresponding to the outer natural breathing. As the body lungs imbibe air, so,
he contends, the spiritual lungs inspire and respire the divine aura, refluent
with the highest thought and purest sentiment, and that without any labor or
trial of brain."27
Spiritualism is one of the most direct lines of
approach to Theosophy, since an acceptance of the possibility of spiritistic
phenomena is a prerequisite for the adoption of the larger scheme of occult
truth. Spiritualism covers a portion of the ground embraced by the belief in
reincarnation, and in so far constitutes an introduction to it. Theosophy is
further, an endorsement of the primary position of the Spiritualists regarding
the survival of the soul entity, and thus commends itself to their approbation.
The Spiritualists have been considerably vexed by the question of
reincarna-
______________
Inner Life (New York, 1853); and The
Magic Staff (Boston, 1858). He edited a periodical, The Herald of
Progress.
27 Howitt's The History of the Supernatural, Vol.
II, p. 228.
38
tion, and their ranks are split over the subject.
Some of the message seem to endorse it, others evade it, and some negate the
idea. What is significant at this point is that the Spiritualistic agitation
prepared the way for Theosophic conceptions. A large percentage of the first
membership came from the ranks of the Spiritualists.
But Spiritualism is
but one facet of a human interest which has expressed itself in all ages,
embracing the various forms of mysticism, occultism, esotericism, magic,
healing, wonder-working, arcane science, and theurgy. The growing acquaintance
with Yoga practice and Hindu philosophy in this country under the stimulus of
many eloquent Eastern representatives has already been mentioned. The
demonstrations of mesmeric power lent much plausibility to Oriental pretensions
to extraordinary genius for that sort of thing. More than might be supposed,
there was prevalent in Europe and America alike a never-dying tradition of
magical art, a survival of Medieval European beliefs in superhuman activities
and powers both in man and nature. Among the rural and unschooled populations
this tradition assumed the form of harmless superstitions. Among more learned
peoples it issued in philosophic speculations dealing with the spiritual
energies of nature, the hidden faculties of man, such as prophecy, tongues and
ecstatic vision, and the extent and possibility of man's control over the
external world through the manipulation of a subtle ether possessing magnetic
quality. The heritage of Paracelsus, Robert Fludd, Thomas Vaughn and Roger
Bacon, Agrippa von Nettesheim, the Florentine Platonists and their German,
French, and English heirs still lingered. The Christian scriptures were
themselves replete with incidents of the supernatural, with necromancy,
witchcraft, miracles, ghost-walking, spirit messages, symbolical dreams, and the
whole armory of thaumaturgical exploits. The doctrine of Satan was itself
calculated to enliven the imagination with ideas of demoniac possession, and was
all the more credible by reason of the prevalence of insanity which was ascribed
to spirit obsession. The early nineteenth
39
century was must
closer to the Middle Ages than our own time is, not only because education was
less general, but also because a far larger proportion of the population was
agrarian instead of metropolitan. Such cults were, however, by no means
restricted to "backwoods" sections. They were astonishingly prevalent in the
larger centers. More enlightened groups accepted a less crude form of the
practices. Where knowledge ceases superstition may begin; and the problems of
life that press upon us for solution and that are still beyond our grasp, lead
the mind into every sort of rationalization or speculation. Perhaps more people
than acknowledge God in church pews believe in the existence of intelligences
that play a part in life, whether in answer to prayer, in suggestive dreams, in
occasional vision and apparitions, in messages through mediums, or in whatever
guise; and out of such an unreflective theology arise many of the types of
superstitious philosophy. To analyze this situation in its entirety would take
us into extensive fields of folk-lore and involve every sort of old wives' tale
imaginable. The chief point is that the varieties of chimney-corner legend and
omnipresent superstition have had their origin in a larger primitive
interpretation of the facts and forces of nature. They must be recognized as the
modern progeny of ancient hylozoism and animism. In the childhood of our
culture, as well as in the childhood of the race and of the individual, there is
a close sympathy between man and nature which leads him to ascribe living
quality to the external world. Countryside fables are doubtless the jejune
remnant of what was once felt to be a vital magnetic relation between man's
spirit and the spirit of the world. They are the distorted forms of some of the
ancient rites for effecting magical intercourse between man and nature. While it
is not to be inferred that Theosophy itself was built on the material embodied
in countryside credulity, it will be seen that the native inclination toward an
animistic interpretation of phenomena was in a measure true to the deeper theses
which the new cult presented. Madame Blavatsky herself says in Isis Unveiled
that the spontaneous re-
40
sponsiveness of the peasant mind
is likely to lead to a closer apprehension of the living spirit of Nature than
can be attained by the sophistications of reason.
The major tendencies in
the direction of Theosophy have now been enumerated. It remains only to mention
the scattering of American students before 1875 whose researches were taking
them into the realm where the fundamentals of Theosophy itself were to be found.
We refer to the Rosicrucians, the Freemasons, the Kabalists, Hermeticists,
Egyptologists, Assyriologists, students of the Mysteries, of the Christian
origins, of the pagan cults, and the small but gradually increasing number of
Comparative Religionists and Philologists.28 There were men of intelligence both
in Europe and America, who had kept on the track of ancient and medieval
esotericism, and the opening up of Sanskrit literature gave a decided impetus to
a renaissance of research in those realms. The material that went into Frazer's
Golden Bough, Ignatius Donnelley's Atlantis: the Antediluvian
World, Hargrave Jennings' The Rosicrucians,
______________
28
That there was much very real theosophy among the early German Pietists who
settled north and west of Philadelphia in the Pennsylvania colony is indicated
by the following extract from The German Sectarians of Pennsylvania, by
Julius Friedrich Sachse (Vol. I, pp. 457 ff.). He says: "Thus far but little
attention has been given by writers on Pennsylvania history to the influences
exercised by the various mystical, theosophical and cabbalistic societies and
fraternities of Europe in the evangelization of this Province and in reclaiming
the German settlers from the rationalism with which they were threatened by
their contact with the English Quakers.
"Labadie's teachings; Boehme's
visions; the true Rosicrucianism of the original Kelpius party; the
Philadelphian Society, whose chief apostle was Jane Leade; the fraternity which
taught the restitution of all things; the mystical fraternity led by Dr. Julian
Wilhelm Petersen and his wife Eleanor von Merlau-both members of the Frankfort
community-all found a foothold upon the soil of Penn's colony and exercised a
much larger share in the development of this country than is accorded to them.
It has even been claimed by some superficial writers and historians of the day
that there was no strain of mysticism whatever in the Ephrata Community, or, in
fact, connected with any of the early German movements in Pennsylvania. Such a
view is refuted by the writings of Kelpius, Beissel, Miller, and many others who
then lived, sought the Celestial Bridegroom and awaited the millennium which
they earnestly believed to be near.
"With the advent of the Moravian
Brethren in Pennsylvania the number of these mystical orders was increased by
the introduction of two others, viz., The Order of the Passion of Jesus
(Der Orden des Leidens Jesu), of which Count Zinzendorf was Grand Commander, and
the Order of the Mustard Seed (Der Senfkorn Orden)."
41
and many
other compendious works of the sort, was being collated out of the flotsam and
jetsam of ancient survival and assembled into a picture beginning to assume
definite outline and more than haphazard meaning. The great system of
Neo-Platonism, the Gnostics, with Apollonius of Tyana, and Philo Judaeus were
coming under inspection. The universality of religious myths and rites was being
noted. In short, the large body of ancient thought, so deeply imbued with the
occult, was beginning to be scrutinized by the scholars of the nineteenth
century.
It was into this situation that Madame Blavatsky came. Her
office, she said, was that of a clavigera; she bore a key which would
provide students with a principle of integration for the loose material which
would enable them to piece together the scattered stones and glittering jewels
picked up here and there into a structure of surpassing grandeur and priceless
worth. She would show that the gems of literature, whose mystic profundity
astonished and perplexed the savants, were but the fragments of a once-glorious
spiritual Gnosis.
42
CHAPTER III
HELENA P. BLAVATSKY:
HER LIFE AND
PSYCHIC CAREER
Who was Madame Blavatsky? Every new régime
of belief or of social organization must be studied with a view to determining
as far as possible how much of the movement is a contribution of the
individuality of the founder and how much represents a traditional deposit. This
inquiry is of first importance in a consideration of the Theosophical Society,
because, more than in most systems, the personal endowment of its founder gave
it its specific coloring, character and form. It should be said at this point
that the career of Madame Blavatsky as outlined here does not purport to be a
complete or authoritative biography. It was obviously impossible to undertake
such an investigation of her life, as the difficulties of obscure research in
three or four continents were practically prohibitive. We have been forced to
base our study upon the body of biographical material that has been assembled
around her name, emanating, first, from her relatives, secondly, from her
followers and admirers, and thirdly, from her critics. Her life, up to the age
of forty-two, narrowly escaped consignment to the realm of mythology, if not
total oblivion, but was at least partially redeemed to the status of history by
the exertions of Mr. A. P. Sinnett, who procured information from members of her
own family in Russia. His book, Incidents in the Life of Madame
Blavatsky, has been our chief source of information about her youth and
early career. The Countess Wachtmeister's Reminiscences, Col. Olcott's
Old Diary Leaves, V. Solovyoff's A Modern Priestess of Isis and
William Kingsland's The Real Helena P. Blavatsky, together with Madame
Blavatsky's own letters, especially those to Mr. And Mrs. A. P. Sinnett, are the
main works relied upon to guide our
43
story. If the eventful life
of our subject is to be further redeemed from mystery and sheer tradition into
which it already seems to be fading, a more thorough critical study of it should
be undertaken, based upon authentic data collected from first-hand sources as
far as this is possible.
It is to be understood, then, that the aim in
this treatise is to present her career as it is told and believed by
Theosophists, although it is admittedly already partly legendary. The precise
extent it is to be regarded as mythological must be left to the individual
reader, and to future study, to determine.
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was
born in the Ukrainian city of Ekaterinoslaw on the night between the 30th and
31st of July, 1831. Her father was Col. Peter Hahn, and her mother previous to
her marriage, Helene Fadeef. The father was the son of Gen. Alexis Hahn von
Rottenstern Hahn, from a noble family of Mecklenberg, Germany, settled in
Russia. Her mother's parents were Privy Councillor Andrew Fadeef and the
Princess Helene Dolgorouky. Madame Blavatsky's grandfather was a cousin of
Countess Ida Hahn-Hahn, the authoress. Her own mother was known in the literary
world between 1830 and 1840 under the nom de plume of Zenaïda R.--the first
novel writer that had ever appeared in Russia, says the account. Though she died
before her twenty-fifth year, she left some dozen novels of the romantic school,
most of which have been translated into German. The theory of heredity would
thus give us, apparently, abundant background for whatever literary propensities
the daughter was later to display. On her mother's side she was a scion of the
noble lineage of the Dolgorouky's, who could trace direct connections with
Russia's founder, Rurik, and the Imperial line.
Madame Blavatsky came on
to the Russian scene during a year fatal to the Slavic nation, as to all Europe,
owing to the decimation of the population by the first visitation of the
cholera. Her own birth was quickened by several deaths in the household. She was
ushered into the world amid coffins and sorrowing. The infant was so sickly that
a hurried baptism was resorted to in the effort to anticipate death.
During
44
the ceremony, which was signalized with elaborate Greek
Catholic paraphernalia of lighted tapers, the child-aunt of the baby
accidentally set fire to the long robes of the priest, who was severely burned.
This incident was interpreted as a bad omen, and in the eyes of the townsfolk
the infant was doomed to a life of trouble.
From the very date of her
birth, a peculiar tradition operated to invest the life of the growing child
with an odor of superstition and mystic awe. In Russia each household was
supposed to be under the tutelary supervision of a Domovoy, or house goblin,
whose guardianship was propitious, except on March 30th, when, for mysterious
reasons, he became mischievous. But the tradition strangely excepted from this
malevolent spell of the Domovoy those born on the night of July 30-31, a time
closely associated in the annals of popular belief with witches and their
doings. The child came early to learn why it was that, on every recurring March
30th, she was carried around the house, stables and cowpen and made personally
to sprinkle the four corners with water, while the nurse repeated some mystic
incantation. Her first conscious recognition of herself must thus have been
tinged with a feeling that she was in some particular fashion set apart, that
she was somehow the object of special care and attention from invisible
powers.
The Dnieper aided in weaving a spell of enchantment about her
infancy. No Cossack of Southern Ukraine ever crosses it without preparing
himself for death. Along its banks, where the child strolled with her nurses,
the Rusalky (undines, nymphs) haunted the willow trees and the rushes. She was
told that she was impervious to their influences, and in this sense of
superiority she alone dared to approach those sandy shores. She had heard the
servants' tales of these nymphs. Filled with this realization of her favored
standing with the Rusalky, she one day threatened a youngster who had roused her
displeasure that she would have the nymphs tickle him to death, whereupon the
lad ran wildly away and was found dead on the sands--whether from fright or from
having stumbled into one of the treach-
45
erous sandpits which
the swirling waters quickly turn into whirlpools.
Her mother died when
Mlle. Hahn was still a child. She and her younger sister were taken to live with
her father, in barracks with his regiment, and until the age of eleven, they
were entertained, amused and spoiled as les enfants du régiment.
After that they went to live at Saratow with their grandmother, where their
grandfather was civil governor. The child was "alternately petted and punished,
spoiled and hardened," and was difficult to manage. She was of uncertain health,
"ever sick and dying," a sleep walker, and given to abnormal psychic
peculiarities, ascribed by her orthodox nurses to possession by the devil; so
that, as she afterwards said, "she was drenched with enough holy water to float
a ship," and exorcised by priests. She was a born rebel against restraint, and
went into ungovernable fits of passion, which left her violently shaken; but at
the opposite apogee of her disposition she was filled with impulses of the
extremest kindliness and affection. Through life she had this dual temper. Those
who knew her better nature tolerated the irascible element. She was lively,
highly-gifted, full of humor, and of remarkable doing. She had a passionate
curiosity for everything savoring of the weird, the uncanny, the mysterious; she
was strangely attracted by the theme of death. Her imagination, wildly roaming,
appeared to create about her a world of fairy or elfish creatures with whom she
held converse in whispers by the hour. She defied all and everything. She had to
be watched lest she escape from the house and mingle with ragged urchins. She
preferred to listen to the tales of Madame Peigneur (her governess) than do her
lessons. She would openly rebel against her text-books and run off to the woods
or hide in the dusky corridors of the basement of the great house where her
grandfather lived. In a secluded dark recess in the "Catacombs" she had erected
a barrier of old broken chairs and tables, and there, up near the ceiling under
an iron-barred window, she would secrete herself for hours, reading a book of
popular legends known as Solomon's Wisdom. At times she bent to her books
in a
46
spasm of scholarly devotion to amend for mischief making.
Her grandparents' enormous library was then the object of her constant interest.
No less passionately would she drink in the wonders of narratives given in her
presence. Every fairy-tale became a living event to her.
She would be
found speaking to the stuffed animals and birds in the museum in the old house.
She said the pigeons were cooing fairy-tales to her. She heard a voice in every
natural object; nature was animate and, to her, articulate. She seemed to know
the inner life and secrets of every species of insect, bird, and reptile found
about the place. She would recreate their past and describe vividly their
feelings. At this early date she detailed the events of the past incarnations of
the stuffed animals in the museum.
Times without number the little girl
was heard conversing with playmates of her own age, invisible to others. There
was in particular a little hunchback boy, a favorite phantom companion of her
solitude, for whose neglect by the servants and nurses she was often excited to
resentment.
"But amidst the strange double life she thus led from her
earliest recollections, she would sometimes have visions of a mature protector,
whose imposing appearance dominated her imagination from a very early period.
This protector was always the same, his features never changed; in after life
she met him as a living man and knew him as though she had been brought up in
his presence."1
In the neighborhood of the residence was an old man, a
magician, whose doings filled the mind of the young seeress with wonder. The old
man, a centenarian, learned to know the young girl and he used to say of her:
"This little lady is quite different from all of you. There are great events
lying in wait for her in the future. I feel sorry in thinking that I will not
live to see my predictions of her verified; but they will all come to
pass!"
Her whole career is dotted with miraculous escapes
from
______________
1 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, by
A. P. Sinnett (Theosophical Publishing Society, London, 1913), p. 35. See also
footnote at bottom of page 155, in Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P.
Sinnett (New York, Frederick A. Stokes Co.,
47
danger and
still more miraculous recoveries from wounds, sicknesses and fevers. One of the
first appearances of a protective hand in her life came far back in her
childhood. She had always entertained a marked curiosity about a curtained
portrait in her grandfather's castle at Saratow. It was hung so high that it was
far beyond her reach. Denied permission to see it, she awaited her opportunity
to catch a glimpse of it by stealth; and when left alone on one occasion she
dragged a table to the wall, set another table on that, and a chair on top, and
managed to clamber up. On tiptoe she just contrived to pull back the curtain.
The sight of the picture was so startling that she made an involuntary movement
backwards, lost her balance and toppled with her pyramid to the floor. In
falling she lost consciousness; but when she came to her senses some moments
afterwards, she was amazed to see the tables, chairs, and everything in proper
order in the room. The curtain was slipped back again on the rings, and no mark
of the episode was left except the imprint of her small hand on the wall high up
beside the picture.
At another time, when she was nearing the age of
fourteen, her riding horse bolted and flung her, with her foot caught in the
stirrup. As the animal plunged forward she expected to be dragged to death, but
felt herself buoyed up by a strange force, and escaped without a
scratch.
It was not many years more until the young girl's possession of
gifts and extraordinary faculties, commonly classed as mediumistic, became an
admitted fact among her relatives and close associates. She would answer
questions locating lost property, or solving other perplexities of the
household. She sometimes blurted out to visitors that they would die, or meet
with misfortune or accident; and her prophecies usually came true.
In
1844 the father, Col. Hahn, took Helena for her first journey abroad. She went
with him to Paris and London, but proved a troublesome charge.
Her
youthful marriage deserves narration with some fulness, if only because it
precipitated the lady out of her home
48
and into that phase of
her career which has been referred to as her period of preparation and
apprenticeship. As her aunt, Madame Fadeef, describes her marriage:
"she
cared not whether she should get married or not. She had been simply defied one
day by her governess to find any man who would be her husband, in view of her
temper and disposition. The governess, to emphasize the taunt, said that even
the old man she had found so ugly and had laughed at so much calling him a
'plumeless raven,' that even he would decline her for his wife. That was enough;
three days afterwards she made him propose, and then, frightened at what she had
done, sought to escape from her joking acceptance of his offer. But it was too
late. All she knew and understood was--when too late--that she was now forced to
accept a master she cared nothing for, nay, that she hated; that she was tied to
him by the law of the country, hand and foot. A 'great horror' crept upon her,
as she explained it later; one desire, ardent, unceasing, irresistible, got hold
of her entire being, led her on, so to say, by the hand, forcing her to act
instinctively, as she would have done if, in the act of saving her life, she had
been running away from a mortal danger. There had been a distinct attempt to
impress her with the solemnity of marriage, with her future obligations and her
duties to her husband and married life. A few hours later at the altar she heard
the priest saying to her: 'Thou shalt honor and obey thy husband,' and at this
hated word 'shalt' her young face--for she was hardly seventeen--was seen to
flush angrily, then to become deadly pale. She was overheard to mutter in
response through her set teeth--'Surely I shall not.'
"And surely she has
not. Forthwith she determined to take the law and her future life into her own
hands, and--she left her husband forever, without giving him an opportunity to
ever even think of her as his wife.
"Thus Madame Blavatsky abandoned her
country at seventeen and passed ten long years in strange and out-of-the-way
places,--in Central Asia, India, South America, Africa and Eastern
Europe."2
True, before taking this drastic step she acceded to her
father's plea to do the conventional thing; and she let the old General take
her, though even then not without attempts to escape, on what may by courtesy of
language be called a
______________
2 Incidents in the Life of Madame
Blavatsky, by A. P. Sinnett, pp. 39-40.
49
honeymoon, which
drawled out, amid bickerings, to a length of three months, and was terminated
after a bitter quarrel by the bride's dash for freedom on horseback. Gen.
Blavatsky by this time saw the impossibility of the situation and acceded to the
inevitable.
Tracing the life of Madame Blavatsky from this event through
her personally-conducted globe-roaming becomes difficult, owing to the
meagreness of information. Her relatives and her later Theosophic associates
have done their best to piece together the crazy-quilt design of her wanderings
and attendant events of any significance. She herself kept no chronicle of her
journeys, and it was only at long intervals, when she emerged out of the deserts
or jungles of a country to visit its metropolis, or when she needed to write for
money, that she sent letters back home. The family was at first alarmed by her
defection from the fireside, but were constrained to acquiesce in the situation
by their recognition of her immitigable distaste for her veteran husband. If no
other tie kept her attached to the home circle, her need of funds obliged her to
keep in touch with her father, who supplied her with money without betraying her
confidences as to her successive destinations. He acceded to her plans because
he had tried in vain to secure a Russian divorce; and he felt that a few years
of travel for his daughter might best ease the family situation. Ten years
elapsed before the fugitive saw her relatives again.
Her first emergence
after her disappearance was in Egypt. She seems to have traveled there with a
Countess K------, and at that time began to pick up some occult teaching of a
poorer sort. She encountered an old Copt, a man with a great reputation as a
magician. She proved an apt pupil, and the instructor became so much interested
in her that when she revisited Egypt years later, the special attention he (then
a retired ascetic) showed her, attracted the notice of the populace at
Bulak.
After her appearance in Egypt she seems to have bobbed up in
Paris, where she made the acquaintance of many literary people, and where a
famous mesmerist, struck with
50
her psychic gifts, was eager to
put her to work as a sensitive. To escape his importunities she appears to have
gone to London. There she stayed for a time with an old Russian lady, a Countess
B., at Mivart's Hotel. She remained for some time after her friend's departure,
but could not afterwards recall where she resided.
Occasionally in her
travels she fell in with fellow Russians who were glad to accompany her and
sometimes to befriend her. She indulged in a tour about Europe in 1850 with the
Countess B., but was again in Paris when the New Year of 1851 was acclaimed. Her
next move was actuated by a passionate interest in the North American Indians,
which she had acquired from a perusal of Fenimore Cooper's Leatherstocking
Tales. Her zeal in this pursuit took her to Canada in July of 1851. At
Quebec her idealizations suffered a rude shock, when, being introduced to a
party of Indians, both the noble Redskins and some articles of her property
disappeared while she was trying to pry from the squaws a recital of the secret
powers of their medicine men. Dropping the Indians, she turned her interest to
the rising sect of the Mormons, being attracted doubtless by their possession of
an alleged Hermetic document obtained through psychic revelation. But the
destruction of the original Mormon city of Nauvoo, Missouri, by a mob, scattered
the sect across the plains, and Madame Blavatsky thought the time propitious for
exploring the traditions and arcana of Mexico. She came to New Orleans. Here the
Voodoo practices of a settlement of Negroes from the West Indies engaged her
interest, and her reckless curiosity might have led her into dangerous contact
with these magicians; but her protective power reappeared to warn her in a
vision of the risk she was running, and she hastened on to new
experiences.
Through Texas she reached Mexico, protected only by her own
reckless daring and by the occasional intercession of some chance companion. She
seems to have owed much in this way to an old Canadian, Père Jacques, who
steered her safely through many perils.
51
At Copau in Mexico she
chanced to meet a Hindu, who styled himself a "chela" of the Masters (or adepts
in Oriental occult science), and she resolved to seek that land of mystic
enchantment and penetrate northward into the very lairs of the mystic
Brotherhood. She wrote to an Englishman, whom she had met two years before in
Germany, and who shared her interest, to join them in the West Indies. Upon his
arrival the three pilgrims took boat for India. The party arrived at Bombay, via
the Cape to Ceylon, near the end of 1852. Madame's own headstrong bent to enter
Tibet via Nepal in search of her Mahatmas broke up the trio. She made the
hazardous attempt to enter the Forbidden Land of the Lamas, but was prevented,
she always believed, by the opposition of a British resident then in Nepal.
Baffled, she returned to Southern India, thence to Java and Singapore and thence
back to England.
But that country's embroilment in the Crimean War
distressed her sense of patriotism, and about the end of the year 1853 she
passed over again to America, going to New York, thence west to Chicago and on
to the Far West across the Rockies with emigrant caravans. She halted a while at
San Francisco. Her stay in America this time lengthened to nearly two years. She
then once more made her way to India, via Japan and the Straits. She reached
Calcutta in 1855.
In India, in 1856, she was joined at Lahore by a German
gentleman who had been requested by Col. Hahn to find his errant daughter. With
him and his two companions Madame Blavatsky traveled through Kashmir to Leli in
Ladakh in company with a Tatar Shaman, who was instrumental in procuring for the
party the favor of witnessing some magic rites performed at a Buddhist
monastery. Her experiences there she afterwards described in Isis,3 and
they are too long for recital here. One of the exploits of the old priest was
the psychic vivification of the body of an infant who (not yet of walking age)
arose and spoke eloquently of spiritual things and prophesied, while
dominated
______________
3 Vol. II, p. 599.
52
by a magnetic
current from the operator.4 The psychic feat performed by her Shaman guide was
even more wonderful. Yielding to Madame's importunities at a time when she was
herself in grave danger, he released himself from his body as he lay in a tent,
and carried a message to a friend of the young woman residing in Wallachia, from
whom he brought back an answer.5 Shortly after this incident, perceiving their
danger, the Shaman, by mental telepathy apprised a friendly tribal ruler of
their situation, and a band of twenty-five horsemen was sent to rescue the two
travelers, finding them in a locality to which they had been directed by their
chief, yet of which the two had had no possible earthly means of informing
him.
Safely out of the Tibetan wilds--and she came out by roads and
passes of which she had no previous knowledge--she was directed by her occult
guardian to leave the country, shortly before the troubles which began in 1857.
In 1858 she was once more in Europe.
By this time her name had
accumulated some renown, and it was freely mentioned in connection with both the
low and the high life of Vienna, Berlin, Warsaw, and Paris. Her alleged absence
from these places at the times throws doubt on the accuracy of these reports.
After spending some months in France and Germany upon her return from India, she
finally ended her self-imposed exile and rejoined her own people in Russia,
arriving at Pskoff, about 180 miles from St. Petersburg, in the midst of a
family wedding party on Christmas night. Her reason for going to Pskoff was that
her sister Vera--then Madame Yahontoff--was at the
______________
4 Her
recital of marvels seen in Tibet corresponds in the main with similar narratives
related by the Abbé Huc in the first edition of his Recollections of Travel
in Tartary, Tibet and China. Mr. Sinnett makes the statement, without
giving his evidence, that the "miracles" related by the Abbé in his first
edition were expurgated by Catholic authority in the later editions of the
work.
5 Madame Blavatsky later verified the long distance phenomenon by
receiving in writing, in response to an inquiry by mail, a letter from the
Rumanian friend stating that at the identical time of the Shaman's concentration
she had swooned, but dreamed she saw Madame Blavatsky in a tent in a wild
country among menacing tribes, and that she had communicated with her. Madame
Blavatsky states that the friend's astral form was visible in the
tent.
53
time residing there with the family of her late husband,
son of the General N. A. Yahontoff, Marechal de Noblesse of the
place.
Soon afterwards, early in 1859, Madame Blavatsky and her sister
went to reside with their father in a country house belonging to Madame
Yahontoff. This was at Rougodevo, about 200 versts from St. Petersburg. About a
year later, in the spring of 1860, both sisters left Rougodevo for the Caucasus
on a visit to their grandparents, whom they had not seen for years. It was a
three weeks' journey from Moscow to Tiflis, in coach with post horses. Madame
Blavatsky remained in Tiflis less than two years, adding another year of roaming
about in Imeretia, Georgia, and Mingrelia, exciting the superstitious
sensibilities of the inhabitants of the Mingrelia region to an inordinate degree
and gaining a reputation for witchcraft and sorcery. She was there taken down
with a wasting fever, which an old army surgeon could make nothing of; but he
had the good sense to send her off to Tiflis to her friends. Recovering after a
time, she left the Caucasus and went to Italy. Here, the legend goes, she, with
some other European women, volunteered to serve with Garibaldi and was under
severe fire in the battle of Mentana.6
The four years intervening between
1863 and 1867 seem to have been spent in European travel, though the records are
barren of accurate detail. But the three from 1867 to 1870 were passed in the
East,7 and were quite fruitful and eventful.
______________
6 In 1873
while at the Eddy farmhouse with her new friend Col. Olcott, she revealed to him
this chapter in her life, proving it by showing him where her left arm had been
broken in two places by a saber stroke, and having him feel a musket ball in her
right shoulder and another in her leg, revealing also a scar just below the
heart where she had been stabbed by a stiletto.
7 It must have been about
this time that Madame did some traveling in an altogether different capacity
than occult research. She is known by her family to have made tours in Italy and
Russia under a pseudonym, giving piano concerts. She had been a pupil of
Moscheles, and when with her father in London as a young girl she had played at
a charity concert with Madame Clara Schumann and Madame Arabella Goddard in a
piece for three pianos.
54
In 1870 she returned from the Orient,
coming through the newly opened Suez Canal, spent a short time in Piraeus, and
from there took passage for Spezzia on board a Greek vessel. On this voyage she
was one of the very few saved from death in a terrible catastrophe, the vessel
being blown to bits by an explosion of gunpowder and fireworks in the cargo.
Rescued with only the clothes they wore, the survivors were looked after by the
Greek government, which forwarded them to various destinations. Madame Blavatsky
went to Alexandria and to Cairo, tarrying at the latter place until money
reached her from Russia.
While awaiting the arrival of funds, the
energetic woman determined to found a Société Spirite, for the
investigation of mediums and manifestations according to the theories and
philosophy of Allen Kardec. The latter was an outstanding advocate of
Spiritualistic philosophy on the Continent. He had correlated the commonly
reported spiritistic exploits to a more profound and involved theory of cosmic
evolution and a higher spirituality in man. His work, Life and Destiny,
written under the pseudonym of Leon Denis, unfolded a comprehensive system of
spiritual truth identical in its main features with Theosophy itself. His
interests were not primarily in spiritistic phenomena for themselves, but for
what they revealed of the inner spiritual capacities and potentialities of our
evolving Psyche.
It required but a few weeks to disgust Madame Blavatsky
with her fruitless undertaking. Some French female spiritists, whom she had
drafted for service as mediums, in lack of better, proved to be adventuresses
following in the wake of M. de Lesseps' army of engineers and workmen, and they
concluded by stealing the Society's funds. She wrote home:
"To wind up
the comedy with a drama, I got nearly shot by a madman--a Greek, who had been
present at the only two public séances we held, and got possessed I suppose, by
some vile spook."8
______________
8 Incidents in the Life of Madame
Blavatsky, by A. P. Sinnett, p. 125.
55
She terminated the
affairs of her Société and went to Bulak, where she renewed her previous
acquaintance with the old Copt. His unconcealed interest in his visitor aroused
some slanderous talk about her. Disgusted with the growing gossip, she went home
by way of Palestine, making a side voyage to Palmyra and other ruins, and
meeting there some Russian friends. At the end of 1872 she returned without
warning to her family, then at Odessa.
In 1873 she again abandoned her
home, and Paris was her first objective. She stayed there with a cousin,
Nicholas Hahn, for two months. While in Paris she was directed by her "spiritual
overseers" to visit the United States, "where she would meet a man by the name
of Olcott," with whom she was to undertake an important enterprise. Obedient to
her orders she arrived at New York on July 7th, 1873.9 She was for a time
practically without funds; actually, as Col. Olcott avers, "in the most dismal
want, having . . . to boil her coffee-dregs over and over again for lack of
pence for buying a fresh supply; and to keep off starvation, at last had to work
with her needle for a maker of cravats."10 During this interval she was lodged
in a wretched tenement house in the East Side, and made cravats for a kindly old
Jew, whose help at this time she never forgot.11 In her
______________
9
An incident highly characteristic of her nature marked her coming to this
country, and her followers would hardly pardon our omitting it. Having purchased
her steamer ticket, she was about to board the vessel when her attention was
attracted to a peasant woman weeping bitterly on the wharf. Her quick sympathies
touched, Madame Blavatsky approached her and inquired the trouble. She soon
gathered that a "sharp" had sold the woman a worthless ticket, and that she was
stranded without funds. Madame Blavatsky's finances had barely sufficed to
procure her own passage, she having sent a dispatch to Russia instructing her
father to forward her additional money in New York. In the emergency she did not
hesitate. Going to the office of the Company, she arranged to exchange her cabin
ticket for two steerage ones, and packed the grateful emigrant on board along
with her.--See Old Diary Leaves, by Col. H. S. Olcott (New York and
London, G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1895), pp. 28-29.
10 Old Diary
Leaves, by Col. H. S. Olcott, Vol. I, p. 440.
11 Col. Olcott (Old
Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 440) states that during this period of her own need
she held in custody the sum of about 23,000 francs, which she later told him her
"guardians" had charged her to deliver a person in the United States whose
definite location would be given her after her arrival here. The order came
after a time, and she went to Buffalo, was given a name and street
number,
56
squalid quarters she was sought out by a veteran
journalist, Miss Anna Ballard, in search of copy for a Russian story. She
received, in late October, a legacy from the estate of her father, who had died
early in that month. A draft of one thousand rubles was first sent her, and
later the entire sum bequeathed to her. Then in affluence she moved to better
quarters, first to Union Square, then to East 16th Street, then to Irving Place.
But her money did not abide in her keeping long. In regard to the sources of her
income after her patrimony had been flung generously to the winds, we are told,
upon Col. Olcott's pledged honor, that both his and her wants, after the
organization of the Theosophical Society, were frequently provided for by the
occult ministrations of the Masters. He claims that during the many years of
their joint campaigns for Theosophy, especially in India, the treasure-chest at
headquarters, after having been depleted, would be found supplied with funds
from unknown sources. Shopping one day in New York with Colonel, she made
purchases to the amount of about fifty dollars. He paid the bills. On returning
home she thrust some banknotes into his hand, saying: "There are your fifty
dollars." He is certain she had no money of her own, and no visitor had come in
from whom she could have borrowed. Once during this period she created the
duplicate of a thousand dollar note while it was held in the hand of the Hon.
John L. O'Sullivan, formerly Ambassador to Portugal; but it faded away during
the two following days. Its serial number was identical with that of its
prototype. The knowledge that financial help would come at need, however, did
not dispose Madame Blavatsky to relax her effort toward her own sustenance.12
During this time, and for nearly all the remainder of her life, the Russian
noblewoman spent large stretches
______________
where she delivered the
money without question to a man who was on the point of committing suicide. It
was understood that she had been made the agent of rectifying a great wrong done
him.
12 Mr. O'Sullivan rallied her about her possession of so easy a road
to wealth. "No, indeed," she answered, "'tis but a psychological trick. We who
have the power of doing this, dare not use it for our own or any other's
interests, any more than you would dare commit the forgery by methods of the
counterfeiters. It would be stealing from the government in either
case."--Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 435.
57
of her time in
writing occult, mystic, and scientific articles for Russian periodicals. This
constituted her main source of income. Col. Olcott states that her Russian
articles were so highly prized that "the conductor of the most important of
their reviews actually besought her to write constantly for it, on terms as high
as they gave Turgenev."13
A chronicle of her life during this epoch may
not omit her second marriage, which proved ill-fated at the first. It came about
as follows: A Mr. B., a Russian subject, learning of her psychic gifts through
Col. Olcott, asked the Colonel to arrange for him a meeting with his
countrywoman. He proceeded to fall into a profound state of admiration for
Madame Blavatsky, which deepened though he was persistently rebuffed, and he
finally threatened to take his life unless she would relent. He proclaimed his
motives to be only protective, and expressly waived a husband's claims to the
privileges of married life. In what appears to have been madness or some sort of
desperation, she agreed finally, on these terms, to be his wife. Even then it
was specified that she retain her own name and be free from all restraint, for
the sake of her work. A Unitarian clergyman married them in Philadelphia, and
they lived for some few months in a house on Sansom Street. When taken to task
by her friend Olcott, she explained that it was a misfortune to which she was
doomed by an inexorable Karma; that it was a punishment to her for a streak of
pride which was hindering her spiritual development; but that it would result in
no harm to the young man. The husband forgot his earlier protestations of
Platonic detachment, and became an importunate lover. Madame Blavatsky developed
a dangerous illness at this time as a result of a fall upon an icy sidewalk in
New York the previous winter, and her knee became so violently inflamed that a
partial mortification of the leg set in. The physician declared that nothing but
instant amputation could save her life; but she discarded his advice, called
upon that source of help which had come to her in a number of exigencies,
recovered immediately and left her
______________
13 Old Diary
Leaves, Vol. I., p. 106.
58
husband's "bed and board." He,
after some months of waiting, saw her obduracy and procured a divorce on the
ground of desertion.14
During the latter part of her stay in New York she
and Col. Olcott took an apartment of seven rooms at the corner of 47th Street
and 8th Avenue, which came to be called "The Lamasery," in jocular reference to
her Tibetan connections. "The Lamasery" became a social and intellectual center
during her residence there. Col. Olcott says:
". . . her mirthfulness,
epigrammatic wit, brilliance of conversation, careless friendliness to those she
liked . . ., her fund of anecdote, and, chiefest attraction to most of her
callers, her amazing psychical phenomena, made the 'Lamasery' the most
attractive salon of the metropolis from 1876 to the close of
1878."15
Madame spent her day-hours in writing, her custom for years; and
held open house for visitors in the evening. There was always discussion of one
or another aspect of occult philosophy, in which she naturally took the
commanding part. She would pour out an endless flow of argument and supporting
data, augmented at favorable times by a sudden exhibition of magical power. She
seemed tireless in her psychic energy.
Several persons have left good
word-pictures of her. Col. Olcott graphically describes her appearance upon the
occasion of their first meeting in the old Eddy farmhouse, in Vermont, where
they both came in '74 to study the "spooks." Col. Olcott had been on the scene
for some time, as a representative of the New York Daily Graphic, when
Madame Blavatsky arrived. He was struck by her general appearance, and he
contrived to introduce himself to her through the medium of a gallant offer of a
light for her cigarette.
"It was a massive Kalmuc face," he writes,
"contrasting in its suggestion of power, culture and impressiveness, as
strangely with the commonplace visages about the room, as her red garment
did
______________
14 Mr. W. Q. Judge as her counsel and the decree was
granted on May 25, 1878. Col. Olcott had retained the original papers in the
case.
15 Old Diary Letters, Vol. I, p. 417.
59
with
the gray and white tones of the wall and the woodwork, and the dull costumes of
the rest of the guests. All sorts of cranky people were continually coming and
going at Eddy's, and it only struck me, on seeing this eccentric lady, that this
was but one more of the sort. Pausing on the doorstep I whispered to Kappes,
'Good Gracious! Look at that specimen, will you!'"16
In her autobiography
the Princess Helene von Racowitza makes some interesting references to Madame
Blavatsky, whom she knew intimately.
"I discovered in her the most
remarkable being (for one hardly dare designate her with the simple name of
woman). She gave me new life; . . . she brought new interest into my existence.
Regarding her personal appearance, the head, which rose from the dark flowing
garments, was immensely characteristic, although far more ugly than beautiful. A
true Russian type, a short thick nose, prominent cheek bones, a small clever
mobile mouth, with little fine teeth, brown and very curly hair, and almost like
that of a negro's; a sallow complexion, but a pair of eyes the like of which I
had never seen; pale blue, grey as water, but with a glance deep and
penetrating, and as compelling as if it beheld the inner heart of things.
Sometimes they held an expression as though fixed on something afar, high and
immeasurably above all earthly things. She always wore long dark flowing
garments and had ideally beautiful hands.
"But how shall I attempt to
describe . . . her being, her power, her abilities and her character? She was a
combination of the most heterogeneous qualities. By all she was considered as a
sort of Cagliostro or St. Germain. She conversed with equal facility in Russian,
English, French, German, Italian and certain dialects of Hindustani; yet she
lacked all positive knowledge--even the most superficial European school
training.
"In matters of social life she . . . joined an irresistible
charm in conversation, that comprised chiefly an intense comprehension of
everything noble and great, with the most original and often coarse humor, a
mode of expression which was the comical despair of prudish
Anglo-Saxons.
"Her contempt for and rebellion against all social
conventions made her appear sometimes even coarser than was her wont, and she
hated and fought conventional lying with real Don
Quixotic
______________
16 Ibid., p. 4.
60
courage.
But whoever approached her in poverty or rags, hungry and needing comfort, could
be sure to find in her a warm heart and an open hand. . . . No drop of wine,
beer or fermented liquors ever passed her lips, and she had a most fanatical
hatred of everything intoxicating. Her hospitality was genuinely Oriental. She
placed everything she possessed at the disposal of her friends."17
Mr. J.
Ranson Bridges, a none too kindly critic, who had considerable correspondence
with her from 1888 till her death, says:
"Whatever may be the ultimate
verdict upon the life and work of this woman, her place in history will be
unique. There was a Titanic display of strength in everything she did. The
storms that raged within her were cyclones. Those exposed to them often felt,
with Solovyoff, that if there were holy and sage Mahatmas, they could not remain
holy and sage and have anything to do with Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. Yet she
could be as tender and sympathetic as any mother. Her mastery of some natures
seemed complete. . . . To these disciples she was the greatest thaumaturgist
known to the world since the time of Christ."18
In a moment of gayety she
once dashed off the following description of herself:
"An old woman,
whether 40, 50, 60 or 90 years old, it matters not; an old woman whose
Kalmuco-Buddhisto-Tartaric features, even in youth, never made her appear
pretty; a woman whose ungainly garb, uncouth manners, and masculine habits are
enough to frighten any bustled and corseted fine lady of fashionable society out
of her wits."19
For all her psychic insight, she seemed unable to protect
herself against those who fawned upon her, cultivated her society, and then
repaid her by desertion or slander. She was open to any one who professed occult
interest, and she readily took up with many such persons who later became bitter
critics.
Much ado was made by delicate ladies in her day of
her
______________
17 Published by The Constables, London, 1910.
18
The Arena, April, 1895.
19 Quoted in Old Diary Leaves, Vol.
I, p. 4 (footnote), from a letter written by her entitled "The Knout" to the
R. P. Journal of March 16, 1878.
61
cigarette addiction.
Her evident masculinity, her lack of many of the niceties which ladies commonly
affect, her scorn of conventions, her failure to put on the airs of a woman of
noble rank, her occasional coarse language, and her violence of temper over
petty things, have led many people to infer that the message that she brought
could not have been pure and lofty.
Theosophists put forward an
explanation of her irascibility and nervous instability, in a theory which must
sound exotic to the uninitiated. They state that when she studied in Tibet under
her Masters, and was initiated into the mysteries of their occult knowledge,
they extricated, by processes in which they are alleged to be adepts, one of her
astral bodies and retained it so as to be able to maintain, through an etheric
radio vibration, a constant line of communication with her in any part of the
world. This left her in a state of unstable equilibrium nervously, and rendered
her subject to a greater degree of irritation than would normally have been the
case.
Madame Blavatsky's life story, covered now in its outward phases,
is not complete without consideration of that remarkable series of psychic
phenomena which give inner meaning to her career. In and of themselves they form
a narrative of great interest, on a par with the legendary lives of many other
saints. The story is a long one; a complete record of all her wonder-working, as
told in the Theosophic accounts, would alone fill the space of this volume. A
digest of this material must be made here, though a critical examination is, as
said above, not attempted.
When, in 1858, she returned home from her
first exile of ten years, Spiritualism was just looming on the horizon of
Europe. Nothing seems to be mentioned in the several biographical sketches, of
her coming in contact with the sweep of the Spiritualistic wave that was at full
height in the United States during the early fifties, when she passed through
that country. However the case may be, she returned home in 1858 with her occult
powers already fully developed, and proceeded to make frequent display of
them.
62
At Pskoff, with her sister's husband's family, the
Yahontoff's, raps, knocks, and other sounds occurred incessantly; furniture
moved without any contact; particles changed their weight; and either absent
living folk or the dead were seen both by herself and her relatives many times.
Wherever the young woman went "things" happened. Laughing at the continued
recurrence of these mysterious activities, she averred to her sisters that she
could make them cease or redouble their frequency and power, by the sheer force
of her own will.20 The psychic demonstrations supposedly took place in entire
independence of her coöperation, but she could, if she chose, interject her will
and assume control. Her sister, Madame de Jelihowsky, remembers Helena's
laughing when addressed as a medium, and assuring her friends that "she was no
medium, but only a mediator between mortals and beings we know nothing about."21
The reports of her wonderful exploits following her arrival at Pskoff in 1858
threw that town into a swirl of excited gossip. There was a great deal of
fashionable company at the Yahontoff home in those days. Madame's presence
itself attracted many. Seldom did any of the numerous callers go away
unsatisfied, for to their inquiries the raps gave answer, often long ones in
different languages, some of which were not in Madame Blavatsky's repertoire.
The willing "medium" was subjected to every kind of test, to which she submitted
gracefully.
An instance of her power was her mystification of her own
brother, Leonide de Hahn. A company was gathered in the drawing room, and
Leonide was walking leisurely about, unconcerned with the stunts which his
gifted sister was producing for the diversion of the visitors. He stopped behind
the girl's chair just as some one was telling how
magicians
______________
20 Mr. Sinnett (Incidents in the Life of
Madame Blavatsky, Chapter VI) emphasizes the fact that she was about this
time in a transition state from passive mediumship to active control over her
phenomena. He doubtless wishes to make this matter clear in view of its
important bearing upon the divergence between Spiritualism and Theosophy which
was accentuated when the latter put forth claims somewhat at variance with the
usual theses presented by the former.
21 Incidents in the Life of
Madame Blavatsky, p. 61.
63
change the avoirdupois of objects.
"And you mean to say that you can do it?" he asked his sister ironically.
"Mediums can, and I have done it occasionally," was the reply. "But would you
try?" some one asked. "I will try, but promise nothing." Hereupon one of the
young men advanced and lifted a light chess table with great ease. Madame then
told them to leave it alone and stand back. She was not near it herself. In the
expectant silence that ensued she merely looked intently at the table. Then she
invited the same young man who had just lifted it to do so again. He tried, with
great assurance of his ability, but could not stir the table an inch. He grew
red with the effort, but without avail. The brother, thinking that his sister
had arranged the play with his friend as a little joke on him, now advanced.
"May I also try?" he asked her. "Please do, my dear," she laughed. He seized the
table and struggled; whereat his smile vanished. Try as he would, his effort was
futile. Others tried it with the same result. After a while Helena urged Leonide
to try it once more. He lifted it now with no effort.
A few months later,
Madame Blavatsky, her father and sister, having left Pskoff and lodging at a
hotel in St. Petersburg, were visited by two old friends of Col. Hahn, both now
much interested in Spiritualism. After witnessing some of Helena's performances,
the two guests expressed great surprise at the father's continued apathy toward
his daughter's abilities. After some bantering they began to insist that he
should at least consent to an experiment, before denying the importance of the
phenomena. They suggested that he retire to an adjoining room, write a word on a
slip of paper, conceal it and see if his daughter could persuade the raps to
reveal it. The old gentleman consented, believing he could discredit the foolish
nonsense, as he termed it, once for all. He retired, wrote the word and
returned, venturing in his confidence the assertion that if this experiment were
successful, he "would believe in the devil, undines, sorcerers, and witches, in
the whole paraphernalia, in short, of old woman's superstitions; and you may
prepare to offer me as
64
an inmate of a lunatic asylum."22 He
went on with his solitaire in a corner, while the friends took note of the raps
now beginning. The younger sister was repeating the alphabet, the raps sounding
at the desired letter; one of the visitors marked it down. Madame Blavatsky did
nothing apparently. By this means one single word was got, but it seemed so
grotesque and meaningless that a sense of failure filled the minds of the
experimenters. Questioning whether that one word was the entire message, the
raps sounded "Yes--yes--yes!" The younger girl then turned to her father and
told them that they had got but one word. "Well what is it?" he demanded.
"Zaïchik."23 It was a sight indeed to witness the change that came over the old
man's face at hearing this one word. He became deadly pale. Adjusting his
spectacles with a trembling hand, he stretched it out, saying, "Let me see it!
Hand it over. Is it really so?" He took the slips of paper and read in a very
agitated voice "Zaïchik." Yes; Zaïchik; so it is. How very strange!" Taking out
of his pocket the paper he had written on in the next room, he handed it in
silence to his daughter and guests. On it they found he had written: "What was
the name of my favorite horse which I rode during my first Turkish campaign?"
And lower down, in parenthesis, the answer,--" Zaïchik."
The old Colonel,
now assured there was more than child's play in his daughter's pretensions,
rushed into the region of phenomena with great zeal. He did not matriculate at
an asylum; instead he set Helena to work investigating his family tree. He was
stimulated to this inquiry by having received the date of a certain event in his
ancestral history of several hundred years before, which he verified by
reference to old documents. Scores of historical events connected with his
family were now given him; names unheard of, relationships unknown, positions
held, marriages, deaths; and all were found on painstaking research to have been
correct in every item! All this information was given rapidly and
unhesitatingly. The investigation lasted for months.
______________
22
Ibid., p. 72.
23 In Russian, "little hare."
65
In
the spring of 1858 both sisters were living with their father in the
country-house in a village belonging to Mme. Yahontoff. In consequence of a
murder committed near their property, the Superintendent of the District Police
passed through the villages and stopped at their house to make some inquiries.
No one in the village knew who had committed the crime. During tea, as all were
sitting around the table, the raps came, and there were the usual disturbances
around the room. Col. Hahn suggested to the Superintendent that he had better
try his daughter's invisible helpers for information. He laughed incredulously.
He had heard of "spirits," he said, but was derisive of their ability to give
information in "a real case." This scorn of her powers caused the young girl to
desire to humble the arrogant officer. She turned fiercely upon him. "And
suppose I prove to you the contrary?" she defiantly asked him. "Then," he
answered, "I would resign my office and offer it to you, Madame, or, better
still, I would strongly urge the authorities to place you at the head of the
Secret Police Department." "Now look here, Captain," she said indignantly. "I do
not like meddling in such dirty business and helping you detectives. Yet, since
you defy me, let my father say over the alphabet and you put down the letters
and record what will be rapped out. My presence is not needed for this, and with
your permission I shall even leave the room." She went out, with a book, to
read. The inquiry in the next room produced the name of the murderer, the fact
that he had crossed over into the next district and was then hiding in the hay
in the loft of a peasant, Andrew Vlassof, in the village of Oreshkino. Further
information was elicited to the effect that the murderer was an old soldier on
leave; he was drunk and had quarreled with his victim. The murder was not
premeditated; rather a misfortune than a crime. The Superintendent rushed
precipitately out of the house and drove off to Oreshkino, more than 30 miles
distant. A letter came by courier the following morning saying that everything
given by the raps had proved absolutely correct. This incident produced a great
uproar in the district and Madame's work was viewed
66
in a more
serious light. Her family, however, had some difficulty convincing the more
distant authorities that they had no natural means of being familiar with the
crime.
One evening while all sat in the dining room, loud chords of music
were struck on the closed piano in the next room, visible to all through the
open door. On another occasion Madame's tobacco pouch, her box of matches and
her handkerchief came rushing to her through the air, upon a mere look from her.
Many visitors to her apartment in later years witnessed this same procedure.
Again, one evening, all lights were suddenly extinguished, an amazing noise was
heard, and though a match was struck in a moment, all the heavy furniture was
found overturned on the floor. The locked piano played a loud march. The
manifestations taking place when the home circle was unmixed with visitors were
usually of the most pronounced character.
Sometimes there were alleged
communications from the spirits of historical personages, not the inevitable
Napoleon and Cleopatra, but Socrates, Cicero and Martin Luther, and they ranged
from great power and vigor of thought to almost flippant silliness. Some from
the shade of the Russian poet Pushkin were quite beautiful.
While the
family read aloud the Memoirs of Catherine Romanovna Dashkoff, they were
interrupted many times by the alleged spirit of the authoress herself,
interjecting remarks, making additions, offering explanations and
refutations.
In the early part of 1859 the sister, Madame Jelihowsky,
inherited a country village from the estate of her late husband at Rougodevo,
and there the family, including Helena, went to reside for a period. No one in
the party had ever known any of the previous occupants of the estate. Soon after
settling down in the old mansion, Madame discerned the shades of half a dozen of
the former inhabitants in one of the unoccupied wings and described them to her
sister. Seeking out several old servants, she found that every one of the
wraiths could be identified and named by the aged domestics. The young woman's
description of one man was
67
that he had long finger nails, like
a Chinaman's. The servant stated that one of the former residents had contracted
a disease in Lithuania, which renders cutting of the nails a certain road to
death through bleeding.
Sometimes the other members of the family would
converse with the rapping forces without disturbing Helena at all. The forces
played more strongly than every, it seemed, when Madame was asleep or sick. A
physician once attending her illness was almost frightened away by the noises
and moving furniture in the bedroom.
A terrible illness befell her near
the end of the stay at Rougodevo. Years before, her relatives believed during
her solitary travels over the steppes of Asia, she had received a wound. This
wound reopened occasionally, and then she suffered intense agony, which lasted
three or four days and then the wound would heal as suddenly as it had opened,
and her illness would vanish. On one occasion a physician was called; but he
proved of little use, because the prodigious phenomena which he witnessed left
him almost powerless to act. Having examined the wound, the patient being
prostrated and unconscious, he saw a large dark hand between his own and the
wound he was about to dress. The wound was near the heart, and the hand moved
back and forth between the neck and the waist. To make the apparition worse,
there came in the room a terrific noise, from ceiling, floor, windows, and
furniture, so that the poor man begged not to be left alone in the room with the
patient.
In the spring of 1860 the two sisters left Rougodevo for a visit
to their grandparents in the south of Russia, and during the long slow journey
many incidents took place. At one station, where a surly, half-drunken
station-master refused to lend them a fresh relay of horses, and there was no
fit room for their accommodation over the night, Helena terrified him into sense
and reason by whispering into his ear some strange secret of his, which he
believed no one knew and which it was to his interest to keep hidden.
At
Jadonsk, where a halt was made, they attended a church service, where the
prelate, the famous and learned
68
Isidore, who had known them in
childhood, recognized them and invited them to visit him at the Metropolitan's
house. He received them when they came with great kindliness; but hardly had
they entered the drawing room than a terrible hubbub of noise and raps burst
forth in every direction. Every piece of furniture strained and cracked, rocked
and thumped. The women were confused by this demoniacal demonstration in the
presence of the amazed Churchman, though the culprit in the case was hardly able
to repress her sense of humor. But the priest saw the embarrassment of his
guests and understood the cause of it. He inquired which of the two women
possessed such strange potencies. He was told. Then he asked permission to put
to her invisible guide a mental question. She assented. His query, a serious
one, received an instant reply, precise and to the point; and he was so struck
with it all that he detained his visitors for over three hours. He continued his
conversation with the unseen presences and paid unstinted tribute to their
seeming all-knowledge. His farewell words to his gifted guest were:
"As
for you, let not your heart be troubled by the gift you are possessed of . . .
for it was surely given to you for some purpose, and you could not be held
responsible for it. Quite the reverse! For if you but use it with discrimination
you will be enabled to do much good to your fellow-creatures."
Her occult
powers grew at this period to their full development, and she seemed to have
completed the subjection of every phase of manifestation to her own volitional
control. Her fame throughout the Caucasus increased, breeding both hostility and
admiration. She had risen above the necessity of resorting to the slow process
of raps, and read people's states and gave them answers through her own
clairvoyance. She seemed able, she said, to see a cloud around people in whose
luminous substance their thoughts took visible form. The purely sporadic
phenomena were dying away.
Her illness at the end of her stay in
Mingrelia has already been noted. A psychic experience of unusual nature even
for
69
her, through which she passed during this severe sickness,
seems to have marked a definite epoch in her occult development. She apparently
acquired the ability from that time to step out of her physical body,
investigate distant scenes or events, and bring back reports to her normal
consciousness. Sometimes she felt herself as now one person, H. P. Blavatsky,
and again some one else. Returning to her own personality she could remember
herself as the other character, but while functioning as the other person she
could not remember herself as Madame Blavatsky. She later wrote of these
experiences: "I was in another far-off country, a totally different
individuality from myself, and had no connection at all with my actual life."24
The sickness, prostrated her and appears to have brought a crisis in her inner
life. She herself felt that she had barely escaped the fate that she afterwards
spoke of as befalling so many mediums. She wrote in a letter to a
relative:
"The last vestige of my psycho-physical weakness is gone, to
return no more. I am cleansed and purified of that dreadful attraction to myself
of stray spooks and ethereal affinities. I am free, free, thanks to Those whom I
now bless at every hour of my life." (Her Guardians in Tibet.)25
Madame
Jelihowsky writes too:
"After her extraordinary and protracted illness at
Tiflis she seemed to defy and subject the manifestations entirely to her will.
In short, it is the firm belief of all that there where a less strong nature
would have been surely wrecked in the struggle, her indomitable will found
somehow or other the means of subjecting the world of the invisibles--to the
denizens of which she had ever refused the name of 'spirits' and souls--to her
own control."26
As a sequel to this experience her conception of a great
and definite mission in the world formulated itself before her vision. It is
seen to provide the motive for her abortive enterprise in Cairo in 1871; it is
again seen to be operative in her propagation of Theosophy in 1875. It will be
con-
______________
24 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky,
p. 116.
25 Ibid., p. 120
26 Ibid., p.
120
70
sidered more at length in the discussion of her connection
with American Spiritualism.
By 1871 her power in certain phases had been
greatly enhanced. She was able, merely by looking fixedly at objects, to set
them in motion. In an illustrated paper of the time there was a story of her by
a gentleman, who met her with some friends in a hotel at Alexandria. After
dinner he engaged her in a long discussion. Before them stood a little tea tray,
on which the waiter had placed a bottle of liquor, some wine, a wine glass and a
tumbler. As the gentleman raised the glass to his lips it broke to pieces in his
hands. Madame Blavatsky laughed at the occurrence, remarking that she hated
liquor and could hardly tolerate those who drank. He knew the glass was thick
and strong, but, to draw her out, declared it must have been an accidental
crumbling of a thin glass in his grasp. "What do you bet I do not do it again?"
she flashed at him. He then half-filled another tumbler. In his own
words:
"But no sooner had the glass touched my lips than I felt it
shattered between my fingers, and my hand bled, wounded by a broken piece in my
instinctive act of grasping the tumbler together when I felt myself losing hold
of it."
"Entre les lèvres et la coupe, il y a quelquefois une grande
distance," she observed, and left the room, laughing in his face "most
outrageously."27
Another gentleman, a Russian, who encountered her in
Egypt, sent the most enthusiastic letters to his friends about her
wonders.
"She is a marvel, an unfathomable mystery. That which she
produces is simply phenomenal; and without believing any more in spirits than I
ever did, I am ready to believe in witchcraft. If it is after all but jugglery,
then we have in Madame Blavatsky a woman who beats all the Boscos and Robert
Houdin's of the country by her address. . . . Once I showed her a closed
medallion containing a portrait of one person and the hair of another, an object
which I had had in my possession but a few months, which was made at Moscow, and
of which very few knew, and she told me
______________
27 Ibid., p.
128.
71
without touching it: 'Oh! It is your godmother's portrait
and your cousin's hair. Both are dead,' and she proceeded forthwith to describe
them, as though she had both before her eyes. How could she know?"28
At
Cairo she wrote her sister Vera that she had seen the astral forms of two of the
family's domestics and chided her sister for not having written her about their
death during her absence. She described the hospital in which one of them had
passed away, and other circumstances connected with their history since she had
last been in touch with them. It was only afterwards that she learned that when
her letter from Egypt was received by Madame Jelihowsky, the latter was herself
not aware of the death of the two servants. Upon inquiry she found every
circumstance in relation to their late years and their death precisely as Helena
had depicted it.
Upon Madame Blavatsky's arrival in America her open
espousal of the cause of Theosophy was prefaced by much work done in and for the
Spiritualistic movement. Col. Olcott has brought out the fact that the phenomena
taking place at the Eddy farmhouse in Vermont in 1873 changed character quite
decidedly the day she entered the household. Up to the time of her appearance on
the scene the figures that had shown themselves were either Red Indians or
Americans or Europeans related to some one present. But on the first evening of
her stay spirits of other nationalities came up. A Georgian servant body from
the Caucasus, a Mussulman merchant from Tiflis, a Russian peasant girl, and
others, appeared. Later a Kurdish cavalier and a devilish-looking Negro sorcerer
from Africa joined the motley group.
From the Vermont homestead Madame
Blavatsky went to New York, where Col. Olcott joined her shortly afterwards.
Rappings and messages were much in evidence during this sojourn in the
metropolis, the disembodied intelligence in the background purporting to be one
"John King," a name familiar to all spiritists for many years before. The spirit
finally declared itself to be the earth-haunting soul
______________
28
Ibid., p. 127
73
of Sir Henry Morgan, famous buccaneer, and
so showed itself to the sight of Col. Olcott during the séances with the Holmes
mediums some months later in Philadelphia. From him as ostensible source came
many messages both grave and gay.
All the while Madame Blavatsky posed as
a Spiritualist and mingled in the Holmes séances in Philadelphia for the purpose
of lending some of her own power to the rather feeble demonstrations effected by
Mr. and Mrs. Holmes to bolster their reputation in the face of Robert Dale
Owen's public denunciation of them as cheats. She says that on one occasion Mrs.
Holmes was herself frightened at the real appearance of spirits summoned by
herself.
One of the first indications Col. Olcott was to have of the
interest of her distant sages in his own career was shown during the time that
Madame Blavatsky was in Philadelphia. At her urgent invitation the Colonel
determined quite suddenly to run over and spend a few days with her. On the
evening of the same day on which he left his address at the Philadelphia Post
Office the postman brought him several letters from widely distant places, all
bearing the stamp of the sending station, but none that of the receiving
station, New York. They were addressed to him at his New York office address,
yet had come straight to him at Philadelphia without passing through the New
York office. And nobody in New York knew his Philadelphia address. He took them
himself from the postman's hand; so they could not have been tampered with by
his occult friend. But the marvel did not end there. Upon opening them he found
inside each something written in the same handwriting as that in letters he had
received in New York from the Masters, the writing having been made either in
the margins or on any other space left blank by the writers.
"These were
the precursors of a whole series of those phenomenal surprises during the
fortnight or so that I spent in Philadelphia. I had many, and no letter of the
lot bore the New York stamp, though all were addressed to me at my office in
that city."29
______________
29 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 36. In
this work Col. Olcott undertakes to classify the various types of phenomena
produced by Madame Blavatsky.
73
The series of vivid phenomena
which took place during the Philadelphia visit may be listed briefly as
follows:
1.--Col. Olcott purchased a note-book in which to record the rap
messages. On taking it out of the store wrapper he found inside the first cover:
"John King, Henry de Morgan, his book, 4th of the fourth month in A.D. 1875."
And underneath this was a whole pictorial design of Rosicrucian symbols, the
word Fate, the name Helen, the phrase "Way of Providence," a monogram, a pair of
compasses, and various letters and signs. No one had touched it since its
purchase at the stationary shop.
2.--Madame Blavatsky caused a photograph
on the wall to disappear suddenly from its frame and give place to a sketch
portrait of "John King" while a spectator was looking at it.
3.--Col.
Olcott had bought a dozen unhemmed towels. As his companion was no seamstress,
he bantered her to let an elemental do the hemstitching on the lot. She told him
to put the towels, needle and thread inside a bookcase, which had glass doors
curtained with green silk. He did so. After twenty minutes she announced that
the job was finished. He found them actually, if crudely, hemmed. It was four
P.M., and no other persons were in the room.
4.-- Madame Blavatsky once
suddenly disappeared from the Colonel's sight, could not be seen for a period,
and then as suddenly reappeared. She could not explain to him how she did
it.
5.--The increase overnight in the length of her hair, of about four
to five inches, and its later recession to its normal length.
6.--The
projection of a drawing of a man's head on the ceiling above the Colonel's head,
where he had seen nothing a minute before.
7.--The precipitation by "John
King," in answer to the Colonel's challenge to duplicate a letter he had in his
pocket, of the said duplicate, correct in every word.
8.--The
precipitation of a letter into the traveling bag of a Mr. B. while on the train,
the letter not having been packed there originally.
9.--The same Mr. B.
begged Madame Blavatsky to create for him a portrait of his deceased
grandmother. She went to the window, put a blank piece of paper against the
pane, and handed it to him in a moment with the portrait of a little old woman
with many wrinkles and a large wart, which Mr. B. declared a perfect likeness of
his ancestor.
74
10.--The actual production by an Italian artist,
through "his control of the spirits of the air," during one evening of entirely
clear sky, of a small shower of rain, sufficient to wet the sidewalks.
Previously Madame Blavatsky had created a butterfly, following a similar
production by the Italian visitor.
11.--The materialization by Madame
Blavatsky of a heavy gold ring in the heart of a rose which had been "created"
shortly before by Mrs. Thayer, a medium whom Col. Olcott was testing with a view
to sending her to Russia for experimentation at a university
there.
12.--The Colonel's own beard grew in one night from his chin down
to his chest.30
After the return from Philadelphia psychic events
continued with great frequency at the apartments in New York. In December of
1875, Madame Blavatsky, having invited a challenge to reproduce the portrait of
the Chevalier Louis, reputed Adept author of Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten's Art
Magic, rubbed her hand over a sheet of paper and the desired photograph
appeared on the under side. She had laid the bare sheet on the surface of the
table. Col. Olcott had the opportunity nine years later of comparing this
reproduction with the original photograph of the Chevalier Louis, and found the
likeness perfect, yet the lines would not meet precisely when the one was
superimposed on the other. It could not have been a lithographic
reproduction.
Early in 1878, Mr. O'Sullivan asked Madame Blavatsky for
one of a chaplet of large wooden beads which she was wearing. She placed one in
a bowl and produced the bowlful of them.
For the same gentleman in plain
sight of several people, she triplicated a beautiful handkerchief which he had
admired.
To amuse the child of a caller, an English Spiritualist, one day
she produced a large toy sheep mounted on wheels. Col. Olcott claimed it had not
been there a moment before.
On Christmas eve of that year when she and
the Colonel, went to his sister's apartment, Madame expressed
regret
______________
30 Ibid., Vol. I, Chapter III, pp. 40
ff.
75
that she had brought nothing for the youngsters. But
saying, "Wait a minute," she took her bunch of keys from her pocket, clutched
three of them together in one hand, and a moment later showed the party a large
iron whistle hanging on the ring instead of the three keys. Col. Olcott had to
get three new keys from a locksmith.
Another time to placate a little
girl Madame promised her "a nice present," and indicated to Col. Olcott that he
should take it out of their luggage bag in the hall. He unlocked the already
stuffed bag and immediately on top was a harmonica, or glass piano, about
fifteen inches by four in size, with its cork mallet beside it. Colonel had
himself packed the bag, having to use all his strength to close it, had reopened
it on the train, and there was not a moment when his friend could have slipped
an object of such size into it.
It was in New York at this epoch that she
took Col. Olcott's large signet ring, rubbed it in her hands and presently
handed him his original and another like it except that the new one was mounted
with a dark green bloodstone, whereas the original was set with a red carnelian.
That ring she wore till her death, and it has since been the valued possession
of Mrs. Annie Besant.
Once, in Boston, Madame walked through the streets
in a pelting rain and reached her lodgings without the trace of dampness or mud
on her dress or shoes. Similarly the Colonel found a handsome velvet-covered
chair entirely dry, not even damp, after being left out all night in a driving
rain.
One time when the two were talking about three members of the
Colonel's family, a crash was heard in the next room. Rushing in he found that
the photograph of one of the three had been turned face inward, the large
water-color picture of another lay smashed on the floor, while the photograph of
the third was unmolested.
Madame once made instantly a copy of a
scurrilous letter received by the Colonel from a person who had done him an
injustice. Again she duplicated a five-page letter from the eminent
Spiritualist, W. Stainton Moses. There was not time for the receipt of the
letter until its duplication for
76
any one to have copied it. The
second sheets were copies, but not strictly duplicate, as the lines would not
match when the two were placed together and held before the light.
At
"The Lamasery" she produced an entire set of water colors, which Mr. W. Q. Judge
needed in making an Egyptian drawing. Next he needed some gold paint, whereupon
she took a brass key, scraped it over the bottom of an empty saucer, and found
the required paint instantly. The brass key was not consumed in the process, but
was needed, she explained, to help aggregate the atomic material for the gold
color.
When Olcott stated one evening that he would like to hear from one
of the Adepts (in India) upon a certain subject, Madame told him to write his
questions, seal them in an envelope, and place it where he could watch it. He
did so, putting it behind the clock on the mantel, with one end projecting in
plain view. The two went on talking for an hour, when she announced that the
answer had come. He drew out his own envelope, the seal unbroken, found inside
it his own letter, and inside that the Mahatma's answer in the script familiar
to him, written on a sheet of green paper, such as he had not had in the
house.
Through her agency the portrait of the Rev. W. Stainton Moses was
precipitated on satin. It was a distinct likeness, and the head was rayed around
with spiculae of light. It was surrounded with rolling clouds of vapor, his
astral vehicle.
Olcott, Judge and a Dr. Marquette one evening asked her
to produce the portrait of a particular Hindu Yogi on some stationery of the
Lotus Club that the Colonel had brought home that same evening. She scraped some
lead from a pencil on a half sheet of the paper, laid the other half-sheet over
it, placed them between her hands, and showed the result. The likeness to the
original could not be verified, but it was pronounced by Le Clear, the noted
portrait painter, to be one "that no living artist within his knowledge could
have produced."
Once Col. Olcott desired a picture of his Guru, or Hindu
teacher, as yet unseen by him, and Madame essayed to have
77
it
painted through the hand of a French artist, M. Herisse. The artist's only
instructions were that his subject was a Hindu. Madame concentrated, and he
painted. The features, finished in an hour, were afterwards vouched for by Col.
Olcott as being the likeness of his Guru, whom he met years later.
The
Colonel testified to having seen Madame Blavatsky's astral form in a New York
street while she was in Philadelphia; also that of a friend of his then in the
South; again that of one of the Adepts, then in Asia, in an American railway
train and on a steamboat. He stated that he took from the hand of another
Mahatma at Jummu a telegram from H.P.B.31 who was in Madras, the messenger
vanishing a moment later; and that he, H.P.B. and Damodar, a young Hindu devotee
of hers, were greeted by one of these Teachers one evening in India. But the
occurrence of this kind which he regarded as the most striking, affecting as it
did his whole future career, happened at the close of one of his busy days, when
his evening's toil with the composition of Isis was finished. He had
retired to his own room and was reading, the room door locked. Suddenly he
perceived a white radiance at his side and turning saw towering above him the
great stature of an Oriental, clad in white garments and wearing a head-cloth of
amber-striped fabric, hand-embroidered in yellow floss silk.
"Long raven
hair hung from under his turban to the shoulders; his black beard, parted
vertically on the chin in the Rajput fashion, was twisted up at the ends and
carried over the ears; his eyes were alive with soul-fire; eyes which were at
once benignant and piercing in glance; the eyes of a mentor and judge, but
softened by the love of a father who gazes on a son needing counsel and
guidance. He was so grand a man, so imbued with the majesty of moral strength,
so luminously spiritual, so evidently above average humanity, that I felt
abashed in his presence, and bowed my head and bent my knee as one does before a
god or a god-like personage. A hand was laid lightly on my head, a sweet though
strong voice bade me be
______________
31 Theosophists are so much in the
habit of referring to their leader by her three initials that we may be pardoned
for falling into the same convenient usage at times.
78
seated,
and when I raised my eyes the Presence was seated in the other chair beyond the
table. He told me that he had come at the crisis when I needed him; that my
actions had brought me to this point; that it lay with me alone whether he and I
should meet often in this life as coworkers for the good of mankind; that a
great work was to be done for humanity and I had the right to share in it if I
wished; that a mysterious tie, not now to be explained to me, had drawn my
colleague and myself together; a tie which could not be broken, however strained
it might be at times."32
Then he arose and reading the Colonel's sudden
but unexpressed wish that he might leave behind him some token of his visit, he
untwisted the fehta from his head, laid it on the table, saluted benignantly and
was gone.
Many a time, according to the Colonel's version, they were
regaled with most exquisite music, or single bell sounds, coming from anywhere
in the room and softly dying away.
Olcott tells of the deposit of one
thousand dollars to his bank account by a person described by the bank clerk as
a Hindu, while he (Olcott) was absent from the city for two months on business
which he had undertaken at the behest of the Master through H.P.B. He had told
her that his errand would cost him about five hundred dollars per month through
his neglect of his business for the time.
In 1878 the Countess Paschkoff
brought to light an adventure which she had had years before while traveling
with Madame Blavatsky in the Libanus. The two women encountered each other in
the desert and camped together one night near the river Orontes. Nearby stood a
great monument on the border of the village. The Countess asked Madame to tell
her the history of the monument. At night the thaumaturgist built a fire, drew a
circle about it and repeated several "spells." Soon balls of white flame
appeared on the monument, then from a cloud of vapor emerged the spirit of the
person to whom it had been dedicated. "Who are you?" asked the woman. "I am
Hiero, one of the priests of the temple," said the voice of the
spirit.
______________
22 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p.
380.
79
He then showed them the temple in the midst of a vast
city. Then the image vanished and the priest with it.
To round out the
story of her phenomena it is necessary to relate with the utmost brevity the
incidents of the kind that transpired from the time of the departure from
America to India at the end of 1878 until the latter days of her life. This
narrative will include occurrences taking place in India, France, Germany, and
England.
It was in India that the so-called Mahatma Letters were
precipitated, upon which the basic structure of Theosophy is seen to rest. Mr.
A. P. Sinnett, British journalist, editor of "The Pioneer," living in India, is
the main authority for the events of the Indian period in Madame Blavatsky's
life.
During the first visit of six weeks to Mr. Sinnett's home at
Allahabad there were comparatively few incidents, apart from raps. A convincing
exploit of her power was granted, however, for one evening while the party was
sitting in the large hall of the house of the Maharajah of Vizianagaram at
Benares, three or four large cut roses fell from the ceiling. The ceiling was
bare and the room well lighted.
About the beginning of September 1880 she
visited the Sinnetts at their home in Simla. Here some more striking incidents
took place. During an evening walk with Mrs. Sinnett to a neighboring hilltop,
Madame, in response to a suddenly-expressed wish of her companion, obtained for
her a little note from one of the "Brothers." Madame had torn off a blank corner
of a sheet of a letter received that day and held it in her hand for the
Master's use. It disappeared. Then Mrs. Sinnett was asked where she would like
the paper to reappear. She whimsically pointed up into a tree a little to one
side. Clambering up into the branches she found the same little corner of pink
paper sticking on a sharp twig, now containing a brief message and signed by
some Tibetan characters.
A little later the most spectacular of the
marvels said to have been performed by the "Messenger of the Great White
Brotherhood" took place. A picnic party to the woods some miles distant was
planned one morning and six persons
80
prepared to set off.
Lunches were packed for six, but a seventh person unexpectedly joined the group
at the moment of departure. As the luncheon was unpacked for the noontide meal,
there was a shortage of a coffee cup and saucer. Some one laughingly suggested
that Madame should materialize an extra set. Madame Blavatsky held a moment's
mental communication with one of her distant Brothers and then indicated a
particular spot, covered with grass, weeds, and shrubbery. A gentleman of the
party, with a knife, undertook to dig at the spot. A little persistence brought
him shortly to the rim of a white object, which proved to be a cup, and close to
it was a saucer, both of the design matching the other six brought along from
the Sinnett cupboard. The plant roots around the China pieces were manifestly
undisturbed by recent digging such as would have been necessary if they had been
"planted" in anticipation of their being needed. Moreover, when the party
reached home and Mrs. Sinnett counted their supply of cups and saucers of that
design, the new ones were found to be additional to their previous stock. And
none of that design could have been purchased in Simla.33
Before this
same party had disbanded it was permitted to witness another feat of equal
strangeness. The gentleman who had dug up the buried pottery was so impressed
that he decided then and there to join the Theosophical Society. As Col. Olcott,
President of the Society, was in the party, all that was needed was the usual
parchment diploma. Madame Blavatsky agreed to ask the Master to produce such a
document for them. In a moment all were told to search in the underbrush. It was
soon found and used in the induction ceremony.
This eventful picnic
brought forth still another wonder.
______________
33 Mr. Sinnett devotes
some pages of his little volume, The Occult World, to a critical
examination of every conceivable possibility of this incident's being other than
it ostensibly was, and he is unable to find a loophole for the admission of any
theory of deception. All the witnesses to the event made affidavit to the effect
of its evident genuineness. The reader is referred to his analysis of the case,
to be found on pages 64-71 in the work just mentioned. For close scrutiny of the
other events of the same period the same volume should be
consulted.
81
Every one of the water bottles brought along had
been emptied when the need for more coffee arose. The water in a neighborhood
stream was unfit. A servant, sent across the fields to obtain some at a brewery,
stupidly returned without any. In the dilemma Madame Blavatsky took one of the
empty bottles, placed it in one of the baskets, and in a moment took it out
filled with good water.
Some days later the famous "brooch" incident
occurred. The Sinnett party had gone up the hill to spend an evening with Mr.
and Mrs. A. O. Hume, who were likewise much interested in the Blavatskian
theories. Eleven persons were seated around the table and some one hinted at the
possibility of a psychic exploit. Madame appeared disinclined, but suddenly gave
a sign that the Master was himself present. Then she asked Mrs. Hume if there
was anything in particular that she wished to have. Mrs. Hume thought of an old
brooch which her mother had given her long ago and which had been lost. Neither
she nor Mr. Hume had thought of it for years. She described it, saying it
contained a lock of hair. The party was told to search for it in the garden at a
certain spot; and there it was found. Mrs. Hume testified that it was the lost
brooch, or one indistinguishable from it.
According to the statements of
Alice Gordon, a visitor at the Sinnett home, Madame Blavatsky rolled a
cigarette, and projected it ethereally to the house of a Mrs. O'Meara in another
part of Simla, in advance of Miss Gordon's going thither. To identify it she
tore off a small corner of the wrapper jaggedly, and gave it to Miss Gordon. The
latter found it at the other home and the corner piece matched.
Captain
P. J. Maitland recites a "cigarette" incident which occurred in Mr. Sinnett's
drawing room. Madame took two cigarette papers, with a pencil drew several
parallel lines clear across the face of both, then tore off across these lines a
piece of the end of each paper and handed the short end pieces to Captain
Maitland; then she rolled cigarettes out of the two larger portions, moistened
them on her tongue, and caused them to disappear from her hands. The Captain was
told he would find one on the piano and the other on a
82
bracket.
He found them there, still moist along the "seam," and unrolling them found that
the ragged edges of the torn sections and the pencil lines exactly
matched.
Some days later came the "pillow incident." Mr. Sinnett had the
impression that he had been in communication with the Master one night. During
the course of an outing to a nearby hill the following day, Madame Blavatsky
turned to him (he had not mentioned his experience to her) and asked him where
he would like some evidence of the Master's visit to him to appear. Thinking to
choose a most unlikely place, he thought of the inside of a cushion against
which one of the ladies was leaning. Then he changed to another. Cutting the
latter open, they found among the feathers, inside two cloth casings, a little
note in the now familiar Mahatma script, in the writing on which were the
phrases--"the difficulty you spoke of last night" and "corresponding
through--pillows!" While he was reading this his wife discovered a brooch in the
feathers. It was one which she had left at home.
Perhaps it was these
cigarette feats which assured Madame Blavatsky that she now had sufficient power
to dispatch a long letter to her Mahatma mentors. Mr. Sinnett first suggested
the idea to her, and her success in that first attempt was the beginning of one
of the most eventful and unique correspondences in the world's history. It began
his exchange of letters with the Master Koot Hoomi Lal Singh (abbreviated
usually to K.H.), on which Theosophy so largely rests.
On several
telegrams received by Mr. Sinnett were snatches of writing in K.H.'s hand
speaking of events that transpired after the telegram had been sent. Replies
were received a number of times in less time than it would have taken Madame
Blavatsky to write them (instantaneously in a few cases), yet they dealt in
specific detail with the material in his own missives. More than once his
unexpressed doubts and queries were treated. In many cases his own letter in a
sealed envelope would remain in sight and within a very short interval (thirty
seconds in one instance) be found to contain the distant Master's reply, folded
in-
83
side his own sheets, with an appropriate answer,--the seal
not even having been broken. Sometimes he would place his letter in plain view
on the table, and shortly it would be gone. For a time when the Master K.H. was
called away to other business, Mr. Sinnett continued to receive communications
from the brother Adept, Master Morya, while Madame Blavatsky was hundreds of
miles away. They continued in the distant absence of both H.P.B. and Col.
Olcott. And not only were such letters received by Mr. Sinnett, and Mr. Hume,
but by other persons as well. The list includes Damodar K. Mavalankar;
Ramaswamy, an educated English-speaking native of Southern India in Government
service; Dharbagiri Nath; Mohini Chatterji; and Bhavani Rao. Dr. Hübbe-Schleiden
received a missive of the kind later on a railway train in Germany. Mr. Sinnett
would frequently find the letters on the inside of his locked desk drawers or
would see them drop upon his desk. Their production was attended with all manner
of remarkable circumstances.
Then there was the notable episode of the
transmission by the Master of a mental message to a Mr. Eglinton, a
Spiritualist, on board a vessel, the Vega, far out at sea, and the instantaneous
transmission of the letter's response, written on board ship, to some of his
friends in India, the whole thing done in accordance with an arrangement made by
letter to Mr. Sinnett by the Adept two days before. This incident has a certain
importance from the fact that the Master had said in the preliminary letter that
he would visit Mr. Eglinton on the ship on a certain night, impress him with the
untenability of the general Spiritualistic hypothesis regarding communications,
and if possible lead him to a change of mind on the point. Mr. Eglinton's reply
recorded the visit of the Mahatma on the ship and admitted the desirability of a
change to the Theosophic theory of the existence of the Brothers.
An
interesting chapter of events in the sojourn of the two Theosophic leaders in
India is that of the thousands of healings made by Col. Olcott, who states that
he was given
84
the power by the Overlords of his activities for a
limited time with a special object in view. He is said to have cured some eight
thousand Hindus of various ailments by a sort of "laying on of hands." Like
Christ he felt "virtue" go out of his body until exhaustion ensued; and he
stated that he was instructed to recharge his nervous depletion by sitting with
his back against the base of a pine tree.
In 1885 Madame Blavatsky
herself experienced the healing touch of her Masters when she was ordered to
meet them in the flesh north of Darjeeling. Going north on this errand, she was
in the utmost despondency and near the point of death. After two days spent with
the Adepts she emerged with physical health and morale restored, her dynamic
self once more.
The last sheaf of "miracles" takes us from India to
France, Germany, Belgium, and England. In Paris, in 1884, her rooms were the
resort of many people who came if haply they might get sight of a marvel, her
thaumaturgic fame being now world-wide. A Prof. Thurmann reported that in his
presence she filled the air of the room with musical sounds, from a variety of
instruments. She demonstrated that darkness was not necessary for such
manifestations.
Madame Jelihowsky is authority for the account of the
appearance and disappearance of her sister's picture in a medallion containing
only the small photograph of K.H.
A most baffling display of Madame's
gifts took place in the reception room of the Paris Theosophical Society on the
morning of June 11th, 1884. Madame Jelihowsky, Col. Olcott, W. Q. Judge, V.
Solovyoff and two others were present and attested the bona fide nature
of the incident in a public letter. In sight of all a servant took a letter from
the postman and brought it directly to Madame Jelihowsky. It was addressed to a
lady, a relative of Madame Blavatsky, who was then visiting her, and came from
another relative in Russia. Madame Blavatsky, seeing that it was a family
letter, remarked that she would like to know its contents. Her sister ventured
the suggestion that she read it before it was opened. Helena held the letter
against her forehead and proceeded to
85
read aloud and then write
down what she said were the contents. Then, to demonstrate her power further,
she declared that she would underscore her own name, wherever it occurred
within the letter, in red crayon, and would precipitate in red a double
interlaced triangle, or "Solomon's Seal," beneath the signature. When the
addressee opened the letter, not only was H.P.B.'s version of its contents
correct to the word, but the underscoring of her name and the monogram in red
were found, and oddly enough, the wavering in several of the straight lines in
the triangle, as drawn first by Madame Blavatsky outside the letter, were
precisely matched by the red triangle inside. Postmarks indicated it had
actually come from Russia.34
While at Elberfeld, Germany, with her
hospitable benefactress, Madame Gebhard, some of the usual manifestations were
in evidence. Mr. Rudolph Gebhard, a son, recounts several of them. One was the
receipt of a letter from one of the Masters, giving intelligence about an absent
member of the household, found to be correct.
The Countess Constance
Wachtmeister, who became Madame Blavatsky's guardian angel, domestically
speaking, during the years of the composition of The Secret Doctrine in
Germany and Belgium, has printed her account of a number of extraordinary
occurrences of the period. She speaks of a succession of raps in H.P.B.'s
sleeping room when there was special need of her Guardians' care. She also tells
of the thrice-relighted lamp at the sleeper's bedside, she herself having twice
extinguished it. She tells of her receiving a letter from the Master, inside the
store-wrapper of a bar of soap which she had just purchased at a drug
store.
______________
34 Vlesevold Solovyoff, who afterwards sought to
discredit Madame Blavatsky's genuine status, himself witnessed this scene. In
fact he wrote out his own statement of the occurrence and sent it for
publication to the St. Petersburg Rebus, which printed it on July 1,
1884, over his signature. He closes that account with the following paragraph:
"The circumstances under which the phenomenon occurred in its smallest details,
carefully checked by myself, do not leave in me the smallest doubt as to its
genuineness and reality. Deception or fraud in this particular case are really
out of the question."
86
It was under the Countess Wachtmeister's
notice that there occurred the last of Madame Blavatsky's "miraculous"
restorations to health. She had suffered for years from a dropsical or renal
affection, which in those latter days had progressed to such an alarming stage
that her highly competent physicians at one crisis were convinced that she could
not survive a certain night. The great work she was writing was far from
completed; the Countess was heart-broken to think that, after all, that heroic
career was to be cut off just before the consummation of its labors for
humanity; and she spent the night in grief and despair. Arising in the morning
she found Madame at her desk, busy as before at her task. She had been
revivified and restored during the night, and would not say how.
The
Countess records the occasion of an intercession of the Masters in her own
affairs, on behalf of their messenger. At her home in Sweden, while she was
packing her trunks in preparation for a journey to some relatives in Italy, she
clairaudiently heard a voice, which told her to place in her trunk a certain
note-book of her containing notes on the Bohemian Tarot and the Kabala. It was
not a printed volume but a collection of quotations from the above works in her
own hand. Surprised, and not knowing the possible significance of the order, she
nevertheless complied. Before reaching Italy she suddenly changed her plans, and
postponed the trip to Italy and visited Madame Blavatsky in Belgium instead.
Upon arriving and shortly after greeting her beloved friend, she was startled to
hear Madame say to her that her Master had informed her that her guest was
bringing her a book dealing with the Tarot and the Kabala, of which she was to
make use in the writing of The Secret Doctrine.
This must end, but
does not by any means complete, the chronicle of "the Blavatsky phenomena." The
list, long as it has become, is but a fragment of the whole. Without the
narration of these phenomena an adequate impression of the personality and the
legend back of them could not be given. Moreover they belong in any study of
Theosophy, and their
87
significance in relation to the principles
of the cult is perhaps far other than casual or incidental. If her own display
of such powers was made as a demonstration of what man is destined to become
capable of achieving in his interior evolution, these things are to be regarded
as an integral part of her message. They became, apparently in spite of herself,
a part of her program and furnished a considerable impetus toward its
advancement. Theosophy itself re-publishes the theory of man's inherent theurgic
capacity. It can hardly be taken as an anomaly or as an irrelevant circumstance,
then, that its founder should have been regarded as exemplifying the possession
of that capacity in her own person.
88
CHAPTER IV
FROM
SPIRITUALISM TO THEOSOPHY
Nothing seems more certain than that Madame
Blavatsky had no definite idea of what the finished product was to be when she
gave the initial impulse to the movement. She knew the general direction in
which it would have to move and also many objectives which it would have to
seek. In her mind there had been assembled a body of material of a unique sort.
She had spent many years of her novitiate in moving from continent to continent1
in search of data having to do with a widespread tradition as to the existence
of a hidden knowledge and secret cultivation of man's higher psychic and
spiritual capabilities. Supposedly the wielder of unusual abilities in this
line, she was driven by the very character of her endowment to seek for the
deeper science which pertained to the evolution of such gifts, and at the same
time a philosophy of life in general which would explain their hidden
significance. To establish, first, the reality of such phenomena, and then to
construct a system that would furnish the possibility of understanding this
mystifying segment of experience, was unquestionably the main drive of her
mental interests in early middle life. Already well equipped to be the exponent
of the higher psychological and theurgic science, she aimed to become its
philosophic expounder.
But the philosophy Madame Blavatsky was to give
forth could not be oriented with the science of the universe as then generally
conceived. To make her message intelligible she was forced to reconstruct the
whole picture of the cosmos. She had to frame a universe in which her
doctrine
______________
1 It seems that she had been in Peru and Brazil in
1857, according to her later statement to A. P. Sinnett as found on page 154 of
the Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett. A sentence in Vol. I, of
Isis Unveiled makes mention of her personal knowledge of great
underground labyrinths in Peru.
89
would be seen to have relevance
and into whose total order it would fall with perfect articulation. She felt
sure that she had in her possession an array of vital facts, but she could not
at once discern the total implication of those facts for the cosmos which
explained them, and which in turn they tended to explain. We may feel certain
that her ideas grow more systematic from stage to stage, whether indeed they
were the product of her own unaided intellect, or whether she but transcribed
the knowledge and wisdom of more learned living men, the Mahatmas, as the
Theosophic legend has it.
Guided by the character of the situation in
which she found herself, and also, it seems, by the advice of her Master, she
chose to ride into her new venture upon the crest of the Spiritualist waves.
America was chosen to be the hatching center of Theosophy because it was at the
time the heart and center of the Spiritualist movement. It was felt that
Theosophy would elicit a quick response from persons already imbued with
spiritistic ideas. It cannot be disputed that Madame Blavatsky and Col. Olcott
worked with the Spiritualists for a brief period and launched the Society from
within the ranks of the cult. As a matter of fact it was the work of this pair
of Theosophists that gave Spiritualism a fresh impetus in this country after a
period of waning interest about 1874. Col. Olcott's letters in the Daily
Graphic about the Eddy phenomena, and his book, People From the Other
World, did much to revive popular discussion, and his colleague's show of
new manifestations was giving encouragement to Spiritualists. But the Russian
noblewoman suddenly disappointed the expectations thus engendered by assigning a
different interpretation and much lower value to the phenomena. Before this she
and Col. Olcott not only lent moral support to a leading Spiritualist journal,
The Spiritual Scientist, of Boston, edited by Mr. E. Gerry Brown, but
contributed its leading editorials and even advanced it funds.
The motive
behind their participation in a movement which they so soon abandoned has been
misconstrued.
90
Spiritualists, and the public generally, assumed
that of course their activity indicated that they subscribed to the usual tenets
of the sect; that they accepted the phenomena for what they purported to be,
i.e., actual communications in all cases from the spirits of former human
beings. However true this estimate may have been as appertaining to Col.
Olcott--and even to him it had a fast diminishing applicability after his
meeting with H.P.B.--it was certainly not true of her. Madame Blavatsky shortly
became the mark of Spiritualistic attack for the falsification of her original
attitude toward the movement and her presumed betrayal of the cause.
Her
ill-timed attempt to launch her Société Spirite at Cairo in 1871 foreshadowed
her true spirit and motive in this activity. It is evident to the student of her
life that she felt a contempt for the banal type of séance phenomena. She so
expressed herself in writing from Cairo at the time. She felt that while these
things were real and largely genuine, they were insignificant in the view that
took in a larger field of psychic power. But the higher phenomena of that more
important science were known to few, whereas she was constantly encountering
interest in the other type. If she was to introduce a nobler psychism to the
world, she seemed driven to resort to the method of picking up people who were
absorbed in the lower modes of the spiritual science and leading them on into
the higher. She would gather a nucleus of the best Spiritualists and go forward
with them to the higher Spiritualism. To win their confidence in herself, it was
necessary for her to start at their level, to make a gesture of friendliness
toward their work and a show of interest in it.
Her own words may bring
light to the situation:
"As it is I have only done my duty; first, toward
Spiritualism, that I have defended as well as I could from the attacks of
imposture under the too transparent mask of science; then towards two helpless
slandered mediums [the Holmeses]. . . . But I am obliged to confess that I
really do not believe in having done any good--to Spiritualism itself. . . . It
is with a profound sadness in
91
my heart that I acknowledge this
fact, for I begin to think there is no help for it. For over fifteen years have
I fought my battle for the blessed truth; have traveled and preached it--though
I never was born for a lecturer--from the snow-covered tops of the Caucasian
Mountains, as well as from the sandy valleys of the Nile. I have proved the
truth of it practically and by persuasion. For the sake of Spiritualism2 I have
left my home, an easy life amongst a civilized society, and have become a
wanderer upon the face of the earth. I had already seen my hopes realized,
beyond my most sanguine expectations, when my unlucky star brought me to
America. Knowing this country to be the cradle of modern Spiritualism, I came
over here from France with feelings not unlike those of a Mohammedan approaching
the birthplace of his Prophet."3
After her death Col. Olcott found among
her papers a memorandum in her hand entitled "Important Note." In it she
wrote:
"Yes, I am sorry to say that I had to identify myself,
during that shameful exposure of the Holmes mediums, with the Spiritualists. I
had to save the situation, for I was sent from Paris to America on purpose to
prove the phenomena and their reality, and show the fallacy of the
spiritualistic theory of spirits. But how could I do it best? I did not want
people at large to know that I could produce the same thing at will. I
had received orders to the contrary, and yet I had to keep alive the reality,
the genuineness and the possibility of such phenomena in the hearts of
those who from Materialists had turned Spiritualists, but now, owing to the
exposure of several mediums, fell back again and returned to their scepticism. .
. . Did I do wrong? The world is not prepared yet to understand the philosophy
of Occult Science; let them first assure themselves that there are beings in an
invisible world, whether 'spirits' of the dead or elementals; and that there are
hidden powers in man which are capable of making a god of him on
earth."
"When I am dead and gone people will, perhaps, appreciate my
disinterested motives. I have pledged my word to help people on to Truth while
living and I will keep my word. Let them abuse
______________
2 Not
assuredly of the séance-room type. She is obviously using the term here in the
wider sense that it came to have in her larger Theosophic system, as expounded
in this chapter.
3 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p.
12.
92
and revile me; let some call me a medium and a
Spiritualist, others an impostor. The day will come when posterity will learn to
know me better."4
As long as it was a question of the actuality of the
phenomena, she was alert in defence of Spiritualism. In the Daily Graphic
of November. 13, 1874, she printed one of her very first newspaper contributions
in America, replying to an attack of a Dr. George M. Beard, an electropathic
physician of New York, on the validity of the Eddy phenomena. She went so far in
this article as to wager five hundred dollars that he could not make good his
boast that he could imitate the form-apparitions "with three dollars' worth of
drapery." She refers to herself as a Spiritualist. In her first letter to Co.
Olcott after leaving Vermont she wrote as follows:
"I speak to you as a
true friend to yourself and as a Spiritualist anxious to save Spiritualism from
a danger."5
A little later she even mentioned to her friend that the
outburst of mediumistic phenomena had been caused by the Brotherhood of Adepts
as an evolutionary agency. She could, of course, not believe the whole trend
maleficent if it was in the slightest degree engineered by her trusted
Confederates. She added later, however, that the Master soon realized the
impracticability of using the Spiritualistic movement as a channel for the
dissemination of the deeper occult science and instructed her to cease her
advocacy of it.
Along with her reply and challenge to Beard in the
Graphic there was printed an outline of her biography from notes
furnished by herself. In it she says:
"In 1858 I returned to Paris and
made the acquaintance of Daniel Home, the Spiritualist. . . . Home converted me
to Spiritualism. . . . After this I went to Russia. I converted my father to
Spiritualism."
Elsewhere she speaks of Spiritualism as "our belief" and
"our cause." In an article in the Spiritual Scientist of
March
______________
4 Ibid., p. 13.
5 Ibid., p.
68.
93
eighth she uses the phrases "the divine truth of our faith
(Spiritualism) and the teachings of our invisible guardians (the spirits of the
circles)."
Madame Blavatsky's apparently double-faced attitude toward
Spiritualism is reflected in the posture of most Theosophists toward the same
subject today. When Spiritualism, as a demonstration of the possibility and
actuality of spiritistic phenomena, is attacked by materialists or unbelievers,
they at once bristle in its defense; when it is a question of the reliability
and value of the messages, or the dignity and wholesomeness of the séance
procedure, they respond negatively.
It is the opinion of some Theosophic
leaders, like Sinnett and Olcott, that Madame Blavatsky made a mistake in
affiliating herself actively with Spiritualism, inasmuch as the early group of
Spiritualistic members of her Theosophic Society, as soon as they were apprised
of her true attitude, fell away, and the incipient movement was beset with much
ill-feeling.
The controversy between the two schools is important, since
Madame Blavatsky's dissent from Spiritualistic theory gave rise to her first
attempts to formulate Theosophy. To justify her defection from the movement she
was led to enunciate at least some of the major postulates and principles of her
higher science. Theosophy was born in this labor. It is necessary, therefore, to
go into the issues involved in the perennial controversy.
To
Spiritualists the phenomena which purported to be communications from the
still-living spirits of former human beings with those on the earth plane, were
assumed to be genuinely what they seemed. As such they were believed to be far
the most significant data in man's religious life, as furnishing a practically
irrefutable demonstration of the truth of the soul's immortality. They were
regarded as the central fact in any attempt to formulate an adequate religious
philosophy. Spiritualists therefore elevated this assumption to the place of
supreme importance and made everything else secondary.
Not so Madame
Blavatsky. To her the Spiritistic phe-
94
nomena were but a meagre
part of a larger whole. Furthermore--and this was her chief point of
divergence,--she vigorously protested their being what Spiritualists asserted
them to be. They were not at all genuine messages from genuine spirits of earth
people--or were not so in the vast majority of cases. And besides, they were not
any more "divine" or "spiritual" than ordinary human utterances, and were even
in large part impish and elfin, when not downright demoniacal. They were mostly,
she said, the mere "shells" or wraiths of the dead, animated not by their former
souls but by sprightly roving nature-spirits or elementals, if nothing
worse,--such, for instance, as the lowest and most besotted type of human spirit
that was held close to earth by fiendish sensuality or hate. There were plenty
of these, she affirmed, in the lower astral plane watching for opportunities to
vampirize negative human beings. The souls of average well-meaning or of saintly
people are not within human reach in the séance. They have gone on into realms
of higher purity, more etherealized being, and can not easily descend into the
heavy atmosphere of the near-earth plane to give messages about that investment
or that journey westward or that health condition that needs attention. At best
it is only on rare and exceptional occasions that the real intelligence of a
disembodied mortal comes "through." There are many types of living entities in
various realms of nature, other than human souls. Certain of these rove the
astral plane and take pleasure in playing upon gullible people who sit gravely
in the dark. Most of the occurrences at circles are so much astral plane
rubbish; and, besides, séance-mongering is dangerous to all concerned and
eventually ruinous to the medium. If the mediums, she bantered, were really in
the hands of benevolent "guides" and "controls," why do not the latter shield
their protégés from the wrecked health and insanity so frequent among them? She
affirmed that she had never seen a medium who had not developed scrofula or a
phthisical affection.6
______________
6 Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten,
herself a medium and among the foremost Spiritualists of her day--also a charter
member of the Theosophical Society--made
95
Inevitably the
Spiritualists were stunned by their one-time champion's sudden and amazed
reversal of her position. A campaign of abuse and condemnation began in their
ranks, echoes of which are still heard at times.
What Madame Blavatsky
aimed to do was to teach that the phenomena of true Spiritualism bore not the
faintest resemblance to those of table-tipping. True Spiritualism should
envisage the phenomena of the divine spirit of man in their higher
manifestations, the cultivation of which by the ancients and the East has given
man his most sacred science and most vital knowledge. She wrote in a letter to
her sister about 1875 that one of the purposes of her new Society was "to show
certain fallacies of the Spiritualist. If we are anything we are Spiritualists,
only not in the modern American fashion, but in that of the ancient Alexandria
with its Theodidaktoi, Hypatias and Porphyries."7 In one of the letters of
Mahatma K.H. to A. P. Sinnett the Master writes:
"It was H.P.B. who,
acting under the orders of Atrya (one whom you do not know) was the first to
explain in the 'Spiritualist' the difference between psyche and nous, nefesh and
ruach--Soul and Spirit. She had to bring the whole arsenal of proofs with her
quotations from Paul to Plato, from Plutarch and James before the Spiritualists
admitted that the Theosophists were right."8
In 1879 she wrote in the
magazine which she had just founded in India:
"We can never know how much
of the mediumistic phenomena we must attribute to the disembodied until it is
settled how much can be done by the embodied human soul, and to blind but
active powers at work within those regions which are yet unexplored by
science."9
In other words Spiritualism should be a culture of the spirits
of the living, not a commerce with the souls of the dead.
To
______________
a statement to the same effect to Col. Olcott in 1875.
See Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 83.
7 Quoted in William
Kingsland's The Real H. P. Blavatsky (J. M. Watkins, London, 1928), p.
123.
8 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (New York, Frederick A.
Stokes Co., 1924), p. 289.
9 The Theosophist, Vol. I,
1879.
96
live the life of the immortal spirit while here in the
body is true Spiritualism. We can readily see that with such a purpose in mind
she would not be long in discerning that the Spiritualistic enterprise could not
be used to promulgate the type of spiritual philosophy that she had learned in
the East.
When this conclusion had fully ripened in her mind, she began
the undisguised formulation of her own independent teaching. Her new philosophy
was in effect tantamount to an attack on Spiritualism, and that from a quarter
from which Spiritualism was not prepared to repulse an assault. It came not from
the old arch-enemy, materialistic scepticism, but from a source which admitted
the authenticity of the phenomena.
Her first aim was to set forth the
misconceptions under which the Spiritualists labored. She says:
"We
believe that few of those physical phenomena which are genuine are caused by
disembodied human spirits."10
Again she
"ventures the prediction
that unless Spiritualists set about the study of ancient philosophy so as to
learn to discriminate between spirits and to guard themselves against the baser
sort, twenty-five years will not elapse before they will have to fly to the
Romish communion to escape these 'guides' and 'controls' that they have fondled
so long. The signs of this catastrophe already exhibit
themselves."11
Again she declares that
"it is not mediums, real,
true and genuine mediums, that we would ever blame, but their patrons, the
Spiritualists."12
In Isis Unveiled she rebukes Spiritualists for
claiming that the Bible is full of phenomena just like those of modern mediums.
She asserts that there were Spiritualistic phenomena in the Bible, but not
mediumistic,--a distinction of great import to her. She declares that the
ancients could
______________
10 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p.
13.
11 Ibid., p. 53.
12 Ibid., p.
489.
97
tell the difference between mediums who harbored good
spirits and those haunted by evil ones, and branded the latter type unclean,
while reverencing the former. She positively asserts that
"pure spirits
will not and cannot show themselves objectively; those that do are not pure
spirits, but elementary and impure. Woe to the medium that falls a prey to
such!"13
Col. Olcott quotes her as writing:
"Spiritualism in the
hands of an Adept becomes Magic, for he is learned in the art of blending
together the laws of the universe without breaking any of them. . . . In the
hands of an inexperienced medium Spiritualism becomes unconscious
sorcery, for . . . he opens, unknown to himself, a door of communication
between the two worlds through which emerges the blind forces of nature lurking
in the Astral Light, as well as good and bad spirits."14
In The Key to
Theosophy15 written near the end of her life, she states what may be assumed
to be the official Theosophic attitude on the subject:
"We assert that
the spirits of the dead cannot return to earth--save in rare and exceptional
cases--nor do they communicate with men except by entirely subjective means.
That which does appear objectively is often the phantom of the ex-physical man.
But in psychic and, so to say, 'spiritual' Spiritualism we do believe most
decidedly."16
One of her most vigorous expressions upon this issue occurs
toward the end of Isis.
______________
13 Ibid., Vol. II, p.
586.
14 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 110.
15 Page
27.
16 That H. P. B. was by no means alone in predicating the existence
of other than human spirits denizening the astral world is shown by Col. Olcott,
who (Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 438), cites Mrs. Britten's statement
printed in an article in The Banner of Light, as follows: "I know of the
existence of other than human spirits and have seen apparitions of spiritual or
elementary existences evoked by cabalistic words and
practices."
According to Olcott the Hon. A. Aksakoff, eminent Russian
Professor, states that "Prince A. Dolgorouki, the great authority on mesmerism,
has written me that he has ascertained that spirits which play the most
prominent part at séances are elementaries,--gnomes, etc. His clairvoyants have
seen them and describe them thus."
98
"The totally insufficient
theory of the constant agency of disembodied human spirits in the production of
Spiritualistic phenomena has been the bane of the Cause. A thousand mortifying
rebuffs have failed to open their reason or intuition to the truth. Ignoring the
teachings of the past, they have discovered no substitute. We offer them
philosophical deduction instead of unverifiable hypothesis, scientific analysis
and demonstration instead of indiscriminating faith. Occult philosophy gives
them the means of meeting the reasonable requirements of science, and frees them
from the humiliating necessity to accept the oracular teachings of
'intelligences' which, as a rule, have less intelligence than a child at school.
So based and so strengthened, modern phenomena would be in a position to command
the attention and enforce the respect of those who carry with them public
opinion. Without invoking such help Spiritualism must continue to vegetate,
equally repulsed--not without cause--both by science and theologians. In its
modern aspect it is neither science, a religion nor a philosophy."17
In
1876, the writing of Isis was committing her to a stand which made
further compromise with Spiritualism impossible. Her statement reveals what she
would ostensibly have labored to do for that movement had it shown itself more
plastic in her hands. She would have striven to buttress the phenomena with a
more historical interpretation and a more respectable rationale.
In this
context, however, the following passage from Isis is a bit difficult to
understand. It seems to make a gesture of conciliation toward the Spiritualistic
hypothesis after all. She says:
"We are far from believing that all the
spirits that communicate at circles are of the classes called 'Elemental' and
'Elementary.' Many--especially among those who control the medium subjectively
to speak, write and otherwise act in various ways--are human disembodied
spirits. Whether the majority of such spirits are good or bad, largely depends
on the private morality of the medium, much on the circle present, and a good
deal on the intensity and object of their purpose. . . . But in any case, human
spirits can never materialize themselves in propria
persona."18
______________
17 Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 636. 18
Ibid., Vol. I, p. 67
99
If this seems a recession from her
consistent position elsewhere assumed, it must be remembered that she never,
before or after, denied the possibility of the occasional descent of genuinely
human spirits "in rare and exceptional cases."
Before 1875 she wrote to
her sister that there was a law that sporadically, though periodically, the
souls of the dead invade the realms of the living in an epidemic, and the
intensity of the epidemic depends on the welcome they receive. She called it
"the law of forced post-mortem assimilation." She elsewhere clarified this idea
by the statement that our spirits here and now, being of kindred nature with the
totality of spirit energy about us, unconsciously draw certain vibrations or
currents from the life of the supermundane entities, whether we know it or not.
Through this wireless circuit we sometimes drink in emanations, radiations,
thought effluvia, so to speak, from the disembodied lives. The veil, she
affirmed, between the two worlds is so thin that unsuspected messages are
constantly passing across the divide, which is not spatial but only a
discrepancy in receiving sets. And both she and the Master K.H. stated that
during normal sleep we are en rapport with our loved ones as much as our
hearts could desire. The reason we do not ordinarily know it is that the rate
and wave length of that celestial communication can not be registered on the
clumsy apparatus of our brains. It takes place through our astral or spiritual
brains and can not arouse the coarser physical brain to synchronous
vibration.
Her critique of the Spiritualistic thesis in general would be
that something like ninety per cent of all ordinary "spirit" messages contain
nothing to which the quality of spirituality, as we understand that term in its
best significance, can in any measure be ascribed.
In rebuttal,
Spiritualists point to many previsions, admonitory dreams, verified prophecies
and other messages of great beauty and lofty spirituality, some of them leading
to genuine reform of character, and they advance the claim, that genuine
transference of intelligence from the spirit realms to earth is vastly more
general than that fraction of
100
experience which could be
subsumed under her "rare and exceptional cases of "spirituality."
In one
of the last works issued by Mr. Sinnett19 he deplores the unfortunate clash that
has come between the two cults, points out that it is foolish and unfounded, and
reminds both parties of the broad bases of agreement which are found in the two
systems. He feels that there can be no insurmountable points of antagonism,
inasmuch as Spiritualism, too, he asserts, is under the watch and ward of a
member of the Great White Brotherhood, the Master known as Hilarion; and that it
would be illogical to assume that members of that same spiritual Fraternity
could foster movements among mankind that work at cross purposes with each
other. But Mr. Sinnett does not give any authority for his statement as to
Hilarion's regency over Spiritualism, and many Theosophists are inclined to
doubt it. He feels that there is every good reason why Spiritualism should go
forward with Theosophy in such a unity of purpose as would render their combined
influence the most potent force in the world today against the menace of
materialism. Whenever Spiritualists display an interest in the formulation of
some scheme of life or cosmology in which their phenomena may find a meaningful
allocation, they can hardly go in any other direction than straight into
Theosophy. This is shown by their Articles of Faith, in which the idea of Karma,
the divine nature of man, his spiritual constitution and other conceptions
equally theosophic have found a place.
Perhaps Theosophists and
Spiritualists alike may discern the bases of harmony between their opposing
faiths in a singular passage from The Mahatma Letters, an utterance of
the Master K.H.
"It is this [sweet blissful dream of devachanic Maya]
during such a condition of complete Maya that the Souls or actual Egos of
pure loving sensitivities, laboring under the same illusion, think their loved
ones come down to them on earth, while it is their own Spirits that are raised
towards those in the Devachan. Many of the subjective spiritual
communications--most of them when the
______________
19 Collected
Fruits of Occult Teaching (London, T. F. Unwin, Ltd.,
1919).
101
sensitives are pure-minded--are real; but it is most
difficult for the uninitiated medium to fix in his mind the true and
correct pictures of what he sees and hears. Some of the phenomena called
psychography (though more rarely) are also real. The spirit of the sensitive
getting idylized, so to say, by the aura of the Spirit in the Devachan, becomes
for a few minutes that departed personality, and writes in the
handwriting of the latter, in his language and in his thoughts, as they were
during his life-time. The two spirits become blended in one; and, the
preponderance of one over the other during such phenomena determines the
preponderance of personality in the characteristics exhibited in such writings
and 'trance-speaking.' What you call 'rapport' is in plain fact an identity of
molecular vibration between the astral part of the incarnate medium and the
astral part of the discarnate personality . . . there is rapport between medium
and 'control' when their astral molecules move in accord. And the question
whether the communication shall reflect more of the one personal idiosyncrasy or
the other, is determined by the relative intensity of the two sets of vibrations
in the compound wave of Akasha. The less identical the vibratory impulses the
more mediumistic and less spiritual will be the message. So then measure your
medium's moral state by that of the alleged 'controlling' Intelligence, and your
tests of genuineness leave nothing to be desired."20
This plank in the
Theosophic platform not having been laid down in 1875 to bridge the chasm
between the two movements, Madame Blavatsky drew away from her Spiritualistic
associates, and it became but a matter of time until some propitious
circumstance should give to her divergent tendency a body and a name.
The
break with Spiritualism and the launching of the Theosophical Society were
practically contemporary. The actual formation of the new organization does not
on the surface appear to have been a deliberate act of Madame Blavatsky. While
it would never have been organized without her presence and her influence, still
she was not the prime mover in the steps which brought it into being. She seems
merely to have gone along while others led. However her Society grew out of the
stimulus that had gone forth from her.
______________
20 Mahatma
Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 101.
102
It was Col. Henry Steele
Olcott who assumed the rôle of outward leader in the young movement. He gave
over (eventually) a lucrative profession as a corporation lawyer, an
agricultural expert, and an official of the government, to expend all his
energies in this enterprise. He had acquired the title of colonel during the
Civil War in the Union army's manoeuvres in North Carolina. At the close of the
war he had been chosen by the government to conduct some investigations into
conditions relative to army contracts in the Quartermaster's Department and had
discharged his duties with great efficiency, receiving the approbation of higher
officials. He was regarded as an authority on agriculture and lectured before
representative bodies on that subject. He had established a successful practice
as a corporation counsel, numbering the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
among his clients. In addition to these activities he had done much reportorial
work for the press, notably in connection with his Spiritualistic researches.
His authorship of several works on the phenomena has already been mentioned. His
career had achieved for him a record of high intelligence, great ability, and a
character of probity and integrity.
It is the belief of Theosophists that
he was expressly chosen by the Mahatmas to share with Madame Blavatsky the honor
and the labor of spreading her message in the world. A passage from the
Mahatma Letters puts this in clear light. The Master K.H. there
says:
"So, casting about, we found in America the man to stand as
leader--a man of great moral courage, unselfish, and having other good
qualities. He was far from being the best, but--he was the best one available. .
. . We sent her to America, brought them together--and the trial began. From the
first both she and he were given to understand that the issue lay entirely with
themselves."
In spite of difficulties, caused by the clash of
temperaments and policies, this odd, "divinely-constituted" partnership held
firmly together until the end. Their relationship was one of a loyal
camaraderie, both being actuated by an uncommon devotion to the same
cause.
103
As early as May, 1875, the Colonel had suggested the
formation of a "Miracle Club," to continue spiritistic investigation. His
proposal was made in the interest of psychic research. It was not taken up. But
Madame Blavatsky's sprightly evening chatter and her reported magical feats
continued to draw groups of intelligent people to her rooms. Among those thus
attracted was Mr. George H. Felt, who had made some careful studies in phases of
Egyptology. He was asked to lecture on these subjects and on the 7th of
September, 1875, a score of people had gathered in H.P.B.'s parlors to hear his
address on "The Lost Canon of Proportion of the Egyptians." Dr. Seth Pancoast, a
most erudite Kabbalist was present, and after the lecture he led the discussion
to the subject of the occult powers of the ancient magicians. Mr. Felt said he
had proven those powers and had with them evoked elemental creatures and
"hundreds of shadowy forms." As the tense debate proceeded, acting on an
impulse, Col. Olcott wrote on a scrap of paper, which he passed over to Madame
Blavatsky through the hands of Mr. W. Q. Judge, the following: "Would it not be
a good thing to form a Society for this kind of study?" She read it and
indicated assent.
Col. Olcott arose and
"after briefly sketching
the present condition of the Spiritualistic movement; the attitude of its
antagonists, the Materialists; the irrepressible conflict between science and
the religious sectaries; the philosophical character of the ancient theosophies
and their sufficiency to reconcile all existing antagonisms; . . . he proposed
to form a nucleus around which might gather all the enlightened and brave souls
who are willing to work together for the collection and diffusion of knowledge.
His plan was to organize a Society of Occultists and begin at once to collect a
library; and to diffuse information concerning those secret laws of Nature which
were so familiar to the Chaldeans and Egyptians, but are totally unknown to our
modern world of science."21
______________
21 Old Diary Leaves,
Vol. I, p. 119. From notes taken at the meeting by Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten,
and published a day or two later in a New York daily.
104
It was a
plain proposal to organize for occult research, for the extension of human
knowledge of the esoteric sciences, and for a study of the psychic possibilities
in man's nature. No religious or ethical or even philosophical interest can be
detected in the first aims. The Brotherhood plank was a later development, and
the philosophy was an outgrowth of the necessity of rationalizing the scientific
data brought to light. The very nature of the movement committed it, of course,
to an anti-materialistic view. Col. Olcott was still predominantly concerned to
get demonstrative psychic displays. He was made Chairman, and Mr. Judge,
Secretary.
It is interesting to note the personnel of this first
gathering of Theosophists.
"The company included several persons of great
learning and some of wide personal influence. The Managing Editors of two
religious papers; the co-editors of two literary magazines; an Oxford LL.D.; a
venerable Jewish scholar and traveler of repute; an editorial writer of one of
the New York morning dailies; the President of the New York Society of
Spiritualists; Mr. C. C. Massey an English barrister at law; Mrs. Emma Hardinge
Britten and Dr. Britten; two New York lawyers besides Col. Olcott; a partner in
a Philadelphia publishing house; a well-known physician; and . . . Madame
Blavatsky herself."22
At a late hour the meeting adjourned until the
following evening, when organization could be more fully effected. Those who
were present at the Sept. 8th meeting, and who thus became the actual formers
(Col. Olcott insists on the word instead of Founders, reserving that title
to Madame Blavatsky and himself) of the Theosophical Society, were: Col. Olcott,
H. P. Blavatsky, Chas. Sotheran, Dr. Chas. E. Simmons, H. D. Monachesi, C. C.
Massey, of London, W. L. Alden, G. H. Felt, D. E. deLara, Dr. W. Britten, Mrs.
E. H. Britten, Henry J. Newton, John Storer Cobb, J. Hyslop. W. Q. Judge, H. M.
Stevens. A By-Law Committee was named, other routine business attended to, a
general discussion held and adjournment taken to Sept. 13th.
Mr.
______________
22 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 119.
105
Felt
gave another lecture on Sept. 18th, after which several additional members were
nominated, the name, "The Theosophical Society," proposed, and a committee on
rooms chosen. Several October meetings were held in furtherance of the Society;
and on the 17th of November, 1875, the movement reached the final stage of
constitutional organization. Its President was Col. Henry Olcott;
Vice-Presidents, Dr. Seth Pancoast and G. H. Felt; Corresponding Secretary,
Madame H. P. Blavatsky; Recording Secretary, John S. Cobb; Treasurer, Henry J.
Newton; Librarian, Chas. Sotheran; Councillors, Rev. H. Wiggin, R. P. Westbrook,
LL. D., Mrs. E. H. Britten, C. E. Simmons, and Herbert D. Monachesi; Counsel to
the Society, W. Q. Judge. Mr. John W. Lovell, the New York publisher, has the
distinction of having paid the first five dollars (initiation fee) into the
treasury, and is at the present writing the only surviving member of the
founding group. At the November 17th meeting the President delivered his
inaugural address. It was an amplification of his remarks made at the meeting of
Sept. 7th, with some prognostications of what the work of the Society was
destined to mean in the changing conceptions of modern thought.
The
infant Society did not at once proceed to grow and expand. The chief reason for
this was that Mr. Felt, whose theories had been the immediate object of
strongest interest, and who was expected to be the leader and teacher in their
quest of the secrets of ancient magic, for some unaccountable reason failed them
utterly. His promised lectures were never scheduled, his demonstrations of
spirit-evocation never shown. This disappointment weighed heavily upon some of
the members. Mrs. Britten, Mr. Newton, and the other Spiritualists in the group,
finding that Madame Blavatsky was not disposed to investigate mediums in the
conventional fashion, or in any way to make the Society an adjunct of the
Spiritualistic movement, suffered another disappointment and became inactive or
openly withdrew. Mr. Judge and Col. Olcott were busy with their professional
labors, and
106
Madame Blavatsky had plunged into the writing of
Isis Unveiled. The Society fell into the state of "innocuous desuetude,"
and was domiciled solely in the hearts of three persons, Olcott, Judge, and
Madame Blavatsky. However dead it might be to all outward appearance, it still
lived in the deep convictions of this trio. True, an occasional new recruit was
admitted, two names in particular being worthy of remark. On April 5th, 1878,
Col. Olcott received the signed application for membership from a young
inventor, one Thomas Alva Edison, and near the same time General Abner W.
Doubleday, veteran Major-General in the Union Army, united with the Society.
Edison had been attracted by the objects of the Society, largely because of
certain experiences he had had in connection with the genesis of some of his
ideas for inventions. They had seemed to come to him from an inner intelligence
independent of his voluntary thought control. Also he had experimented to
determine the possibility of moving physical objects by exertion of the will. He
was doubtless in close sympathy with the purposes of the Society, but the main
currents of his mechanical interests drew him away from active coöperation with
it. As for Major-General Doubleday, Theosophy gave articulate voice to theories
as to life, death, and human destiny which he had long cherished without a
formal label. He stated that it was the Theosophic idea of Karma which had
maintained his courage throughout the ordeals of the Civil War and he testified
that his understanding of this doctrine nerved him to pass with entire
fearlessness through those crises in which he was exposed to fire.23 When
Theosophy was brought to his notice he cast in his lot with the movement and was
a devoted student and worker while he lived. When the two Founders left America
at the end of 1878 for India, Col. Olcott constituted General Doubleday the
President of the American body.24
______________
23 He was in active
command of the Army of the Potomac at the Battle of Gettysburg, following the
death of General Reynolds on the 1st of July until the arrival of General
Meade.
24 He devised the modern game of
baseball.
107
Concerning Mr. W. Q. Judge, there is only to be said
that he was a young barrister at the time, practicing in New York and making his
home in Brooklyn, where until about 1928 a brother, John Judge, survived him. He
was a man of upright character and had always manifested a quick interest in
such matters as Theosophy brought to his attention. It is reported among
Theosophists that Madame Blavatsky immediately saw in him a pupil upon whose
entire sympathy with her own deeper aims and understanding of her esoteric
situation she could rely implicitly. He is believed always to have stood closer
to her in a spiritual sense than Col. Olcott; in fact it is hinted that there
was a secret understanding between them as to the inner motivations behind the
Society. Later developments in the history of the movement seem to give weight
to this theory.
Mr. Judge and General Doubleday were the captains of the
frail Theosophic craft in America during something like four years, from 1878 to
1882, following the sailing of the two Founders for India. If little activity
was displayed by the Society during this period, it was not in any measure the
fault of those left in charge. They were not lacking in zeal for the cause. It
is to be attributed chiefly to a state of suspended animation in which it was
left by the departure of the official heads. This condition itself was brought
about by the long protracted delay in carrying out a measure which in 1878 Col.
Olcott had designed to adopt for the future expansion of the Society. Madame
Blavatsky's work in Isis had disclosed the fact that there was an almost
complete sympathy of aims in certain respects between the new Society and the
Masonic Fraternity; that the latter had been the recipient and custodian down
the ages of much of the ancient esoteric tradition which it was the purpose of
Theosophy to revive. The idea of converting the Theosophical Society into a
Masonic body with ritual and degrees had been under contemplation for some time,
and overtures toward that end had been made to persons in the Masonic order. In
fact the plan had been so favorably regarded that on his departure Col. Olcott
left Mr. Judge and General
108
Doubleday under instructions to
hold all other activities in abeyance until he should prepare a form of ritual
that would properly express the Society's spiritual motif and aims. It happened,
however, that on reaching India both his and his colleague's time was so
occupied with other work and other interests that for three years they never
could give attention to the matter of the ritual. By that time they found the
Society beginning to grow so rapidly without the support they had intended for
it in the union with an old and respected secret order, that the project was
abandoned. But it was this tentative plan that was responsible for the apparent
lifelessness of the American organization during those years. A number of times
the two American leaders telegraphed Olcott in India to hasten the ritual and
hinted that its non-appearance forced them to keep the Society here embalmed in
an aggravated condition of status quo. When the scheme was definitely abandoned,
straightforward Theosophic propaganda was initiated and a period of healthy
expansion began.
It is of interest in this connection to note that on
March 8, 1876, on Madame Blavatsky's own motion, it was "resolved, that the
Society adopt one or more signs of recognition, to be used among the Fellows of
the Society or for admissions to the meetings." This might indicate her steady
allegiance to the principle of esotericism. The practice fell into disuse after
a time. Yet it was this idea of secrecy always lurking in the background of her
mind that eventually led to the formation of a graded hierarchy in the
Theosophical Society when the Esoteric School was formally
organized.
Another development that Col. Olcott says "I should prefer to
omit altogether if I could" from the early history of the Society was the
affiliation of the organization with a movement then being inaugurated in India
toward the resuscitation of pure Vedic religion. This proceeded further than the
contemplated union with Masonry, and it led to the necessity of a more succinct
pronouncement of their creed by Col. Olcott and Madame
Blavatsky.
Naturally Madame Blavatsky's accounts of the
existence
109
of the great secret Brotherhood of Adepts in North
India and her glorification of "Aryavarta" as the home of the purest occult
knowledge, had served to engender a sort of nostalgia in the hearts of the two
Founders for "Mother India." It seemed quite plausible that, once the aims of
the Theosophical Society were broadcast in Hindustan, its friendly attitude
toward the ancient religions of that country would act as an open sesame to a
quick response on the part of thousands of native Hindus. It was not illogical
to believe that the young Theosophical Society would advance shortly to a
position of great influence among the Orientals, whose psychology, ideals, and
religious conceptions it had undertaken to exalt, particularly in the eyes of
the Western nations. India thus came to be looked upon as the land of promise,
and the "return home," as Madame Blavatsky termed it, became more and more a
consummation devoutly to be wished. With Isis completed and published the
call to India rang ever louder, and finally in November, 1878, came the Master's
orders to make ready. It was not until the 18th of December that the ship
bearing the two pilgrims passed out of the Narrows.
There had seemed to
be no way opened for them to make an effective start in India, no appropriate
channel of introduction to their work there, until 1878. Then Col. Olcott
chanced to learn of a movement recently launched in India, whose aims and
ideals, he was given to believe, were identical with those of his own Society.
It was the Arya Samaj, founded by one Swami Dhyanand, who was reputed to be a
member of the same occult Brotherhood as that to which their own Masters, K.H.
and M., belonged. This latter allegation was enough to win the immediate
interest of the two devotees in its mission, and through intermediaries Col.
Olcott was put in touch with the Swami, to whom he made overtures to join
forces. The Arya Samaj was represented to the Colonel as world-wide in its
eclecticism, devoted to a revival of the ancient purity of Vedantism and pledged
to a conception of God as an eternal impersonal principle which, under whatever
name, all people alike worshipped. An
110
official linking of the
two bodies was formally made in May, 1878, and the title of the Theosophical
Society was amended to "The Theosophical Society of the Arya Samaj." But before
long the Colonel received a translation of the rules and doctrines of the Arya
Samaj, which gave him a great shock. Swami Dhyanand's views had either radically
changed or had originally been misrepresented. His cult was found to be
drastically sectarian--merely a new sect of Hinduism--and quite narrow in
certain lines. Even then the Colonel endeavored to bridge the gap, drawing up a
new definition of the aims of his Society in such an open fashion that the way
was left clear for any Theosophists to associate with the Samaj if they should
so desire. It was not until several years after the arrival in India that final
disruption of all connection between the two Societies was made, the Founders
having received what Col. Olcott calls "much evil treatment" from the learned
Swami.
When the first discovery of the real character of the Arya Samaj
was made in 1878, it was deemed necessary to issue a circular defining the
Theosophical Society in more explicit terms than had yet been done. Olcott does
not quote from this circular of his own, but gives the language of the circular
issued by the British Theosophical Society, then just organized, as embodying
the essentials of his own statement. This enables us to discern how far the
originally vague Theosophical ideals had come on their way to explicit
enunciation.
1. The British Theosophical Society is founded for the
purpose of discovering the nature and powers of the human soul and spirit by
investigation and experiment.
2. The object of the Society is to increase
the amount of human health, goodness, knowledge, wisdom, and
happiness.
3. The Fellows pledge themselves to endeavor, to the best of
their powers, to live a life of temperance, purity, and brotherly love. They
believe in a Great First Intelligent Cause, and in the Divine Sonship of the
spirit of man, and hence in the immortality of that spirit, and in the universal
brotherhood of the human race.
4. The Society is in connection and
sympathy with the Arya Samaj of Aryavarta, one object of which Society is to
elevate, by a
111
true spiritual education, mankind out of
degenerate, idolatrous and impure forms of worship wherever
prevalent.25
In his own circular, Olcott, with the concurrence of H.P.B.,
made the first official statement of the threefold hierarchical constitution of
the Theosophical Society. This grouping naturally arose out of the basic facts
in the situation itself. There were, first, at the summit of the movement, the
Brothers or Adepts; then there were persons, like H.P.B., Olcott himself and
Judge, with perhaps a few others, who were classified in the category of
"chelas" or accepted pupils of the Masters; then there were just plain members
of the Society, having no personal link as yet with the great Teachers. A
knowledge of this graduation is essential to an understanding of much in the
later history of the Society.
In the same circular the President
said:
"The objects of the Society are various. It influences its Fellows
to acquire an intimate knowledge of natural law, especially its occult
manifestations."
Then follow some sentences penned by Madame
Blavatsky:
"As the highest development, physically and spiritually, on
earth of the creative cause, man should aim to solve the mystery of his being.
He is the procreator of his species, physically, and having inherited the nature
of the unknown but palpable cause of his own creation, must possess in his inner
psychical self this creative power in lesser degree. He should, therefore, study
to develop his latent powers, and inform himself respecting the laws of
magnetism, electricity and all other forms of force, whether of the seen or
unseen universes."
The President proceeds:
"The Society teaches
and expects its Fellows to personally exemplify the highest morality and
religious aspirations; to oppose the materialism of science and every form of
dogmatic theology . . .; to make known, among Western nations, the
long-suppressed facts about Oriental religious philosophies, their
ethics, chronology, esotericism, symbolism . . . ; to disseminate a knowledge of
the sublime teachings of the pure esoteric system of the archaic
period
______________
25 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p.
399.
112
which are mirrored in the oldest Vedas and in the
philosophy of Gautauma Buddha, Zoroaster, and Confucius; finally and chiefly, to
aid in the institution of a Brotherhood of Humanity, wherein all good and pure
men of every race shall recognize each other as the equal effects (upon this
planet) of one Uncreate, Universal, Infinite and Everlasting Cause."26
He
sums up the central ideas as being:
1. The study of occult
science.
2. The formation of a nucleus of universal
brotherhood.
3. The revival of Oriental literature and
philosophy.
And these three became later substantially the permanent
platform of the Society. In their final and present form they stand:
1.
To form a nucleus of the Universal Brotherhood of Humanity without distinction
of race, creed, sex, caste, or color.
2. To encourage the study of
Comparative Religion, Philosophy, and Science.
3. To investigate the
unexplained laws of nature and the powers latent in man.
The inclusion of
a moral program to accompany occult research and comparative religion was seen
to be necessary. Madame Blavatsky's disapprobation of Spiritualism had as its
prime motivation that movement's lack of any moral bases for psychic progress.
Therefore the ethical implications which she saw as fundamental in any true
occult system were embodied in the Theosophic platform in the Universal
Brotherhood plank. Brotherhood, a somewhat vague general term, was made the only
creedal or ethical requirement for fellowship in the Society. At that it is, as
a moral obligation, a matter of the individual's own interpretation, and it is
the Society's only link with the ethical side of religion. Not even the member's
clear violation of accepted or prevalent social codes can disqualify him from
good standing. The Society refuses to be a judge of what constitutes morality or
its breach, leaving that determination to the member himself. At the same time
through its literature it
______________
26 Ibid., Vol. I., p.
400.
113
declares that no progress into genuine spirituality is
possible "without clean hands and a pure heart." It adheres to the principle
that morality without freedom is not morality. Thus the movement which began
with an impulse to investigate the occult powers of ancient magicians, was
moulded by circumstances into a moral discipline, which placed little store in
magic feats.
114
CHAPTER V
ISIS UNVEILED
One
morning in the summer of 1875 Madame Blavatsky showed her colleague some sheets
of manuscript which she had written. She explained: "I wrote this last night 'by
order,' but what the deuce it is to be I don't know. Perhaps it is for a
newspaper article, perhaps for a book, perhaps for nothing: anyhow I did as I
was ordered."
She put it away in a drawer and nothing more was said about
it for some months. In September of that year she went to Syracuse on a visit to
Prof. and Mrs. Hiram Corson, of Cornell University, and while there she began to
expand the few original pages. She wrote back to Olcott in New York that "she
was writing about things she had never studied and making quotations from books
she had never read in all her life; that, to test her accuracy Prof. Corson had
compared her quotations with classical works in the University Library and had
found her to be right."1
She had never undertaken any extensive literary
production in her life and her unfamiliarity with English at this time was a
real handicap. When she returned to the city Olcott took two suites of rooms at
433 West 34th Street, and there she set to work to expound the rudiments of her
great science. From 1875 to 1877 she worked with unremitting energy, sitting
from morning until night at her desk. In the evenings, after his day's
professional labors, Olcott came to her help, aiding her with the English and
with the systematic arrangement of the heterogeneous mass of material that
poured forth. Later Dr. Alexander Wilder, the Neo-Platonic scholar, helped her
with the spelling of the hundreds of classical philological terms she employed.
But Madame Blavatsky wrote the book, Isis
Unveiled.
______________
1 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p.
203.
115
After the first flush of its popularity it has been
forgotten, outside of Theosophic circles. Even among Theosophists, or at any
rate in the largest organic group of the Theosophical Society, the book is
hardly better known than in the world at large. During the last twenty-five
years there has been a tendency in the Society to read expositions of Madame
Blavatsky's ponderous volumes rather than the original presentation; neophytes
in the organization have been urged to pass up these books as being too
recondite and abstruse. It has even been hinted that many things are better
understood now than when the Founder wrote, and that certain crudities of dogma
and inadequacies of presentation can be avoided by perusing the commentary
literature. As a result of this policy the percentage of Theosophic students who
know exactly what Madame Blavatsky wrote over fifty years ago is quite small.
Thousands of members of the Theosophical Society have grown old in the cult's
activities and have never read the volumes that launched the cult
ideas.
Isis must not, however, be regarded as a text-book on
Theosophy. The Secret Doctrine, issued ten years later, has a better
claim to that title. Isis makes no formulation, certainly not a
systematic one, of the creed of occultism. It is far from being an elucidation
or exegesis of the basic principles of what is now known as Theosophy. Isis
makes no attempt to organize the whole field of human and divine knowledge,
as does The Secret Doctrine. It merely points to the evidence for the
existence of that knowledge, and only dimly suggests the outlines of the cosmic
scheme in which it must be made to fit. It is in a sense a panoramic survey of
the world literature out of which she essayed in part to draw the system of
Theosophy. If Theosophy is to be found in Isis, it is there in seminal
form, not in organic expression. Perhaps it were better to say that the book
prepared the soil for the planting of Madame Blavatsky's later teaching. Her
impelling thought was to reveal the traces, in ancient and medieval history and
literature, of a secret science whose principles had been lost to view. She
aimed to show
116
that the most vital science mankind had ever
controlled had sunk further below general recognition now than in any former
times. She would relight the lamp of that archaic wisdom, which would illuminate
the darkness of modern scientific pride.
Her work, then, was to make a
restatement of the occult doctrine with its ancient attestations. This was a
gigantic task. It meant little short of a thorough search in the entire field of
ancient religion, philosophy, and science, with an eye to the discernment of the
mystery tradition, teachings, and practices wherever manifested; and then the
collation, correlation, and systematic presentation of this multifarious
material in something like a structural unity. The many legends of mystic power,
the hundreds of myths and fables, were to be traced to ancient rites, whose
far-off symbolism threw light on their significance. It would be not merely an
encyclopedia of the whole mythical life of the race, but a digest and
codification, so to speak, of the entire mass into a system breathing
intelligible meaning and common sense. Her task, in a word, was to redeem the
whole ancient world from the modern stigma of superstition, crude ignorance, and
childish imagination.
In view of the immensity of her undertaking we are
forced to wonder whence came the self-assurance that led her to believe she
could successfully achieve it. She was sadly deficient in formal education; her
opportunities for scholarship and research had been limited; her command of the
English language was imperfect. Yet her actual accomplishment pointed to her
possession of capital and resources the existence of which has furnished the
ground for much of the mystery now enshrouding her life. There seems to be an
obvious discrepancy between her qualifications and her product, to account for
which diverse theories have been adduced.
Just how, when and where Madame
Blavatsky gained her acquaintance with practically the entire field of ancient
religions, philosophies, and science, is a query which probably can never be
satisfactorily answered. The history of many
117
portions of her
life before 1873 is unrecorded. We do not know when or where she studied ancient
literature. Books from which she quoted were not within her reach when she wrote
Isis. Can her knowledge be attributed to a phenomenal memory? Olcott does
say:
"She constantly drew upon a memory stored with a wealth of
recollections of personal perils and adventures and of knowledge of occult
science, not merely unparalleled, but not even approached by any other person
who had ever appeared in America, so far as I have heard."2
Throughout
the two volumes of Isis there are frequent allusions to or actual
passages from ancient writings, a list of which includes the following: The
Codex Nazareus; the Zohar, the great Kabbalistic work of the Jews; Chaldean3
Oracles; Chaldean Book of Numbers; Psellus' Works; Zoroastrian Oracles; Magical
and Philosophical Precepts of Zoroaster; Egyptian Book of the Dead; Books of
Hermes; Quiché Cosmogony; Book of Jasher; Kabala of the Tanaim; Sepher Jezira;
Book of Wisdom of Schlomah (Solomon); Secret Treatise on Mukta and Badha; The
Stangyour of the Tibetans; Desatir (pseudo-Persian4); Orphic Hymns; Sepher
Toldos Jeshu (Hebrew MSS. of great antiquity); Laws of Manu; Book of Keys
(Hermetic Work); Gospel of Nicodemus; The Shepherd of Hermas; (Spurious) Gospel
of the Infancy; Gospel of St. Thomas; Book of Enoch; The History of Baarlam and
Josaphat; Book of Evocations
______________
2 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
33.
3 The term Chaldean in these titles is thought by modern scholars to
veil an actual Greek origin of the texts in question. The existence of Chaldea
and Chaldeans appears to be regarded as highly uncertain. Of the Chaldeans
Madame Blavatsky says in The Theosophical Glossary: "Chaldeans, or
Kasdim. At first a tribe, then a caste of learned Kabbalists. They were the
savants, the magians of Babylonia, astrologers and diviners." Of the Chaldean
Book of Numbers she says: "A work which contains all that is found in the
Zohar of Simeon Ben-Jochai and much more. . . . It contains all the
fundamental principles taught in the Jewish Kabbalistic works, but none of their
blinds. It is very rare indeed, there being perhaps only two or three copies
extant and these in private hands."
4 Scholars have thrown doubt on the
Persian authorship of this book. Madame Blavatsky in the Glossary
describes it as "a very ancient Persian work called the Book of Shet.
It speaks of the thirteen Zoroasters and is very
mystical."
118
(of the Pagodas); Golden Verses of Pythagoras;
various Kabbalas; Tarot of the Bohemians.
In the realm of more
widely-known literature, she uses material from Plato and to a minor extent,
Aristotle; quotes the early Greek philosophers, Thales, Heraclitus, Parmenides,
Empedocles, Democritus; is conversant with the Neo-Platonist representatives,
Ammonius Saccas, Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus and Proclus; shows familiarity
with Plutarch, Philo, Apollonius of Tyana, the Gnostics, Basilides, Bardesanes,
Marcion, and Valentinus. She had examined the Church Fathers, from Augustine to
Justin Martyr, and was especially familiar with Irenaeus, Tertullian and
Eusebius, whom she charged with having wrecked the true ancient wisdom. Beside
this array she draws on the enormous Vedic, Brahmanic, Vedantic, and Buddhistic
literatures; likewise the Chinese, Persian, Babylonian, "Chaldean," Syrian, and
Egyptian. Nor does she neglect the ancient American contributions, such as the
Popul Vuh. Her acquaintance also with the vast literature of occult magic and
philosophy of the Middle Ages seems hardly less inclusive. She levies upon
Averroës, Maimonides, Paracelsus, Van Helmont, Robert Fludd, Eugenius
Philalethes, Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim, Roger Bacon, Bruno, Pletho,
Mirandolo, Henry More and many a lesser-known expounder of mysticism and magic
art. She quotes incessantly from scores of compendious modern
works.
Because of this show of prodigious learning some students later
alleged that Isis was not the work of Madame Blavatsky, but of Dr.
Alexander Wilder; others declared that Col. Olcott had written
it.5
______________
5 It is clear that Madame Blavatsky was not a literary
person before the epoch of the writing of Isis. She herself, in the last
article for Lucifer that she wrote before her death in 1891, entitled
My Books, wrote:
1. When I came to America in 1873 I had not
spoken English--which I had learned in my childhood colloquially--for over
thirty years. I could understand when I read it, but could hardly speak the
language.
2 I had never been at any college, and what I knew I had taught
myself; I had never pretended to any scholarship in the sense of modern
research; I had then hardly read any scientific European works, knew little of
Western philosophy and sciences. The little which I had studied and learned of
these disgusted me with its
119
There are three main sources of
testimony bearing on the composition of the books: (1) Statements of her
immediate associates and co-workers in the writing; (2) Her own version; (3) The
evidence of critics who have traced the sources of her materials.
First,
there is the testimony of her colleague, Olcott, who for two years collaborated
almost daily with her in the work. He says:
"Whence, then, did H.P.B.
draw the materials which comprise Isis and which cannot be traced to accessible
literary sources of quotation? From the Astral Light, and by her soul-senses,
from her Teachers--the 'Brothers,' 'Adepts,' 'Sages,' 'Masters,' as they have
been variously called. How do I know it? By working two years with her on Isis
and many more years on other literary work."6
He goes on:
"To
watch her at work was a rare and never-to-be-forgotten experience. We sat at
opposite sides of one big table usually, and I could see her every movement. Her
pen would be flying over the page; when she would suddenly stop, look out into
space with the vacant eye of the clairvoyant seer, shorten her vision as though
to look at something held invisibly in the air before her, and begin copying on
the paper what she saw. The quotation finished, her eyes would resume their
natural expression, and she would go on writing until again stopped by a similar
interruption."7
Still more remarkable is the following:
"Most
perfect of all were the manuscripts which were written for her while she was
sleeping. The beginning of the chapter on the civilization of ancient Egypt
(Vol. I., Chapter XIV) is an illustration. We had stopped work the evening
before at about 2 A.M. as usual,
______________
materialism, its
limitations, narrow cut-and-dried spirit of dogmatism and air of superiority
over the philosophies and sciences of antiquity.
3. Until 1874 I had
never written one word in English, nor had I published any work in any language.
Therefore:--
4. I had not the least idea of literary rules. The art of
writing books, of preparing them for print and publication, reading and
correcting proofs, were so many closed secrets to me.
5. When I started
to write that which later developed into Isis Unveiled, I had no more
idea than the man in the moon what would come of it. I had no plan; . . . I knew
that I had to write it, that was all.--Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p.
223.
6 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 208.
7 Ibid., p.
208.
120
both too tired to stop for our usual smoke and chat
before parting; she almost fell asleep in her chair, while I was bidding her
goodnight; so I hurried off to my bed room. The next morning, when I came down
after my breakfast, she showed me a pile of at least thirty or forty pages of
beautifully written H.P.B. manuscript, which, she said, she had had written for
her by-------, a Master . . . It was perfect in every respect and went to the
printers without revision."8
It is the theory of Olcott that the mind of
H.P.B. was receptive to the impressions of three or four intelligent
entities--other persons living or dead--who overshadowed her mentally, and wrote
through her brain. These personages seemed to cast their sentences upon an
imperceptible screen in her mind. They sometimes talked to Olcott as themselves,
not as Madame Blavatsky. Their intermittent tenancy of her mind he takes as
accounting for the higgledy-piggledy manner in which the book was constructed.
Each had his favorite themes and the Colonel learned what kind of material to
expect when one gave place to another. There was in particular, in addition to
several of the Oriental "Sages," a collaborator in the person of an old
Platonist--"the pure soul of one of the wisest philosophers of modern times, one
who was an ornament to our race, a glory to his country." He was so engrossed in
his favorite earthly pursuits of philosophy that he projected his mind into the
work of Madame Blavatsky and gave her abundant aid.
"He did not
materialize and sit with us, nor obsess H.P.B. medium-fashion, he would simply
talk with her--psychically, by the hour together, dictating copy, telling her
what references to hunt up; answering my questions about details, instructing me
as to principles; and, in fact, playing the part of a third person in our
literary symposium. He gave me his portrait once--a rough sketch in colored
crayons on flimsy paper . . . from first to last his relation to us both was
that of a mild, kind, extremely learned teacher and elder
friend."9
______________
8 Ibid., p. 211. The Countess Wachtmeister
testified to similar productions of pages of manuscript in connection with the
writing of The Secret Doctrine ten years later.
9 Old Diary
Leaves, Vol. I. p. 239.
121
The medieval occultist Paracelsus
manifested his presence for a brief time one evening.10 At another time Madame
produced two volumes necessary to verify questions which Olcott
doubted.
"I went and found the two volumes wanted, which, to my
knowledge, had not been in the house until that very moment. I compared the
texts with H.P.B.'s quotation, showed her that I was right in my suspicions as
to the error, made the proof correction, and then . . . returned the two volumes
to the place on the étagère from which I had taken them. I resumed my seat and
work, and when, after while, I looked again in that direction, the books had
disappeared."11
As Olcott states, when one or another of these unseen
monitors was in evidence, the work went on in fine fashion. But, he notes, when
Madame was left entirely to her own devices, she floundered in more or less
helpless ineptitude. She would write haltingly, scratch it over, make a fresh
start, work herself into a fret and get nowhere.
Olcott's testimony, as
that of Dr. Wilder, Mr. Judge, Dr. Corson, the Countess Wachtmeister, the two
Keightleys, Mr. Fawcett and all the others who at one time or another were in a
position to observe Madame Blavatsky at work, must be accepted as sincere. But
if anybody could be supposed to know unmistakably what was happening in
her mind, that person would be the subject herself. What has she to say? She
states decisively that she was not the author, only the writer of her books. In
one of her home letters she says, speaking of Isis:
"since neither
ideas nor teachings are mine."
In another letter to Madame Jelihowsky she
writes:
"Well, Vera, whether you believe me or not, something miraculous
is happening to me. You cannot imagine in what a charmed world of pictures and
vision I live. I am writing Isis; not writing, rather copying out and drawing
that which She personally shows to me. Upon my word, sometimes it seems to me
that the ancient
______________
10 Ibid., p. 240.
11.
Ibid., p. 210.
122
goddess of Beauty in person leads me
through all the countries of past centuries which I have to describe. I sit with
my eyes open and to all appearances see and hear everything real and actual
around me, and yet at the same time I see and hear that which I write. I feel
short of breath; I am afraid to make the slightest movement for fear the spell
might be broken. Slowly century after century, image after image, float out of
the distance and pass before me as if in a magic panorama; and meanwhile I put
them together in my mind, fitting in epochs and dates, and know for sure that
there can be no mistake. Races and nations, countries and cities, which have
long disappeared in the darkness of the prehistoric past, emerge and then
vanish, giving place to others; and then I am told the consecutive dates. Hoary
antiquity makes way for historical periods; myths are explained to me with
events and people who have really existed, and every event which is at all
remarkable, every newly-turned page of this many-colored book of life, impresses
itself on my brain with photographic exactitude. My own reckonings and
calculations appear to me later on as separate colored pieces of different
shapes in the game which is called casse-tête (puzzles). I gather them together
and try to match them one after the other, and at the end there always comes out
a geometrical whole. . . . Most assuredly it is not I who do it all, but my Ego,
the highest principle that lives in me. And even this with the help of my Guru
and teacher who helps me in everything. If I happen to forget something I have
just to address him, and another of the same kind in my thought as what I have
forgotten rises once more before my eyes--sometimes whole tables of numbers
passing before me, long inventories of events. They remember everything. They
know everything. Without them, from whence could I gather my knowledge? I
certainly refuse point blank to attribute it to my own knowledge or memory, for
I could never arrive alone at either such premises or conclusions. I tell you
seriously I am helped. And he who helps me is my Guru."12
In another
letter to the same sister Helena assures her relative about her mental
condition:
"Do not be afraid that I am off my head; all I can say is that
someone positively inspires me. . . . More than this; someone enters me. It is
not I who talk and write; it is something within me;
______________
12
Published in The Path, Vol. IX, p. 300.
123
my higher and
luminous Self; that thinks and writes for me. Do not ask me, my friend, what I
experience, because I could not explain it to you clearly. I do not know myself!
The one thing I know is that now, when I am about to reach old age, I have
become a sort of storehouse of somebody else's knowledge. . . . Someone comes
and envelops me as a misty cloud and all at once pushes me out of myself, and
then I am not 'I' any more--Helena P. Blavatsky--but somebody else. Someone
strong and powerful, born in a totally different region of the world; and as to
myself it is almost as if I were asleep, or lying by not quite conscious--not in
my own body, but close by, held only by a thread which ties me to it.
However at times I see and hear everything quite clearly; I am perfectly
conscious of what my body is saying and doing--or at least its new possessor. I
can understand and remember it all so well that afterwards I can repeat it, and
even write down his words. . . . At such a time I see awe and fear on the faces
of Olcott and others, and follow with interest the way in which he
half-pityingly regards them out of my own eyes, and teaches them with my
physical tongue. Yet not with my mind, but his own, which enwraps my brain like
a cloud. . . . Ah, but I really cannot explain everything!"13
Again
writing to her relatives, she states:
"When I wrote Isis I wrote it so
easily that it was certainly no labor but a real pleasure. Why should I be
praised for it? Whenever I am told to write I sit down and obey, and then
I can write easily upon almost anything--metaphysics, psychology, philosophy,
ancient religions, zoölogy, natural sciences or what not. I never put myself the
question: 'Can I write on this subject?' . . .or, 'Am I equal to the task?' but
I simply sit down and write. Why? Because someone who knows all
dictates to me. My Master and occasionally others whom I knew on my
travels years ago. . . . I tell you candidly, that whenever I write upon a
subject I know little or nothing of, I address myself to them, and one of
them inspires me, i.e., he allows me to simply copy what I write from
manuscripts, and even printed matter, that pass before my eyes, in the air,
during which process I have never been unconscious one single
instant."14
To her aunt she wrote:
______________
13 The
Path, Vol. IX, p. 266
14 Letter quoted in Mr. Sinnett's Incidents
in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, p. 205.
124
"At such times it
is no more I who write, but my inner Ego, my 'luminous Self,' who thinks and
writes for me. Only see . . . you who know me. When was I ever so learned as to
write such things? Whence was all this knowledge?"
Whatever the actual
authorship of the two volumes may have been, their publication stirred such
wide-spread interest that the first editions were swept up at once, and Bouton,
the publisher, was taken off guard, there being some delay before succeeding
editions of the bulky tomes could be issued. Professional reviewers were not so
generous; but the press critics were frankly intrigued into something like
praise.15
Years after the publication of Isis, Mr. Emmette
Coleman, a former Theosophist and contributor to current magazines, stated that
he spent three years upon a critical and exhaustive examination of the sources
used by Madame
______________
15 It is of some interest to see how it was
received in 1877. The Boston Transcript says: "It must be acknowledged
that she is a remarkable woman, who has read more, seen more and thought more
than most wise men. Her work abounds in quotations from a dozen different
languages, not for the purpose of vain display of erudition, but to substantiate
her peculiar views. Her pages are garnished with footnotes, establishing as her
authorities some of the profoundest writers of the past. To a large class of
readers this remarkable work will prove of absorbing interest . . . it demands
the earnest attention of thinkers and merits an analytic reading."
From
the New York Independent came the following: "The appearance of erudition
is stupendous. References to and quotations from the most unknown and obscure
writers in all languages abound; interspersed with allusions to writers of the
highest repute, which have evidently been more than skimmed
through."
This from the New York World: "An extremely readable and
exhaustive essay upon the paramount importance of reëstablishing the Hermetic
philosophy in a world which blindly believes that it has outgrown
it."
Olcott's own paper, The New York Daily Graphic, said: "A
marvelous book, both in matter and manner of treatment. Some idea may be formed
of the rarity and extent of its contents when the index alone comprises 50
pages, and we venture nothing in saying that such an index of subjects was never
before compiled by any human being."
The New York Tribune confined
itself to saying: "The present work is the fruit of her remarkable course of
education and amply confirms her claims to the character of an adept in secret
science, and even to the rank of an hierophant in the exposition of its mystic
lore."
And the New York Herald: "It is easy to forecast the
reception of this book. With its striking peculiarities, its audacity, its
versatility and the prodigious variety of subjects which it notices and handles,
it is one of the remarkable productions of the
century."
125
Blavatsky in her various works. He attempted to
discredit the whole Theosophic movement by casting doubt upon the genuineness of
her knowledge. He accused her of outright plagiarism and went to great pains to
collect and present his evidence. In 1893 he published his data. We quote the
following passage from his statement:
"In Isis Unveiled, published
in 1877, I discovered some 2,000 passages copied from other books without proper
credit. By careful analysis I found that in compiling Isis about 100
books were used. About 1,400 books are quoted from and referred to in this work;
but, from the 100 books which its author possessed, she copied everything in
Isis taken from and relating to the other 1,300. There are in Isis
about 2,100 quotations from and references to books that were copied, at
second-hand, from books other than the originals; and of this number only about
140 are credited to the books from which Madame Blavatsky copied them at
second-hand. The others are quoted in such a manner as to lead the reader to
think that Madame Blavatsky had read and utilized the original works, and had
quoted from them at first-hand,--the truth being that these originals had
evidently never been read by Madame Blavatsky. By this means many readers of
Isis . . . have been misled into thinking Madame Blavatsky an enormous
reader, possessed of vast erudition; while the fact is her reading was very
limited, and her ignorance was profound in all branches of
knowledge."16
Coleman went on to assert that "not a line of the
quotations" made by H.P.B. ostensibly from the Kabala, from the old-time mystics
at the time of Paracelsus, from the classical authors, Homer, Livy, Ovid,
Virgil, Pliny, and others, from the Church Fathers, from the Neo-Platonists, was
taken from the originals, but all from second-hand usage. He charged her with
having picked all these passages out of modern books scattered throughout which
she found the material from a wide range of ancient authorship. The reader of
Isis will readily find her many references to modern authors. Coleman
mentioned a half dozen standard works that she used; it is well worth while
glancing at a fuller list. She had read, or was more or less familiar with:
King's
______________
16 Appendix to V. S. Solovyoff's A Modern
Priestess of Isis (London, 1895), p. 354.
126
Gnostics;
Jennings' Rosicrucians; Dunlop's Sod, and Spirit History of
Man; Moor's Hindu Pantheon; Ennemoser's History of Magic;
Howitt's History of the Supernatural; Salverte's Philosophy of
Magic; Barrett's Magus; Col. H. Yule's The Book of Ser Marco Polo;
Inman's Pagan and Modern Christian Symbolism and Ancient Faiths
and Modern; the anonymous The Unseen Universe and Supernatural
Religion; Bunsen's Egypt's Place in Universal History; Lundy's
Monumental Christianity; Horst's Zauber-Bibliothek; Cardinal
Wiseman's Lectures on Science and Religion; Draper's The Conflict of
Science with Religion; Dupuis' Origin of All the Cults; Bailly's
Ancient and Modern Astronomy; Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman
Empire; Des Mousseaux's Roman Catholic writings on Magic, Mesmerism,
Spiritualism; Eliphas Levi's works; Jacolliot's twenty-seven volumes on Oriental
systems; Max Müller's, Huxley's, Tyndall's, and Spencer's works.
It is
hardly to be doubted that Madame Blavatsky culled many of her ancient gems from
these works, and she probably felt that it was a matter of minor importance how
she came by them. What she was bent on saying was that the ancients had said
these things and that they were confirmatory of her general theses. Yet
Coleman's findings must not be disregarded. His work brought into clearer light
the meagreness of her resources and her lack of scholarly preparation for so
pretentious a study.
We have adduced the several hypotheses that have
been advanced to account for the writing of Isis Unveiled. It must be
left for the reader to arrive at what conclusion he can on the basis of the
material presented. We pass on to an examination of the contents.
A hint
as to the aim of the work, is given in the sub-title: A Master-key to the
Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology. She says:
"The
work now submitted to the public judgment is the fruit of a somewhat intimate
acquaintance with Eastern Adepts and study of their science. It is a work on
magico-spiritual philosophy and occult science. It is an attempt to aid the
student to detect the
127
vital principles which underlie the
philosophical systems of old."17
She affirms it to be her aim
"to
show that the pretended authorities of the West must go to the Brahmans and
Lamaists of the far Orient and respectfully ask them to impart the alphabet of
true science."18
Isis, then, is a glorification of the ancient
Orientals. Their knowledge was so profound that we are incredulous when told
about it. If we have "harnessed the forces of Nature to do our work," they had
subjugated the world to their will. They knew things we have not yet dreamed of.
She states:
"It is rather a brief summary of the religions, philosophies
and universal traditions in the spirit of those secret doctrines of which
none,--thanks to prejudice and bigotry--have reached Christendom in so
unmutilated a form as to secure it a fair judgment. Since the days of the
unlucky Mediaeval philosophers, the last to write upon these secret doctrines of
which they were the depositaries, few men have dared to brave persecution and
prejudice by placing their knowledge on record. And these few have never, as a
rule, written for the public, but only for those of their own and succeeding
times who possessed the key to their jargon. The multitude, not understanding
them or their doctrines, have been accustomed to regard them en masse as
either charlatans or dreamers. Hence the unmerited contempt into which the study
of the noblest of sciences--that of the spiritual man--has gradually
fallen."19
She plans to restore this lost and fairest of the sciences.
Materialism is menacing man's higher spiritual unfoldment.
"To prevent
the crushing of these spiritual aspirations, the blighting of these hopes, and
the deadening of that intuition which teaches us of a God and a hereafter, we
must show our false theologies in their naked deformity and distinguish between
divine religion and human dogmas. Our voice is raised for spiritual freedom and
our plea made for the enfranchisement from all tyranny, whether of Science or
Theology."20
______________
17 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p.
165.
18 Ibid., Vol. I, p. xiv.
19 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
xlii.
20 Ibid., Vol. I, p. xiv.
128
She here sets
forth her attitude toward orthodox religionism as well as toward materialistic
science. She intimates that since the days of the true esoteric wisdom, mankind
has been thrown back and forth between the systems of an unenlightening theology
and an equally erroneous science, both stultifying in their influence on
spiritual aspiration, both blighting the delicate culture of beauty and
joyousness.
"It was while most anxious to solve these perplexing problems
[Who, where, what is God? What is the spirit in man?] that we came into contact
with certain men, endowed with such mysterious powers and such profound
knowledge that we may truly designate them as the Sages of the Orient. To their
instruction we lent a ready ear. They showed us that by combining science with
religion, the existence of God and the immortality of man's spirit may be
demonstrated like a problem of Euclid."
She adds:
"Such knowledge
is priceless; and it has been hidden only from those who overlooked it, derided
it or denied its existence."21
The soul within escapes their view, and
the Divine Mother has no message for them. To become conversant with the powers
of the soul we must develop the higher faculties of intuition and spiritual
vision.22
______________
21 Ibid., Vol. I, Preface, p. 1.
22
Perhaps the following excerpt states the intent of Isis more
specifically:
"What we desire to prove is that underlying every ancient
popular religion was the same ancient wisdom-doctrine, one and identical,
professed and practiced by the initiates of every country, who alone were aware
of its existence and importance. To ascertain its origin and precise age in
which it was matured, is now beyond human possibility. A single glance, however,
is enough to assure one that it could not have attained the marvelous perfection
in which we find it pictured to us in the relics of the various esoteric
systems, except after a succession of ages. A philosophy so profound, a moral
code so ennobling, and practical results so conclusive and so uniformly
demonstrable, is not the growth of a generation. . . . Myriads of the brightest
human intellects must have reflected upon the laws of nature before this ancient
doctrine had taken concrete shape. The proofs of this identity of fundamental
doctrine in the old religions are found in the prevalence of a system of
initiation; in the secret sacerdotal castes, who had the guardianship of
mystical words of power, and a public display of a phenomenal control over
natural forces, indicating association with preter-human beings. Every approach
to the Mysteries of all these nations was guarded with the same jealous care,
and in all, the penalty of death was inflicted upon initiates of any degree who
divulged secrets entrusted to them."
129
She says that there were
colleges in the days of old for the teaching of prophecy and occultism in
general. Samuel and Elisha were heads of such academies, she affirms. The study
of magic or wisdom included every branch of science, the metaphysical as well as
the physical, psychology and physiology, in their common and occult phases; and
the study of alchemy was universal, for it was both a physical and a spiritual
science. The ancients studied nature under its double aspect and the claim is
that they discovered secrets which the modern physicist, who studies but the
dead forms of things, can not unlock. There are regions of nature which will
never yield their mysteries to the scientist armed only with mechanical
apparatus. The ancients studied the outer forms of nature, but in relation to
the inner life. Hence they saw more than we and were better able to read meaning
in what they saw. They regarded everything in nature as the materialization of
spirit. Thus they were able to find an adequate ground for the harmonization of
science and religion. They saw spirit begetting force, and force matter; spirit
and matter were but the two aspects of the one essence. Matter is nothing other
than the crystallization of spirit on the outer periphery of its emanative
range. The ancients worshipped, not nature, but the power behind
nature.
Madame Blavatsky contrasts this fulness of the ancient wisdom
with the barrenness of modern knowledge. She characterizes the eighteenth
century as a "barren period," during which "the malignant fever of scepticism"
has spread through the thought of the age and transmitted "unbelief as an
hereditary disease on the nineteenth." She challenges science to explain some of
the commonest phenomena of nature; why, for instance, the moon affects insane
people, why the crises of certain diseases correspond to lunar changes, why
certain flowers alternately open and close their petals as clouds flit across
the face of the moon. She says that science has not yet learned to look outside
this ball of dirt for hidden influences which are affecting us day by day. The
ancients, she declares, postulated reciprocal relations between the planetary
bodies as perfect as those
130
between the organs of the body and
the corpuscles of the blood. There is not a plant or mineral which has disclosed
the last of its properties to the scientist. She declares that theurgical magic
is the last expression of occult psychological science; and denies the
"Academicians" "the right of expressing their opinion on a subject which they
have never investigated." "Their incompetence to determine the value of magic
and Spiritualism is as demonstrable as that of the Fiji Islander to evaluate the
labors of Faraday or Agassiz." There was no missing link in the ancient
knowledge, no hiatus to be filled "with volumes of materialistic speculation
made necessary by the absurd attempt to solve an equation with but one set of
quantities." She runs on:
"Our 'ignorant' ancestors traced the law of
evolution throughout the whole universe. As by gradual progression from the
star-cloudlet to the development of the physical body of man, the rule holds
good, so from the universal ether to the incarnate human spirit, they traced one
uninterrupted series of entities. These evolutions were from the world of spirit
into the world of gross matter; and through that back again to the source of all
things. The 'descent of species' was to them a descent from the spirit, primal
source of all, to the 'degradation of matter.' In this complete chain of
unfoldings the elementary, spiritual beings had as distinct a place, midway
between the extremes, as Darwin's missing link between the ape and
man."23
Modern knowledge posits only evolution; the old science held that
evolution was neither conceivable nor understandable without a previous
involution.
The existence of myriads of orders of beings not human in a
realm of nature to which our senses do not normally give us access, and of which
science knows nothing at all, is posited in her arcane systems. She catches at
Milton's lines to bolster this theory:
"Millions of spiritual creatures
walk this earth,
Unseen both when we sleep and when we wake."
She says
that if the spiritual faculties of the soul are sharpened by intense enthusiasm
and purified from earthly
______________
23 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I,
p. 281.
131
desire, man may learn to see some of these denizens of
the illimitable air.
The physical world was fashioned on the model of
divine ideas, which, like the unseen lines of force radiated by the magnet, to
throw the iron-filings into determinate shape, give form and nature to the
physical manifestation. If man's essential nature partakes of this universal
life, then it, too, must partake of all the attributes of the demiurgic power.
As the Creator, breaking up the chaotic mass of dead inactive matter, shaped it
into form, so man, if he knew his powers, could to a degree do the
same.
To redeem the ancient world from modern scorn Madame Blavatsky had
to vindicate magic--with all its incubus of disrepute and ridicule--and lift its
practitioners to a lofty place in the ranks of true science. She had to
demonstrate that genuine magic was a veritable fact, an undeniable part of the
history of man; and not only true, but the highest evidence of man's kinship
with nature, the topmost manifestation of his power, the royal science among all
sciences! To her view the dearth of magic in modern philosophies was at once the
cause and the effect of their barrenness. If they are to be vitalized again,
magic must be revived. "That magic is indeed possible is the moral of this
book."24
And along with magic she had to champion its aboriginal
bed-fellows, astrology, alchemy, healing, mesmerism, trance subjection, and the
whole brood of "pseudo-science."
"It is an insult to human nature to
brand magic and the occult sciences with the name of imposture. To believe that
for so many thousands of years one half of mankind practiced deception and fraud
on the other half is equivalent to saying that the human race is composed only
of knaves and incurable idiots. Where is the country in which magic was not
practiced? At what age was it wholly forgotten?"25
She explains magic as
based on a reciprocal sympathy between celestial and terrestrial natures. It is
based on the mysterious affinities existing between organic and
inorganic
_______________
24 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 36.
25
Ibid., Vol. I, p. 14.
132
bodies, between the visible and
the invisible powers of the universe. "That which science calls gravitation the
ancient and the medieval hermeticists called magnetism, attraction, affinity."
She continues:
"A thorough familiarity with the occult faculties of
everything existing in Nature, visible as well as invisible; their mutual
relations, attractions and repulsions; the cause of these traced to the
spiritual principle which pervades and animates all things; the ability to
furnish the best conditions for this principle to manifest itself, in other
words a profound and exhaustive knowledge of natural law--this was and is the
basis of magic."26
Out of man's kinship with nature, his identity of
constitution with it, she argues to his magical powers:
"As God creates,
so man can create. Given a certain intensity of will, and the shapes created by
the mind become subjective. Hallucinations they are called, although to their
creator they are real as any visible object is to any one else. Given a more
intense and intelligent concentration of this will, and the forms become
concrete, visible, objective; the man has learned the secret of secrets; he is a
Magician."27
She makes it clear that this power is built on the conscious
control of the substrate of the material universe. She states that the key to
all magic is the formula: "Every insignificant atom is moved by spirit." Magic
is thus conditioned upon the postulation of an omnipresent vital ether,
electro-spiritual in composition, to which man has an affinity by virtue of his
being identical in essence with it. Over it he can learn to exercise a voluntary
control by the exploitation of his own psycho-dynamic faculties. If he can lay
his hand on the elemental substance of the universe, if he can radiate from his
ganglionic batteries currents of force equivalent to gamma rays, of course he
can step into the cosmic scene with something of a magician's powers. That such
an ether exists she states in a hundred places. She calls it the elementary
substance, the Astral Light, the Alkahest, the
______________
26
Ibid., Vol. I, p. 243.
27 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
62.
133
Akasha. It is the universal principle of all life, the
vehicle or battery of cosmic energy. She says Newton knew of it and called it
"the soul of the world," the "divine sensorium." It is the Book of Life; the
memory of God,--since it never gives up an impression. Human memory is but a
looking into pictures on this ether. Clairvoyants and psychometers but draw upon
its resources through synchronous vibrations.
"According to the
Kabalistic doctrine the future exits in the astral light in embryo as the
present existed in embryo in the past . . . and our memories are but the
glimpses that we catch of the reflections of this past in the currents of the
astral light, as the psychometer catches them from the astral emanations of the
object held by him."28
Madame Blavatsky goes so far as to link the
control of these properties with the tiny pulsations of the magnetic currents
emanating from our brains, under the impelling power of will. Thus she attempts
to unite magic with the most subtle conceptions of our own advanced physics and
chemistry. She thus weds the most arrant of superstitions with the most
respected of sciences.
The magnetic nature of gravitation is set forth in
more than one passage. She wrote:
"The ethereal spiritual fire, the soul
and the spirit of the all-pervading mysterious ether; the despair and puzzle of
the materialists, who will some day find out that that which causes the
numberless forces to manifest themselves in eternal correlation is but a divine
electricity, or rather galvanism, and that the sun is one of the myriad magnets
disseminated through space. . . . There is no gravitation in the Newtonian
sense, but only magnetic attraction and repulsion; and it is only by their
magnetism that the planets of
______________
28 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
184. Theosophists appear to be in the habit of using the terms Akasha and Astral
Light more or less synonymously. In the Glossary Madame Blavatsky defines
Akasha (Akasa, Akaz) as "the subtle supersensuous spiritual essence which
pervades all spaces; the primordial substance erroneously identified with Ether.
But it is to Ether what Spirit is to Matter, or Atma to Kamarupa. It is in fact
the Universal Space in which lies inherent the eternal Ideation of the Universe
in its ever-changing aspects on the plane of matter and objectivity. This power
is the . . . same anima mundi on the higher plane as the astral light is on the
lower."
134
the solar system have their motions regulated in their
respective orbits by the still more powerful magnetism of the sun; not by their
weight or gravitation. . . . The passage of light through this (cosmic ether)
must produce enormous friction. Friction generates electricity and it is this
electricity and its correlative magnetism which forms those tremendous forces of
nature. . . . It is not at all to the sun that we are indebted for light and
heat; light is a creation sui generis, which springs into existence at the
instant when the deity willed." She "laughs at the current theory of the
incandescence of the sun and its gaseous substance. . . . The sun, planets,
stars and nebulae are all magnets. . . . There is but One Magnet in the universe
and from it proceeds the magnetization of everything existing."29
It is
this same universal ether and its inherent magnetic dynamism that sets the field
for astrology, as a cosmic science. Of this she says that astrology is a science
as infallible as astronomy itself, provided its interpreters are as infallible
as the mathematicians. She carries the law of the instantaneous interrelation of
everything in the cosmos to such an extent that, quoting Eliphas Levi, "even so
small a thing as the birth of one child upon our insignificant planet has its
effect upon the universe, as the whole universe has its reflective influence
upon him." The bodies of the entire universe are bound together by attractions
which hold them in equilibrium, and these magnetic influences are the bases of
astrology.
With so much cosmic power at his behest, man has done wonders;
and we are asked to accept the truth of an amazing series of the most phenomenal
occurrences ever seriously given forth. They range over so varied a field that
any attempt at classification is impossible. Of physical phenomena she says that
the ancients could make marble statues sweat, and even speak and leap! They had
gold lamps which burned in tombs continuously for seven hundred to one thousand
years without refueling! One hundred and seventy-three authorities are said to
have testified to the existence of such lamps. Even "Aladdin's magical
lamp
______________
29 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p . 271
ff.
135
has also certain claims to reality." There was an asbestos
oil whose properties, when it was rubbed on the skin, made the body impervious
to the action of fire. Witnesses are quoted as stating that they observed
natives in Africa who permitted themselves to be fired at point blank with a
revolver, having first precipitated around them an impervious layer of astral or
akashic substance. Cardinal de Rohan's testimony is adduced to the effect that
he had seen Cagliostro make gold and diamonds. The power of the evil eye is
enlarged upon and instances recounted of persons hypnotizing, "charming," or
even killing birds and animals with a look. She avers that she herself had seen
Eastern Adepts turn water into blood. Observers are quoted who reported a
rope-climbing feat in China and Batavia, in which the human climbers disappeared
overhead, their members fell in portions on the ground, and shortly thereafter
reunited to form the original living bodies! Stories are narrated of fakirs
disemboweling and re-embowling themselves. She herself saw whirling dancers at
Petrovsk in 1865, who cut themselves in frenzy and evoked by the magical powers
of blood the spirits of the dead, with whom they then danced. Twice she was
nearly bitten by poisonous snakes, but was saved by a word of control from a
Shaman or conjurer. The close affinity between man and nature is illustrated by
the statement that in one case a tree died following the death of its human
twin. Speaking of magical trees, she several times tells of the great tree
Kumboum, of Tibet, over whose leaves and bark nature had imprinted ten thousand
spiritual maxims. The magical significance of birthmarks is brought out, with
remarkable instances. She dwells at length on the inability of medical men to
tell definitely whether the human body is dead or not, and cites a dozen
gruesome tales of reawakening in the grave. This takes her into vampirism, which
she establishes on the basis of numerous cases taken mostly from Russian
folklore. It is stated that the Hindu pantheon claimed 330,000,000 types of
spirits. Moses was familiar with electricity; the Egyptians had a high order of
music and chess over five
136
thousand years ago; and anaesthesia
was known to the ancients. Perpetual motion, the Elixer of Life, the Fountain of
Youth and the Philosopher's Stone are declared to be real. She adduces in every
case a formidable show of testimony other than her own. And back of it all is
her persistent assertion that purity of life and thought is a requisite for high
magical performance.
"A man free from worldly incentives and sensuality
may cure in such a way the most 'incurable' diseases, and his vision may become
clear and prophetic."30
"The magic power is never possessed by those
addicted to vicious indulgences."31
Phenomena come, she feels, rather
easily; spiritual life is harder won and worthier.
"With expectancy,
supplemented by faith, one can cure himself of almost any morbific condition.
The tomb of a saint; a holy relic; a talisman; a bit of paper or a garment that
has been handled by a supposed healer; a nostrum, a penance; a ceremonial; a
laying on of hands; or a few words impressively pronounced--will do. It is a
question of temperament, imagination, self-cure."32
"While phenomena of a
physical nature may have their value as a means of arousing the interest of
materialists, and confirming, if not wholly, at least inferentially, our belief
in the survival of our souls, it is questionable whether, under their present
aspect, the modern phenomena are not doing more harm than
good."33
Theosophists themselves often quarrel with Isis because
it seems to overstress bizarre phenomena. They should see that Volume I of the
book aims to show the traces of magic in ancient science, in order to offset the
Spiritualist claims to new discoveries, and to attract attention to the more
philosophic ideas underlying classic magic. Volume II labors to reveal the
presence of a vast occultism behind the religions and theologies of the world.
Again the contention is that
______________
30 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
210.
31 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 218.
32 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
216.
33 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 218.
137
the ancient
priests knew more than the modern expositor, that they kept more concealed than
the present-day theologian has revealed. Modern theology has lost its savor of
early truth and power, as modern technology no longer possesses the "lost arts."
Paganism was to be vindicated as against ecclesiastical orthodoxies.
She
believed that her instruction under the Lamas or Adepts in Tibet had given her
this key, and that therefore the whole vast territory of ancient religion lay
unfruitful for modern understanding until she should come forward and put the
key to the lock. The "key" makes her in a sense the exponent and depository of
"the essential veracities of all the religions and philosophies that are or ever
were."
"Myth was the favorite and universal method of teaching in archaic
times."34
We can not be oblivious of the use made by Plato of myths in
his theoretical constructions.
"Fairy tales do not exclusively belong to
nurseries; all mankind--except those few who in all ages have comprehended their
hidden meaning, and tried to open the eyes of the superstitious--have listened
to such tales in one shape or other, and, after transforming them into sacred
symbols, called the product Religion."35
"There are a few myths in any
religious system but have an historical as well as a scientific foundation.
Myths, as Pococke ably expresses it, 'are now found to be fables just in
proportion as we misunderstand them; truths, in proportion as they were
once understood.'"36
The esotericism of the teachings of Christ and the
Buddha is manifest to anyone who can reason, she declares. Neither can be
supposed to have given out all that a divine being would know.
"It is a
poor compliment paid the Supreme, this forcing upon him four gospels, in which,
contradictory as they often are, there is not a single narrative, sentence or
peculiar expression, whose
______________
34 Ibid., Vol. II, p.
493.
35 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 406.
36 Ibid., Vol. II,
p. 431.
138
parallel may not be found in some older doctrine of
philosophy. Surely the Almighty--were it but to spare future generations their
present perplexity--might have brought down with Him, at His first and only
incarnation on earth, something original--something that would trace a distinct
line of demarcation between Himself and the score or so of incarnate Pagan gods,
who had been born of virgins, had all been saviors, and were either killed or
were otherwise sacrificed for humanity."37
She says that not she but the
Christian Fathers and their successors in the church have put their divine Son
of God in the position of a poor religious plagiarist!
Ancient secret
wisdom was seldom written down at all; it was taught orally, and imparted as a
priceless tradition by one set of students to their qualified successors. Those
receiving it regarded themselves as its custodians and they accepted their
stewardship conscientiously.
To understand the reason for esotericism in
science and religion in earlier times, Madame Blavatsky urges us to recall that
freedom of speech invited persecution.
"The Rosicrucian, Hermetic and
Theosophical Western writers, producing their books in epochs of religious
ignorance and cruel bigotry, wrote, so to say, with the headman's axe suspended
over their necks, or the executioner's fagots laid under their chairs, and hid
their divine knowledge under quaint symbols and misleading
metaphors."38
To give lesser people what they could not appropriate, to
stir complacent conservatism with that threat of disturbing old established
habitudes which higher knowledge always brings, was unsafe in a world still
actuated by codes of arbitrary physical power. High knowledge had to be
esoteric until the progress of general enlightenment brought the masses to a
point where the worst that could happen to the originator of revolutionary ideas
would be the reputation of an idiot, instead of the doom of a Bruno or a Joan.
Madame Blavatsky was willing to be regarded as an idiot,
but
______________
37 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 337.
38 Quoted in
Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 106.
139
her Masters could not
send her forth until autos-da-fé had gone out of vogue.
We have seen in
an earlier chapter that the Mystery Religions of the Eastern Mediterranean world
harbored an esotericism that presumably influenced the formulation of later
systems, notably Judaism and Christianity. In recent decades more attention has
been given to the claims of these old secret societies. St. Paul's affiliation
with them is claimed by Theosophists, and his obvious indebtedness to them is
acknowledged by some students of early Christianity. It is impossible for Madame
Blavatsky to understand the Church's indifference to its origins, and she arrays
startling columns of evidence to show that this neglect may be fatal. The
Mystery Schools, she proclaims, were not shallow cults, but the guardians of a
deep lore already venerable.
"The Mysteries are as old as the world, and
one well versed in the esoteric mythologies of various nations, can trace them
back to the days of the Ante-Vedic period in India."39
She does not
soften her animosity against those influences and agencies that she charges with
culpability for smothering out the Gnosis. The culprit in the case is
Christianity.
"For over fifteen centuries, thanks to the blindly-brutal
persecution of those great vandals of early Christian history, Constantine and
Justinian, ancient wisdom slowly degenerated until it gradually sank into the
deepest mire of monkish superstition and ignorance. The Pythagorean 'knowledge
of things that are'; the profound erudition of the Gnostics; the world- and
time-honored teachings of the great philosophers; all were rejected as doctrines
of Antichrist and Paganism and committed to the flames. With the last seven Wise
Men of the Orient, the remnant group of Neo-Platonists, Hermias, Priscianus,
Diogenes, Eulalius, Damaskius, Simplicius and Isodorus, who fled from the
fanatical persecutions of Justinian to Persia, the reign of wisdom closed. The
books of Thoth . . . containing within their sacred pages the spiritual and
physical history of the creation and progress of our world, were left to mould
in oblivion and contempt for ages. They found no interpreters in Christian
Europe; the Philalethians, or wise
______________
39 Isis Unveiled,
Vol. II, p. 98.
140
'lovers of truth' were no more; they were
replaced by the light-fleers, the tonsured and hooded monks of Papal Rome, who
dread truth, in whatever shape and from whatever quarter it appears, if it but
clashes in the least with their dogmas."40
She speaks of
the
"Jesuitical and crafty spirit which prompted the Christian Church of
the late third century to combat the expiring Neo-Platonic and Eclectic Schools.
The Church was afraid of the Aristotelian dialectic and wished to conceal the
true meaning of the word daemon, Rasit, asdt (emanations); for if the truth of
the emanations were rightly understood, the whole structure of the new religion
would have crumbled along with the Mysteries."41
This motive is stressed
again when she says that the Fathers had borrowed so much from Paganism that
they had to obliterate the traces of their appropriations or be recognized by
all as merely Neo-Platonists! She is keen to point out the value of the riches
thus thrown away or blindly overlooked, and to show how Christianity has been
placed at the mercy of hostile disrupting forces because of its want of a true
Gnosis. She avers that atheists and materialists now gnaw at the heart of
Christianity because it is helpless, lacking the esoteric knowledge of the
spiritual constitution of the universe, to combat or placate them. Gnosticism
taught man that he could attain the fulness of the stature of his innate
divinity; Christianity substituted a weakling's reliance upon a higher power.
Had Christianity held onto the Gnosis and Kabbalism, it would not have had to
graft itself onto Judaism and thus tie itself down to many of the developments
of a merely tribal religion. Had it not accepted the Jehovah of Moses, she says,
it would not have been forced to look upon the Gnostic ideas as heresies, and
the world would now have had a religion richly based on pure Platonic philosophy
and "surely something would then have been gained." Rome itself, Christianized,
paid a heavy penalty for spurning the wisdom of old:
______________
40
Ibid., Vol. II, p. 32.
41 Ibid., Vol. II, p.
34.
141
"In burning the works of the theurgists; in proscribing
those who affected their study; in affixing the stigma of demonolatry to magic
in general; Rome has left her exoteric worship and Bible to be helplessly
riddled by every free-thinker, her sexual emblems to be identified with
coarseness, and her priests to unwittingly turn magicians and sorcerers in their
exorcisms. Thus retribution, by the exquisite adjustment of divine law, is made
to overtake this scheme of cruelty, injustice and bigotry, through her own
suicidal acts."42
Yet Christianity drew heavily from paganism. It erected
almost no novel formulations. Christian canonical books are hardly more than
plagiarisms of older literatures, she affirms, compiled, deleted, revised, and
twisted. She believed that the first chapters of Genesis were based on
the "Chaldean" Kabbala and an old Brahmanical book of prophecies (really later
than Genesis). The doctrine of the Trinity as purely Platonic, she says.
It was Irenaeus who identified Jesus with the "mask of the Logos or Second
Person of the Trinity." The doctrine of the Atonement came from the Gnostics.
The Eucharist was common before Christ's time. Some Neo-Platonist, not John, is
alleged to have written the Fourth Gospel. The Sermon on the Mount is an echo of
the essential principles of monastic Buddhism.
Jesus is torn away from
allegiance to the Jewish system and stands neither as its product nor its
Messiah. Wresting him away from Judaism, and likewise from the emanational
Trinity, both of which rôles were thrust upon him gratuitously by the Christian
Fathers, she declares him to have been a Nazarene, i.e., a member of the
mystic cult of Essenes of Nazars, which perpetuated Oriental systems of the
Gnosis on the shores of the Jordan.
"One Nazarene sect is known to have
existed some 150 years B.C. and to have lived on the banks of the Jordan, and on
the eastern shore of the Dead Sea, according to Pliny and Josephus. But in
King's 'Gnostics' we find quoted another statement by Josephus from verse 13
which says that the Essenes had been established on the shores of the Dead Sea
'for thousands of ages' before Pliny's time."43
______________
42
Ibid., Vol. II, p. 121 43 Ibid., Vol. II, p.
139.
142
Jesus, one of this cult, had become adept in the occult
philosophies of Egypt and Israel, and endeavored to make of the two a synthesis,
drawing at times on more ancient knowledge from the old Hindu doctrines. He was
simply a devout occultist and taught among the people what they could receive of
the esoteric knowledge, reserving his deeper teachings for his fellows in the
Essene monasteries. He had learned in the East and in Egypt the high science of
theurgy, casting out of demons, and control of nature's finer forces, and he
used these powers upon occasion. He posed as no Messiah or Incarnation of the
Logos, but preached the message of the anointing (Christos) of the human spirit
by its baptismal union with the higher principles of our divine
nature.44
In short, Madame Blavatsky leaves to Christianity little but
the very precarious distinction of having "copied all its rites, dogmas and
ceremonies from paganism" save two that can be claimed as original
inventions--the doctrine of eternal damnation (with the fiction of the Devil)
"and the one custom, that of the anathema."
"The Bible of the Christian
Church is the latest receptacle of this scheme of disfigured allegories which
have been erected into an edifice of superstition, such as never entered into
the conceptions of those from whom the Church obtained her knowledge. The
abstract fictions of antiquity, which for ages had filled the popular fancy with
but flickering shadows and uncertain images, have in Christianity assumed the
shapes of real personages and become historical facts. Allegory metamorphosed,
becomes sacred history, and Pagan myth is taught to the people as a revealed
narrative of God's intercourse with His chosen people."45
The final
proposition which Isis labors to establish is that the one source of all
the wisdom of the past is India. Pythag-
______________
44 A wealth of
curious citations is drawn up behind these positions. The whole Passion Week
story is stated to be the reproduction of the drama of initiation into the
Mysteries, and not to have taken place in historical fact. And practically every
other chapter of Christ's life story is paralleled in the lives of the twenty or
more "World Saviors," including Thoth, Orpheus, Vyasa, Buddha, Krishna,
Dionysus, Osiris, Zoroaster, Zagreus, Apollonius, and others.
45 Isis
Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 406.
143
oreanism, she says, is
identical with Buddhistic teachings. "The laws of Manu are the doctrines of
Plato, Philo, Zoroaster, Pythagoras and the Kabala." She quotes Jacolliot, the
French writer:
"This philosophy, the traces of which we find among the
Magians, the Chaldeans, the Egyptians, the Hebrew Kabalists, and the Christians,
is none other than that of the Hindu Brahmans, the sectarians of the pitris, or
the spirits of the invisible worlds which surround us."46
She, with the
key in her hand, sees the solution of the problem of comparative religion as an
easy one.
"While we see the few translators of the Kabala, the Nazarene
Codex and other abstruse works, hopelessly floundering amid the interminable
pantheon of names, unable to agree as to a system in which to classify them, for
the one hypothesis contradicts and overturns the other, we can but wonder at all
this trouble, which could be so easily overcome. But even now, when the
translation and even the perusal of the ancient Sanskrit has become so easy as a
point of comparison, they would never think it possible that every
philosophy--whether Semitic, Hamitic or Turanian, as they call it, has its key
in the Hindu sacred works. Still, facts are there and facts are not easily
destroyed."47
"What has been contemptuously termed Paganism was ancient
Wisdom replete with Deity. . . . Pre-Vedic Brahmanism and Buddhism are the
double source from which all religions spring; Nirvana is the ocean to which all
tend."48
She says there are many parallelisms between references to
Buddha and to Christ. Many points of identity also exist between
Lamaico-Buddhistic and Roman Catholic ceremonies. The idea here hinted at is the
underlying thesis of the whole Theosophic position. Successive members of the
great Oriental Brotherhood have been incarnated at intervals in the history of
mankind, each giving out portions of the one central doctrine, which therefore
must have a common base. The puzzling identities found in the study
of
______________
46 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 38.
47 Ibid.,
Vol. II, p. 227.
48 Ibid., Vol. II, p.
639.
144
Comparative Religion thus find an explanation in the
identity of their authorship.
Mrs. Annie Besant later elaborated this
view in the early pages of her work, Esoteric Christianity. She contrasts
it with the commonly accepted explanation of religious origins of the
academicians of our day. Summing up this position she writes:
"The
Comparative Mythologists contend that the common origin is a common ignorance,
and that the loftiest religious doctrines are simply refined expressions of the
crude and barbarous guesses of savages, of primitive men, regarding themselves
and their surroundings. Animism, fetishism, nature-worship--these are the
constituents of the primitive mud out of which has grown the splendid lily of
religion. A Krishna, a Buddha, a Lao-Tze, a Jesus, are the highly civilized, but
lineal descendants of the whirling medicine-men of the savage. God is a
composite photograph of the innumerable gods who are the personifications of the
forces of nature. It is all summed up in the phrase: Religions are branches from
a common trunk--human ignorance.
"The Comparative Religionists consider,
on the other hand, that all religions originated from the teachings of Divine
Men, who gave out to the different nations, from time to time, such parts of the
verities of religion as the people are capable of receiving, teaching ever the
same morality, inculcating the use of similar means, employing the same
significant symbols. The savage religions--animism and the rest--are
degenerations, the results of decadence, distorted and dwarfed descendants of
true religious beliefs. Sun-worship and pure forms of nature worship were, in
their day, noble religions, highly allegorical, but full of profound truth and
knowledge. The great Teachers . . . form an enduring Brotherhood of men, who
have risen beyond humanity, who appear at certain periods to enlighten the
world, and who are the spiritual guardians of the human race. This view may be
summed up in the phrase: Religions are branches from a common trunk--Divine
Wisdom."49
This is the view of religions which Madame Blavatsky presented
in Isis. Religions, it would say, never rise; they only degenerate.
Theosophic writers50 are at pains to point
______________
49 Dr. Annie
Besant: Esoteric Christianity, p. 8.
50 E.g., cf. C.
W. Leadbeater: The Christian Creed.
145
out that once a
pure high religious impulse is given by a Master-Teacher, it tends before long
to gather about it the incrustations of the human materializing tendency, under
which the spiritual truths are obscured and finally lost amid the crudities of
literalism. Then after the world has blundered on through a period of darkness
the time grows ripe for a new revelation, and another member of the Spiritual
Fraternity comes into terrestrial life. Madame Blavatsky says:
"The very
corner-stone of their (Brahmans' and Buddhists') religious systems is periodical
incarnations of the Deity. Whenever humanity is about merging into materialism
and moral degradation, a Supreme Being incarnates himself in his creature
selected for the purpose, . . . Christna saying to Arjuna (in the Bhagavad
Gita): 'As often as virtue declines in the world, I make myself manifest to
save it.'"51
Madame Blavatsky stated that she was in contact with several
of these supermen, who sent her forth as their messenger to impart, in new form,
the old knowledge.
_____________
51 Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p.
535.
146
CHAPTER VI
THE MAHATMAS AND THEIR
LETTERS
The Masters whom Theosophy presents to us are simply high-ranking
students in life's school of experience. They are members of our own
evolutionary group, not visitants from the celestial spheres. They are supermen
only in that they have attained knowledge of the laws of life and mastery over
its forces with which we are still struggling. They are also termed by
Theosophists the "just men made perfect," the finished products of our terrene
experience, those more earnest souls of our own race who have pressed forward to
attain the fulness of the stature of Christ, the prize of the high calling of
God in Christhood. They are not Gods come down to earth, but earthly mortals
risen to the status of Christs. They ask from us no reverence, no worship; they
demand no allegiance but that which it is expected we shall render to the
principles of Truth and Fact, and to the nobility of life. They are our "Elder
Brothers," not distant deities; and will even make their presence known to us
and grant us the privilege of coöperating with them when we have shown ourselves
capable of working unselfishly for mankind. They are not our Masters in the
sense of holding lordship over us; they are the "Masters of Wisdom and
Compassion." Moved by an infinite sympathy with the whole human race they have
renounced their right to go forward to more splendid conquests in the
evolutionary field, and have remained in touch with man in order to throw the
weight of their personal force on the side of progress.
But the rank of
the Mahatmas must not be underrated because they still fall under the category
of human beings. They have accumulated vast stores of knowledge about the life
of man and the uni-
147
verse; about the meaning and purpose of
evolution; the methods of progress; the rationale of the expansion of the powers
latent in the Ego; the choice and attainment of ends and values in life; and the
achievement of beauty and grandeur in individual development. Upon all these
questions which affect the life and happiness of mortals they possess competent
knowledge which they are willing to impart to qualified students. They have by
virtue of their own force of character mastered every human problem, perfected
their growth in beauty, gained control over all the natural forces of life. They
stand at the culmination of all human endeavor. They have lifted mortality up to
immortality, have carried humanity aloft to divinity. Through the mediatorship
of the Christos, or spiritual principle in them, they have reconciled the carnal
nature of man, his animal soul, with the essential divinity of his higher Self.
And they, if they have been lifted up, stand patiently eager to draw all men
unto them.
Madame Blavatsky's exploitation of the Adepts (or their
exploitation of her) is a startling event in the modern religious drama. It was
a unique procedure and took the world by surprise. To be sure, India and Tibet,
even China, were familiar with the idea of supermen. India had its Buddhas,
Boddhisatvas, and Rishis. But what not even India was prepared to view without
suspicion was that several of the hierarchical Brotherhood should carry on a
clandestine intercourse with a nondescript group, made up of a Russian, an
American, and several Englishmen, and issue to them fragments of the ancient
lore for broadcasting to the incredulous West, which would mock it, scorn it,
and trample it underfoot.
It was only justified, according to Madame
Blavatsky, by certain considerations which influenced the final decision of the
Great White Brotherhood Council. Majority opinion was against the move; but the
minority urged that two reasons rendered it advisable. The guillotine and the
fagot pile had been eliminated from the historical forms of martyrdom; and,
secondly, the esotericism of the doctrines was, in a
manner,
148
an automatic safety device. The teachings would appeal
to those who were "ready" for them; their meaning would soar over the heads of
those for whom they were not suited.
The matter was decided
affirmatively, we are informed, by the assumption of full karmic responsibility
for the launching of the crusade by the two Adepts, Morya and Koot Hoomi Lal
Singh. The latter, in the early portion of his present incarnation, had been a
student at an English University and felt that he had found sufficient
reliability on the part of intelligent Europeans to make them worthy to receive
the great knowledge. Morya, we are told, had taken on Madame Blavatsky as his
personal attaché, pupil or chela. She had earned in former situations the right
to the high commission of carrying the old truth to the world at large in the
last quarter of the nineteenth century.
It is hinted that Madame
Blavatsky had formed a close link with the Master Morya in former births, when
she was known to him as a great personage. It is also said that she was herself
kept from full admission to the Brotherhood only by some special "Karma" which
needed to be "worked out" in a comparatively humble station and personality
during this life. She said the Masters knew what she was accountable for, though
it was not the charlatanism the world at large charged her with. We are led to
assume that the Master Morya exercised a guardianship over her in early life,
and later, that he occasionally manifested himself to her, giving her
suggestions and encouragement. One or two of these encounters with her Master
are recorded. She met him in his physical body in London in 1851. In one of her
old note-books, which her aunt Madame Fadeef sent to her in Würzburg in 1885,
there is a memorandum of her meeting with Morya in London. The entry is as
follows:
"Nuit mémorable. Certaine nuit par un clair de lune que se
couchait à--Ramsgate--12 août, 1851,--lorsque je rencontrai le Maître de mes
rêves."
Hints are thrown out as to other meetings on her travels, and we
are told that she studied ancient philosophy and
149
science under
the Master's direct tutelage in Tibet covering periods aggregating at least
seven years of her life. The testimony of Col. Olcott is no less precise. He
says:
"I had ocular proof that at least some of those who worked with us
were living men, from having seen them in the flesh in India, after having seen
them in the astral body in America and in Europe; from having touched and talked
with them. Instead of telling me that they were spirits, they told me they were
as much alive as myself, and that each of them had his own peculiarities and
capabilities, in short, his complete individuality. They told me that what they
had attained to I should one day myself acquire, how soon would depend entirely
on myself; and that I might not anticipate anything whatever from favor, but,
like them, must gain every step, every inch, of progress by my own
exertions."1
The fact that the Masters were living human beings made
their revelations of cosmic and spiritual truth, say the Theosophists, more
valuable than alleged revelations from hypothetical Gods in other systems of
belief. That their knowledge is, in a manner of speaking, human instead of
heavenly or "divine" should give it greater validity for us. The Mahatmas were,
it is said, in direct contact with the next higher grades of intelligent beings
standing above them in the hierarchical order, so that their teachings have the
double worth of high human and supernal authority. This, occultists believe,
affords the most trustworthy type of revelation.
It was not until the two
Theosophic Founders had reached India, in whose northernmost vastnesses the
members of the Great White Brotherhood were said to maintain their earthly
residence, that continuous evidence of their reality and their leadership was
vouchsafed. The Theosophic case for Adept revelation rests upon a long-continued
correspondence between persons (Mr. A. P. Sinnett, mainly, Mr. A. O. Hume,
Damodar and others in minor degree) of good intelligence, but claiming no
mystical or psychical illumination, and the two Mahatmas, K.H. and M. Sinnett,
Editor of The Pioneer, at Simla in northern India, was an
English
______________
1 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, of June,
1893.
150
journalist of distinction and ability. Although he had
manifested no special temperamental disposition toward the mystical or occult,
he was the particular recipient of the attention and favors of the Mahatmas over
a space of three or four years, beginning about 1879. It was at his own home in
Simla, later at Allahabad, that most of the letters were received, addressed to
him personally. Most, if not all, were in answer to the queries which he was
permitted, if not invited, to ask his respected teachers.
Mr. Sinnett's
book, The Occult World, was the first direct statement to the West of the
existence of the Masters and their activity as sponsors for the Theosophical
Society. He undertook the onerous task of vindicating, as far as argument and
the phenomenal material in his hands could, the title of these supermen to the
possession of surpassing knowledge and sublime wisdom. His work supplemented
that of Madame Blavatsky in Isis, yet it went beyond the latter in
asserting the connection of the Theosophical Society with an alleged association
of perfected individuals. It put the Theosophical Society squarely on record as
an organization, not merely for the purpose of eclectic research, but standing
for the promulgation of a body of basic truths of an esoteric sort and
arrogating to itself a position of unique eminence in a spiritual world
order.
In the Introduction to The Occult World Mr. Sinnett
elaborates his apologetic for the general theory of Mahatmic existence and
knowledge. Fundamental for his argument is, of course, the theory of
reincarnational continuity of development which would enable individual humans,
through long experience, to attain degrees of learning far in advance of the
majority of the race. But his "proofs" of both the existence and the superior
knowledge of these exceptional beings are offered in the book itself, in which
his experience with them, and the material of some of their letters to him, are
presented. His introductory dissertation is a justification of the Mahatmic
policy of maintaining their priceless knowledge in futile obscurity within the
narrow confines of their exclusive Brotherhood. He then attempts to
rectify
151
our scornful point of view as regards esotericism. Of
the superlative wisdom of the Masters he posits his own direct knowledge. The
Brothers are to him empirically real. But the logical justification of their
attitude of seclusion and aloofness, or worse, of their selfish appropriation of
knowledge which it must be assumed would be of immense social value if
disseminated, is the point upon which he chiefly labors.
"There is a
school of philosophy," he says, "still in existence of which modern culture has
lost sight . . . modern metaphysics, and to a large extent modern physical
science, have been groping for centuries blindly after knowledge which occult
philosophy has enjoyed in full measure all the while. Owing to a train of
fortunate circumstances I have come to know that this is the case; I have
come into contact with persons who are heirs of a greater knowledge concerning
the mysteries of Nature and humanity than modern culture has yet evolved. . . .
Modern science has accomplished grand results by the open method of
investigation, and is very impatient of the theory that persons who have
attained to real knowledge, either in science or metaphysics, could have been
content to hide their light under a bushel. . . . But there is no need to
construct hypotheses in the matter. The facts are accessible if they are sought
for in the right way."2
Spiritual science is foremost with the Adepts;
physical science being of secondary importance. The main strength of occultism
has been devoted to the science of metaphysical energy and to the development of
faculties in man, not instruments outside him, which will yield him actual
experimental knowledge of the subtle powers in nature. It aims to gain actual
and exact knowledge of spiritual things which, under all other systems, remain
the subject of speculation or blind religious faith.
Summing up the
extraordinary powers which Adeptship gives its practitioners, he says they are
chiefly the ability to dissociate consciousness from the body, to put it
instantaneously in rapport with other minds anywhere on the
earth,
______________
2 A. P. Sinnett: The Occult World, p.
1.
152
and to exert magical control over the sublimated energies
of matter. Occultism postulates a basic differentiation between the principles
of mind, soul, and spirit, and gives a formal technique for their interrelated
development. It has evolved a practique, also, based on the spiritual
constitution of matter, which, it alleges, vastly facilitates human growth. The
skilled occultist is able to shift his consciousness from one to another plane
of manifestation. In short, his control over the vibrational energies of the
Akasha makes him veritably lord of all the physical creation.
The members
of the Brotherhood remain in more or less complete seclusion among the Himalayas
because, as they have said, they find contact with the coarse heavy currents of
ordinary human emotionalism--violent feeling, material grasping, and base
ambitions--painful to their sensitive organization. This great fraternity is at
once the least and most exclusive body in the world; it is composed of the
world's very elect, yet any human being is eligible. He must have demonstrated
his possession of the required qualifications, which are so high that the
average mortal must figure on aeons of education before he can knock at the
portals of their spiritual society. The road thither is beset with many real
perils, which no one can safely pass till he has proven his mastery over his own
nature and that of the world.
"The ultimate development of the adept
requires amongst other things a life of absolute physical purity, and the
candidate must, from the beginning, give practical evidence of his willingness
to adopt this. He must . . . for all the years of his probation, be perfectly
chaste, perfectly abstemious, and indifferent to physical luxury of every sort.
This regimen does not involve any fantastic discipline or obtrusive ascetism,
nor withdrawal from the world. There would be nothing to prevent a gentleman in
ordinary society from being in some of the preliminary stages of training
without anybody about him being the wiser. For true occultism, the sublime
achievement of the real adept, is not attained through the loathsome ascetism of
the ordinary Indian fakeer, the yogi of the woods and wilds, whose dirt
accumulates with his sanctity--of
153
the fanatic who fastens iron
hooks into his flesh or holds up an arm till it withers."3
How did the
Mahatmas impart their teaching? Mr. Sinnett was the channel of transmission, and
to him the two Masters sent a long series of letters on philosophical and other
subjects, they themselves remaining in the background. The Mahatma
Letters themselves, as originally received by Mr. Sinnett, were not
published until 1925.4 Sinnett, early in his acquaintance with the Masters,
asked K.H. for the privilege of a personal interview with him. The Master
declined. His messages came in the form of long letters which dropped into his
possession by facile means that would render the Post Office authorities of any
nation both envious and sceptical. The correspondence began when Madame
Blavatsky suggested that Mr. Sinnett write certain questions which were on his
mind in a letter addressed to K.H., saying she would dispatch it to him, several
hundred miles distant, by the exercise of her magnetic powers. She would
accompany it with the request for a reply. The idea in Mr. Sinnett's mind was
one which he thought, could the Adept actually carry it out, would demonstrate
at one stroke the central theses of occultism and practically revolutionize the
whole trend of human thinking. His suggestion to K.H. in that first letter was
that the Mahatma should use his superior power to reproduce in far-off India, on
the same morning on which it issued from the press, a full copy of the London
Times. Madame Blavatsky disintegrated the missive and wafted its
particles to the hermit in the mountains. The answer came in two days. The test
of the London newspaper, he wrote, was inadmissible precisely because "it would
close the mouths of the sceptics." The world is unprepared for so convincing a
demonstration of supernormal powers, he argued, because, on the one hand the
event would throw the principles and formulae of science
______________
3
Ibid., p. 14. More detailed requirements in the way of preparation for
Adeptship will be set forth when we undertake the general critique of the occult
life, in Chapter XI.
4 In 1883 he published the general outlines of the
cosmology involved in their communications in a work called Esoteric
Buddhism.
154
into chaos, and on the other, it would demolish
the structure of the concepts of natural law by the restoration of the belief in
"miracle." The result would thus be disastrous for both science and faith.
Incompetent as the thesis of mechanistic naturalism is to provide mortals with
the ground of understanding of the deeper phenomena of life and mind, it does
less harm on the whole than would a return to arrant superstition such as must
follow in the wake of the wonder Sinnett had proposed. The Master asked his
correspondent if the modern world had really thrown off the shackles of ignorant
prejudice and religious bigotry to a sufficient extent to enable it to withstand
the shock that such an occurrence would bring to its fixed ideas. If this one
test were furnished, he went on, Western incredulity would in a moment ask for
others and still others; shrewd ingenuity would devise ever more bizarre
performances; and since not all the millions of sceptics could be given ocular
demonstrations, the net outcome of the whole procedure would be confusion and
unhappiness. The mass of humanity must feel its way slowly toward these high
powers, and the premature exhibition of future capacity would but overwhelm the
mind and unsettle the poise of people everywhere.
Mr. Sinnett replied,
venturing to believe "that the European mind was less hopelessly intractable
than Koot Hoomi had represented it." The Master's second letter continued his
protestations:
"The Mysteries never were, never can be, put within reach
of the general public, not, at least, until the longed-for day when our
religious philosophy becomes universal. At no time have more than a scarcely
appreciable minority of men possessed Nature's secret, though multitudes have
witnessed the practical evidences of the possibility of their
possession."
Letters followed on both sides, Mr. Sinnett taking advantage
of many opportunities afforded by varying circumstances in each case to fortify
his assurance that Madame Blavatsky herself was not inditing the replies in the
name of the Adept. Frequently replies came, containing specific reference to
detailed matters in his missives, when she had not been out
155
of
his sight during the interim between the despatch and the return. The letters
came and went as well when she was hundreds of miles away. The answers would
often be found in his locked desk drawer, sometimes inside his own letter, the
seal of which had not been broken. On occasion the Mahatma's reply dropped from
the open air upon his desk while he was watching.
Madame Blavatsky and
the Master both explained the method by which the letters were written.
Theoretically, they were not written at all, but "precipitated." Among the
Adept's occult or "magical" powers is that of impressing upon the surface of
some material, as paper, the images which he holds vividly before his mind. He
may thus impress or imprint a photograph, a scene, or a word, or sentence, upon
parchment. He uses materials, of course, paper, ink or pencil graphite. But in
his ability to disintegrate atomic combinations of matter, he can seize upon the
material present, or even at a distance, and "precipitate" or reintegrate it, in
conformity with the lines of his strong thought-energies. He can thus image a
sentence, word for word, in his mind, and then pour the current of atomic
material into the given form of the letters, upon the plane of the paper. The
idiosyncrasies of his own chirography would be carried through the mental
process. K.H., we are told, always used blue ink or blue pencil, while the
epistles from M. always came in red. Specimens of the two handwritings are given
in the frontispiece of the Mahatma Letters. The art of occult
precipitation appears still more marvelous when we are told by Madame Blavatsky
that the Adept did not attend to the actual precipitation himself but delegated
it to one of his distant chelas, who caught his Master's thought-forms in the
Astral Light and set them down by the chemical process which he had been taught
to employ. The Master thus needed only to think vividly the words of his
sentences, so as to impress them upon the mind of his pupil, and the latter did
the rest. This was explained by H.P.B. in an article, Lodges of Magic, in
Lucifer, Oct., 1888, while she was being accused of issuing false
messages from the Master.
156
"For it is hardly one out of one
hundred 'Occult' letters that is ever written by the hand of the Masters in
whose names and on whose behalf they are sent, as the Masters have neither need
nor leisure to write them; and that when a Master says: 'I wrote that letter,'
it means only that every word in it was dictated by him and impressed under his
direct supervision. Generally they make their chela . . . write (or precipitate)
them. It depends entirely upon the chela's state of development how accurately
the ideas may be transmitted and the writing model imitated. Thus the non-adept
recipient is left in the dilemma of uncertainty whether if one letter is false,
all may not be."
For example, when a Mr. Henry Kiddle, an American
lecturer on Spiritualism, accused the writer of the Mahatma Letters of
having plagiarized whole passages from his lecture delivered at Mt. Pleasant,
New York, in 1880, a year prior to the publication of The Occult World,
the Master K.H. explained in a letter to Mr. Sinnett that the apparent forgery
of words and ideas came about through a bit of carelessness on his part in the
precipitation of his ideas through a chela. While dictating the letter to the
latter, he had caught himself "listening in" on Mr. Kiddle's address being
delivered at the moment in America; and as a consequence the chela took down
portions of the actual lecture as reflected from the mind of K.H.
Mr.
Sinnett used the opportunity thus given him to draw from the Mahatma an outline
of a portion of the esoteric philosophy and science which was presumed to be in
his custody. The Master exhibited readiness to comply with Mr. Sinnett's
requests for information upon all vital and important matters.
Koot Hoomi
tells Sinnett first that the world must prepare itself for the manifestation of
phenomenal elements in constantly augmenting volume and force. The age of
miracles, he says, is not past; it really never was. Plato was right in
asserting that ideas ruled the world; and as the human mind increases its
receptivity to larger ideas, the world will advance, revolutions will spring
from the spreading ferment, creeds and powers will crumble before their onward
march.
157
The duty set before intelligent people is to sweep away
as much as possible of the dross left by our pious forefathers to make ready for
the apotheosis of human life. The great new ideas
"touch man's true
position in the universe, in relation to his previous and future births; his
origin and ultimate destiny; the relation of the mortal to the immortal; of the
temporary to the eternal; of the finite to the infinite; ideas larger, grander,
more comprehensive, recognizing the universal reign of Immutable Law, unchanging
and unchangeable in regard to which there is only an Eternal Now, while to
uninitiated mortals time is past or future as related to their finite existence
on this material speck of dirt. This is what we study and what many have
solved."5
Many old idols must be dethroned, chief of all being that of an
anthropomorphized Deity, with its train of debasing superstitions.
"And
now," says K.H., "after making due allowance for evils that are natural and that
cannot be avoided . . . I will point out the greatest, the chief cause of nearly
two thirds of the evils that pursue humanity ever since that cause became a
power. It is religion, under whatever form and in whatever nation. It is the
sacerdotal caste, the priesthood and the churches; it is in those illusions that
man looks upon as sacred that he has to search out the source of that multitude
of evils which is the great curse of humanity and that almost overwhelms
mankind. Ignorance created gods and cunning took advantage of the opportunity.
Look at India and look at Christendom and Islam, at Judaism and Fetichism. It is
priestly imposture that rendered these Gods so terrible to man; it is religion
that makes of him the selfish bigot, the fanatic that hates all mankind outside
his own sect without rendering him any better or more moral for it. It is belief
in God and Gods that makes two-thirds of humanity the slaves of a handful of
those who deceive them under the false pretence of saving them. . . . Remember
the sum of human misery will never be diminished unto that day when the better
portion of humanity destroys in the name of Truth, Morality and universal
Charity the altars of their false Gods."6
______________
5 Mahatma
Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 24.
6 Ibid., p.
57.
158
He goes on to clarify and delimit his
position:
"Neither our philosophy nor ourselves believe in a God, least
of all in one whose pronoun necessitates a capital G. Our philosophy falls under
the definition of Hobbes. It is preëminently the science of effects by their
causes and of causes by their effects, and since it is also the science of
things deduced from first principle, as Bacon defines it, before we admit any
such principle we must know it, and have no right to admit even its possibility.
. . . Therefore we deny God both as philosophers and as Buddhists. We know there
are planetary and other spiritual lives, and we know there is in our system no
such thing as God, either personal or impersonal. Parabrahm is not a God, but
absolute immutable law, and Ishwar is the effect of Avidya (ignorance) and Maya
(illusion), ignorance based on the great delusion. The word 'God' was invented
to designate the unknown cause of those effects which man has ever admired or
dreaded without understanding them, and since we claim--and that we are able to
prove what we claim--i.e., the knowledge of that cause and causes, we are
in a position to maintain there is no God or Gods behind them."7
The
causes assigned to phenomena by the Mahatmas, he says, are natural, sensible,
supernatural, unintelligible, and unknown. The God of the theologians is simply
an imaginary power, that has never yet manifested itself to human perception.
The cause posited by the Adept is that power whose activities we behold in every
phenomenon in the universe. They are pantheists, never agnostics. The Deity they
envisage is everywhere present, as well in matter as elsewhere.
"In other
words we believe in Matter alone, in matter as visible nature and matter in its
invisibility as the invisible omnipresent omnipotent Proteus with its unceasing
motion which is its life, and which nature draws from herself, since she is the
great whole outside of which nothing can exist. . . . The existence of matter,
then, is a fact; the existence of motion is another fact, their self-existence
and eternity or indestructibility is a third fact. And the idea of pure Spirit
as a Being or an Existence--give it whatever name you will--is a chimera, a
gigantic absurdity."8
______________
7 Ibid., p. 52.
8
Ibid., p. 56.
159
Furthermore, says K.H., your conceptions
of an all-wise Cosmic Mind or Being runs afoul of sound logic on another count.
You claim, he says, that the life and being of this God pervades and animates
all the universe. But even your own science predicates of the cosmic material
ether that it, too, already permeates all the ranges of being in nature. You are
thus putting two distinct pervading essences in the universe. You are
postulating two primordial substances, two basic elemental essences, where but
one can be. Why posit an imaginary substrate when you already have a concrete
one? Find your God in the material you are sure is there; do not forge a fiction
and put it outside of real existence to account for that existence. Why
constitute a false God when you have a real Universe?
There is an
illimitable Force in the universe, but even this Force is not God, since man may
learn to bend it to his will. It is simply the visible and objective expression
of the absolute substance in its invisible and subjective form.
From this
strict and inexorable materialism K.H. seems to relent a moment when he says to
Mr. Hume:
"I do not protest at all, as you seem to think, against your
theism, or a belief in abstract ideal of some kind, but I cannot help asking
you, how do you or can you know that your God is all-wise, omnipotent and
love-ful, when everything in nature, physical and moral, proves such a being, if
he does exist, to be quite the reverse of all you say of him? Strange delusion
and one which seems to overpower your very intellect!"9
The intricate
problem, then, of how the blind and unintelligent forces of matter in motion do
breed and have bred "highly intelligent beings like ourselves" "is covered by
the eternal progression of cycles, and the process of evolution ever perfecting
its work as it goes along." Intelligence lies somehow in the womb of matter, and
evolution brings it to birth. Matter and spirit, we must constantly be reminded,
are but the two polar aspects of the One Substance.
The great
philosophical problem of whether reality is monistic or pluralistic finds clear
statement and elucidation
______________
9 Ibid., p.
141.
160
in the Letters. It can be gathered from all the argument
of K.H. that primordial nature is a monism, but that when the hidden energy, or
sheer potentiality, of the unit principle deploys into action, or what the
occultists speak of as manifestation, it splits, first into a duality, or
polarization, and then into an infinity of modifications arising from varying
intensities of vibration and modes of combination. Through the spectacles of
time and space we see life as multiple; could we be freed from the limitations
of our sensorium, however, we could see life whole, as a single essence.
Non-polarized force is, in any terms of our apperceptive nature, an
impossibility and a nonentity; pure spirit is a sheer abstraction. Spirit must
be changed into matter, to be seen.
It is a silly philosophy which would
exalt spirit and debase matter, as many ascetic or idealistic religious systems
have done. Matter is the garment of spirit, and needs but to be beautified and
refined. Spirit is helpless without it. "Bereaved of Prakriti, Purusha (Spirit)
is unable to manifest itself, hence ceases to exist--becomes nihil."10 Likewise
Spirit is necessary to the faintest stir of life in matter.
"Without
Spirit or Force even that which Science styles as 'not-living' matter, the
so-called mineral ingredients which feed plants, could never have been called
into form."11
Form will vanish the moment spirit is withdrawn from
it.
"Matter, force and motion are the trinity of physical objective
nature, as the trinitarian unity of spirit-matter is that of the spiritual or
subjective nature. Motion is eternal because spirit is eternal. But no modes of
motion can ever be conceived unless they are in conjunction with
matter."12
"Unconscious and non-existing when separated, they become
consciousness and life when brought together,"13
says K.H. in reference
to the two poles of being. If the spirit or force were to fail, the electron
would cease to swirl about
______________
10 Ibid., p.
142.
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid., p.
71.
161
the proton, the atom would collapse, the worlds would
vanish. The world is an illusion in the same way that the solid appearance of
the revolving spokes of a wheel is an illusion. Stop the swirl, and the universe
not only collapses--it goes out of manifestation.
A novel and startling
corollary of the teaching that the forces of nature are "blind unconscious"
laws, is seen in the query of K.H. to Mr. Hume, whether it had ever occurred to
him that
"universal, like finite human mind, might have two attributes or
a dual power--one, the voluntary and conscious, and the other the involuntary
and unconscious, or the mechanical power. To reconcile the difficulty of many
theistic and anti-theistic propositions, both these powers are a philosophical
necessity. . . . Take the human mind in connection with the body. Man has two
distinct physical brains; the cerebrum . . . the source of the voluntary nerves;
and the cerebellum--the fountain of the involuntary nerves which are the agents
of the unconscious or mechanical powers of the mind to act through. And weak and
uncertain as may be the control of man over his involuntary, such as the blood
circulation, the throbbings of the heart and respiration, especially during
sleep--yet how far more powerful, how much more potential appears man as master
and ruler over the blind molecular motion . . . than that which you will
call God shows over the immutable laws of nature. Contrary in that to the
finite, the 'infinite mind' . . . exhibits but the functions of its
cerebellum."14
That Master admits that he is arguing the case for such a
duality of cosmic mental function only on the basis of the theory that the
macrocosm is the prototype of the microcosm, and that the high planetary spirits
themselves have no more concrete evidence of the operation of a "cosmic
cerebrum" than we have.
The Master has taken many pages to detail to Mr.
Sinnett the information relative to the evolution of the worlds from the nebular
mist, and the outline of the whole cosmogonic scheme. As this will be dealt with
more fully in our review of The Secret Doctrine, it need only be glanced
at
______________
14 Ibid., p. 137.
162
here to give
coherence to the material in the Letters. Force or spirit descends into
matter and creates or organizes the universes. Its immersion in the mineral
kingdom marks the lowest or grossest point of its descent, and from there it
begins to return to spirit, carrying matter up with it to self-consciousness.
Impulsions of life energy emanate from "the heart of the universe" and go
quivering through the various worlds, vivifying them and bringing to each in
turn its fitting grade of living organisms. Thus came the races of men on our
Earth, which is now harboring its Fifth great family, the Aryan.
What is
of great interest in the scheme of Theosophy is that
"At the beginning of
each Round, when humanity reappears under quite different conditions than those
afforded by the birth of each new race and its sub-races, a 'Planetary' has to
mix with these primitive men, and to refresh their memories and reveal to them
the truths they knew during the preceding Round. Hence the confused traditions
about Jehovahs, Ormazds, Osirises, Brahms and the tutti quanti. But that happens
only for the benefit of the First Race. It is the duty of the latter to choose
the fit recipients among its sons, who are 'set apart'--to use a Biblical
phrase--as the vessels to contain the whole stock of knowledge to be divided
among the future races and generations until the close of that Round. . . .
Every race has its Adepts; and with every new race we are allowed to give them
as much of our knowledge as the men of that race deserve. The last seventh race
will have its Buddha, as every one of its predecessors had."15
And then
Koot Hoomi undertakes to meet the inevitable query: What comes out of the
immense machinery of the cycles and globes and rounds?
_______________
15
Ibid., p. 167. "En passant to show you that not only were not the
'Races' invented by us, but that they are a cardinal dogma with the Lama
Buddhists, and with all who study our esoteric doctrines, I send you an
explanation on a page or two of Rhys Davids' Buddhism,--otherwise
incomprehensible, meaningless and absurd. It is written with the special
permission of the Chohan (my Master) and--for your benefit. No Orientalist has
ever suspected the truths contained in it, and--you are the first Western man
(outside Tibet) to whom it is now explained."--The Mahatma Letters, p.
158.
163
"What emerges at the end of all things is not only 'pure
and impersonal spirit,' but the collected 'personal' remembrances" . . .16 The
individual, imperishable, will enjoy the fruits of its collective
lives.
If the Mahatma's attempt to solve the eternal riddle of the "good"
of earthly life is not so complete and satisfactory as might have been wished,
we at least gather from this interesting passage that its ultimate meaning can
be ascertained only by our personal experience with every changing form and
aspect of life itself. We must taste of all the modes of existence. This
inflicts upon us the "cycle of necessity," the imperative obligation to tread
the weary wheel of life on all the globes. We will know the "good" of it all
only by living through it. There is no vindication for ethics, for religion, for
philosophy, for teleology and optimism, save in life and experience itself.
Reason, dialectic, can do nothing for us if life does not first furnish us the
material content of the good. All we can do is look to life with the confident
expectation that its processes will justify our wishes. We must in the end stand
on faith. If life prove not ultimately sweet to the tasting, no rationalization
will make it so.
We are assured, however, that the unit of personal
consciousness built up in the process of cosmic evolution is never annihilated,
but expands until it becomes inclusive of the highest. It enjoys the fruitage of
its dull incubations in the lower worlds in its ever-enhancing capacities for a
life "whose glory and splendor have no limits."
But, says K.H.
immortality is quite a relative matter. Man, being a compound creature, is not
entirely immortal. You know, he reminds us, that the physical body has no
immortality. Neither the etheric double nor the kama rupa (astral body), nor yet
the lower manasic (mental) principle survive disintegration. Only the Ego in the
causal body holds its conscious existence between lives on earth. Even the
planetary spirits, high as they are in the scale of being, suffer breaks in
their conscious life,--the periods of pralaya. In the true sense of the term
only the one life has absolute
______________
16 Mahatma Letters to A.
P. Sinnett, p. 158.
164
immortality, for it is the only
existence which has neither beginning nor end, nor any break in its continuity.
All lower aspects and embodiments have immortality, but with periodic recessions
into inanition.
The problem of evil received treatment at K.H.'s hands,
and is summarized in the statement that
"Evil has no existence per se and
is but the absence of good and exists but for him who is made its victim. It
proceeds from two causes, and no more than good is it an independent cause in
nature. Nature is destitute of goodness or malice; she follows only immutable
laws, when she either gives life and joy or sends suffering and death and
destroys what she has created. Nature has an antidote for every poison and her
laws a reward for every suffering. The butterfly devoured by a bird becomes that
bird, and the little bird killed by an animal goes into a higher form. It is the
blind law of necessity and the eternal fitness of things, and hence cannot be
called evil in Nature. The real evil proceeds from human intelligence and its
origin rests entirely with reasoning man who dissociates himself from Nature.
Humanity then alone is the true source of evil. Evil is the exaggeration of
good, the progeny of human selfishness and greediness. Think profoundly and you
will find that save death--which is no evil but a necessary law, and accidents
which will always find their reward in a future life--the origin of every evil,
whether small or great, is in human action, in man whose intelligence makes him
the one free agent in Nature. It is not Nature that creates diseases, but man. .
. . Food, sexual relations, drink, are all natural necessities of life; yet
excess in them brings on disease, misery, suffering, mental and physical. . . .
Become a glutton, a debauchee, a tyrant, and you become the originator of
diseases, of human suffering and misery. Therefore it is neither Nature nor an
imaginary Deity that has to be blamed, but human nature made vile by
selfishness."17
It will be of interest to hear what K.H. says about
"heaven."
"It (Devachan)18 is an idealed paradise in each case, of
the
______________
17 Ibid., p. 52.
18 Devachanna
would be equivalent to the Sanskrit devachhanna, hidden (abode) of
the gods. On page 373 of the Mahatma Letters the Master K.H. writes: "The
meaning of the terms 'Devachan' and 'Deva-Loka,' is identical; 'chan' and
'loka'
165
Ego's own making, and by him filled with the scenery,
crowded with the incidents and thronged with the people he would expect to find
in such a sphere of compassionate bliss."19
Man makes his own
heaven or hell, and is in it while he is making it. It is subjective; only,
Theosophy postulates a certain (refined and sublimated) objectivity to the forms
of our subjectivity. Man does in heaven only what he does on earth--forms a
conception and then hypostatizes or reifies it. Only, in the case of nirvanic
states, the reification is instantaneously externalized. On earth it is a slower
formation. The "Summerland" of the Spiritualists is but the objectification of
the Ego's buoyant dreams, when freed from the heavy limitations of the earth
body.
"In Devachan the dreams of the objective life become the realities
of the subjective."20
This means that the ideal creations, the highest
aspirations of man on earth, become the substance of his actual consciousness in
heaven. They are the only elements of his normal human mind that are pitched at
a vibration rate high enough to impress the matter or stuff of his permanent
body, and hence they alone cause a repercussion or response in his pure
subjective consciousness when the lower bodies are lost. On this theory the day
dreams and the ideal longings of the human soul become the most vital and
substantial, and abiding, activities of his psychic life.
The only
memories of the earth life that intrude into this picture of heavenly bliss are
those connected with the feelings of love and hate.
"Love and hatred are
the only immortal feelings, the only survivors from the wreck of the Ye-damma or
phenomenal world."21
______________
equally signifying place or
abode. Deva is a word too indiscriminately used in Eastern
writings, and is at times merely a blind." Deva may be roughly translated as
"the shining one" or god. Devachan written alternatively Deva-Chan) is thus used
to signify "the abode of the gods." Theosophists interchange it with our term
"heaven-world."
19 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p.
179.
20 Ibid., p. 197.
21 Ibid., p.
187.
166
All other feelings function at too low a rate to register
on the ethereal body of the Devachanee, and are lost.
"Out of the
resurrected past nothing remains but what the Ego has felt spiritually--that was
evolved by and through, and lived over by his spiritual faculties--be it love or
hatred."22
Suicides, says K.H., must undergo a peculiar discipline
following their premature death. Since they have arbitrarily interrupted a cycle
of nature before its normal completion, the operation of law requires that they
hang suspended, so to speak, in a condition of near-earthly existence until what
would have been their natural life-term has expired.
"The suicides who,
foolishly hoping to escape life, found themselves still alive, have suffering
enough in store for them from that very life. Their punishment is in the
intensity of the latter."23
Their distress consists, it seems, in
remaining within the purview of their earthly life without being able to express
its impulses. They are often tempted to enjoy life again by proxy, i.e.,
through mediums or by efforts at a sort of vampiristic obsession. Victims of
death by accident have a happier fate. They are more quickly released from
earth's lure to partake of the lethal existence in the higher
Devachan.
All those souls who do not slip down into the eighth
sphere--Avichi--through a "pull" of the animal nature which proved too strong
for their spiritual fibre to resist, go on to the Devachan--to Heaven. To the
Theosophist heaven is not "that bourne from which no traveler e'er returns," nor
is access to it a matter of even rare exception. Millions of persons in earth
life have had glimpses through its portals, in sleep, trance, catalepsis,
anaesthesia, hypnosis, or in the open-eyed mystic's vision. It is a realm of
sweet surcease from pain and sorrow, of happiness without alloy. But it is far
from being the same place, or from providing identically the same experience,
for every soul. Each one's heaven is determined by the capacities for spiritual
enjoyment developed on earth. Only the spiritual senses
survive.
______________
22 Ibid., p. 187.
23 Ibid.,
p. 183.
167
To enrich heaven one must have laid up spiritual
treasure on earth. Furthermore, the life there is not without break. The
released Ego does not loll away an eternal existence there, but after due rest
returns to earth. Nor is his enjoyment of the Devachan the same in each sojourn
there. He bites deeper into the bliss of heaven each time he takes his flight
from body. The constant enrichment of his experience in the upper spheres
provides a never-ending novelty.
To Mr. Sinnett's assertion that a mental
condition of happiness empty of sensational, emotional, and lower mental
(manasic) content would be an intolerable monotony K.H. replies by asking him if
he felt any sense of monotony during that one moment in his life when he
experienced the utmost fulness of conscious being. Devachan is like that, he
assured the complainant, only much more so. As our climatic moments in this life
seem by their ineffable opulence to swallow up the weary sense of the time-drag,
so the ecstatic consciousness of the heaven state is purged of all sense of
ennui or successive movement. To put it succinctly, there is no sense of time in
which to grow weary.
"No; there are no clocks, no timepieces in Devachan,
. . . though the whole Cosmos is a gigantic chronometer in one sense . . . I may
also remind you in this connection that time is something created entirely by
ourselves; that while one short second of intense agony may appear, even on
earth, as an eternity to one man, to another, more fortunate, hours, days and
sometimes whole years may seem to flit like one brief moment. . . . But finite
similes are unfit to express the abstract and the infinite; nor can the
objective ever mirror the subjective. . . . To realize the bliss in Devachan, or
the woes in Avitchi, you have to assimilate them--as we do. . . . Space and time
may be, as Kant has it, not the product but the regulators of the sensations,
but only so far as our sensations on earth are concerned, not those in Devachan.
. . Space and time cease to act as 'the frame of our experience' 'over
there.'"24
The land of distinctions is transcended and the here and there
merge into the everywhere, as the everywhere into the here and there, and the
now and then into the now.
______________
24 Ibid., p.
194.
168
Koot Hoomi is sure that the materialistic attitudes of
the Occidental mind have played havoc with the subtle spirituality embodied in
Eastern religions, in the effort at translation and interpretation.
"Oh,
ye Max Müllers and Monier Williamses, what have ye done with our
philosophy?"25
You can not take the higher spiritual degrees by mere
study of books. Progress here has to do largely with the development of latent
powers and faculties, the cultivation of which is attended with some dangers. In
this juncture it avails the student far more to be able to call upon the
personal help of a kindly guardian who is truly a Master of the hidden forces of
life, than to depend upon his own efforts, however consecrated. Each grade in
the hierarchy of evolved beings stands ready to tutor the members of the class
below.
"The want of such a 'guide, philosopher and friend' can never be
supplied, try as you may. All you can do is to prepare the intellect: the
impulse toward 'soul-culture must be furnished by the individual. Thrice
fortunate they who can break through the vicious circle of modern influence and
come above the vapors! . . . Unless regularly initiated and trained--concerning
the spiritual insight of things and the supposed revelations made unto man in
all ages from Socrates down to Swedenborg . . . no self-tutored seer or
clairvoyant ever saw or heard quite correctly."26
The Master Morya
has a word to say to Sinnett about "the hankering of occult students after
phenomena" of a psychic nature. It is a maya27 against which, he says, they have
always been warned. It grows with gratification; the Spiritualists, he says, are
thaumaturgic addicts. It adds no force to metaphysical truth that his own and
K.H.'s letters
______________
25 Ibid., p. 241
26
Ibid., p. 255.
27 Maya, a word frequent in several schools
of Indian Philosophy, commonly used to denote the illusory or merely phenomenal
character of man's experience which he gains through his sense equipment. It is
often identified with avidya or ajnana and contrasted with
Brahmavidya or knowledge of truth and reality, in their unconditioned
form.
169
drop into Sinnett's lap or come under his pillow. If the
philosophy is wrong a "wonder" will not set it right. Spiritual knowledge, made
effective for growth, is the desideratum. Trance mediumship, he reiterates, is
itself both undesirable and unfruitful. No mind should submit itself passively
to another. "We do not require a passive mind, but on the contrary are seeking
for those most active." Nothing can give the student insight save the unfolding
of his own inner powers.
Much of the Adept's writing to Sinnett has to do
with the conditions of probation and "chelaship" in the master science of
soul-culture. He says there are certain rigid laws the fulfilment of which is
absolutely essential to the disciple's secure advancement. They have to do with
self-mastery, meditation, purity of life, fixity of purpose. These laws, which
at first seem to the neophyte to bar his path, will be seen, as he persists in
obedience to them, to be the road to all he can ask. But no one can break them
without becoming their victim. Too eager expectation on the part of the aspirant
is dangerous. It disturbs the balance of forces.
"Each warmer and quicker
throb of the heart wears so much life away. The passions, the affections, are
not to be indulged in by him who seeks to know; for they wear out the
earthly body with their own secret power; and he who would gain his aim must be
cold."28
A hint as to the occult desirability of vegetarianism is dropped
in the sentence:
"Never will the Spiritualists find reliable trustworthy
mediums and Seers (not even to a degree) so long as the latter and their
'circle' will saturate themselves with animal blood and the millions of
infusoria of the fermented fluids."29
Arcane knowledge has always been
presented in forms such that only the most determined aspirants could grasp the
meanings. K.H. interjects that Sir Isaac Newton understood the principles of
occult philosophy but "withheld his knowl-
______________
28 Mahatma
Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 274.
29 Ibid., p.
276.
170
edge very prudently for his own reputation." The
"scientific" attitude of mind is declared to be unpropitious for the attainment
of clear insight into truth, and the pretensions of modern scientists that they
comprehend "the limits of the natural" receive some of the Master's irony. "Oh,
century of conceit and mental obscuration!" he jeers.
"All is secret for
them as yet in nature. Of man--they know but the skeleton and the form . . .
their school science is a hotbed of doubts and
conjectures."30
Furthermore, "to give more knowledge to a man than he is
fitted to receive is a dangerous experiment." In his ignorance or his passion he
may make a use of it fatal both to himself and those about him. The Adepts, it
appears also, have their own reasons for not wishing to impart knowledge more
rapidly than the pupil can assimilate it. The misuse of knowledge by the pupil
always reacts upon the initiator; the Teacher becomes responsible in a measure
for the results. The Master would only hinder and complicate his own progress by
indiscreet generosity to his chela.
As one means of lightening this
responsibility the chela is required, when accepted, to take a vow of secrecy
covering every order he may receive and the specific information imparted. The
Master knows whether the vow is ever broken, without a question being
put.
The prime qualification for the favor of receiving the great
knowledge is rectitude of motive. Wisdom must be sought only for its
serviceability to Brotherhood and progress, not even as an end in
itself:
"The quality of wisdom ever was and will be yet for a long
time--to the very close of the fifth race--denied to him who seeks the wealth of
the mind for its own sake, and for its own enjoyment and result, without the
secondary purpose of turning it to account in the attainment of material
benefits."31
The applicant for chelaship is tested--unknown to
himself--in subtle ways before he is accepted, and often
after-
______________
30 Ibid., p. 281.
31 Ibid., p.
305.
171
wards, too. It is not a system of secret espionage, but a
method of drawing out the inner nature of the neophytes, so that they may become
self-conquerors.
K.H. reminds Sinnett that the efforts of theosophic
adherents to restore or propagate esoteric doctrines have ever been met by the
determined opposition of the vested ecclesiastical interests, which have not
scrupled to resort to forgery of documents, alleged confessions of fraud, or
other villainous subterfuge, to crush out the "heresy."
"Some of you
Theosophists are now wounded only in your 'honor' or your purses, but those who
held the lamp in previous generations paid the penalty of their lives for their
knowledge."32
He points out, too, the distressful state into which
certain over-eager aspirants have brought themselves by "snatching at forbidden
power before their moral nature is developed to the point of fitness for its
exercise." He says: "it would be a sorry day for mankind" if any sharper or
deadlier powers--such as those the high Adepts are privileged to wield--were put
in the hands of those unaccustomed to use them, or morally
untrustworthy.
K.H. volunteers to explain the occult significance of the
interlaced black and white triangles in the circle which forms part of the
monogram on the seal of the Theosophical Society. The Jewish Kabbalists viewed
the insignia as Solomon's Seal. It is "a geometrical synthesis of the whole
occult doctrine."
"The two interlaced triangles . . . contain the
'squaring of the circle,' the 'philosophical stone,' the great problems of Life
and Death, and--the Mystery of Evil."33
The upward-pointing triangle is
Wisdom concealed, and the downward-pointing one is Wisdom revealed--in the
phenomenal world.
"The circle indicates the bounding, circumscribing
quality of the All, the Universal Principle which expands . . . to embrace all
things."
______________
32 Ibid., p. 322.
33 Ibid.,
p. 337
172
The three sides represent the three gunas, or finite
attributes. The double triangles likewise symbolize the Great Passive and the
Great Active principles, the male and female, Purusha (Spirit) and Prakriti
(Matter).34 The one triangle points upward to Spirit, the other downward to
Matter, and their interlacing represents the conjunction of Spirit and Matter in
the manifested universe. The six points of the two triangles, with the central
point, yield the significant Seven, the symbol of Universal
Being.
Manifestation of the Absolute Life creates universes, and starts
evolutionary processes; but, says K.H. to Sinnett,
"neither you nor any
other man across the threshold has had or ever will have the 'complete theory'
of Evolution taught him; or get it unless he guesses it for himself. . . .
Some--have come very near to it. But there is always . . . just enough error . .
. to prove the eternal law that only the unshackled Spirit shall see the things
of the Spirit without a veil."35
Pride of intellect grows enormously more
dangerous the farther one goes toward the higher realms; and after that is
overcome spiritual pride raises its head. An average mortal finds his share of
sin and misery rather equally distributed over his life; but a chela has it
concentrated all within one period of probation. One who essays the higher peaks
of knowledge must overcome a heavier drag of moral gravitation than one who is
content to walk the plain.
From a purely political standpoint it is
interesting to note that in 1883 K.H. had taken hold of a project to launch in
India a journal to be named "The Phoenix," which, with Mr. Sinnett as editor,
was to function as an agent for the cultivation of native Hindu patriotism, of
which the Master saw a sore need in India's critical situation at that time.
Native princes were looked to for financial support, as well as Theosophists,
and propaganda for the venture had already been set in motion. But K.H. declares
that his
______________
34 The terms Purusha and Prakriti
are employed in the Sankhya school of Indian philosophy to designate spirit
and matter as the two opposing phases of the one life when in active
manifestation.
35 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p.
348.
173
closer inspection of the situation and his discovery of
the wretched political indifference of his countrymen made the enterprise
dubious, financially and spiritually. He then ordered Sinnett to drop it
entirely, as he saw certain failure ahead.
The Mahatma Letters, in
the latter portion, go deeply into the affairs of the London Lodge, T. S., which
Mr. Sinnett had founded on his return to England, and they even advise as to the
"slate" of officers to stand for election. There was a factional grouping in the
Lodge at the time, the Kingsford-Maitland party standing for Christian
esotericism as against the paramount influence of the Tibetan Masters, whose
existence was regarded by them as at least hypothetical; and the Sinnett wing
adhering closely to H.P.B. and her Adepts. Mrs. Anna B. Kingsford had had a
series of communications in her own right from high teachers, which K.H. himself
stated were in accord with his own doctrine. These were published in a volume,
The Perfect Way. The Master counsels harmony between the two parties,
preaching, with Heraclitus, that harmony is the equilibrium established by the
tension of two opposing forces.
Much or most of the substance of the
later Letters is personal, touching Sinnett's relations with persons of
prominence in the Theosophical movement. The Adepts make no claim to
omniscience--they themselves are in turn disciples of higher and grander beings
whom they speak of as the Dhyan Chohans,36 and whom they rank next to the
"planetaries"--but they assert their ability to look from any distance into the
secret minds of Sinnett's associates as well as into his own. They gave him the
benefit of this spiritual "shadowing" to guide him in the Society's
affairs.
Many complimentary things are said to Mr. Sinnett for his
encouragement; but he is not spared personal criticism
______________
36
Of the Dhyan Chohans Madame Blavatsky speaks in the Glossary as
follows: "The Lords of Light," the highest gods, answering to the Roman Catholic
Archangels, the divine intelligences charged with the supervision of Kosmos.
Dhyan is a Sanskrit term signifying "wisdom" or "illumination," but the
name Chohans seems to be more obscure in origin, and is probably Tibetan,
used in the general sense of "Lords" of "Masters."
174
of the
sharpest sort. He is told that his attitude of Western pride stands in the way
of his true spiritual progress. While his admirable qualities have won him the
distinction of being used as a literary aid to the Mahatmas, still he is
pronounced far from eligible for chelaship.
Much of the material in the
Letters, being of a quite personal and intimate nature, was, to be sure, never
intended for publication; in fact, was again and again forbidden publication.
But the Sinnett estate was persuaded, in 1925, to give out the Letters for the
good they might be expected to do in refutation of the many bizarre divergencies
which Neo-Theosophy was making from the original teachings. Their publication
came at the conclusion of the half-century period of the existence of the
Theosophical Society and was supposed to terminate an old and begin a new cycle
with some exceptional significance such as Theosophists attribute to times and
tides in the flow of things.
To most Theosophists the existence of the
Masters and the contents of their teaching form the very corner-stone of their
systematic faith. And ultimately they point to the wisdom and spirituality
displayed in the Letters themselves as being sufficient vindication of that
faith.
175
CHAPTER VII
STORM, WRECK, AND
REBUILDING
Reverting from philosophy to history we must now give some
account of what happened in India from the date the two Founders left America
late in 1878.
India welcomed Theosophy with considerable warmth. Col.
Olcott toured about, founding Lodges rapidly, and Madame Blavatsky bent herself
to the more esoteric work of corresponding with her Masters and of establishing
her official mouthpiece, The Theosophist. Though Isis Unveiled had
been put forth in America, Theosophy was first really propagated in
India.
The early history of the Society in India need not concern us
here, save as it had repercussions in the United States. But it is necessary to
touch upon the conspicuous events that transpired there in 1884-85, for they
shook the Theosophic movement to its foundations and for a time threatened to
end it. We refer to the official Reports issued in those two years by the
Society for Psychical Research in England upon the genuineness of the Theosophic
phenomena.1
The S.P.R., having been founded shortly before 1884 by
prominent men interested in the growing reports of spiritistic and psychic
phenomena (the early membership included at least three Theosophists, Prof. F.
W. H. Myers, Mr. W. Stainton Moses and Mr. C. C. Massey), manifested a
pronounced interest in the recently-published and widely-read works of Mr.
Sinnett, The Occult World and Esoteric Buddhism. Madame
Blavatsky's Isis Unveiled and the works and experiments of Prof. William
Crookes had done much to foster this new study. Accordingly when Col. Olcott
and
______________
1 The official reports of the S.P.R. are to be found in
Vol. III, pages 201 to 400 of the Proceedings of the S.P.R. A very
adequate review of the entire affair is made by William Kingsland in the text
and appendix of his recent work, The Real H. P. Blavatsky (M. Watkins,
London, 1928). Partial accounts are found in many other works, as for instance,
The Theosophical Movement.
176
Mohini M. Chatterji, a
devoted follower of H.P.B., were in Europe in 1884, the S.P.R. requested the
three to sit for friendly questioning concerning Madame Blavatsky's reported
marvels. She was herself interrogated at this time. This procedure led to the
publication "for private and confidential use" of the First Report of the
Committee in the fall of 1884. In sum the Report expressed decided incredulity
as to the genuine nature of the phenomena. Ascribing fraud only to Madame
Blavatsky, it says:
"Now the evidence in our opinion renders it
impossible to avoid one or other of two alternative conclusions: Either that
some of the phenomena recorded are genuine, or that other persons than Madame
Blavatsky, of good standing in society, and with characters to lose, have taken
part in deliberate imposture."
The conclusion was:
"On the whole,
however, (though with some serious reserves) it seems undeniable that there is a
prima facie case for some part at least of the claim made, which . . . cannot,
with consistency, be ignored."
Later in the same year the S.P.R. sent one
of its members, Mr. Richard Hodgson, a young University graduate, to India to
conduct further investigation of the phenomena reported to have taken place at
the Headquarters of the Theosophical Society, at Madras. He was given
untrammeled access to the premises and permitted to examine in person members of
the household who had witnessed some of the events in question.
H.P.B.'s
nemesis in these ill-started proceedings was one Madame Coulomb. In 1871, when
Madame Blavatsky had been brought to Cairo, along with other survivors of their
wrecked vessel, the French woman, a claimant to the possession of mediumistic
powers, became interested in H.P.B.'s psychic abilities and rendered her some
assistance. When, in 1879, the Founders arrived in India, Madame Coulomb in her
turn resorted to her Russian friend for aid, and H.P.B. made her the
housekeeper, and her husband the
177
general utility man, of the
little Theosophic colony. They proved to be ungrateful, meddlesome, and
unscrupulous, became jealous and discontented, and when left in charge of Madame
Blavatsky's own rooms in the building during her absence on the journey to
Europe in 1884, they fell into bickering and open conflict with Mr. Lane-Fox,
Dr. Franz Hartmann and others of the personnel over questions of authority and
small matters of household management. Both they and the Theosophists took up
the matters of dispute by letter with H.P.B. and Col. Olcott in Europe, and the
two leaders urged conciliation and peace on both sides. But finally the
ill-repressed resentment of Madame Coulomb broke out into secret machinations
with the Christian missionaries to expose Madame Blavatsky as a fraud. Madame
Coulomb placed in the hands of the missionaries letters allegedly written to her
by her former friend, in which evidence of the latter's connivance with her
French protégé to perpetrate deception in phenomena was revealed. Just before
exploding this bombshell the Coulombs had become unendurable, and had finally
been compelled to leave the premises.
Madame Coulomb bartered her
incriminating material to the missionaries for a considerable sum of money, and
the purchasers spread the alleged exposure before the public in their organ, the
Christian College Magazine.2 Madame Blavatsky, in Europe, made brief
replies in the London Times and the Pall Mall Gazette, stating
that the Coulomb letters were forgeries. She wished to bring recrimination
proceedings against her accusers to vindicate herself and the Society. Friends
dissuaded her, or deserted her, and nothing was done. But the Founders prepared
to hasten back to India. Col. Olcott seems to have taken a vacillating course,
and the resolution adopted at a Convention held in India upon their return
expressed the opinion of the delegates that Madame Blavatsky should take no
legal action.
______________
2 It was from some three hundred native
students of this same Christian College that Madame Blavatsky received a
welcoming ovation on her return from Paris to India, and was given a testimonial
of their assured faith in her lofty motives.
178
She resigned her
office as Corresponding Secretary, but later was requested to resume her old
place.
Mr. Hodgson submitted his report, which was published near the end
of 1885.3 He had not witnessed any phenomena nor examined any. He questioned
witnesses to several of the wonders a full year after the latter had taken
place. He rendered an entirely ex parte judgment in that he acted as
judge, accuser, and jury and gave no hearing to the defense. He ignored a mass
of testimony of the witnesses to the phenomena, and accepted the words of the
Coulombs whose conduct had already put them under suspicion.4 The merits of the
entire case have been carefully gone into by William Kingsland in his The
Real H. P. Blavatsky, and by the anonymous authors of The Theosophical
Movement. The matter of most decisive weight in Mr. Hodgson's unfavorable
judgment was the secret panel in H.P.B.'s "shrine" or cabinet built in the wall
of her room, and a sliding door exhibited by the Coulombs to the investigators,
and described as having been used by Madame Blavatsky for the insertion of
alleged Mahatma letters from the next room by one of the Coulomb accomplices.
The Theosophists resident at Headquarters charged that the secret window had
been built in, at the instigation of the missionaries, by M. Coulomb during
H.P.B.'s absence. He alone had the keys to Madame's apartment, and one of the
points of his quarrel with the house members was the possession of the keys. He
refused to give them up, alleging that Madame Blavatsky had placed him in
exclusive charge of her rooms during her absence. The charges of course threw
doubt upon the existence of the Masters, the genuineness of their purported
letters and the whole Mahatmic foundation of Theosophy.
______________
3
In The Proceedings of the S.P.R., Vol. III, pp. 201 to 400.
4
Further distrust of the Coulomb's charges against H.P.B. is justifiable in view
of the statement given on June 5, 1879 by Madame Coulomb to the Ceylon
Times, of which she sent the subject of her remarks a copy. She wrote: "I
have known this lady for the last eight years and I must say the truth that
there is nothing against her character. We lived in the same town, and on the
contrary she was considered one of the cleverest ladies of the age. Madame
Blavatsky is a musician, a painter, a linguist, an author, and I may say that
very few ladies and indeed few gentlemen, have a knowledge of things as general
as Madame Blavatsky."
179
A great point at issue was the
comparison of H.P.B.'s handwriting with that of the Mahatma Letters. Two
experts, Mr. F. G. Netherclift and Mr. Sims, first testified they were not
identical, but later reversed their testimony. Mr. F. W. H. Myers confessed
there was entire similarity between the handwriting of the Mahatma Letters and a
letter received by Madame Blavatsky's aunt, Madame Fadeef, back in 1870 at
Odessa, Russia, from the hand of a Hindu personage who then vanished from before
her eyes. (Madame Blavatsky was at some other quarter of the globe at the time.)
A distinguished German handwriting expert later declared there was no similarity
between H.P.B.'s chirography and those of the Master M. and K.H.
It
remained for Mr. Hodgson to assign an adequate motive for Madame Blavatsky's
colossal career of deception, and here he confesses difficulty. He finally
concludes that her motive was patriotism for her native land: she was a Russian
spy! Mr. Solovyoff, in his A Modern Priestess of Isis, gives some
substance to this charge. It is conceivable that Madame Blavatsky could have
felt sentimental interest in the Russianizing, rather than the Anglicizing, of
India; yet it appears preposterous to think that she would have endured the
privations and hardships to which she was subjected in her devotion to Theosophy
merely to cloak a subterranean machination for Russian dominance in India. She
was an American citizen, having been naturalized before she left the United
States.
Mr. Hodgson declared Madame Blavatsky to be "one of the most
accomplished, ingenious and interesting impostors in history." In a letter to
Sinnett, June 21, 1885, she records her reciprocal opinion of Mr. Hodgson. She
writes:
"They very nearly succeeded [in killing both her and the
Theosophical Society]. At any rate they have succeeded in fooling Hume and the
S.P.R. Poor Myers! and still more, poor Hodgson! How terribly they will be
laughed at some day!"
The attack of the S.P.R. upon Theosophy and its
leaders fell with great force upon the followers of the
movement
180
everywhere and only a few remained loyal through the
storm.
Among the faithful in America was Mr. W. Q. Judge. It remained for
him to effect a reorganization of the forces in the United States in 1885, when
the S.P.R. attack was raging abroad. In the previous year he had gone to France,
had met H.P.B., continued on to India and back to America. In 1885 he
reorganized the sparse membership into the Aryan Lodge. In 1886 he started the
publication of The Path, long the American organ for his expression of
Theosophy. Active study and propaganda followed quickly thereupon and the number
of branches soon tripled. Col. Olcott had appointed an American Board of
Control. This body met at Cincinnati in 1886 and organized "The American Section
of the Theosophical Society." In April, 1887, the branches held their first
Convention, and adopted constitution and by-laws. Mr. Judge became General
Secretary. The organization was a copy of that of the Federal Government, though
allegiance was subscribed to the General Council in India. In 1888 the second
Convention was held, with Mr. Archibald Keightley present as a representative
from England. Theosophical organization was at last in full swing in
America.
Brief mention may be made at this point of a somewhat divergent
movement within the ranks of Theosophy itself about 1886. A Mr. W. T. Brown, of
Glasgow, had had close fellowship with the Theosophists at Adyar, Madras, from
1884 to 1886. He then came to this country and associated himself with Mrs.
Josephine W. Cables, who had been a Christian Spiritualist, but who had as early
as 1882 organized the Rochester Theosophical Society. This was the first
Theosophical Lodge established in America after the original founding in New
York in 1875. But Mrs. Cables tried to represent Theosophy as a mixture of
Christianity, Spiritualism, Mysticism, personal ideas on diet and occultism in
general. She founded The Occult World, a magazine which Prof. Elliott
Coues, then President of the American Board of Control, tried to make the
official organ of Theosophy in
181
America. But Mr. Judge's
Path was in the field, and Mrs. Cables and Mr. Brown gave expression to
some jealousy of the rival publication, alleging that the Theosophical Society
was not a unique instrument for the spreading of occult knowledge, but that
Christ was to be accepted as the final guide and authority. They referred to the
Theosophic teaching as "husks," while Christ had fed the world the real kernel.
To this H.P.B. replied through The Path for December, 1886, and cast the
blame for their losing touch with her Masters on Mrs. Cables and Mr. Brown
themselves.5 Mrs. Cables turned her Rochester Theosophical Society into the
"Rochester Brotherhood" and her magazine into an exponent of Mystical
Spiritualism. Mr. Brown returned to the fold of orthodox Christianity. Prof.
Coues was destined to contribute a sensational chapter to Theosophic history
before he broke with the movement forever.6
A close study of the record
will reveal that it was during these years that the germ of a hierarchical
division in the Theosophical organization developed. In the theory of the
existence and evolutionary attainments of the Masters themselves was enfolded
the conception of a graded approach to their elevated status. As the
Theosophical Society came to be understood as only an appanage of the Masters in
their service of humanity, its inner intent was soon seen to be that of
affording a means of access to these high beings. It was recognized as an
organization whose supreme headship was vested in the Mahatmas and whose
corporate membership formed a lower degree of spiritual discipleship. This
hierarchical grading naturally fell into three degrees, predicated on the thesis
that the Adepts accept pupils for personal tutelage. There were first, the
Masters, then their accepted pupils or chelas, and lastly just plain
Theosophists or mem-
______________
5 It is in this article that Madame
Blavatsky gives out that important declaration of hers, that as soon as the
sincere aspirant steps upon the Path leading to the higher initiations, his
accumulated Karma is thrown upon him, in condensed form. The determination to
pursue the occult life is therefore often spoken of as involving the
"challenging of one's Karma."
6 He was the instigator of the "Sun Libel
Case," which will be outlined in Chapter XII.
182
bers of the
Society. The third class might or might not be led to aspire to chelaship, on
the terms of a serious pledge to consecrate all life's efforts to spiritual
mastery. These three divisions came to be called the First, Second and Third
Sections of the Theosophical Society. It is the theory advanced in the
Theosophic Movement that H.P.B. represented the First Section, Mr. Judge
the Second and Col. Olcott the Third. The Russian noblewoman was regarded as the
only bona fide or authoritative link of communication with the First Section
(though the Masters might at any time grant the favor of their special interest
to others, as they did to Mr. Sinnett); Judge was held to be an accepted chela,
in the high confidence of Madame Blavatsky and her mentors, their reliable agent
to head the order of lay chelaship; Col. Olcott was the active and visible head
of the Theosophical Society, the accepted instrument of the Masters in the work
of building up that organization which was to present the ancient doctrine of
their existence to the world and mark out anew the path of approach to them.
H.P.B. and Judge worked behind the scenes, while Olcott stood in the gaze of the
world. To them belonged the task of bringing out the teaching and keeping it
properly related to its sources; to him fell the executive labor of providing
ways and means to serve it to a sceptical public. The functions of the former
two were esoteric; those of Olcott exoteric. It was understood that the Colonel
was not advanced beyond the position of a lay or probationary chela. He himself
seems to have accepted this ranking as deserved, and generously admitted
that
"to transform a worldly man such as I was in 1874--a man of clubs,
drinking parties, mistresses, a man absorbed in all sorts of worldly, public,
and private undertakings and speculations--into that purest, wisest, noblest,
and most spiritual of human beings--a 'Brother,' was a wonder demanding next to
miraculous efficacy. . . . No one knows until he really tries it, how awful a
task it is to subdue all his evil passions and animal instincts and
develop his higher nature."7
The Theosophical Movement ascribes
most of the trials and
______________
7 The Theosophical Movement,
p. 132.
183
tribulations of Theosophy to the Colonel's indifferent
success, at times, in the "awful task." Years later, Olcott says:
"She
was the teacher, I the pupil; she the misunderstood and insulted messenger of
the Great Ones, I the practical brain to plan, the right hand to work out the
practical details."8
Out of this situation eventuated the formation of
the Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society. So many members were reaching
out after the chelaship that Judge wrote to H.P.B. in 1887 for advice as to what
to offer them. She replied, telling him to go ahead in America and she would
soon do something herself. She then began the publication of Lucifer, in
which the qualifications, dangers, obstacles, and status of chelaship were set
forth in article after article. Judge went to London; and there, at the request
of Madame Blavatsky drew the plans and wrote the rules for the guidance of the
new body. Col. Olcott looked on with some perturbation while his spiritual
superiors stepped lightly over his authority to inaugurate the higher
enterprise. In October, 1888, the first public statement relative to the
Esoteric Section appeared. It announced the purpose of the formation of the
Esoteric Section to be:
"To promote the esoteric interests of the
Theosophical Society by the deeper study of esoteric philosophy."
All
authority was vested in Madame Blavatsky and official connection with the
Theosophical Society itself was disclaimed.
A further hint as to the
impelling motive back of the new branch of activity was given by H.P.B. in the
letter she addressed to the Convention of the American Section meeting in April,
1889. She says:
"Therefore it is that the ethics of Theosophy are even
more necessary to mankind than the specific aspects of the psychic facts of
nature and man . . ."
She made a plea for solidarity in the fellowship of
the Theosophical Society, to form a nucleus of true
Brotherhood.
______________
8 Old Diary Leaves, Vol.
IV.
184
Unity had to be achieved to withstand exterior onslaught,
as well as interior discord. An attack upon one must be equally met by all. The
first object of the Society is Universal Brotherhood. She asked in the
finale:
"How many of you have helped humanity to carry its smallest
burden, that you should all regard yourselves as Theosophists? Oh, men of the
West, who would play at being the Saviors of mankind before they can spare the
life of a mosquito whose sting threatens them! Would ye be partakers of Divine
Wisdom or true Theosophists? Then do as the gods when incarnated do. Feel
yourselves the vehicles of the whole humanity, mankind as part of yourselves,
and act accordingly . . ."
She then sent out a formal letter, marked
strictly private and confidential, to all applicants for entry into the new
school. It contained an introductory statement, the "Rules of the Esoteric
Section (Probationary) of the Theosophical Society" and the "Pledge of
Probationers in the Esoteric Section." The latter was as follows:
"I
pledge myself to support, before the world, the Theosophical Movement, its
leaders and its members; and in particular to obey, without cavil or delay, the
orders of the Head of the Section, in all that concerns my relation with the
Theosophical Movement."
It can be seen that such a pledge carried the
possibility of far-reaching consequences and might be difficult to fulfil under
certain precarious conditions. Much controversy in the Society from 1906 onwards
hinges about this pledge.
Madame Blavatsky went on to say:
"It is
through an Esoteric Section alone . . . that the great exoteric Society may be
redeemed and made to realize that in union and harmony alone lie its strength
and power. The object of the Section, then, is to help the future growth of the
Theosophical Society as a whole in the true direction, by promoting brotherly
union at least among a choice minority."
The Book of Rules
provided that the work to be pursued was not practical occultism, but mutual
help in the Theosophic life; it outlined measures for suppressing gossip,
slander, cant, hypocrisy, and injustice; for limiting the
claims
185
of occult interests and psychic inclinations; it
inculcated the widest charity, tolerance, and mutual helpfulness as the prime
condition of all true progress. Said the Rule:
"The first test of true
apprenticeship is devotion to the interest of another."
It
concludes:
"It is not the individual or determined purpose of attaining
oneself Nirvana, which is, after all, only an exalted and glorious
selfishness, but the self-sacrificing pursuit of the best means to lead
our neighbor on the right path . . ."
Conditions for membership in the
Esoteric Section were three: (1) one must be a Fellow of the Theosophical
Society; (2) the pledge must be signed; (3) the applicant must be approved by
the Head of the Section. And warning was issued that, while no duties would be
required in the Order that would interfere with one's family or professional
obligations, "it is certain that every member of the Esoteric Section will have
to give up more than one personal habit . . . and adopt some few ascetic rules."
The habits referred to were alcoholism and meat-eating, mainly, and the ascetic
rules were those regulating meditation, sleep, diet, kindly speech, altruistic
thought, etc.
The establishment of the Esoteric Section was one of the
moves undertaken to rebuild the structure of Theosophy which had been so badly
shattered by the S.P.R. attack and its consequences. But while this was going
forward, largely under the direction of Judge, Madame Blavatsky had already
begun to devote her tireless energies to the accomplishment of another great
work of reconstruction. Its inception bore a logical relation to the
promulgation of the Esoteric branch. If students were to be taken deeper into
the essentials of the occult life, there was need of a fuller statement of the
scheme of the world's racial and cosmogonic history, so that the task of
personal and social development might be seen and understood in its most
intimate rapport with the larger streams of life. The arcane knowledge had to be
further unveiled.
186
The combined attack of the Coulombs, the
Christian missionaries and the English Psychic Research Society on Madame
Blavatsky in 1885 was indeed a fiery-furnace test. She had vigorously, in
Isis and elsewhere, attacked orthodoxy and conservative interests in
religion and science. She was now to feel the full force of the blow which
society, through the representatives of these vested interests, was impelled to
strike back at her, and it was greater than she had anticipated. It nearly ended
her career. Not that she was one to cringe and wince under attack. Far from it.
She wanted to bring suit against her calumniators. She burned under a sense of
injustice. She even contemplated the possibility of startling a crowded court
room with a display of her suspected phenomena. But--the trial would have
necessitated dragging her beloved Masters into the mire of low human emotions,
and this she could not do. Instead, the storm within her soul had to wear itself
out by degrees. It nearly cost her life itself; but she was saved, as has been
maintained, by the intervention of her Master's power. She wished to die,
feeling that her life work was irreparably defeated. At this juncture she was
summoned, as we gather from her letters to the Sinnetts, to a quiet nook north
of Darjeeling, met the Mahatmas in person, and returned after a few days to her
friends, "fixed" once more. Whatever the "inside" facts in the case, she went
north broken in body and spirit, and two days later emerged from her retirement
apparently well, and with a new zest for life, ready to battle again for her
"Cause."
Not long thereafter came the journey from India, which she was
never to see again, back to Europe, where she spent more peaceful days of work
among devoted friends, the Gebhards at Würzburg, Germany, the Countess
Wachtmeister, the Keightleys, and many more in Belgium, France, and England. She
said the secret of her new lease on life at this time was that the Master had
indicated to her that he wished her to perform one more service in the interests
of Theosophy before she relinquished the body. Her task was not finished.
Isis was little more than a clearing away
187
of old
rubbish and the announcement that a great secret science lay buried amid the
ruins of ancient cities. The Mahatma Letters gave but a fragmentary
outline of the great Teaching, enough to stimulate inquiry in the proper
direction. But the magnum opus, the fundamentals of the Secret Doctrine,
had not yet been produced. The "Secret Doctrine" was still secret. Restored to
comparative health, and given certain reassurances of support from her Masters,
her courage we renewed. One finds the motive of vindication running strong in
her mind at this time; all thought of defence, of retaliation given up, she
would disprove all the charges of knavery, deception and disingenuousness of
every stripe by a master-work before whose brilliance all suggestion of petty
human motives would vanish. She writes in a letter to Sinnett:
"As for
[the charges of] philosophy and doctrine invented, the Secret Doctrine
shall show. Now I am here alone, with the Countess [Wachtmeister] for witness. I
have no books, no one to help me. And I tell you that the Secret Doctrine
will be twenty times as learned, philosophical and better than Isis,
which will be killed by it. Now there are hundreds of things which I am
permitted to say and explain. I will show what a Russian spy can do, an
alleged forger-plagiarist, etc. The whole doctrine is shown to be the mother
stone, the foundation of all the religions including Christianity, and on the
strength of exoteric published Hindu books, with their symbols explained
esoterically. The extreme lucidity of 'Esoteric Buddhism' [Mr. Sinnett's book
expounding the summarized teaching of the Mahatma Letters] will also be
shown, and its doctrines proven correct, mathematically, geometrically,
logically and scientifically. Hodgson is very clever, but he is not clever
enough for truth, and it shall triumph, after which I can die
peacefully."9
The work was intended in its first conception to be an
"expansion of Isis." It was soon seen, however, that the fuller
clarification of the hints in the earlier work would necessitate the practically
complete unveiling of the whole occult knowledge. So Isis was forgotten,
and the new production made to stand on its own feet.
______________
9
Found in the Appendix to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, pp.
480-481.
188
The hint in her letter just quoted that she would do
the actual writing of the new volumes practically without the aid of reference
or source books is to be taken to mean, doubtless, that the very manner of her
production of the work would constitute the final irrefutable proof of the
existence and powers of the Mahatmas. The composition as well as the contents of
the book was to be phenomenal. She says in a letter to Madame Jelihowsky, her
sister, written at this time that "it is the phenomena of Isis all over
again." Yet there were some variations. In a Sinnett letter she
writes:
"There's a new development and scenery every morning. I live
two lives again! Master finds that it is too difficult for me to be looking
consciously into the astral light for my Secret Doctrine, and so, it is now
about a fortnight, I am made to see all I have to as though in my dream. I see
large and long rolls of paper on which things are written, and I recollect them.
Thus all the Patriarchs from Adam to Noah were given me to see, parallel with
the Rishis; and in the middle between them the meaning of these symbols or
personifications. I was ordered to . . . make a rapid sketch of what was known
historically and in literature, in classics and in profane and sacred
histories--during the five hundred years that followed it; of magic, the
existence of a universal Secret Doctrine known to the philosophers and Initiates
of every country, and even to several of the Church Fathers such as Clement of
Alexandria, Origen and others, who had been initiated themselves. Also to
describe the Mysteries and some rites; and I can assure you that the most
extraordinary things are given out now, the whole story of the Crucifixion,
etc., being shown to be based on a rite as old as the world--the Crucifixion of
the Lathe of the Candidate--trials, going down to Hell, etc., all Aryan . . . I
have facts for twenty volumes like Isis; it is the language, the cleverness for
compiling them, that I lack."10
Writing to her niece, Madame Vera
Johnston, she said:
"You are very green if you think that I actually know
and understand all the things I write. How many times am I to
repeat
______________
10 Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett
(New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co.), p. 194.
189
to you and
your mother that the things I write are dictated to me; that sometimes I see
manuscripts, numbers and words before my eyes of which I never knew
anything?"11
In a letter to Judge in America, March 24, 1886, H.P.B.
says:
"Such facts, such facts, Judge, as Masters are giving out,
will rejoice your old heart. . . . The thing is becoming enormous, a wealth of
facts."
Madame Johnston quotes Franz Hartmann, who accompanied Madame
Blavatsky on her trip from Madras to Europe in April, 1885, when she was so ill
that she had to be hoisted aboard, as saying that
"while on board the
S.S. 'Tibre' and on the open sea, she very frequently received in some occult
manner many pages of manuscript referring to the Secret Doctrine, the material
of which she was collecting at the time. Miss Mary Flynn was with us, and knows
more about it than I; because I did not take much interest in those matters, as
the receiving of 'occult correspondence' had become almost an everyday
occurrence with us."12
The person who had most continuous and prolonged
opportunity to witness whatever display of extraordinary assistance was afforded
the compiler of The Secret Doctrine was the Countess Constance
Wachtmeister, already mentioned as being the companion and guardian of Madame
Blavatsky during must of the period of the composition at Würzburg, Ostend, and
in London. In her Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky, and The Secret
Doctrine she writes in detail of the many facts coming under her observation
which pointed to exterior help in the work. She wrote:
"The Secret
Doctrine will be indeed a great and grand work. I have had the privilege of
watching its progress, of reading the manuscripts, and witnessing the occult way
in which she derived her information."
The Countess states that on two or
three occasions she saw on H.P.B.'s desk in the morning numbers of sheets of
manu-
______________
11 The Path, Vol. IX, p. 300.
12
Ibid., p. 266.
190
script in the familiar handwriting of
the Masters. She writes that at times a piece of paper was found on the desk in
the morning with unfamiliar characters traced in red ink. It was an outline of
the author's work for the day,--the "red and blue spook-like messages."
Questioned how it was precipitated, H.P.B. stated that elementals were used for
the purpose, but that they had nothing to do with the intelligence of the
message, only with the mechanics of the feat.
More significant, perhaps,
than these details is the question of the origin of the many quotations and
references, as in Isis, from old works, or from books not in her
possession. The testimony on this score is more voluminous and challenging than
in the case of Isis. 13
Madame Blavatsky was practically without
reference books and was too ill to leave the house to visit libraries. She
worked from morning until night at her desk. Dr. Hübbe-Schleiden, her German
convert, says she had scarcely half-a-dozen books. Her niece
writes:
"Later on when we three went to Ostend [in the very midst of the
work], it was I who put aunt's things and books in order, so I can testify that
the first month or two in Ostend she decidedly had no other books but a few
French novels, bought at railway stations and read whilst traveling, and several
odd numbers of some Russian newspapers and magazines. So there was absolutely
nothing where her numerous quotations could have come from."14
Two young
Englishmen, Dr. Bertram Keightley and his nephew Archibald, worked with Madame
Blavatsky on the arrangement of her material. It fell to them eventually to edit
the work for her. They contribute their testimony as to what took place of a
phenomenal sort. Says Bertram:
"Of phenomena in connection with The
Secret Doctrine I have very little indeed to say. Quotations, with full
references, from
______________
13 The Countess Wachtmeister herself went
to the pains of verifying a quotation already written out by Madame Blavatsky,
which the latter said would be found in a volume in the Bodleian Library. She
found the excerpt to be correct as to wording, page, chapter, and title of the
book quoted. She adds that Miss Emily Kislingbury, a devoted member of the
Society, verified a quotation from Cardinal Weisman's Lectures on Science and
Religion.
14 Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky and The Secret
Doctrine, Appendix, p. 105 ff.
191
books which were never in
the house--quotations verified after hours of search, sometimes at the British
Museum, for a rare book--of such I saw and verified not a few."15
The
nephew speaks to the same effect. As a matter of fact, during the writing of the
latter portions of the book in London, Madame Blavatsky kept two or three young
men, students from the University of Dublin, busily engaged in the daily search
for quotations, which she said would be found in books of which she gave not
only the titles, but the exact location of the passages. These men have
repeatedly borne testimony to the facts in this connection. They were Mr. E.
Douglass Fawcett, Mr. S. L. McGregor Mathers, Mr. Edgar Saltus, and one or two
more.16
There were frequent and notable visitors in the evenings, when
the day's writing was put aside. Mr. Archibald Keightley tells that:
"Mr.
J. G. Romanes, a Fellow of the Royal Society, comes in to discuss the
evolutionary theory set forth in her Secret Doctrine. Mr. W. T. Stead, Editor of
the Pall Mall Gazette, who is a great admirer of The Secret Doctrine,
finds much in it that seems to invite further elucidation. Lord Crawford, Earl
of Crawford and Balcarres, another F.R.S.--who is deeply interested in occultism
and cosmography, and who was a pupil of Lord Lytton and studied with him in
Egypt--comes to speak of his special subject of concern. Mr. Sidney Whitman,
widely known for his scathing criti-
______________
15 Ibid.,
Appendix, p. 89 ff.
16 The experience of Mr. C. Carter Blake, a scientist
is pertinent on this point. He asserts that her learning was extraordinary, in
consideration of her lack of early education and her want of books. He testifies
that she knew more than he did on his own lines of anthropology, specifying her
abstruse knowledge on the subject of the Naulette jaw. He says: "Page 744 in the
Second Volume of the Secret Doctrine refers to facts which she could not easily
have gathered from any published book." She had declared that the raised beaches
of Tarija were pliocene, when Blake argued that they were pleistocene. She was
afterwards proved correct. On page 755 of Vol. II, she mentions the fossil
footprints at Carson, Indiana. Says Blake: "When Madame Blavatsky spoke to me of
the footprints I did not know of their existence, and Mr. G. W. Bloxam,
Assistant Secretary of the Anthropological Institute, afterwards told me that a
pamphlet on the subject in the library had never been out. Madame Blavatsky
certainly had sources of information (I don't say what) transcending the
knowledge of experts on their own lines."--Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky
and The Secret Doctrine, Appendix, pp. 117 ff.
192
cism upon
English cant, has ideas to express and thoughts to interchange upon the ethics
of Theosophy; and so they come."17
Untiringly through 1885, 1886 and
1887, in Germany with the Gebhards, then in Belgium and finally in London, she
labored to get the voluminous material in form. Unable on account of her
dropsical condition to take exercise, she was again and again threatened with
complete breakdown by the accumulation of toxins in her system. A young
physician of London, Dr. Bennett, who attended her at times, pronounced her
condition most grave, on one occasion declaring it impossible for her to survive
the night. In our third chapter we have seen Countess Wachtmeister's account of
her surprising recovery. The Countess alleges that Madame destroyed many pages
of manuscript already written, in obedience to orders from the Master. There was
left, however, enough material for some sixteen hundred close-printed pages
which now make up the two volumes commonly accepted as her genuine product. To
an examination of the contents of this pretentious work we now invite the
reader.
______________
17 Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky and The
Secret Doctrine, Appendix, pp. 96 ff.
193
CHAPTER
VIII
THE SECRET DOCTRINE
The Secret Doctrine sets forth
what purports to be the root knowledge out of which all religion, philosophy,
and science have grown. The sub-title--"The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and
Philosophy" reveals the daring aim and scope of the undertaking. It is an effort
to present and align certain fundamental principles in such a way as to render
possible a synthesis of all knowledge.
The first volume deals with
cosmogenesis, the second with anthropogenesis. A third, to deal with the lives
of the great occultists down the ages, was in form for the press, as testified
to by the Keightleys, who typed the manuscript, and by Alice L. Cleather and
others, but never came to the public. A fourth was projected and almost entirely
written, but likewise went to oblivion instead of to the printer. A third
volume, issued five years after H.P.B.'s death under the editorship of Mrs.
Annie Besant, is made up of some other writings of Madame Blavatsky, dealing in
part with the Esoteric Section, but is not regarded by close students as having
been the original third volume.
The whole book professes to be a
commentary on The Stanzas of Dzyan,1 which H.P.B. alleged to be a
fragment of Tibetan sacred writings of two types, one cosmological, the other
ethical and devotional. The Secret Doctrine elucidates the former section
of the Stanzas, and her later work, The Voice of the Silence, the latter.
The Stanzas of Dzyan are of great antiquity, she claimed, drawn from the
Mani Koum-
______________
1 The word Dzyan presents some etymological
difficulties. Madame Blavatsky in the Glossary states that Dzyan (also
written Dzyn and Dzen) is a corruption of the Sanskrit Dhyana, meaning
meditation. In Tibetan, learning is called Dzin.
194
boum,2 or
sacred script of the Dzungarians,3 in the north of Tibet. She is not sure of
their origin, but says she was permitted to memorize them during her residence
in the Forbidden Land. They show a close parallel with the Prajna Paramita
Sutras of Hindu sacred lore.
There are of course charges that she
invented the Stanzas herself or plagiarized them from some source. Max Müller is
reported to have said that in this matter she was either a remarkable forger or
that she has made the most valuable gift to archeological research in the
Orient. She says herself in the Preface:
"These truths are in no sense
put forward as a revelation; nor does the author claim the position of a
revealer of mystic lore, now made public for the first time in the world's
history. For what is contained in this work is to be found scattered throughout
thousands of volumes embodying the scriptures of the great Asiatic and early
European religions, hidden under glyph and symbol, and hitherto left unnoticed
because of this veil. What is now attempted is to gather the oldest tenets
together and to make of them one harmonious and unbroken whole. The sole
advantage which the
______________
2 This document (spelled variously
Koumboum, Kumbum, Kounboum, etc.) was a Buddhist text connected with the
Koumboum monastery, in Tibet. On the monastery grounds grew the sacred Tree of
Tibet, the 'tree of the ten thousand images,' as Huc describes it. . . .
"Tradition has it that it grew out of the hair of Tsonka-pa, who was buried on
that spot. . . . In the words of the Abbé Huc, who lived several months with
another missionary, named Gabet, near this phenomenal tree: 'Each of its leaves
in opening, bears either a letter or a religious sentence, written in sacred
characters, and these letters are, of their kind, of such a perfection that the
type-foundries of Didot contain nothing to excel them. Open the leaves, which
vegetation is about to unroll, and you will there discover, on the point of
appearing, the letters or the distinct words which are the marvel of this unique
tree. Turn your attention from the plant to the bark of its branches, and new
characters will meet your eyes! Do not allow your interest to flag; raise the
layers of this bark and still other characters will show themselves below
those whose beauty has surprised you. For, do not fancy that these superposed
layers repeat the same printing. No, quite the contrary; for each lamina you
lift presents to view its distinct type. How, then, can we suspect jugglery? I
have done my best in that direction to discover the slightest trace of human
trick, and my baffled mind could not retain the slightest suspicion.' Yet
promptly the kind French Abbé suspects--the Devil."--Quoted from Madame
Blavatsky, article Kounboum in The Theosophical Glossary.
3 The
Dzungarians were a section of the Mongolian Empire at its height, whose name now
remains only as the name of a mountain range. They have disappeared
geographically.
195
writer has over her predecessors, is that she
need not resort to personal speculation and theories. For this work is a partial
statement of what she herself has been taught by more advanced students,
supplemented in a few details only, by the results of her own study and
observation."4
Near the end of her Introductory she printed in
large type, quoting Montaigne:
"I have here made only a nosegay of culled
flowers, and have brought nothing of my own but the string that ties
them."
Then she adds:
"Pull the 'string' to pieces, if you will.
As for the nosegay of facts--you will never be able to make away with
these. You can only ignore them and no more."
In the Introductory
she presents once more the thesis of esotericism as the method used
throughout former history for the preservation and propagation of the precious
deposit of the Ancient Wisdom. She affirms that under the sandswept plains of
Tibet, under many a desert of the Orient, cities lie buried in whose secret
recesses are stored away the priceless books that the despoiling hands of the
bigot would have tossed into the flames. Books which held the key to thousands
of others yet extant, she alleges, unaccountably disappeared from view--but are
not lost. There was a "primeval revelation," granted to the fathers of the human
race, and it still exists. Furthermore, it will reappear. But unless one
possesses the key, he will never unlock it, and the profane world will search
for it in vain. The Golden Legend traces its symbolic pattern mysteriously
through the warp and woof of the oldest literatures, but only the initiated will
see it. A strange prophecy is dropped as she passes on.
"The rejection of
these teachings may be expected and must be accepted beforehand. No one styling
himself a 'scholar,' in whatever department of exact science, will be permitted
to regard these teachings seriously. They will be derided and rejected a priori
in this century; but only in this one. For in the twentieth century
of
______________
4 Page vii.
196
our era scholars will
begin to recognize that the Secret Doctrine has neither been invented nor
exaggerated, but on the contrary, simply outlined; and finally that its
teachings antedate the Vedas."5
Her book is not the Secret Doctrine in
its entirety, but a select number of fragments of its fundamental tenets. But it
will be centuries before much more is given out. The keys to the Zodiacal
Mysteries "must be turned seven times before the whole system is divulged." One
turn of the key was given in Isis. Several turns more are given in The
Secret Doctrine.
"The Secret Doctrine is not a treatise, or a series
of vague theories, but contains all that can be given out to the world in this
century."6
She is to deal with the entire field of life, in all its
manifestations, cosmic, universal, planetary, earthly, and human. Omnipresent
eternal life is assumed as given, without beginning or end, yet periodical in
its regular manifestations. It is always in being for Itself, yet for us it
comes into and goes out of existence with periodical rhythm. Its one absolute
attribute, which is itself, is eternal causeless motion, called the "Great
Breath." Life eternal exhales and inhales, and this action produces the
universes and withdraws them. It is in regular and harmonious succession either
passive or active. These conditions are the "Days" and "Nights" of Brahm, when,
so to say, universal life is either awake or asleep. This characteristic of the
One Life stamps everything everywhere with the mark of an analogous process. No
work of Life is free from this law. It is the immutable law of the All and of
every part of the All. It is the universal law of Karma, and makes reincarnation
the method of life expression everywhere. Life swings eternally back and forth
between periods of activity and rest. Upon inaugurating an active period after a
"Night" of rest, life begins to expand, and continues until it fills all space
with cosmical
______________
5 The Secret Doctrine, Introductory,
p. xxxvii.
6 Ibid., p. xxxviii.
197
creation; in
turn, at the end of this activity, it contracts and withdraws all the energy
within itself. The Secret Doctrine is an account of the activities of the
One Life from the beginning of one of these periods of reawakening to its end,
treating the cosmic processes generally, and the earth and human processes
specifically. It is the cryptic story of how the universe is created, whence it
emanates, what Powers fashion it, whither it goes and what it means.
The
period of universal rest is known in esoteric circles as "Pralaya,"7 the active
period as a "Manvantara."8 A description of the Totality of Things is nothing
but an account of the Life Force alternating, shuttle-like, between these two
conditions.
The universe comes out of the Great Being and disappears into
it. Life repeats in any form it takes the metaphor of this process. It
vacillates forever between the opposite poles of Unity and Infinity, noumenon
and phenomenon, absoluteness and relativity, homogeneity and heterogeneity,
reality and appearance, the unconditional and the conditioned, the dimensionless
and the dimensioned, the eternal and the temporal. What Life is when not
manifest to us is as indescribable, as unthinkable as is space. The
Absolute--God--is just this Space. Space is neither a "limitless void" nor a
"conditioned fulness," but both. It appears void to finite minds, yet is the
absolute container of all that is. Where the universe goes when it
dissolves--and still remains in being--is where anything else goes when it
dissolves,--into solution. Not in a purely mechanical sense, yet that too. It
goes from infinite particularity back into the one genus, from form back to
formlessness, from differentiation back to homogeneity. Matter goes to bits,
finer, finer, till it is
______________
7 Pralaya, as given in Sanskrit
dictionaries, means "dissolution, reabsorption, destruction, annihilation,
death"; especially the destruction of the whole world at the end of a Kalpa;
also "fainting, loss of sense of consciousness; sleep." It apparently is derived
from the Sanskrit stem li, one of whose meanings is to disappear or
vanish. Madame Blavatsky describes Pralaya in the Glossary as "a period
of obscuration or repose--planetary, cosmic or universal--the opposite of
Manvantara."
8 Manvantara (Manu plus antara, between) is described as the
period or age of a Manu. It comprised a period of 4,320,000 human years,
supposedly the period intervening between two Manus.
198
held in
solution in the infinite sea of pure Non-Being. It goes from actuality to
latency.
Occultism is the study of the worlds in their latent state;
material science is the study of the same worlds in their actual or manifest
condition. Or, to use Aristotelian terms, since no attributes can be predicated
of pure potentiality, matter is privation. Matter is sheer possibility, with no
capacity but to be acted upon, shaped, formed, impregnated. Nothing can be
affirmed of it save that it is, and even then it is not as matter, but
the pure essence, germ, or root of matter. It is just the Absolute, i.e.,
freed from all marks of differentiation. Since nothing can be asserted of it, it
is pure negation, non-being. Absolute being, paradoxically, ultimately equals
non-being. Being has so far retreated from actuality that it ends in sheer
Be-ness. The eternal "dance of life" is a rhythmic movement of the All from
Be-ness to Being, through the path of Becoming. This brings us to the famous
three fundamentals of the Secret Doctrine, the three basic principles of the
Sacred Science. They are:
1. The Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless and
Immutable Principle, on which all speculation is impossible--beyond the range
and reach of thought--the One Absolute Reality, Infinite Cause, the Unknowable,
the Unmoved Mover and Rootless Root of all--pure Be-ness--Sat. It is symbolized
in esotericism under two aspects, Absolute Space and Absolute Motion; the latter
representing unconditioned Consciousness. The impersonal reality of the cosmos
is the pure noumenon of thought. Parabrahm (Be-ness) is out of all relation to
conditioned existence. In Sanskrit, parabrahman means "the Supreme Spirit
of Brahma." Whenever the life of Parabrahm deploys into manifestation, it
assumes a dual aspect, giving rise to the "pairs of opposites," or the
polarities of the conditioned universe. The One Life splits into Spirit-Matter,
Subject-Object. The contrast and tension of these two aspects are essential to
hold the universes in manifestation. Without cosmic substance cosmic ideation
would not manifest as individual self-consciousness, since only through matter
can there be effected a focus of
199
this undifferentiated
intelligence to form a conscious being. Similarly cosmic matter apart from
cosmic ideation, would remain an empty abstraction.
Madame Blavatsky here
introduces the conception of a force whose function it is to effect the linkage
between spirit and matter. This is an energy named Fohat (supposedly a Tibetan
term), which becomes at once the solution of all mind-body problems. It is the
"bridge" by which the "Ideas" existing in the Divine Intelligence are impressed
on cosmic substance as the "Laws of Nature." It is the Force which prescribes
form to matter, and gives mode to its activity. It is the agent of the formative
intelligences, the various sons of the various trinities, for casting the
creations into forms of "logical structure."
2. The periodical activity
already noted, which makes Space the "playground of numberless universes
incessantly manifesting and disappearing," the rhythmic pulse which causes "the
appearance and disappearance of worlds like a regular tidal ebb and flow." This
second fundamental affirms that absolute law of periodicity, of flux and reflux,
which physical science has noted and recorded in all departments of nature, and
which the old science termed the Law of Karma. It has been treated briefly
above, and a later chapter will trace its operations in nature more
fully.
3. The identity and fundamental unity of all individual Souls with
the universal Over-Soul, the microcosm with the macrocosm. The history of the
individual or personalized Soul is thus of necessity a miniature or copy of the
larger life of the universe, a pilgrimage through the worlds of matter and
sense, under the cyclic karmic law,--"cycles of necessity" and incarnation. In
fact individual self-consciousness is only acquirable by the Spirit, in its
separated though still divine aspect--the Soul--by an independent conscious
existence that brings it in contact with every elementary form of the phenomenal
world. This demands of it a "descent into matter" to its lowest and most inert
forms, and a re-ascent through every rising grade until immaterial conditions
are once more attained. The road downward and
200
upward is marked
by seven steps, grades or planes of cosmic formation, on each of which man
acquires a nature and faculties consonant with the type of structure of the atom
there encountered. On the downward arc (or Involution, a process unknown to
modern science which deals only with Evolution), Life undergoes at each step an
increased degree of differentiation; and the naming of the various
potentialities emerging into potencies, gives us the dualities, the trinities,
the tetractys, and the numberless hierarchies of the ancient Greeks and
Orientals. The Gods, the Mothers-Fathers-Sons, Spirits, Logoi, Elohim,
Demiurges, Jehovahs, Pitris, Aeons, are but names of the Intelligent Forces that
are first emanated from the impregnated womb of time. The first emanated
principles are sexless, but sex is introduced (in symbolic form) as soon as the
dual polarization of Spirit-Matter takes place. The whole story of the
Cosmogenesis (Volume I) is a recital of the scheme according to which the primal
unity of unmanifest Being breaks up into differentiation and multiformity and so
fills space with conscious evolving beings.
Thus the three fundamentals
express respectively the Be-ness, the Becoming, and the Being of the everlasting
That, which is Life.
The First Stanza describes the state of the Absolute
during Pralaya, the "Night of Brahm," when nothing is in existence, but
everything only is. Such a description can obviously be only a grouping
of symbolisms. The only fit symbol of the Absolute is darkness, "brooding over
the face of the deep" (Space). It is the night of Life, and all Nature sleeps.
The worlds were not. The only description is privative. Time was not; mind was
not; "the seven ways to bliss," or the evolutionary paths, were not; the "causes
of misery," of the worlds of illusion, were not; even the hierarchies who would
direct the "new wheel," were not. The first differentiation of the That,
viz., Spirit, had not been made. ("That" is a reminiscence of the phrase
tat tvam asi "that [i.e., the All] thou art," found in the
Indian Upanishads.) Matter was not; but only its formless
essence.
201
Nature had thus slept for "seven eternities," however
they may have been registered in a timeless consciousness; for time was not,
since there was no differentiation, hence no succession. Mind was not, having no
organ to function through. All was noumenon. The Great Breath, on whose outgoing
energy worlds sprang into existence, had not yet gone forth. The universe was a
blank; metaphysics had not begun to generate physics; the universe held in
solution had not yet begun to precipitate into crystallization. All life was
hidden in the formless embrace of the protyle, or primal substance. Darkness is
the "Father of Lights," but the Son had not yet been born. When day dawns,
Father (Spirit) and Mother (Substance) unite to beget their Son, who will then
cleave the Cimmerian darkness and issue forth to flood all space.
Stanza
II continues the description of the sleeping universe, pointing, however, to the
signs of reawakening. "The hour had not yet struck; the ray had not yet flashed
into the germ; the mother-lotus had not yet swollen." From the darkness soon
would issue the streak of dawn, splitting open by its light and warmth the shell
of each atom of virgin matter, and letting issue thence the Seven Creators, who
will fashion the universe. In the Mundane Egg the germ of life was deposited
from the preceding Manvantaras, and the Divine Energy, brooding over it for
aeons, caused it to hatch out its brood of new worlds. In immaterial form within
the germ dwelt the archetypal ideas, the (Platonic) memories of former
experiences, which will determine the form of the new structures as the Divine
Architects of the worlds. All things on earth are but patterns of things in the
heavens; spiritual ideas crystallized into concretion on the plane of
manifestation--"sermons in stones." The lotus is the symbol of esoteric teaching
because its seed contains a miniature of the future plant, and because, like
man, it lives in three worlds, the mud (material), the water (typifying the
emotional), and the air (spiritual).
Creation starts with incubation. The
Cosmic Egg must be fertilized ere it can be hatched. A ray, or first
emanation,
202
from the Darkness opens the womb of the Mother
(Primal Substance), and it then emanates as three, Father-Mother-Son, which,
with the energy of Fohat makes the quaternary. Thus occultism explains all the
mysteries of the trinity and the Immaculate Conception. The first dogma of
Occultism is universal unity under three aspects. The Son was born from virgin
(i.e., unproductive, unfertilized) matter (Root Substance, the Mother),
when the latter was fecundated by the Father (Spirit).
The archetypal
ideas do not imply a Divine Ideator, nor the Divine Thought a Divine Thinker.
The Universe is Thought itself, reflected in a manifested material. But the
Universe is the product, or "Son," which during the prologue of the drama of the
creation lies buried in the Divine Thought. The latter has "not yet penetrated
unto the Divine Bosom."
Stanza III rings with the concluding vibrations
of the seventh eternity as they thrill through boundless space, sounding the
cock-crow of a new Manvantaric daybreak. The Mother (Substance) swells,
expanding from within. The vibration sweeps along, impregnating the quiescent
germs of life in the whole expanse. Darkness gives out light; light drops into
virgin matter, opening every bud. Divine Intelligence impregnates chaos. The
germs float together into the World-Egg, the ancient symbol of Nature
fructified. The aggravation of units of matter under the impulse of dynamic
spirit is symbolized by the term "curdling." Pure Spirit curdles pure matter
into the incipient granules of hyle, or substance.
The serpent symbol is
prominent in the early cosmology, typifying at different times the eternity,
infinitude, regeneration and rejuvenation of the universe, and also wisdom. The
familiar serpent with its tail in its mouth was a symbol not only of eternity
and infinitude, but of the globular form of all bodies shaped out of the fire
mist. In general the "fiery serpent" represented the movement of Divine Wisdom
over the face of the waters, or primary elements.
The text of the whole
doctrine of the early stages, in fact, of the entire creative process, is the
statement
203
"that there is but One Universal Element, infinite,
unborn and undying, and that all the rest--as the world of phenomena--are but so
many various differentiated aspects and transformations of that One, from
Cosmical down to micro-cosmical effects, from superhuman down to human and
sub-human beings, the totality in short of objective
existence."9
Naturally but one tiny segment of all that activity is
cognizable by man, whose perceptive powers are limited to a small range of
vibratory sensitivity. Only that part of nature which comes within hail of his
sense equipment, only the expressions of life which take physical form, are
known (directly) to him. Were it not, says Theosophy, for the fact that
superhuman beings, whose cognitive powers have been vastly extended beyond
ordinary human capacity, have imparted to those qualified to receive it
information relative to the upper worlds and the inner realities of nature, we
would know nothing of cosmology.
"In order to obtain clear perception of
it, one has first of all to admit the postulate of a universally diffused,
omnipresent, eternal Deity in Nature; secondly, to have fathomed the meaning of
electricity in its true essence; and thirdly, to credit man with being a
septenary symbol, on the terrestrial plane, of the One Great Unit, (the Logos),
which is itself the seven-vowelled sign, the Breath, crystallized into the
Word."10
Madame Blavatsky starts with the Absolute, the All-That-Is, not
even the One, but the No-Number.
In Stanza IV we see this primordial
essence awakening to activity. It emanates or engenders the One, the homogeneous
substrate of all. It in turn projects or splits itself into the Two,
Father-Mother, and these, interacting, produce the "Sons" or Rays, who by their
word of power, the "Army of the Voice" (the laws of nature), build the worlds of
the universe. These sons are always seven in number, and their created works are
thus given a seven-fold constitution. Christians know them as the Seven Logoi,
or the Seven
______________
9 The Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, p.
75.
10 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 83.
204
Archangels. These
carry the differentiation of the one cosmic substrate to its furthest extent in
the production of the ninety-two or more elements of our globe, which their
forces weld into an infinity of combinations to compose our structural earth.
All the physical forces we know, light, heat, cold, fire, water, gas, earth,
ether, are the progeny of the great universal agent, Fohat, which we know under
its form of electricity. Electricity is the universal agent employed by the Sons
of God to create and uphold our world.
In bold outline this is the whole
story. But Madame Blavatsky supplies a wealth of detail and a richness of
illustration that go far to clarify the various phases of the process and the
diversified agents coöperating in it.
When the One has created the
Two--Spirit and Matter--the allegory goes on to say, the interaction of these
Two "spin a web whose upper end is fastened to Spirit and the lower one to
Matter." This web is the universe, ranging in constituent elements from coarse
matter up to vibrant Spirit. Yet Spirit and Matter are but two phases of one and
the same Prime Element.
Cosmic Fire, Fohat, Divine Electricity, energizes
the universe. But to the natural concept of electricity the occult science adds
the property of intelligence. Cerebration is attended by electrical phenomena,
it is said.
Humanity is a materialized and as yet imperfect expression of
the seven hierarchical Devas, or the seven conscious intelligent powers in
nature. The planetary deities, or the planets as living beings, are fundamental
in the Theosophic view, as to the Aristotelian and ancient Greek view generally.
Mankind is but repeating the history of precedent life units, which have risen
to celestial heights and magnitudes.
The forms of created life are all
determined by the geometrical forms in the minds of the Intelligences. "Nature
geometrizes universally in all her manifestations." There is an inherent law by
which nature coördinates or correlates all her geometrical forms, and her
compound elements; and in it there is no room for chance. The worlds are all
subject
205
to Rulers or Regents, and the apparent deviations from
precise natural programs are due to voluntary actions on the part of those great
Beings who, like ourselves, are in the cycle of experience and evolution. The
Solar Logoi can err in their spheres as we in ours. Some of the exceptional
oddities in nature are the effects of their efforts to experiment and
learn.
The "Lipika" ("scribes") "write" the eternal records of nature on
the imperishable scroll of the Akashic ether. They are the "amanuenses of the
Eternal Ideation," who copy the archetypal ideas and imprint them on the
material substance. They write the Book of Eternal Life and exercise an
influence on the science of horoscopy.
Stanza V elaborates in more detail
the creative process, controlled by the various "sevens," the "Breaths"
(prana, basic category in Indian philosophy) and the "Sons." The Doctrine
teaches that to become a fully conscious divine "god," the spiritual primeval
Intelligence must pass through the human stage. And "human" in this usage is not
limited to the humanity of our globe, but applies also to the numberless other
mortal incarnations of varying types on other planets. A human state is one in
which Intelligence is embodied in a condition of material organization in which
there is established an equilibrium between matter and spirit,--and this state
is reached in the middle point of the Fourth Round on each chain of globes, or
when spirit is most deeply enmeshed in matter, and is ready to begin its
emergence. The hierarchical entities must have won for themselves the right of
divinity through self-experience, as we are doing. "The 'Breath' or first
emanation becomes a stone, the stone a plant, the plant an animal, the animal a
man, the man a spirit and the spirit a god." All the great planetary gods were
once men, and we men shall in the future take our places in the skies as Lords
of planets, Regents of galaxies and wielders of fire-mist! As our human wills
(the divine elements in us) are now masters over small potencies, so our
expanded Intelligences will direct vast elemental energies, and worlds will
arise under the impulsion of our thought. There is room
in
206
space for us all. The "flaming fire" (electricity) shall be
our minister, to flash at our bidding. The "fiery wind" is the incandescent
cosmic dust which follows the impulsion of the will as iron filings follow a
magnet. Yet this cosmic dust is "mind-stuff," has the potentiality of
self-consciousness in it, and is, like the Monad of Leibnitz, a universe in
itself and for itself. "It is an atom and an angel." Fohat is the universal
fiery agent of Divine Will, and the electricity we know is one aspect, not by
any means the highest, of it. In a higher state Fohat is the "objectivized
thought of the gods," the Word made flesh. In another aspect he is the Universal
Life Force, solar energy. He is said to take "three and seven strides through
the seven regions above and the seven below," which is taken to mean the
successive waves of vital force impregnating the seven levels of nature. "God is
a living Fire,"--the Christians are fire-worshippers, too, says Madame
Blavatsky. God is the One Flame. It burns within every material thing. The
ultimate essence of each constituent part of the compounds of nature is unitary,
whether in the spiritual, the intellectual or the physical world.
In
order that the One may become the many, there must be a principium
individuationis, and this is provided by the qualities of matter. A spark of
Divine Fire, so to speak, is wrapped in a vesture of matter, which circumscribes
the energies of spirit with a "Ring Pass-Not." Each embodied Monad or Spiritual
Ego looks out through its sense windows to perceive another Ego; but perceives
only the material garment of that Ego. The process of evolution will make this
garment thinner, so that the inner splendor of the Self can be seen luminously
through it.
The fiery energy of the great planetary beings, our author
says, will never "run down," as it is constantly being fed by intra-cosmic fuel,
a theory which Prof. Millikan has made familiar in recent days.
Stanza VI
carries out the further stages of differentiation of the life principle in its
first or virgin forms. Man's physical body is but one of seven constituents of
his being, and a planet likewise presents only its outer garment, its
physical
207
vehicle, to our view. The stars, as beings, are
septenary, having astral, mental, and spiritual bodies in addition to their
physical globes. It is affirmed that this septiform constitution of man, which
makes him an analogue of the great cosmic beings and of the cosmos itself, is to
be taken as the true significance of the Biblical phrase "man, the image and
likeness of God." The more real or more spiritual essences of the being of both
man and stars are not visible to sense. The life impulsion animating man
contacts the material world only in and through his physical body; the same
thing is true of the chain of globes. Both man and the planet have one physical
body on the material plane, two on the vital etheric plane, two on the mental
plane, and two on the upper plane of spirit. The latter two are beyond the
powers of human ken, and to us are material only in the sense that they are not
entirely devoid of differentiation. They are still vestures of spirit, not
spirit itself. But they are the first garments of "pure" spirit. A life wave, in
man or planet, comes forth from spirit, enters one after the other the bodies of
increasing material density, until it has descended to a perfect equilibrium
between matter and spirit, in the gross physical or fourth body; and then begins
its ascent through three other vehicles of increasingly tenuous organization.
And it runs seven times round each cycle of bodies and dwells for milliards of
years in each of the seven kingdoms of nature, the mineral, vegetable, animal,
and human, and three sub-mineral kingdoms of an elementary character, not known
to science. The waves of life pass successively from one globe to another,
lifting one into active existence as another goes "dead." They traverse the
seven globes of a chain like a great spiral serpent, revolving like a barber's
pole, every turn of the axis carrying a kingdom of nature one stride higher. For
instance, hitting Globe A of the chain the impulsion builds up the mineral
kingdom there; as this first wave swings onward to Globe B (where it builds the
mineral kingdom for it) the second impulsion hits Globe A and lifts the mineral
kingdom erected by the previous wave into the vegetable evolution. As the first
wave leaps over from Globe
208
B to Globe C, to start mineral life
there, the second wave has brought the vegetable kingdom to Globe B, and the
animal kingdom on Globe A. The fourth outgoing of force will introduce the
mineral world on Globe D, the vegetable on Globe C, the animal on Globe B, and
the human on Globe A. After the human come the superhuman or spiritual
evolutions. The detailed explanation of the entire cycle of birth, growth, life,
and death of solar systems is of such complexity that it is the work of years
for the Theosophic student to grasp it with any clearness. It is immensely
involved, so that charts and graphs are generally resorted to. The student is
referred to standard Theosophic works for the minutiae of this subject. We can
but note here the principles of the system and some of their
implications.
The earth, as the one visible representative of its six
invisible principles, has to live through seven Rounds. The first three take it
through the process of materialization; the fourth fully crystallizes it,
hardens it; the last three take it gradually out of physical, back to ethereal
and finally spiritual form. The Fourth Globe of each chain is thus always the
nadir of the process of involution, and the Fourth Round is always the time in
which this process is consummated. The earth is now a little past the nethermost
point of material existence, as we have passed the middle of the Fourth Round.
We have finished the descending arc and have begun our return to Deity, both the
globe and the human family on it. Exiles from God, prodigal sons in a far
country, we have set out on our homeward journey.
Man came on our globe
at the beginning of the Fourth Round in the present series of life cycles and
races, following the evolution of the mineral, vegetable, and animal kingdoms
thereon. Every life cycle on our earth brings into being seven Root Races. The
First Root Race were the progeny of "celestial men," or the Lunar Pitris,11 of
which again there are seven hierarchies.
______________
11 The word Pitris
commonly means "fathers, ancestors, progenitors." Madame Blavatsky, however, on
the authority of her Mahatmic instructors, employs the term in a wider sense.
She uses it in a racial sense. In the Glossary she speaks of the Pitris
as "the ancestors or creators of mankind. They are of the seven classes,
three
209
Human Egos continue to come into the stream of our
evolution on earth up to the Fourth Round. But at this point the door into the
human kingdom closes. Those Monads who have not reached the human kingdom by
this time will find themselves so far behind that they will have to wait over,
in a state of suspended vitality, until the next wave bears them onward. But for
their loss of opportunity on this chain they will be rewarded by becoming men on
a higher chain altogether.
The hosts of Monads are divided into three
classes: Lunar Pitris, present Men, and the laggards. The first class are
advanced Egos who reached "Manhood" in the First Round. The laggards are those
who come in last, and are still in an undeveloped state.
The Moon is the
parent of our Earth--and this in spite of the fact that it is our satellite. It
is older, and its spirit has passed from its now lifeless body into our planet.
In brief, the Earth is the new body or reincarnation of the Moon,--or more
correctly, of that great Spirit which tenanted the Moon aeons ago. Madame
Blavatsky uses the apt illustration of a mother circling around her child's
cradle, to vindicate the anomaly of a parent body in a satellitic relation to
its offspring.
There exists in nature a triple evolutionary scheme, or
three separate schemes of evolution, which proceed contemporaneously in our
system and are inextricably interblended at every point. These are the Monadic,
the intellectual, and the physical. Here again analogy steps in to clarify
thought. As man is a Monad, or spark of the Infinite Essence, which is evolving
in connection both with a principle of mind and a physical body, so nature is a
combination of three streams of development. The higher part must find its way
to growth through connection with the lower and
______________
of which
are incorporeal. In popular theology they are said to be created from Brahma's
side. . . . The Pitris are not the ancestors of the present living men, but
those of the human kind or Adamic races; the spirits of the human races, which
on the great scale of descending evolution preceded our races of men, and they
were physically, as well as spiritually, far superior to our modern pigmies. In
Manava Dharma Shastra they are called the Lunar
Ancestors."
210
the lowest. But each of these three evolutions has
its own laws, and the interconnection of them all in man makes him the complex
being he is. Every speck of matter strives to reach its model in man; and every
man aspires to be a self-conscious Monad.
Out of this assertion of a
threefold nature in man grows one of the unique conceptions of Theosophy: that
Man, a divine spiritual Monad, is in this evolution dwelling in and controlling
(if he has learned how to prevent it controlling him) the body of an animal. And
the body is the animal's, not man's, in the strict sense. The body has its own
type of consciousness, primal urgings, its own independent soul, but no
intellect or spiritual nature. Through its association with us in the same house
it is supposed to develop in a way it could never do unaided, first a mind and
later the inkling of spirituality. But every organism has its principle, and the
soul of the animal is capable of attending to those functions which pertain to
the life of the body. Hence, the commonplace functions of our bodies are
regulated by a cerebration which is so far from being directly our own that we
are at any rate totally unconscious of it. This amounts to saying that our
subconscious, or the operations of our sympathetic, as distinguished from our
cerebral, nervous system, is the "soul" of our animal mate. The hope of the
animal lies in his fairly ready susceptibility to training, so that he is able
quickly to take up by an automatism whatever "we" do
habitually.
Theosophy affirms that man has to control, not his own lower
nature, but a lower order of being whose body he is
tenanting.
Theosophists point to the development of a child as
corroborative of this theory. Before mind develops, the child is an animal
simply. Later comes intellect, and after more time comes spirituality. Man is
not simple; he is a congeries of individuals in association. As the individual's
unfoldment in his own life is a recapitulation of the growth of humanity as a
unit, it follows the same order of evolution. The great Creative Lords did not
implant the principle of mind in our
211
order until, in the
Fourth Race, appropriate bodies had been built up. We are only now beginning to
evolve spiritual faculty.
The so-called Fall "was the fall of Spirit into
generation, not the fall of mortal man." Madame Blavatsky undertakes to show
that on this point of theology, as on that of the Virgin Birth, Christian
doctrine is childishly literal-minded. It has taken a fact of cosmology, which
like all others in ancient thought had been symbolized in various forms, and
rendered it in a literal historical sense. The "Falls" are but phases of the
universal "descent into matter," which appears under several aspects, one being
the general outgoing of spirit into the material worlds, another the "fall of
the angels" and a third the "fall of man." The taint of sexuality associated
with certain conceptions of man's fall is a reference to the fact that when the
spiritual Monads who descended to earth to inhabit the bodies of a lower race
(the animals spoken of above), they were of necessity forced into sexual
procreation, whereas they had propagated by powers of the intellectualized will
in their previous high estate.
Then in regard to the Satans, the
Serpents, the Dragons, the Devils, the Demons, the Demiurges, the Adversaries,
Madame Blavatsky delves deep into ancient lore to prove that, when read properly
in their esoteric meaning, all the old legends of the Evil Ones, the Powers of
Darkness, refer to no essentially evil beings, great or small, but to the Divine
Wisdom of the Sons of Light (all light emanates from darkness) who impregnate
the universe with the principle of intelligence. Adam's eating of the fruit of
the forbidden tree gave him knowledge of good and evil. This can mean only that
beings of a "pure" spiritual nature represented symbolically by resident life in
Eden or Paradise, sought, through incarnation in physical bodies in a material
world, the opportunity to bring the latent intelligence in their divine nature
to actualization in self-conscious knowledge. Dragons are always found guarding
a tree--the tree of knowledge.
"When the Church, therefore, curses Satan,
it curses the cosmic reflection of God; it anathematizes God made manifest in
matter
212
or in the objective; it maledicts God, or the
ever-incomprehensible Wisdom, revealing itself as Light and Shadow, good and
evil in nature in the only manner comprehensible to the limited intellect of
man."12
"Satan, once he ceases to be viewed in the superstitious dogmatic
unphilosophical spirit of the Churches, grows into the grandiose image of one
who made of terrestrial a divine Man; who gave him . . . the law of the Spirit
and Life and made him free from the sin of ignorance, hence of
death."13
All references to Satan stood for an aspect of nature that was
evil only as the negative pole of electricity is evil, i.e., as it stands
in opposition to the positive, a necessary and benignant phase of activity.
"Deus est Demon inversus."
The globes, or their constituent
matter, go through seven fundamental transformations in their life history: (1),
the homogeneous; (2), the aëriform and radiant (gaseous); (3), curd-like
(nebulous); (4), atomic, ethereal (beginning of differentiation); (5), germinal,
fiery; (6), vapory (the future Earth); (7), cold, depending on the sun for
life.
When the worlds are populated and the Monads have entered the human
chain, certain great beings who have risen to knowledge on other chains
supervise the instruction of the oncoming races, keeping closely in touch with
the spiritual condition of the unenlightened masses. Either they themselves
descend into the world or they send forth lesser teachers to keep alive the seed
of spiritual wisdom. Kapila, Hermes, Enoch, Orpheus, Krishna were a few of their
emissaries. They voluntarily forego their own higher evolution, at least
temporarily, "to form the nursery for future human adepts," during the rest of
our cycle.
Stanza VII goes into the numerology of the primal and later
hierarchies, and gives the inner cosmological significance of the numbers. Two,
of course, symbolizes the polarization of original essence into the duality of
Spirit-Matter. Three refers to the triune constitution of the Divine Men, or
Planetary Beings, who manifest the union of the three
______________
12
The Secret Doctrine, Vol. II, p. 235.
13 Ibid., Vol. I, p.
198.
213
highest principles, Atma-Buddhi-Manas,14 in one organism.
Man on his plane reflects this trinitarian union. The quaternaries represent the
cardinal points which square the circle of infinity and typify manifestation.
Four sometimes also stands for the basic states of elementary essence, or the
four perceptible planes of material existence, earth, water, air, and ether.
Five is the symbol of man in his present stage of evolutionary development, as
he stands in the fifth lap of his progression round the spiral, and has
consequently developed five of his ultimate seven capacities. This accounts for
his having five senses, five fingers and toes. The pentacle or five-pointed star
is often his symbol. The six-pointed star refers to the six forces or powers of
nature, all synthesized by the seventh or central point in the star. Seven is,
of course, the number of life in its final form of organization on the material
plane. This is because the Logoi created man in their own septenary image. Man
is really, in his totality, a sevenfold being, or a being made up of the union
of seven distinct constituent parts. His threefold nature is a truth for his
present status only. He is sevenfold potentially, threefold actually. This means
that of his seven principles only the lower three have been brought from latency
to activity, as he is engaged in awakening to full function his fourth or
Buddhic principle. At the far-off summit of his life in the seventh Round he
will have all his seven principles in full flower, and will be the divine man he
was before--only now conscious of his divinity. At the end of each
Round,
"when the seventh globe is reached the nature of everything that
is evolving returns to the condition it was in at its starting
point--
______________
14 The term Atma-Buddhi-Manas is the Theosophical
manner of designating the "higher triplicity" in man, the union of the three
higher principles which constitutes him an individual Ego. If one were to say,
man is composed of mind, soul and spirit in his higher nature, it would roughly
approximate the Theosophic description. Sanskrit dictionaries give Atma
as meaning, "breath, life, soul"; Buddhi as meaning "intelligence,
reason, intellect, mind, discernment, judgment, the power of forming and
retaining conceptions and general notions; perception, apprehension,
understanding"; and Manas as "the principle of mind or
spirit."
214
plus, every time, a new and superior degree in the
states of consciousness."15
The theory of an inner permanent unit of
life, repeatedly touching the outer material worlds in order to gain experience,
is symbolized in Theosophy by the Sutratma ("thread-soul"), or string of pearls.
The permanent life principle is the thread running through all, and the
successive generations in matter are the beads strung along it.
To
understand these postulations, we must envisage man as dwelling only partially
in the physical embodiment, and having segments of his constitution in the
invisible worlds. In the latter lies the ground-plan of his earth life, shaped
by his previous life histories. The present physical life will contribute its
quota of influence to modify that ground-plan when it becomes in turn the
determinant of his succeeding incarnation.
The Sabbath, according to
Madame Blavatsky, has an occult significance undreamed of by our theologians. It
means the rest of Nirvana, and refers to the seventh or final Round of each
emanation through the planes of nature. But the Sabbath should be as long as the
days of activity.
A passage in a footnote says that the introductory
chapters of Genesis were never meant to represent even a remote allegory
of the creation of our earth. They
"embrace a metaphysical conception of
some indefinite period in the eternity, when successive attempts were being made
by the law of evolution at the formation of universes. The idea is plainly
stated in the Zohar."16
Had its purpose been to give the true genesis,
the narrative would have followed the outline laid down in The Secret
Doctrine. The creation in which Adam Kadmon ("Primal Man") has a part, did
not take place on our earth, but in the depths of primordial matter.
The
theory is adduced that each Round of the emanational wave of life engenders one
of the four elements, of which
______________
15 The Secret
Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 103.
16 Ibid., p.
246.
215
the Greeks spoke so much. The First Round developed one
element, "one-dimensional space," fiery energy. The Second Round brought forth
the second element, air. Matter in the Second Round was two-dimensional. The
Third Round brought water, and the Fourth produced earth in its hard encrusted
state. The Fifth will beget ether, the gross body of the immaterial Akasha.17
The senses of man in that distant day will be refined to the point at which
responsiveness to ethereal vibrations will be general. Our range of cognition
will be thus vastly enhanced, for whole realms of nature's life now closed to us
because of our low pitch of faculty, will then be opened up. Phenomena
manifesting the permeability of matter will be to our higher senses then a daily
commonplace. We will have X-ray vision, so that we shall be able "to see into
the heart of things."
If man's nature is sevenfold, so is his evolution.
The seven principles in him are enumerated as "the Spiritual or Divine; the
psychic or semi-divine; the intellectual; the passional; the instinctual or
cognitional; the semi-corporeal; and the purely material or physical. All these
evolve and progress cyclically, passing from one into another . . . one in their
ultimate essence, seven in their aspects."
An important point is made by
the expounder of Occultism as to the way in which we should think of all spirits
in the supersensible and the sub-sensible worlds. Those superior to us have all
been men, whether in this or former evolutions on other globes or in other
Manvantaras; and those below us, the elementaries, nature spirits, will be men
in the future. If a spirit has intelligence he must have got it in the human
stage, where alone that principle is developed. Spirits are not to be regarded
as exotic products of nature, beings of a
______________
17 "The fourth
dimension of space" enters the discussion at this point. The phrase should be,
says the writer, "the fourth dimension of matter in space," since obviously
space has no dimensions. The dimensions, or characteristics of matter are those
determinations which the five senses of man give to it. Matter has extension,
color, motion (molecular), taste, and smell; and it is the development of the
next sense in man--normal clairvoyance--that will give matter its sixth
characteristic, which she calls permeability. Extension--which covers all
concepts of dimension in our world--is limited to three directions. Only when
man's perceptive faculties unfold will there be a real fourth
dimension.
216
foreign universe, creatures of a type unrelated to
ourselves. They are either our lower or our higher brothers.
"The whole
order of nature evinces a progressive march toward a higher life. There is
design in the action of the seemingly blindest forces. The whole process of
evolution with its endless adaptations, is a proof of this."18
All nature
is animated and controlled by lofty Intelligences, who could not be supposed to
act with less of conscious design than ourselves. Design is exhibited everywhere
in the universe, in proportion to the degree of intelligence evolved. There is
no blind chance in the cosmos, but only varying grades of intelligence. The laws
of nature are inviolable, but individual beings of every grade of intelligence
move and act amid those laws, learning gradually to bring their actions into
harmony with them. The deus implicitus within each of us--in every
atom--must become the deus explicitus, and the difficulties and risks of
the process are commensurate with its glorious rewards.
Some of these
Intelligences are veritable genii who preside over our lives. They are our good
or evil demons. Hermes says
"they imprint their likeness on our souls,
they are present in our nerves, our marrow, our veins and our very brain
substance. At the moment when each of us receives life and being he is taken in
charge by the genii (Elementals) who preside over births. . . . The genii have
then the control of mundane things and our bodies serve them as
instruments."19
Part II of Book One begins with an analysis of the
evolution of Symbolism. No traditional folk lore, according to Madame Blavatsky,
has ever been pure fiction; it represented a natural form of primitive language.
Ideography was a stage of growth in the art of human communication. Symbolism
was no mere intellectual device of idealistic algebra, but a natural idiom of
thought. Mythology was a primitive pictographic mode of conveying truths. An
ideograph could be understood "in any language."
______________
18 The
Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 277.
19 Quoted in The Secret
Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 295.
217
A later development of this art
brought the mystery language, or particular set of symbols to represent the
esoteric truths. The cross, the lamb, the bull, the hawk, the serpent, the
dragon, the sword, the circle, the square, the triangle, and many other signs
were adopted for special significances. There are seven keys, however, to the
mystery tongue, and some of them, as well as the knowledge of how to turn them,
have been lost. Only in Tibet, it is maintained, is the code still intact. No
religion was ever more than a chapter or two of the entire volume of archaic
mysteries. No system except Eastern Occultism was ever in possession of the full
secret, with its seven keys.
There is a chapter on the Mundane Egg, which
in all theologies is taken to represent the prototype of life hidden in the
lotus symbol. Here we find a special sacredness attributed to the letter M, as
symbolizing water, i.e., waves, or the great deep, the sea of prime
substance. And such sacred names as Maitreya, Makara, Messiah, Metis, Mithras,
Monad, Maya, Mother, Minerva, Mary, Miriam and others are said to carry the
hidden significance of the letter. The Moon and its place in symbolism is the
subject of a chapter. All the lunar goddesses had a dual aspect, the one divine,
the other infernal. All were the virgin mothers of an immaculately born
Son,--the sun. Here, as nearly everywhere else, Christian dogmas and terms are
traced to an origin in pagan ideas. The Satan myth is again taken up in a
separate chapter, where it is said that the only diabolical thing about it are
its perversions under Christian handling.
The Sevens are given more
thorough elucidation in another chapter. There were seven creations, or rather
creation had seven stages. The first was that of the Divine Mind, Universal
Soul, Infinite Intellect; the second was the first differentiation of indiscrete
Substance; the third was the stage of organic evolution. These three steps were
sub-mineral, and had yet brought nothing visible to being. The fourth brought
the minerals; the fifth brought animals, in germ form; the sixth produced
sub-human divinities, and the seventh
218
crowned the work with
man. Man is thus the end and apex of the evolutionary effort. Man completes all
forms in himself. But esoterically there is a primary creation and a secondary
creation, and each is sevenfold. The first created Spirit, the second
Matter.
Madame Blavatsky traces the working of the septenates in nature
through many forms not commonly thought of. Many normal and abnormal processes
have one or more weeks (seven days) as their period, such as the gestation of
animals, the duration of fevers, etc. "The eggs of the pigeon are hatched in two
weeks; those of the fowl in three; those of the duck in four; those of the goose
in five; and those of the ostrich in seven." We are familiar with the incidence
of seven in many aspects of physics, in color, in sound, the spectrum; in
chemistry, in the law of atomic weights; in physiology; in nature. Madame
Blavatsky cites a long list of the occurrence of the mystic number in the
ceremonials, cosmologies, architecture, and theologies of all
nations.
Scientific authorities are adduced by the author to corroborate
her contention that the material universe is ordered on a system which has seven
as its constitutional groundplan.
"The birth, growth, maturity, vital
functions . . . change, diseases, decay, and death, of insects, reptiles,
fishes, birds, mammals and even of man, are more or less controlled by a law of
completion in weeks," or seven day periods.20
From the seven colors of
the rainbow to the seven-year climacterics in man's life and his allotted seven
decades on earth, all the living universe seems to run in sevens and reflects
the sevenfold nature of the precosmic patterns of things.
Volume II
concerns the planetary history of our earth, the inception of human life on it,
and the evolution of the latter through the previous races up to now. Humanity
is assigned an age on the globe of infinitely greater length
than
______________
20 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 311. Quoted from H.
Grattan Guinness, F. R. G. S.: The Approaching End of the
Age.
219
the science of her day was willing to concede, which
even outstretches the ampler figures set down by contemporary science.
We
must start with the earth's place in the solar cosmos. As will be recalled, our
planet is the one physically perceptible (to ordinary human vision) globe of a
chain of seven (the six others being of rarefied impalpable materials), this
chain being itself but one of seven, each of which has a physical representative
revolving about our sun. These physical globes are subject to the cyclic law
which brings to them successive waves of vivification and sterility, and this
law operates as well with all the productions of life on the globe as with the
globe itself.
The story of man then becomes that of a succession of great
world races preceding the present one, with the various continents inhabited by
each, and the form, the condition and the progress of mankind in each
manifestation. Evolution is postulated as the working modus, but it is evolution
in cycles, not in a straight line.
The very beginning of life on our
planet occurred with the first impact upon it of the initial life wave in the
First Round. But this first wave brought life only in the form and to the degree
of mineral organizations. When that life impetus passed on to the next globe in
the septenary chain to integrate mineral structure there, the second wave struck
the earth and carried evolution forward from the mineral to the vegetable stage.
The third crest carried life on into the animal kingdom; and the Fourth Round
then became the epoch of the entry of man on the scene. The advent of man on the
physical or fourth globe of every planetary chain is coincident with the Fourth
Round, because the middle of that round is the central point--three and
one-half--in a seven series, and man's life represents the perfect balance
between spirit and matter. This point would be reached at the exact half-way
mark, where the impulsion of life energy would have spent itself in the outward
or downward direction (from spirit to matter), and the energies in play would
begin to gather force for the rebound or return of spirit,
bearing
220
matter with it to "its home on high." The middle of
the Fourth Round, therefore, would find a perfect balance established between
the spiritual and the physical; and that point would be located in the middle of
the fourth sub-race of the fourth root-race of human life on the earth. As we
are now in the fifth sub-race (the Anglo-Saxon) of the fifth root-race (the
Aryan), we are by some millions of years past the turning point of our cosmical
destiny.
On the reascending arc spirit slowly reasserts itself at the
expense of the physical. At the close of the seventh Round at the end of the
Manvantara, the Monad will find itself again free from matter, as it was in the
beginning, but with the rich treasure of experience stowed safely away in
indestructible consciousness, to become in turn the germ of growth in the next
Manvantara. On the descending arc the pressure is centrifugal for spirit,
centripetal for matter; the ascending path will see these conditions reversed.
Downward, the spirit was being nailed on the cross of matter and buried; upward,
it is the gradual resurrection of spirit and the transfiguration of matter. Our
fifth race is struggling to liberate itself from the inhibitions of matter; the
sixth will take us far from flesh and material inertia. The cycle of
spirituality will begin, when all humans are Adepts.21 Henceforward spirit will
emerge victorious as it has the whole weight of cosmic "gravity" on its side.
This is the cosmic meaning of Easter.
The account in Genesis of
the appearance of man is not far awry, but must be read esoterically, and in
several different senses. It is in no sense the record of the Primary Creation,
which brought the heavenly hierarchies into purely noumenal existence; it is
that of the Secondary Creation, in which the Divine Builders bring cosmical
systems into material form. The accounts given in the Puranas and the older
literature are of pre-cosmic creation; the one given in Genesis is only
of the cosmic or phenomenal creation. The former deal with a spiritual genesis,
the latter only with a material genesis.
______________
21 The races of
"intelligent" animals and semi-human apes will then be advanced to our present
station.
221
Man was the first of mammalian creatures to arrive in
the Fourth Round. He came in the first race of the Round, several hundred
million years ago. But he was not then the kind of being he is now. He was not
then compounded of three elements, body, mind, and spirit. His body was being
organized by the slow accretion of material around a purely ethereal or astral
matrix or shell, provided for the purpose by the Lunar Pitris, in successive
sojourns in the mineral, vegetable, and animal realms, during the three
preceding Rounds. These Lunar progenitors started his mundane existence by
furnishing first the nucleating shell and the earthly house made ready for
occupancy finally by the living Monad, the indestructible spark of the Eternal
Fire. The latter is the true being, Man himself. But at this early time he was,
comparatively speaking, in the condition of formless spiritual essence. He had
not yet come to live in a physical body, but was hovering over the scene,
awaiting the preparation of that body by the forces guiding material evolution.
He was temporarily clothed in ethereal forms, which became more densely material
as he descended toward the plane of embodiment. He, a Divine Spirit, descended
to meet the material form, which rose to become his fit vehicle. The two can not
be conjoined, however,--the gap between crass materiality and sheer spirit being
too great--without the intermediating offices of a principle that can stand
between them and eventually unify them. This principle is Manas or Mind. As
Fohat in the cosmos links spirit with matter, so Manas in the microcosmic man
brings a Divine Monad into relation with a physical form. The complete
conjunction of all three of these principles in one organism was not effected by
nature until the middle of the Third Root-Race. Then only can the life of man
properly be said to have begun. That date was eighteen million years ago. Men
then first became "gods," responsible for good and evil, divine beings
struggling with the conditions of terrestrial life, undergoing further tutelage
in the school of experience under the teachers, Nature and Evolution. They were
the Kumaras, "princes," "virgin youths"--beings
222
dwelling on
the planes of spiritual passivity, who yet yearned for the taste of concrete
life, and whose further evolution made necessary their descent into material
condition on earth. They were the rebels (against inane quiescence), spirits
longing for activity, the angels who "fell" down to earth (not to hell), but
only to rise with man to a state higher than their former angelhood. They
stepped down into their earthly encasement in the Fourth Round. Their
prospective physical bodies were not ready till then.
Humanity had run
the course of two races before having developed a physical body comparable to
the ones we are familiar with. What and where were these two races? The first is
given no specific name, but it inhabited the "Imperishable Sacred Land," about
which there is little information. It was a continent that lay in a quarter of
the globe where the climate was suited to the forms of life then prevalent. At
the end of its long history it was sunk by great cataclysms beneath the ocean.
Men in this race were boneless, their bodies plastic; in fact "organisms without
organs."
In due time the second great continent appeared, to be the home
of the Second Race, the Hyperboreans. This, we are told, lay around the present
region of the North Pole. But the climate then was equable and even tropical,
owing to the position of the earth's axis, which was then at a quite decided
angle of divergence from the present inclination. The author claims that the
axis had twice shifted radically; that Greenland once had a torrid climate and
luxuriant vegetation. Spitzbergen and Nova Zembla are mentioned as remnants of
the Hyperborean Land.
The Third Race was the Lemurian, and it occupied a
vast continent extending south from the Gobi Desert and filling the area of the
Indian Ocean, west to Madagascar and east to New Zealand. Madame Blavatsky gives
its boundaries with considerable explicitness. Australia is one of its remnants
and the much-discussed Easter Island another. Some of the Australian aborigines,
some races in China, and some islanders, are lingering descendants of the
Lemurians. It was destroyed mainly by fire, and eventually
submerged.
223
As it sank its successor arose in the Atlantic
Ocean and became the seat of Fourth Race civilization. This is the fabled
Atlantis, to which Plato and the ancient writers have alluded, the existence of
which Madame Blavatsky says was a general tradition among the early nations.22
The Azores, Cape Verde, Canary Islands and Teneriffe are the highest peaks of
the alleged Atlantean Land. The Fourth Race flourished there some 850,000 years
ago, though the last portion, the island of Poseidonis, north of the Sahara
region, carried the surviving remnant of the race to a watery doom only eleven
thousand years ago. This final cataclysm became the basis of the world-wide
deluge myth. The later Lemurians and the Atlanteans were men like the present
humanity, fully compounded of mind, body, and spirit or soul. They had reached
in some lines (the mechanical and the psycho-spiritual) a development far higher
than our own, wielding psychic forces with which we are not generally familiar
and having, beside airships, a more ready method of tapping electric and
super-electric forces. In the early centuries of the race's history its members
were gigantic in stature, and Madame Blavatsky uses this assertion to explain
the historical riddle of the erection of the Druidical temples, the pyramids,
and other colossal forms of their architecture.23
It must be understood
that the races overlapped in temporal history, the former ones being progenitors
of their successors. Nature never makes sudden leaps over unbridged gaps. Her
progressions are gradual. Many circum-
______________
22 Ignatius
Donnelley endeavored to substantiate the claims for its existence in an
elaborate work, Atlantis: The Antediluvian World, some sixty or seventy
years ago. By tracing numberless similarities in the languages, customs, and
ideas of Old World civilizations with those of Central America he adduced a
formidable body of evidence pointing to the former existence of a linking area.
Madame Blavatsky counts more heavily than science has done upon this authority.
Soundings have revealed the presence of a great raised plateau on the ocean
floor at about one-third the depth of the general main, extending from Northern
Brazil toward Ireland.
23 She assigns a tentative date of 78,000 years
ago for the erection of the great pyramid of Cheops, reaching this conclusion
from reasoning and calculations based on the Dendera Zodiac, which indicates
that three sidereal years (25,686 years each) had passed since the pole star was
in a position suggested by the various features of the great pile's
construction.
224
Mediterranean nations were descendants of the
Atlanteans, and a few degenerate Lemurian stocks yet linger on. Nor were their
several continents annihilated at one stroke. Portions of the old lands remained
long after the new ones had risen from the waters. This permitted migrations and
the continuity of propagation. The races were in no sense special creations, but
attained distinct differentiations through the modifying influences of time and
environment. The Atlanteans permitted their ego-centric development to outstrip
their spiritual progress, fell into dangerous practices of sorcery and magic,
and through the operation of karmic law their civilization had to be blotted
out, so that a more normal evolution of the Egos involved could be initiated
under new conditions in succeeding races.
The Fifth Race, our present
Aryan stock, took its rise in northern Asia, spread south and west, and ran the
course that is known to history. The Anglo-Saxon is the fifth sub-race of the
seven that will complete the life of this Root-Race. The beginnings of the sixth
sub-race are taking form in America, we are told. Mentality is the special
characteristic of human development which our fifth sub-race is emphasizing.
Each race, so to say, sounds in its life one note in a scale of
seven.
This in outline is the story of the five races and their
continental homes. Two other great races are yet to appear, before the cosmic
life impulses complete their expenditure of energy in this Fourth Round. At the
termination of that period the present humanity will have reached the end of its
allotted cycle of evolution and the life impulse will withdraw from our globe.
The latter will lose its living denizens and its own life and will be left in a
condition of deadness or pralaya, to await the return of the wave on its fifth
swing round the chain of spheres.
Back in the first race the "propagation
of the species" was, strictly speaking, creation, not generation. The phrase,
"fall into generation," applicable to the Asuras (demons) or Kumaras who
descended into earthly bodies for physical experience, has been wrongly linked
with "the fall of the angels." It was the procedure which ensued at that stage
of
225
evolution, occurring in the middle of the Third Race
period, when spiritual methods of propagation were superseded by sexual ones.
Until then the attraction of the sexes was not the incentive, or the condition
precedent, to breeding, for there were no sexes. Man was male-female,
hermaphroditic. Before that he was asexual, and earlier still he was sexless.
Coition was by no means the only method employed by nature to carry life
forward. There were several other methods prior to this, and there will be
others succeeding it in the long course of growth. To the men of the First Race
sex union was impossible since they did not possess physical bodies. Their
bodies were astral shells. They were wraiths, umbrae, only ethereal counterparts
of dense bodies. In matter of such tenuity, subject largely to the forces of
will, procreation amounted to a renewal of old tissue rather than the upbuilding
of a new body exterior to the old. Reproduction was thus a re-creation, a
constant or periodical rejuvenation. The Stanzas state that the humanity
of that First Race never died. Its members simply renewed their life, revivified
their organisms, from age to age. The serpent was used as a sacred symbol for
many reasons, and one of them is that it periodically casts off an old exterior
garment and emerges a new creature from within. This process is somewhat
analogous to what took place with the First Race men. Each individual at stated
periods, by the exercise of some potency of the creative will described as
abstract meditation, extruded from his form a new version of itself. Such bodies
could not be affected by climate or temperature. The First Race men were known
as the Mind-Born.
Among the Second Race, the Hyperboreans, reproduction
was still spiritual, but of a form designated asexual. The early part of the
race were the "fathers of the Sweat-Born," the latter part were the Sweat-Born
themselves. These terms, taken from Sanskrit literature, will have no meaning
for the materialist. Yet she declares that analogues are not wanting in nature.
The process comes closest to what is known in biology as "budding". The astral
form
226
clothing the spiritual Monad, at the season of
reproduction,
"extrudes a miniature of itself from the surrounding aura.
This germ grows and feeds on the aura till it becomes fully developed, when it
gradually separates from its parent, carrying with it its own sphere of aura;
just as we see living cells reproducing their like by growth and subsequent
division into two."24
The process of reproduction had seven stages in
each race, and this was one of them. Each covered aeons of time.
The
later Second and early Third Race men were oviparous and hermaphroditic. Man in
this race became androgyne. But there were two stages of androgynous
development. In the first stage, in the late Second and early Third Races,
reproduction took place by a modification of the budding process. The first
exudations of spores had separated from the parent and then grown to the size of
the latter, becoming a reproduction of the old. Later the ejected spores
developed to such a form that instead of being but miniature copies of the
parents, they became an embryo or egg of the latter. This egg was formed within
the organism, later extruded, and after a period it burst its shell, releasing
the young offspring. But it was not fully androgyne, for the reason that it
required no fertilization by a specialized male aspect or organ of the parent.
It was a process midway between the Self-Born and the Sex-Born.
Later on
this process had become so modified by gradual evolution that the embryonic egg
produced by one portion of the parent organism remained inert and unproductive
until fructified by the positively polarized elements segregated in another
portion of the procreator's body. Thus was developed the method of fertilization
of the ovum by the male organs, when both were contained within the same
organism.
It seems that the Third Race was marked by three distinct
divisions, consisting of three orders of men differently procreated. "The first
two were produced by an oviparous
227
method presumably unknown to
modern Natural History." The infants of the two earlier forms were entirely
sexless, "shapeless even for all one knows, but those of the later races were
born androgynous."
"It is in the Third Race that the separation of the
sexes occurred. From being previously asexual, Humanity became distinctly
hermaphroditic or bisexual; and finally the man-bearing eggs began to give
birth, . . . first to beings in which one sex predominated over the other, and
finally to distinct men and women. Enos, the son of Seth, represents the first
true men--and--women humanity. Adam represents the pure spiritual or androgyne
races, who then separating into man and woman, becomes Jah-Heva in one form or
race, and Cain and Abel (male and female) in its other form, the double-sexed
Jehovah. Seth represents the later Third Race."25
Thus man, at one time
more spiritual than physical, started by creating through the inner powers of
his mind, and again in the distant future he will be destined to create by
spiritual will,--Kriyasakti.26 Creation, we are told, "is but the result of will
acting on phenomenal matter." There are yet many mysteries in sex which humanity
will bring to light as it unfolds its knowledge of the spiritual control of
nature.
Madame Blavatsky weaves into her story the Promethean myth, the
war of the Titans against Zeus being interpreted to mean the rebellion of the
Asuras and Kumaras against the inertia and passivity of an unfruitful spiritual
state, and their consequent drive for physical incarnation. This myth was the
Greek version of "the war in heaven" and the succeeding "fall of the angels."
The author ridicules the idea that mankind lacked fire in its common form before
Prometheus brought it from heaven. The "fire" he brought as a divine gift was
"the opening of man's spiritual percep-
______________
25 The sexless
(First) race was Adam solus. Then came the Second Race; Adam-Eve, or
Jah-Heva, inactive androgynes; and finally the Third, or the "separating
hermaphrodite," Cain and Abel, who produced the Fourth, Seth-Enos, etc.--The
Secret Doctrine, Vol. II, p. 134.
26 Kriyasakti means
"capacity to act, a sakti or supernatural power as appearing in actions."
By Madame Blavatsky the term is taken as meaning creative power or capability of
doing work.
228
tions." In the Greek allegory Zeus represents the
hosts of the primal progenitors, the Pitris, or "Fathers" who created man
senseless and without mind, who provided the first element of his nature,